Publication Cover
Education 3-13
International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education
Volume 51, 2023 - Issue 1
343
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Students’ images of STEM professionals: a study in the Portuguese context

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 121-141 | Received 10 May 2021, Accepted 05 Jul 2021, Published online: 16 Jul 2021

References

  • Aguilar, Mario, Alejandro Rosas, Juan Zavaleta, and Avenilde Romo-Vázquez. 2016. “Exploring High-Achieving Students’ Images of Mathematicians.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14 (3): 527–548. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9586-1.
  • Barman, Charles. 1999. “Students’ Views About Scientists and School Science: Engaging K-8 Teachers in a National Study.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 10 (1): 43–54.
  • BlaŽev, Mirta, Mia Karabegovic, Josip Burusic, and Leila Selimbegovic. 2017. “Predicting Gender-STEM Stereotyped Beliefs among Boys and Girls from Prior School Achievement and Interest in STEM School Subjects.” Social Psychology of Education 20: 831–847. doi:10.1007/s11218-017-9397-7.
  • Cardador, M., Rodica Damian Teresa, and Justin Wiegand. 2021. “Does More Mean Less?: Interest Surplus and the Gender Gap in STEM Careers.” Journal of Career Assessment 29 (1): 76–97. doi:10.1177/1069072720930658.
  • Chambers, David. 1983. “Stereotypic Images of the Scientist: The Draw-a-Scientist Test.” Science Education 67 (2): 255–265. doi:10.1002/sce.3730670213.
  • Christidou, Vasilia, Vassilia Hatzinikita, and Giannis Samaras. 2012. “The Image of Scientific Researchers and Their Activity in Greek Adolescents’ Drawings.” Public Understanding of Science 21 (5): 626–647. doi:10.1177/0963662510383101.
  • Crippen, Kent, and Pavlo Antonenko. 2018. “Designing for Collaborative Problem Solving in STEM.” In Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education, edited by Yehudit Dori, Zemira Mevarech, and Dale Baker, 89–116. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  • DGEEC. 2020. “Perfil do Docente 2018/2019 – Análise Sectorial.” Direção-Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência (DGEEC). https://www.dgeec.mec.pt/np4/98/%7B$clientServletPath%7D/?newsId=148&fileName=DGEEC_DSEE_2020_PerfilDocente1819_AS.PDF.
  • DiGironimo, Nicole. 2011. “What is Technology? Investigating Student Conceptions About the Nature of Technology.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (10): 1337–1352. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.495400.
  • Díaz, José, Ángel Alonso, Mª Antonia Mas, and Pilar Romero. 2003. “Creencias Sobre la Tecnología y sus Relaciones con la Ciencia.” Revista Electrónica de Ensenanza de las Ciencias 2 (3): 353–376.
  • Emvalotis, Anastassios, and Athina Koutsianou. 2018. “Greek Primary School Students’ Images of Scientists and Their Work: Has Anything Changed?” Research in Science and Technological Education 36 (1): 69–85. doi:10.1080/02635143.2017.1366899.
  • Erişti, Suzan. 2011. “Elementary School Students’ Perceptions of Technology in Their Pictorial Representations.” Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 2 (1): 24–37. doi:10.17569/tojqi.83367.
  • Farland-Smith, Donna. 2009. “Exploring Middle School Girls’ Science Identities: Examining Attitudes and Perceptions of Scientists When Working ‘Side-by-Side’ with Scientists.” School Science and Mathematics 109 (7): 415–427. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb17872.x.
  • Farland-Smith, Donna. 2012. “Development and Field Test of the Modified Draw-a-Scientist Test and the Draw-a-Scientist Rubric.” School Science and Mathematics 112 (2): 109–116. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00124.x.
  • Farland-Smith, Donna, and William McComas. 2007. “The Enhanced (DAST): A More Valid, Efficient, Reliable & Complete Method of Identifying Students’ Perceptions of Scientists.” Paper presented at the meeting of the national association of research in Science teaching conference, New Orleans, LA.
  • Farokhi, Masoumeh, and Masoud Hashemi. 2011. “The Analysis of Children’s Drawings: Social, Emotional, Physical, and Psychological Aspects.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 30: 2219–2224. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.433.
  • Ferguson, Sarah, and Stephanie Lezotte. 2020. “Exploring the State of Science Stereotypes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Draw-A-Scientist Checklist.” School Science and Mathematics 120 (1): 55–65. doi:10.1111/ssm.12382.
  • Fernandes, Geraldo, António Rodrigues, and Carlos Alberto Ferreira. 2018. “Conceptions of the Nature of Science and Technology: a Study with Children and Youths in a Non-Formal Science and Technology Education Setting.” Research in Science Education 48: 1071–1106. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9599-6.
  • Finson, Kevin. 2002. “Drawing a Scientist: What We Do and Do Not Know After Fifty Years of Drawings.” School Science and Mathematics 102 (7): 335–345. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18217.x.
  • Finson, Kevin, John Beaver, and Bonnie Cramond. 1995. “Development and Field Test of a Checklist for the Draw-A-Scientist Test.” School Science and Mathematics 95 (4): 195–205. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15762.x.
  • Fralick, Bethany, Jennifer Kearn, Stephen Thompson, and Jed Lyons. 2009. “How Middle Schoolers Draw Engineers and Scientists.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 18 (1): 60–73. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9133-3.
  • Hills, Philip, and Michael Shallis. 1975. “Scientists and Their Images.” New Scientist 67 (964): 471–475.
  • Howson, Geoffrey, and Jean-Pierre Kahane. 1990. “A Study Overview.” In The Popularization of Mathematics, edited by A. Howson, and J. Kahane, 1–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139013512.002.
  • Hurk, Anniek van den, Martina Meelissen, and Annemarie van Langen. 2018. “Interventions in Education to Prevent STEM Pipeline Leakage.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (2): 150–164. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1540897.
  • ITEA (International Technology Education Association). 2007. Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Reston, VA: ITEEA.
  • Kaleva, Satu, Jouni Pursiainen, Mirkka Hakola, Jarmo Rusanen, and Hanni Muukkonen. 2019. “Students’ Reasons for STEM Choices and the Relationship of Mathematics Choice to University Admission.” International Journal of STEM Education 6 (43), doi:10.1186/s40594-019-0196-x.
  • Knight, Meredith, and Christine Cunningham. 2004. “Draw an Engineer Test (DAET): Development of a Tool to Investigate Students’ Ideas about Engineers and Engineering.” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, no. April 2015: 4079–89.
  • Lamb, Richard, Leonard Annetta, Jeannette Meldrum, and David Vallett. 2012. “Measuring Science Interest: Rasch Validation of the Science Interest Survey.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10: 643–668.
  • Lyons, Jed, and Stephen Thompson. 2006. “Investigating the Long-Term Impact of an Engineering-Based GK-12 Program on Students’ Perceptions of Engineering.” ASEE Annual Conference and exposition., Conference Proceedings
  • Makarova, Elena, Belinda Aeschlimann, and Walter Herzog. 2019. “The Gender Gap in STEM Fields: The Impact of the Gender Stereotype of Math and Science on Secondary Students’ Career Aspirations.”.” Frontiers in Education 4 (60), doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00060.
  • Martín-Páez, Tobías, David Aguilera, Francisco Perales-Palacios, and José Vílchez-González. 2019. “What Are We Talking About When We Talk About STEM Education? A Review of Literature.” Science Education 103 (4): 799–822. doi:10.1002/sce.21522.
  • Mead, Margaret, and Rhoda Metraux. 1957. “Image of the Scientist among High-School Students.” Science 126 (3270): 384–390.
  • Meyer, Corlia, Lars Guenther, and Marina Joubert. 2019. “The Draw-a-Scientist Test in an African Context: Comparing Students’ (Stereotypical) Images of Scientists Across University Faculties.” Research in Science and Technological Education 37 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/02635143.2018.1447455.
  • Miller, David, Kyle Nolla, Alice Eagly, and David Uttal. 2018. “The Development of Children’s Gender-Science Stereotypes: A Meta-Analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist Studies.” Child Development 89 (6): 1943–1955. doi:10.1111/cdev.13039.
  • National Research Council. 2014. STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/18612.
  • OECD. 2016. Education at a Glance 2016: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/eag-2016-en.
  • OECD. 2018. “How is the Tertiary-Educated Population Evolving?”. Education Indicators in Focus, No. 61. doi:10.1787/a17e95dc-en.
  • Oware, Euridice, Brenda Capobianco, and Heidi Diefes-Dux. 2007. “Young Children’s Perceptions of Engineers before and after a Summer Engineering Outreach Course.” Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 3–8. doi:10.1109/FIE.2007.4417814.
  • Picker, Susan, and John Berry. 2000. “Investigating Pupils’ Images of Mathematicians.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 43 (1): 65–94. doi:10.1023/A:1017523230758.
  • Reis, Pedro, Sara Rodrigues, and Filipa Santos. 2006. “Concepções Sobre os Cientistas em Alunos do 1.° Ciclo do Ensino Básico: Poções, Máquinas, Monstros, Invenções e Outras Coisas Malucas.” Revista Eletrónica de Ensenanza de las Ciencias 5 (1): 51–74.
  • Rennie, Léonie, and Tina Jarvis. 1995. “Children’s Choice of Drawings to Communicate Their Ideas About Technology.” Research in Science Education 25 (3): 239–252. doi:10.1007/BF02357399.
  • Rock, David, and Jean Shaw. 2000. “Exploring Children’s Thinking About Mathematicians and Their Work.” Teaching Children Mathematics 6 (9): 550–555.
  • Ruiz-Mallén, Isabel, and Maria Escalas. 2012. “Scientists Seen by Children: A Case Study in Catalonia, Spain.” Science Communication 34 (4): 520–545. doi:10.1177/1075547011429199.
  • Scherz, Zahava, and Miri Oren. 2006. “How to Change Students’ Images of Science and Technology.” Science Education 90 (6): 965–985. doi:10.1002/sce.20159.
  • Schinske, Jeffrey, Monica Cardenas, and Jahana Kaliangara. 2015. “Uncovering Scientist Stereotypes and Their Relationships with Student Race and Student Success in a Diverse, Community College Setting.” CBE Life Sciences Education 14 (3): 1–16. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-12-0231.
  • Silver, Anne, and Brian Rushton. 2008. “Primary-School Children’s Attitudes Towards Science, Engineering and Technology and Their Images of Scientists and Engineers.” Education 3-13 36 (1): 51–67. doi:10.1080/03004270701576786.
  • Sjøberg, Svein, and Camilla Schreiner. 2010. The ROSE Project. An Overview and Key Findings. Oslo: University of Oslo.
  • Stehle, Stephanie, and Erin Peters-Burton. 2019. “Developing Student 21st Century Skills in Selected Exemplary Inclusive STEM High Schools.” International Journal of STEM Education 6 (39), doi:10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1.
  • Thibaut, Lieve, Stijn Ceuppens, Haydée De Loof, Jolien De Meester, Leen Goovaerts, Annemie Struyf, Jelle Boeve-de Pauw, et al. 2018. “Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Practices in Secondary Education.” European Journal of STEM Education 3 (1): 1–12. doi:10.20897/ejsteme/85525.
  • Thomson, Margareta, Zarifa Zakaria, and Ramona Radut-Taciu. 2019. “Perceptions of Scientists and Stereotypes Through the Eyes of Young School Children.” Education Research International. doi:10.1155/2019/6324704.
  • Toma, Radu, and Ileana Greca. 2018. ““The Effect of Integrative STEM Instruction on Elementary Students’ Attitudes Toward Science.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14 (4): 1383–1395. doi:doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83676.
  • Toma, Radu, Ileana Greca, and Martha Gómez. 2018. “Una Revisión Del Protocolo Draw-a-Scientist-Test (DAST).” Revista Eureka 15 (3): 3014. doi:10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2018.v15.i3.3104.
  • Trujillo, Gloriana, and Kimberly Tanner. 2014. “Considering the Role of Affect in Learning: Monitoring Students’ Self-Efficacy, Sense of Belonging, and Science Identity.” CBE Life Sciences Education 13 (1): 6–15. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-12-0241.
  • Walker, Kathleen. 2007. “Review of Research: Children and Their Purple Crayons: Understanding Their Worlds Through Their Drawings.” Childhood Education 84 (2): 96–96. doi:10.1080/00094056.2008.10522983.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.