Falling from a Great Height: Principles of Good Practice in Performance Measurement and the Perils of Top Down Determination of Performance Indicators

References

• Argyris C Schön DA 1978 Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley)
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson , AA and Waterhouse , JH . 1997 . A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement . Sloan Management Review , 38 ( 3 ) : pp.25–37
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission 2003 Targets in the Public Sector (London: HMSO)
   Google Scholar
• Austin RD 1996 Measuring and Managing Performance in Organizations (New York: Dorset House)
   Google Scholar
• Austin RD Larkey PD Royo J 1998 Measuring knowledge work: pathologies and patterns in: Andy D. Neely (Ed.) Performance Measurement – Theory and Practice, (Cambridge: Centre for Business Performance, Cambridge University)
   Google Scholar
• Behn , RD . 2003 . Why measure performance: different purposes require different measures? . Public Administration Review , 63 ( 5 ) : pp.586–606
   Google Scholar
• Bititci , US and Turner , T . 2000 . Dynamics of Performance Measurement Systems . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 20 ( 6 ) : pp.692–704
   Google Scholar
• Blackman , T . 1998 . Towards evidence-based local government: theory and practice . Local Government Studies , 24 ( 2 ) : pp.56–70
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird T 2000 Strategic objective maps as ‘windows’ into worlds of cause-and-effect in: Proceedings of the British Academy of Management Annual Conference, (Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh) pp.13–15
   Google Scholar
• Bowerman , M , Francis , G , Ball , A and Fry , J . 2002 . The evolution of benchmarking in UK local authorities . Benchmarking: An International Journal , 9 ( 5 ) : pp.429–449
   Google Scholar
• Chen H-T 1990 Theory-Driven Evaluations (London: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary A Tandon R 1988 Participatory Evaluation (New Delhi: Society for Participatory Research in Asia)
   Google Scholar
• De Bruijn , H . 2002a . Performance measurement in the public sector: strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement . The International Journal of Public Sector Management , 15 ( 7 ) : pp.578–94
   Google Scholar
• De Bruijn H 2002b Managing Performance in the Public Sector (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Fetterman DM Kaftarian SJ Wandersman A (Eds.) 1996 Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self Assessment and Accountability (London: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald L Moon P 1996 Performance Measurement in Service Industries: Making it Work (London: CIMA)
   Google Scholar
• Fiske EB Ladd HF 2000 When Schools Compete: a Cautionary Tale (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute)
   Google Scholar
• Gewirtz S 2002 Achieving success? critical reflections on New Labour's ‘Third Way’ agenda for education. Keynote lecture to international meeting on Curriculum Politics, Oporto, May
   Google Scholar
• Gianakis , GA . 2002 . The promise of public sector performance measurement: anodyne or placebo? . Public Administration Quarterly , 26 ( 1 )
   Google Scholar
• Gray , A . 1997 . Contract culture and target fetishism. the distortive effects of output measures on local regeneration programmes . Local Economy , 11 ( 4 ) : pp.343–357
   Google Scholar
• Greene , JC , Benjamin , L and Goodyear , L . 2001 . The merits of mixing methods in evaluation . Evaluation , 7 ( 1 ) : pp.25–44
   Google Scholar
• Guba EG Lincoln YS 1989 Fourth Generation Evaluation (London: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi , A . 2002 . Performance measurement: a look at some possible dysfunctions . Work Study , 51 ( 5 ) : pp.230–39
   Google Scholar
• House ER 1980 Evaluating with Validity (London: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• House ER 1994 Integrating the quantitative and qualitative in: C. Reichardt & S.F. Rallis, The Qualitative– Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives. New Directions for Evaluation 61 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass)
   Google Scholar
• Hronec SM 1993 Vital Signs: Using Quality, Time, and Cost Performance Measurements to Chart Your Company's Future (New York: AMACOM)
   Google Scholar
• Ittner CD Larcker DF 2003 Harvard Business Review November 2003
   Google Scholar
• Jackson A 2002 A classification of gaming in: A. Neely and A. Walters (Eds.) Performance Measurement and Management: Research and Action, (Cranfield: Centre for Business Performance)
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation 1994 The Program Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs 2nd Edn, (London: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan RS Norton DP 1998 Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system in: Harvard Business Review on Measuring Corporate Performance, (Boston: Harvard Business School Press)
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan , RS and Norton , DP . 1992 . The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance . Harvard Business Review , January–February : pp.71–79
   Google Scholar
• Likierman , A . 1993 . Performance indicators: 20 early lessons from managerial use . Public Money and Management , 13 ( 4 ) : pp.15–22
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald B 1976 A political classification of evaluation studies in: D. Hamilton (Ed.) Beyond the Numbers Game, (London: Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Marr , B and Schiuma , G . 2003 . Business performance measurement: past, present and future . Management Decision , 41 ( 8 ) : pp.680–687
   Google Scholar
• Martins RA 2000 Use of performance measurement systems: some thoughts towards a comprehensive approach in: A. Neely (Ed.) Performance Measurement – Past, Present and Future, (Cranfield: Cranfield University School of Management)
   Google Scholar
• Meyer MW 2002 Rethinking Performance Measurement: Beyond the Balanced Scorecard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office 2001 Inappropriate Adjustments to NHS Waiting Lists Report to the Comptroller and Auditor General, (London: the Stationery Office)
   Google Scholar
• Neely , A . 1999 . The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next? . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 19 ( 2 ) : pp.205–228
   Google Scholar
• Neely , A . 2001 . The performance prism in practice . Measuring Business Excellence , 5 ( 2 ) : pp.6–12
   Google Scholar
• Neely , A , Gregory , M and Platts , K . 1995 . Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda . International Journal of Operations and Production Management , 15 ( 4 ) : pp.80–116
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill O 2002 A question of trust. BBC, Reith Lectures
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ 1996 Utilization-Focused Evaluation 3rd Edn, (London: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Perry A 2000 Performance indicators: measure for measure or a comedy of errors? in: C. Mager & P. Robinson (Eds.) The New Learning Market, (London, FEDA)
   Google Scholar
• Power M 1994 The Audit Explosion (London: Demos)
   Google Scholar
• Reichardt CS Cook TD 1979 Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods in: T.D. Cook & C.S. Reichardt (Eds.) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research, (Newbury Park, CA: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Ridgway , VF . 1956 . Dysfunctional consequences of performance measurements . Administrative Science Quarterly , 1 ( 2 ) : pp.240–247
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson , I . 1998 . Beyond performance measurement? assessing ‘value’ in local government . Local Government Studies , 24 ( 4 ) : pp.1–25
   Google Scholar
• Scriven , M . 1976 . Evaluation bias and its control . Evaluation Studies Review Annual , 1 : pp.119–39
   Google Scholar
• Seigart D Brisolara S 2002 Feminist evaluation. explorations and experiences in: New Directions for Evaluation 96 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass)
   Google Scholar
• Shadish WJ Cook TD Leviton LC 1995 Foundations of Program Evaluation. Theories of Practice (London: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Slater , SF and Olsen , EM . 1997 . Strategy-based performance measurement . Business Horizons , 40 ( 4 ) : p.37
   Google Scholar
• Smith ML 1994 Qualitative plus/versus quantitative: the last word in: C. Reichardt & S.F. Rallis (Eds.) The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives. New Directions for Evaluation 61 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass)
   Google Scholar
• Stake RE 1975 Evaluating the Arts in Education: a Responsive Approach (Columbus, OH: Merrill)
   Google Scholar
• Stewart , J and Walsh , K . 1994 . Performance measurement: when performance can never be finally defined . Public Money and Management , 14 ( 2 ) : pp.43–49
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam DL 2001 Evaluation models in: New Directions for Evaluation 89 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass)
   Google Scholar
• Tomorrow's Company 1999 The Inclusive Approach and Business Success (London: Tomorrow's Company)
   Google Scholar
• Vince , R and Broussine , M . 2000 . Rethinking organisational learning in local government . Local Government Studies , 26 ( 1 ) : pp.15–30
   Google Scholar
• Weiss , CH . 1988 . Evaluation for decisions: is anyone there? does anyone care? . Evaluation Practice , 9 ( 1 ) : pp.5–19
   Google Scholar
• Wisniewski , M and Stewart , D . 2004 . Performance measurement for stakeholders: the case of Scottish local authorities . The International Journal of Public Sector Management , 17 ( 3 ) : pp.222–233
   Google Scholar