Primary school teachers’ teaching strategies for the development of students’ text comprehension

References

• Akdeniz, C. 2016. Instructional Process and Concepts in Theory and Practice: Improving the Teaching Process. Kindle Edition. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, L. R., D. Magnusson, and B. M. El- Khouri. 2003. Studying Individual Development in an Interindividual Context. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. 2011. “Rational Responses to High Stakes Testing: The Case of Curriculum Narrowing and the Harm That Follows.” Cambridge Journal of Education 41 (3): 287–302. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, C. C., and M. Pressley. 2002. “What Comprehension Instruction Could Be.” In Comprehension Instruction, edited by M. Pressley, and C. C. Block, 383–392. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, D. S. 2005. The Power of Critical Theory: Liberating Adult Learning and Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, D. S., and S. Preskill. 1999. Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for University Teachers. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., and J. Oakhill. 2011. “Matthew Effects in Young Readers: Reading Comprehension and Reading Experience aid Vocabulary Development.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 44 (5): 431–443. doi:10.1177/0022219411410042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, C., M. T. Stewart, and C. C. Block. 2005. “Teaching Several Metacognitive Strategies Together Increases Students’ Independent Metacognition.” In Metacognition in Literacy Learning; Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and Professional Development, edited by S. E. Israel, C. C. Block, K. L. Bauserman, and K. Kinnucan-Welsh, 277–295. Mahwah, NJ: Elbraum.
   Google Scholar
• Deppeler, J. 2012. “Developing Inclusive Practices: Innovation Through Collaboration.” In What Works in Inclusion? edited by C. Boyle, and K. J. Topping, 125–138. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., and J. F. Carlisle. 2011. “The Development of Comprehension.” In Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. IV, edited by M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, and P. Afflerbach, 199–228. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., and P. Pearson. 2002. “Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension.” In What Research has to Say about Reading Instruction, 3rd ed., edited by A. E. Farstrup, and S. J. Samuels, 205–242. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin, D. 1978. “What Classroom Observations Reveal About Reading Comprehension Instruction.” Technical report No. 106 in Center for the Study of Reading. Cambridge, MA: Bolt Beraneck and Newman Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Elosúa, M. R., J. A. García-Madruga, J. O. Vila, I. Gómez-Veiga, and L. Gil. 2013. “Improving Reading Comprehension: From Metacognitive Intervention on Strategies to the Intervention on Working Memory Executive Processes.” Universitas Psychologica 12 (5): 1425–1438. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Bogotá, Colombia. doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY12-5.ircm
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eristi, B., and C. Akdeniz. 2012. “Development of a Scale to Diagnose Instructional Strategies.” Contemporary Educational Technology 3 (2): 141–161. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2519-8_2 doi: 10.30935/cedtech/6074
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., C. Schatschneider, M. N. Eakin, J. M. Fletcher, L. C. Moats, and D. J. Francis. 2006. “The Impact of Instructional Practices in Grades 1 and 2 on Reading and Spelling Achievement in High Poverty Schools.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 31 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, J. B., and N. B. Ratner. 2009. The Development of Language. 7th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2015. “The Applicability of Visible Learning to Higher Education.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 1 (1): 79–91. doi:10.1037/stl0000021.
   Google Scholar
• Hermin, M., and M. Toth. 2006. Inspiring Active Learning: A Complete Handbook for Teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A., D. Watkins, and M. Kelly. 2001. “The Conceptual Change Approach to Improving Teaching and Learning: An Evaluation of a Hong Kong Staff Development Programme.” Higher Education 42: 143–169. doi:10.1023/A:1017546216800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., and M. J. Snowling. 2015. “Learning to Read: What We Know and What We Need to Understand Better.” Child Development Perspectives 7 (1): 1–5. doi:10.1111/cdep.12005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalbani, L. N. 2014. The Impact of Effective Teaching Strategies on the Students’ Academic Performance and Learning Outcome. Munich: GRIN Verlag. Accessed November 23, 2018. https://www.grin.com/document/300046/.
   Google Scholar
• Kärbla, T., K. Uibu, and M. Männamaa. 2018. “Pikilõikeline sissevaade eesti keele taseme- ja eksamitööde tekstimõistmisülesannetesse.” [Longitudinal Introspective Into the Text Comprehension Tasks of National Tests and Exams of Estonian Language.] Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education 6 (1): 157–178. doi:10.12697/eha.2018.6.1.07.
   Google Scholar
• Käsper, M., K. Uibu, and J. Mikk. 2018. “Language Teaching Strategies’ Impact on Third-Grade Students’ Reading Outcomes and Reading Interest.” International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education 10 (5): 601–610. doi:10.26822/iejee.2018541309.
   Google Scholar
• Kikas, E., E. Pakarinen, P. Soodla, K. Peets, and M.-K. Lerkkanen. 2018. “Associations Between Reading Skills, Interest in Reading, and Teaching Practices in First Grade.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 62 (6): 832–849. doi:10.1080/00313831.2017.1307272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepola, J., J. Lynch, E. Laakkonen, and M. Silvén. 2012. “The Role of Inference Making and Other Language Skills in the Development of Narrative Listening Comprehension in 4-6-Year-old Children.” Reading Research Quarterly 47 (3): 259–282. doi:10.1002/rrq.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerkkanen, M.-K., N. Kiuru, E. Pakarinen, A.-M. Poikkeus, H. Rasku-Puttonen, M. Siekkinen, and J.-E. Nurmi. 2016. “Child-Centered Versus Teacher-Directed Teaching Practices: Associations with the Development of Academic Skills in the First Grade at School.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 36: 145–156. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.12.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. 2003. What Works in Schools: Translating Research Into Action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B., N. Haywood, C. Sachdev, and S. Faraday. 2008. What is Independent Learning and What are the Benefits for Students? London: Department for Children, Schools and Families Research.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D. 2004. Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J. V., M. S. Berenhaus, and K. Cain. 2015. “Children’s Reading Comprehension and Comprehension Difficulties.” In The Oxford Handbook of Reading, edited by A. Pollatsek, and R. Treiman, 344–360. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2014. TALIS 2013 Results: An International Perspective on Teaching and Learning. OECD Publishing. Accessed May 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264196261-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. PISA 2015 Results in Focus. OECD Publishing. Accessed November 10, 2018. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf/.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., E. H. Hiebert, and M. L. Kamil. 2007. “Vocabulary Assessment: What We Know and What We Need to Learn.” Reading Research Quarterly 42 (2): 282–296. doi:10.1598/RRQ.42.2.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Põhikooli riiklik õppekava. 2011. [The National Curriculum for Basic Schools of Estonia; in Estonian]. Government Regulation Passed 6th of January 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Prado, L., and L. Plourde. 2005. “Increasing Reading Comprehension Through the Explicit Teaching of Reading Strategies: Is There a Difference among the Genders?” Reading Improvement 48 (1): 32–43.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., R. Wharton-McDonald, J. Mistretta-Hampston, and M. Echevarria. 1998. “Literacy Instruction in 10 Fourth- and Fifth-Grade Classrooms in Upstate New York.” Scientific Studies of Reading 2 (2): 159–194. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0202_4.
   Google Scholar
• Rasku-Puttonen, H., E. Pakarinen, K. Trossmann, and A.-M. Poikkeus. 2011. “Classroom Practices in Finnish and Estonian Preschools: Subgroups of Observed Teaching Practices.” In Global Perspectives in Early Childhood Education: Diversity, Challenges and Possibilities (Baltische Studien zur Erziehungs- und Sozialwissenschaft), edited by M. Veisson, E. Hujala, P. Smith, M. Waniganayake, and E. Kikas, 313–331. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, A. S., and L. K. Hagan. 2011. “Promoting Higher Level Thinking in Psychology: Is Active Learning the Answer?” Teaching of Psychology 38 (2): 102–105. doi:10.1177/0098628311401581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruus, V.-R., I. Henno, E. Eisenschmidt, K. Loogma, H. Noorväli, P. Reiska, and S. Rekkor. 2008. “Reforms, Developments and Trends in Estonian Education During Recent Decades.” In Reforms and Innovations in Estonian Education, edited by J. Mikk, M. Veisson, and P. Luik, 11–26. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Publishers House.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelowicz, K., and J. D. Bain. 1992. “Conceptions of Teaching Held by Academic Teachers.” Higher Education 24: 93–111. doi:10.1007/BF00138620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxton, M. 2010. Child Language: Acquisition and Development. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schaik, P. van., M. Volman, W. Admiraal, and W. Schenke. 2018. “Barriers and Conditions for Teachers’ Utilisation of Academic Knowledge.” International Journal of Educational Research 90: 50–63. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2018.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekelj, A., and I. Rigo. 2011. “Teaching English Grammar in Primary School.” Tabula: Periodicus Facultatis Philosophicae Polensis; Rivista Della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia; Journal od the Faculty of Humanities 9: 188–199. doi:UDK 371.3:811.111’36>:373.3 doi: 10.32728/tab.09.2011.14
   Google Scholar
• Silva, M., and K. Cain. 2015. “The Relations Between Lower and Higher Level Comprehension Skills and Their Role in Prediction of Early Reading Comprehension.” Journal of Educational Psychology 107 (2): 321–331. doi:10.1037/a0037769.supp doi: 10.1037/a0037769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. 2011. Vygotsky and Literacy Research: A Methodological Framework. Boston, MA: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Soodla, P., M.-K. Lerkkanen, P. Niemi, E. Kikas, G. Silinskas, and J.-E. Nurmi. 2015. “Does Early Reading Instruction Promote the Rate of Acquisition? A Comparison of Two Transparent Orthographies.” Learning and Instruction 38: 14–23. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, X., E. Kikas, E. Pakarinen, M.-K. Lerkkanen, J. Muotka, and J.-E. Nurmi. 2017. “Profiles of Teaching Practices and First and Third Graders’ Reading Skills in Finland and Estonia.” Teaching and Teacher Education 64: 150–161. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornbury, S. 1999. How to Teach Grammar. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Uibu, K., and E. Kikas. 2014. “Authorative and Authoritarian-Inconsistent Teachers’ Preferences for Teaching Methods and Instructional Goals.” Education 3-13 42: 5–22. doi:10.1080/03004279.2011.618808.
   Google Scholar
• Uibu, K., E. Kikas, and K. Tropp. 2010. “Teaching Practices, Their Dynamics, Associations with Self-Reported Knowledge and Students’ Language Achievement.” In Systematic Person Oriented Study of Child Development in Early Primary School, edited by A. Toomela, 47–71. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Uibu, K., and M. Männamaa. 2014. “Õpetamistegevused ja õpilaste Tekstimõistmine üleminekul Esimesest kooliastmest teise astmesse.” [Teaching Practices and the Students’ Text Comprehension in Transition From First School Stage to the Second; in Estonian.] Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education 2 (1): 96–131. doi:10.12697/eha.2014.2.1.05.
   Google Scholar
• Vestheim, O. P., and K. M. Lyngsnes. 2016. “A Study of Norwegian Schools Achieving Good National Test Results.” International Journal of Educational Research 79: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2016.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar