Fostering quality interactions with children in the family home: what are the challenges for nannies?

References

• Allen, S., and M. E. Whalley. 2010. Supporting Pedagogy and Practice in Early Years Settings. Exeter: Learning Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach, C. F., and L. B. Silverstein. 2003. Qualitative Data: an Introduction to Coding and Analysis. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, J. 2010. Doing Your Research Project. A Guide for First-Time Researchers in Education, Health and Social Science. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, P. 2014. “Learning Conversations: Teacher Researchers Evaluating Dialogic Strategies in Early Years Settings.” International Journal of Early Years Education 22 (4): 441–456. doi: 10.1080/09669760.2014.968532
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. ISSN 1478-0887. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Chu, M. 2016. “What’s Missing in Most of our Early Childhood Degrees? Focusing More Deeply on Relationships and Learning with Infants, Toddlers and Their Families.” Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 37 (4): 264–281. doi: 10.1080/10901027.2016.1241966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, G., P. Moss, and A. Pence. 1999. Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Postmodern Perspectives. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Degotardi, S. 2010. “High-Quality Interactions with Infants: Relationships with Early-Childhood Practitioners’ Interpretations and Qualification Levels in Play and Routine Contexts.” International Journal of Early Years Education 18 (1): 27–41. doi: 10.1080/09669761003661253
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2017a. Study of Early Education and Development (SEED): Study of Quality of Early Years Provision in England Research Report December 2017. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2017b. Statutory Framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. 2016. Interacting or Interfering? Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J., and E. Wood. 2012. “Changing Educational Practice in the Early Years Through Practitioner-led Action Research: an Adult-Child Interaction Project.” International Journal of Early Years Education 20 (2): 114–129. doi: 10.1080/09669760.2012.715400
   Google Scholar
• Gerhardt, S. 2008. Why Love Matters: How Affection Shapes a Baby’s Brain. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, H. 2014. ‘Practitioners’ Understanding of Quality Interactions with Young Children’, Successful Pedagogy: Advocating for Strong Evidence to Support Early Learning. International Convention Centre, Birmingham, 1 November. Available at: http://tactyc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Hilary-Harris_Quality-Interactions-with-Young-Children.pdf (Accessed: 12 June 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Ikegami, K., and C. Rivalland. 2016. “Exploring the Quality of Teacher–Child Interactions: the Soka Discourse in Practice.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 24 (4): 521–535. doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2016.1189719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishimine, K., R. Wilson, and D. Evans. 2010. “‘Quality of Australian Childcare and Children’s Social Skills.’.” International Journal of Early Years Education 18 (2): 159–175. doi: 10.1080/09669760.2010.494430
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., and J. Twani. 2014. “Having Real Conversations: Engaging Children in Talk to Extend Their Language and Learning.” In Early Years Foundations: Critical Issues, edited by J. Payler, J. Georgeson, and J. Moyles, 67–77. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lokken, I. M., E. Bjornestad, M. L. Broekhuizen, and T. Moser. 2018. “The Relationship Between Structural Factors and Interaction Quality in Norwegian ECEC for Toddlers.” International Journal of Childcare and Education Policy 12 (9): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, C. L. 2010. Shadow Mothers: Nannies, au Pairs and the Micropolitics of Mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherji, P., and D. Albon. 2010. Research Methods in Early Childhood. An Introductory Guide. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nutbrown, K. 2012. Foundations for Quality The Independent Review of Early Education and Childcare Qualifications Final Report. Runcorn: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• Purdon, A. 2014. “‘Sustained Shared Thinking in an Early Childhood Setting: an Exploration of Practitioners’ Perspectives.” Education 3-13 International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education 44 (3): 20–39.
   Google Scholar
• Purdon, A. 2018. “A Comparison of Free Time Activity Choices of Third Culture Kids in Albania and Children in the UK.” Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary Elementary and Early Years Education 46 (2): 218–236. doi: 10.1080/03004279.2016.1218523
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. 2017. “Constructing Quality Childcare: Perspectives of Quality and Their Connection to Belonging, Being and Becoming.” International Journal of Whole Schooling Special Issue January 2017: 50–64.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, K., and T. Lucas. 2011. “Exploring Young Children’s Conceptions about Thinking.” Journal of Research in Childhood Education 25: 364–375. doi: 10.1080/02568543.2011.605206
   Google Scholar
• Sandhu, M. 1995. Nannies touching the future. Keynote address presented at the annual conference of the international Nanny association, 10th, Scottsdale, AZ, June 22–25, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Siraj-Blatchford, I., D. Kingston, and E. Melhuish. 2015. Assessing Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care. Sustained Shared Thinking and Emotional Wellbeing (SSTEW) Scale for 2–5 Years Olds Provision. London: UCL and IOE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siraj-Blatchford, I., K. Sylva, S. Muttock, R. Gilden, and D. Bell. 2002. Researching Effective Pedagogy in the Early Years (REPEY) DfES Research Report 365. HMSO London: Queen’s Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Siraj-Blatchford, I., K. Sylva, B. Taggart, P. Sammons, and E. Melhuish. 2008. “Towards the Transformation of Practice in Early Childhood Education: the Effective Provision of pre-School Education (EPPE) Project.” The Cambridge Journal of Education 38 (1): 23–36. doi: 10.1080/03057640801889956
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., and M. Osborne. 2008. “Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis.” In Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. edited by J. A. Smith, 2nd ed., 53–80. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 2008. “Qualitative Case Studies.” In Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Ch. 17, 443–466. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sylva, K., I. Siraj-Blatchford, and B. Taggart. 2003. Assessing Quality in the Early Years: Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale – Extension (ECERS-E). Four Curricular Subscales. Stoke on Trent, UK: Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sylva, K., I. Siraj-Blatchford, B. Taggert, P. Sammons, K. Elliot, and E. Melhuish. 2004. The Effective Provision of Preschool Education (EPPE) Project Technical Paper 12 – The Final Report: Effective Preschool Education. London: DfES and Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Tizard, B., and M. Hughes. 1984. Young Children Learning: Talking and Thinking at Home and at School. London: Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in Society. New York: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitebread, D., K. Martina, and A. O’Connor. 2015. “ Quality in Early Childhood Education: an International Review and Guide for Policy Makers.” World Innovation Summit for Education University of Cambridge Available at: http://www.wise-qatar.org/sites/default/files/asset/document/wise-research-7-cambridge-11_17.pdf (Accessed 22.10.18).
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. 2008. “Focus Groups.” In Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, edited by J. A. Smith, 2nd ed., 186–206. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar