Analysis of blended learning training sessions for Taiwanese elementary school English teachers

References

• Aycock, A., C. Garnham, and R. Kaleta. 2002. “Lesson Learned from the Hybrid Course Project [Electronic Version].” Teaching with Technology Today 8, http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham2.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Badiee, F., and D. Kaufman. 2014. “Effectiveness of an Online Simulation for Teacher Education.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 22 (2): 167–186.
   Google Scholar
• Basal, A. 2015. “Perceptions of pre-Service English Teachers Towards the Integration of an LMS Into English Language Teacher Education.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 23 (4): 485–507.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, C., and L. Thomas. 2009. “Understanding Teacher Identity: An Overview of Issues in the Literature and Implications for Teacher Education.” Cambridge Journal of Education 39 (2): 175–189.
   Google Scholar
• Benitt, N. 2019. “Campus Meets Classroom: Video Conferencing and Reflective Practice in Language Teacher Education.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL 8 (2): 121–139.
   Google Scholar
• Bernatek, B., J. Cohen, J. Hanlon, and M. Wilka. 2012. Blended Learning in Practice: Introduction to Case Studies from Leading Schools. Austin, TX: Michael and Susan Dell Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Birman, B., L. Desimone, A. Porter, and M. Garet. 2000. “Designing Professional Development That Works.” Educational Leadership 57 (8): 28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. 2007. Impact of professional development on teaching limited English proficient students in a suburban school. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wayne University, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Caner, M. 2009. A study on blended learning model for teaching practice course in pre–service English Language teacher training programme. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Anadolu University Institute of Education Science, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, C. 2002. “Putting the ‘C’ in ICT: Using Computer Conferencing to Foster a Community of Practice among Student Teachers.” Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 11 (2): 163–179.
   Google Scholar
• Cramp, A. 2015. “Meaningful Dialogue in Digitally Mediated Learning for in-Service Teacher Development.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 24 (1): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2002. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., and C. Paton. 2003. “The Cambridge CELTA Course Online.” In Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation, edited by B. Tomlinson, and C. Whittaker, 111–124. London, UK: British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Dudeny, G., and N. Hockly. 2003. “Reversing the Blend: From Online to Blended.” In Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation, edited by B. Tomlinson, and C. Whittaker, 75–82. London, UK: British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Eliahoo, R. 2016. “Teacher Educators: Proposing new Professional Development Models Within an English Further Education Context.” Professional Development in Education 43(2), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P., M. Guitert Catasús, R. Hampel, S. Heiser, J. Hopkins, L. Murphy, and U. Stickler. 2013. “Online Teacher Development: Collaborating in a Virtual Learning Environment.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 26 (4): 311–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guemide, B., and C. Benachaiba. 2012. “Exploiting ICT and E-Learning in Teacher's Professional Development in Algeria: The Case of English Secondary School Teachers.” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 13 (3): 33–49.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, S., and T. Godfrey. 2003. “Creating a Blended Delta Module one.” In Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation, edited by B. Tomlinson and C. Whittaker. 101–110. London, UK: British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, K. H. 2010. “CALL Teacher Education as an Impetus for L2 Teachers in Integrating Technology.” ReCALL 22 (1): 53–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hramiak, A. 2010. “Online Learning Community Development with Teachers as a Means of Enhancing Initial Teacher Training.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 19 (1): 47–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahyalar, E. 2016. “A Blended Learning Environment in Language Teaching: Students’ Feedback About the Experience.” The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education 6 (3): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kissau, S. 2015. “Type of Instructional Delivery and Second Language Teacher Candidate Performance: Online Versus Face-to-Face.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 28 (6): 513–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoweles, M. S. 1990. The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. 4th edition. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kocoglu, Z., Y. Ozek, and Y. Kesli. 2011. “Blended Learning: Investigating its Potential in an English Language Teacher Training Programme.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 27 (7): 1124–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotadaki, M., G. Asimakopoulos, G. Karousiotis, V. Dai, and V. Petropoulou. 2016. “Teaching, Learning and Professional Development Through Digital Storytelling: An Innovative Blended Learning Training Course for Primary and Secondary Education Teachers.” MIBES Transactions 10 (1): 82–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kupetz, R., and B. Ziegenmeyer. 2005. “Blended Learning in a Teacher Training Course: Integrated Interactive e-Learning and Contact Learning.” ReCALL 17 (2): 179–196.
   Google Scholar
• Kupetz, R., and B. Ziegenmeyer. 2006. “Flexible Learning Activities Fostering Autonomy in Teaching Training.” ReCALL 18 (1): 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, D., Morris, M., & Kupritz, V. (2007). Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.455.2964&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Perez, M. V., M. C. Perez-Lopez, and L. Rodriguez-Ariza. 2011. “Bended Learning in Higher Education: Students’ Perceptions and Their Relation to Outcomes.” Computers & Education 56 (3): 818–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckin, R. 2010. Re-designing Learning Contexts: Technology-Rich, Learner-Centred Ecologies. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marquez, B., C. Vincent, J. Marquez, J. Pennefather, K. Smolkowski, and J. Sprague. 2016. “Opportunities and Challenges in Training Elementary School Teachers in Classroom Management: Initial Results From Classroom Management in Action, an Online Professional Development Programme.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 24 (1): 87–109.
   Google Scholar
• Mendieta Aguilar, J. A. 2012. “Blended Learning and the Language Teacher: A Literature Review.” Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal 14 (2): 163–180.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. 2009. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: San Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Meskill, C., and N. Anthony. 2007. “Learning to Orchestrate Online Instructional Conversations: A Case of Faculty Development for Foreign Language Educators.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 20 (1): 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. 1989. “Editorial: Three Types of Interaction.” American Journal of Distance Education 3 (2): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. 1991. “Editorial: Distance Education Theory.” American Journal of Distance Education 5 (3): 1–6
   Google Scholar
• Neumeier, P. 2005. “A Closer Look at Blended Learning—Parameters for Designing a Blended Learning Environment for Language Teaching and Learning.” ReCALL 17 (2): 163–178.
   Google Scholar
• O-Hare, K., and X. Bo. 2003. “A Case Study of Blended Learning: The ‘Communicative Assessment – Development of Testing Skills’ Project.” In Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation, edited by B. Tomlinson, and C. Whittaker, 83–90. London: British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., and D. Stallings. 2015. “Preparing Teachers for Emerging Blended Learning Environments.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 22 (1): 57–81.
   Google Scholar
• Osguthorpe, R. P., and C. R. Graham. 2003. “Blended Learning Environments: Definitions and Directions.” The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 4 (3): 227–233.
   Google Scholar
• Peachey, N. 2003. “A Blended Learning Teacher Development Course for the Development of Blended Learning in English Language Teaching.” In Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation, edited by B. Tomlinson, and C. Whittaker, 65–74. London, UK: British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Richman, L. 2015. “Using Online Case Studies to Enhance Teacher Preparation.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 23 (4): 535–559.
   Google Scholar
• Rienties, B., N. Brouwer, and S. Lygo-Baker. 2013. “The Effects of Online Professional Development on Higher Education Teachers’ Beliefs and Intentions Towards Learning Facilitation and Technology.” Teaching and Teacher Education 29: 122–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., and B. Barret. 2007. Blended Learning: Using Technology in a Beyond the Language Classroom. Bangkok, Thailand: Macmillan Publishers Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Shelley, M., L. Murphy, and C. J. White. 2013. “Language Teacher Development in a Narrative Frame: The Transition From Classroom to Distance and Blended Settings.” System 41 (3): 560–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, H. J., and t. A. Brush. 2008. “Student Perceptions of Collaborative Learning, Social Presence and Satisfaction in a Blended Learning Environment: Relationships and Critical Factors.” Computers & Education 51 (1): 318–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 1994. “Case Studies.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 236–247. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stracke, E. 2007. “A Road to Understanding: A Qualitative Study Into why Learners Drop out of a Blended Language Learning (BLL) Environment.” ReCALL 19 (01): 57–78.
   Google Scholar
• Strambi, A, and Bouvet. 2003. “Flexibility and Interaction at a Distance: A Mixed-Model Environment for Language Learning.” Language Learning 7 (3): 81–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogt, J. 2010. “A Blended in-Service Arrangement for Supporting Science Teachers in Technology Integration.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 18 (1): 83–109.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, M. J. 1991. Training Foreign Language Teachers. A Reflective Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., N. S. Chen, and M. Levy. 2010. “Teacher Training in a Synchronous Cyber Face-to-Face Classroom: Characterizing and Supporting the Online Teachers’ Learning Process.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 23 (4): 277–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, C. 2003. “Introduction.” In Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation, edited by B. Tomlinson, and C. Whittaker, 9–24. London, UK: British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A., and C. W. Lewis. 2008. “Teacher Education Programmes Delivered at a Distance: An Examination of Distance Student Perceptions.” Teaching & Teacher Education 24 (3): 601–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar