The impact of intergovernmental fiscal tools on local service decision: the Nebraska case for water and wastewater systems

References

• American Society of Civil Engineers. 2021. A Comprehensive Assessment of America’s Infrastructure. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://infrastructurereportcard.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/National_IRC_2021-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2019. Kay Facts About Nebraska’s Infrastructure. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/Nebraska
   Google Scholar
• Bae, S. S., and R. C. Feiock. 2004. “The Flypaper Effect Revisited: Intergovernmental Grants and Local Governance.” International Journal of Public Administration 27 (8–9): 577–596. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120030256.
   Google Scholar
• Boadway, R., and A. Shah. 2009. Fiscal Federalism: Principles and Practice of Multi-Order Governance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, D. F., and W. E. Oates. 1971. “The Analysis of Revenue Sharing in a New Approach to Collective Fiscal Decisions.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 85 (3): 416–439. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cable News Network. 2019. “Flint Water Crisis Fast Facts.” CNN, April 23. https://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/04/us/flint-water-crisis-fast-facts/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. 2016. “Banking on Infrastructure: Exploring the Fiscal Impacts of State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Loans on Leveraging State and Local Transportation Investment.” Public Budgeting & Finance 36 (3): 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congleton, R. D., and R. W. Bennett. 1995. “On the Political Economy of State Highway Expenditures: Some Evidence of the Relative Performance of Alternative Public Choice Models.” Public Choice 84 (1–2): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congressional Research Service (CRS). 2018. Wastewater Infrastructure: Overview, Funding, and Legislative Developments. Washington, DC: CRS.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, C., B. A. Cody, M. Tiemann, N. T. Carter, and M. Stubbs. 2016. Federally supported water supply and wastewater treatment programs. Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46471.
   Google Scholar
• Courant, P. N., E. M. Gramlich, and D. L. Rubinfeld. 1979. “The Stimulative Effect of Intergovernmental Grants: Or Why Money Sticks Where it Hits.” In Fiscal Federalism and Grants-In-Aid, edited by P. Mieszkowski and W. H. Oakland, 23–30. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S., and R. P. Inman. 1986. “Education, Welfare and the“new” Federalism: State Budgeting in a Federalist Public Economy. Studies in State and Local Public Finance, edited by H. S. Rosen, 187–228. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• CRS (Congressional Research Service). 2022. Federally Supported Projects and Programs for Wasterwater, Drinking Water, and Water Supply Infrastructure. Washington DC: CRS.
   Google Scholar
• Deller, S. C., and C. S. Maher. 2005. “Categorical Municipal Expenditures with a Focus on the Flypaper Effect.” Public Budgeting & Finance 25 (3): 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2005.00368.x.
   Google Scholar
• Duncombe, W., and J. Yinger. 1998. “School Finance Reform: Aid Formulas and Equity Objectives.” National Tax Journal 51 (2): 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41789325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2010. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Environmental Protection Agency Recovery Act Plan. Washington, DC: Office of Water.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, W. A. 1977. “Some Properties of a Modification of the Limited Information Estimator.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 45 (4): 939–953. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamkhar, S. 2003. “The Role of Federal Budget and Trust Fund Institutions in Measuring the Effect of Federal Highway Grants on State and Local Government Highway Expenditure.” Public Budgeting & Finance 23 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5850.2301001.
   Google Scholar
• Goel, R. K., and M. A. Nelson. 2003. “Use or Abuse of Highway Tax Revenues? An Economic Analysis of Highway Spending.” Applied Economics Letters 10 (13): 813–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350485032000129566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2004. Water Infrastructure: Comprehensive Asset Management Has Potential to Help Utilities Better Identify Needs and Plan Future Investment. Washington D.C: GAO.
   Google Scholar
• Gramlich, E. M. 1977. “Intergovernmental Grants: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” InThe Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism, edited by W. Oates, 106–126. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, J. G., and G. W. Johnson. 1991. State Revolving Loan Funds. Auburn, AL: Auburn University.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, N. P., and D. R. Maurice. 1986. “Infrastructure Bond Bank Initiatives: Policy Implications and Credit Concerns.” Public Budgeting & Finance 6 (3): 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5850.00718.
   Google Scholar
• Inman, R. P. 1979. “The Fiscal Performance of Local Governments: An Interpretative Review.“ In Current Issues in Urban Economics, edited by P. Mieszkowski and M. Staszheim, 270–321. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inman, R. P. 2008. The Flypaper Effect. National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. 2020. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska at Omaha). Determinants and Dynamics of State Highway Maintenance Spending.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. 2022. “Don’t Pass Deferred Maintenance Costs to the Next Generation! The Effects of Politics on State Highway Maintenance Spending.” Public Works Management & Policy 27 (2): 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X211047247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and C. Ebdon. 2021. “Asset Maintenance Practices and Challenges in U.S. Counties.” Public Works Management & Policy 26 (3): 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X20937715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, B. 2002. “Endogenous Federal Grants and Crowd-Out of State Government Spending: Theory and Evidence From the Federal Highway Aid Program.” American Economic Review 92 (1): 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802760015612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laukaitis, A. 2014. “Report: Nebraska’s Waterways Are 6th Worst in Nation for Pollution.” Lincoln Journal Star. Accessed June 19. https://journalstar.com/news/local/report-nebraska-s-waterwaysare-th-worst-in-nationfor/article_b52146f6-a1e1-5c97-983c-93eadbf9e03d.html
   Google Scholar
• Leduc, S., and D. Wilson. 2017. “Are State Governments Roadblocks to Federal Stimulus? Evidence on the Flypaper Effect of Highway Grants in the 2009 Recovery Act.” American Economic Journal, Economic Policy 9 (2): 253–292. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20140371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, B. 2010. “Taxation with Representation: Intergovernmental Grants in a Plebiscite Democracy.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 92 (2): 316–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martell, C. R., and B. M. Smith. 2004. “Grant Levels and Debt Issuance: Is There a Relationship? Is There Symmetry?” Public Budgeting & Finance 24 (3): 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0275-1100.2004.02403004.x.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R., C. Rouge, P. Garrone, L. Grilli, J. J. Harou, and M. Pulido-Velazquez. 2018. “Determinants of the Price Response to Residential Water Tariffs.” Environmental Modelling & Software 101:236–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehiriz, K., and R. Marceau. 2014. “The Flypaper and Asymmetric Effects of Intergovernmental Grants to Quebec Municipalities.” Public Budgeting & Finance 34 (1): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12026.
   Google Scholar
• Mullin, M., and D. M. Daley. 2018. “Multilevel Instruments for Infrastructure Investment: Evaluating State Revolving Funds for Water.” Policy Studies Journal 46 (3): 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). 2018. Go Back to the Well: States and the Federal Government Are Neglecting a Key Funding Source for Water Infrastructure. New York, NY: NRDC.
   Google Scholar
• NEDEQ (Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality). 2009. American Recovery & Reinvestment Act Projects 2009. Lincoln, NE: NEDEQ.
   Google Scholar
• Nesbit, T. M., and S. F. Kreft. 2009. “Federal Grants, Earmarked Revenues, and Budget Crowd‐Out: State Highway Funding.” Public Budgeting & Finance 29 (2): 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2009.00930.x.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson-Crotty, S., and K. J. Meier. 2002. “Size doesn’t Matter: In Defense of Single-State Studies.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 2 (4): 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000200200405.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ramseur, J. L., A. E. Normand, E. Boyd, C. V. Stern, T. Cowan, M. Stubbs, E. H. Humphreys, and M. Tiemann. 2019. Federally Supported Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment Programs. Washington D.C: Congressional Research Service (CRS).
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, H. S., and T. Gayer. 2009. Public Finance. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, J. E. 2006. “Fiscal Impacts of an Innovative Highway Financing Alternative on State Highway Expenditures the Case of Federal Assistance Funds in the State Infrastructure Bank Programs.” Public Works Management & Policy 11 (1): 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X06290777.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, J. E. 2007. “Federal Highway Assistance Funds in the State Infrastructure Bank Programs: Mechanisms, Merits, and Modifications.” Public Budgeting & Finance 27 (4): 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2007.00893.x.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, J. E. 2017. “Measuring the Flypaper Effect: The Interaction Between Limp-Sum Aid and the Substitution Effect of Matching Aid.” Public Finance and Management 17 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Staiger, D., and J. H. Stock. 1997. “Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 65 (3): 557–586. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, J. H., and M. Yogo. 2005. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” InIdentification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas J. Rothenberg, edited by D. Andrews and J. Stock, 1–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stotsky, J. G. 1991. “State Fiscal Responses to Federal Government Grants.” Growth and Change 22 (3): 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.1991.tb00552.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsten, R. E., S. Eskaf, and J. Hughes. 2009. “Cost Plus: Estimating Real Determinants of Water and Sewer Bills.” Public Works Management & Policy 13 (3): 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X08324302.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, R., J. C. Morris, and E. D. Morris. 2004. “State Implementation of Federal Environmental Policy: Explaining Leveraging in the Clean Water State Revolving Fund.” Policy Studies Journal 32 (3): 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2004.00075.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, M., and H. M. Levin. 1983. “The Impact of Intergovernmental Grants on Educational Expenditure.” Review of Educational Research 53 (3): 329–367. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053003329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, N. 2011. Replacing the Nation’s Deteriorating Water Infrastructure While Maintaining Affordable Water Rates. AARP Public Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. B. 1974. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Woodridge, J. M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross-Sectional Data and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf, J. E., and G. Liu. 2008. “State infrastructure Banks and Intergovernmental Subsidies for Local Transportation Investment.” Public Budgeting & Finance 28 (4): 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2008.00917.x.
   Google Scholar