Supporting preservice teachers to become informed teachers of reading through one-to-one tutoring in an English initial teacher education setting

References

• Abma, Teneke A, and Maurice Widdershoven. 2011. “Evaluation as a Relationally Responsible Practice.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 669–680. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Robin J. 2001. Culture and Pedagogy: International Comparisons in Primary Education. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Robin J. 2005. Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk. York: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, Richard L. 2005. “The Other Five Missing Pillars of Effective Reading Instruction.” Reading Today 22 (6): 3.
   Google Scholar
• Assaf, Lori C., and Minda Minda López. 2015. “Generative Learning in a Service-Learning Project and Field-Based Teacher Education Program: Learning to Become Culturally Responsive Teachers.” Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice 64: 323–338.
   Google Scholar
• Beard, Roger, Greg Brooks, and Jaz Ampaw-Farr. 2019. “How Linguistically-informed are Phonics Programmes?.” Literacy 53 (2): 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Breadmore, Helen, Emma Vardy, Anna Cunningham, A. Rosa Kwok, and Julia Carroll. 2019. Literacy Development: Evidence Review. London: Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Literacy_Development_Evidence.
   Google Scholar
• British Education Research Association. 2018. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. London, BERA British Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Greg. 2016. 5th Ed. “What works for children and young people with literacy difficulties?” http://www.interventionsforliteracy.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/What-Works-5th-edition-Rev-Oct-2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Andrew. 2015. Carter Review of Initial Teacher Training (ITT). London: DfE. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/carter-review-of-initial-teacher-training.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, Ann, Kathleen Rastle, and Kate Nation. 2018. “Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition from Novice to Expert.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 19 (1): 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Margaret, Jonathan Glazzard, Colin Mills, Sue Reid, and Jude Sloan. 2020. Independent Research into the Impact of the Systematic Synthetic Phonics Government Policy on Literacy Courses at Institutions Delivering Initial Teacher Education in England. Birmingham: Newham University. https://www.newman.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2020/03/Independent-Research-into-the-impact-of-the-systematic-synthetic-phonics-government-policy-April-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Christina, and Anne Teravainen. 2017. “What it means to be a reader at age 11: valuing skills, affective components and behavioural processes.” National Literacy Trust. https://cdn.literacytrust.org.uk/media/documents/ROGO_model_evidence_base_December_2017_-_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, Robert, Cesare Aloisi, Steve Higgins, and Lee Elliot Major. 2014. What Makes Great Teaching? Review of the Underpinning Research. London: Sutton Trust. https://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/What-Makes-Great-Teaching-REPORT.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Colby, Susan A., and Joy N. Stapleton. 2006. “Preservice Teachers Teach Writing: Implications for Teacher Educators.” Reading Research and Instruction 45: 353–376.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, John W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• D’Agostino, Jerome V., Emily Rodgers, Christa Winkler, Tracy Johnson, and Rebecca Berenbon. 2021. “The Generalizability of Running Record Accuracy and Self-Correction Scores.” Reading Psychology 42 (2): 111–130. http://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1880177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Barbara, T. Terri Key, and Katie Peterson. 2017. “Summer Literacy: A School/University Partnership That Benefits Young Learners and Beginning Teachers.” Journal of Literacy Practice & Research 42 (3): 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Viv. 2007. Subject Knowledge and Teacher Education: The Development of Beginning Teachers Thinking. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Sue, Anderson Jess, and Adele Rowe. 2017. Report on the Renfrewshire Literacy Approach August 2015 – July 2017. University of Strathclyde: Renfrewshire Council. https://pureportal.strath.ac.uk/en/publications/report-on-the-renfrewshire-literacy-approach-august-2015-july-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Sue, and Gemma Moss. 2014. “Ethics, Education Policy and Research: the Phonics Question Reconsidered.” British Educational Research Journal 40 (2): 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, Sue, and Vivien Smith. 2017. “Assessment, Teacher Education and the Emergence of Professional Expertise.” Literacy 51 (2): 84–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, Naomi. 2007. “What do Effective Teachers of Literacy do? Subject Knowledge and Pedagogical Choices for Literacy.” Literacy 41 (3): 137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, Nick. 2017. “The Importance of Vibrant and Open Debate in Education.” Paper presented at the ResearchED 2017 National conference, London, September 9.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, Phillip B., and William E Tunmer. 1986. “Decoding, Reading and Reading Disability.” Remedial and Special Education 7 (1): 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, Julie, Arthur McKee, and Kate Walsh. 2014. National Council on Teacher Quality: Teacher Prep Review. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2354106.
   Google Scholar
• Hanford, Emily. 2018. Hard Words: Why Aren’t Kids being Taught to Read? APM Reports. https://www.apmreports.org/episode/2018/09/10/hard-words-why-american-kids-arent-being-taught-to-read.
   Google Scholar
• Haverback, Heather R, and Susan J. Parault. 2008. “Preservice Reading Teacher Efficacy and Tutoring: A Review.” Educational Psychology Review 20 (3): 237–255. DOI:10.1007/s10648-008-9077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, Helen. 2020. “Becoming a Teacher of Early Reading: Charting the Knowledge and Practices of Preservice and Newly Qualified Teachers.” Literacy 54 (1): 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, James V., Natalie Svrcek, Catherine Lammert, Annie Daly-Lesch, Erica Steinitz, Erin Greeter, and Samuel DeJulio. 2019. “A Research Review of Literacy Tutoring and Mentoring in Initial Teacher Preparation: Toward Practices That Can Transform Teaching.” Journal of Literacy Research 51 (2): 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X19833292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linek, Wayne M., Olga G. Nelson, Mary Beth Sampson, Catherine K. Zeek, Kathleen A.J. Mohr, and Linda Hughes. 1999. “Developing Beliefs About Literacy Instruction: A Cross-Case Analysis of Preservice Teachers in Traditional and Field Based Settings.” Reading Research and Instruction 38 (4): 371–386. doi:10.1080/19388079909558302.
   Google Scholar
• Lunenberg, Mieke, and Fred Korthagen. 2009. “Experience, Theory and Practical Wisdom in Teaching and Teacher Education.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory Into Practice 15 (2): 225–240. doi:10.1080/13540600902875316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeks, Linda, and Coral Kemp. 2017. “How Well Prepared are Australian Preservice Teachers to Teach Early Reading Skills?” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 42 (11): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n11.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeks, Linda, Jennifer Stephenson, Coral Kemp, and Alison Madelaine. 2016. “How Well Prepared are Australian Preservice Teachers to Teach Early Reading Skills? A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties 21 (2): 69–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2017.1287103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, Angela. 2018. “Inspecting the quality of ITE Partnerships” Ofsted: London https://es.slideshare.net/Ofstednews/inspecting-the-quality-of-initial-teacher-education-partnerships.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Rita A., and Victoria Seeger. 2009. “Dear Sincerely: Exploring Literate Identities with Young Children and Preservice Teachers Through Letter Writing.” Literacy Research and Instruction 48 (2): 185–205. DOI: 10.1080/19388070802226246.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, Gemma. 2009. “The Politics of Literacy in the Context of Large-Scale Education Reform.” Research Papers in Education 24 (2): 155–174. doi: 10.1080/02671520902867093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. 2000. Report of the National Reading Panel, Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence Based Assessment of the Scientific Literature on Reading and its Implications for Reading Instruction. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/documents/report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills. 2018. Inspection Framework 2018. London: Ofsted. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/31151/1/Initial_teacher_education_inspection_handbook_Ofsted_April_18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills. 2020. Initial Teacher Education (ITE) Inspection Framework and Handbook. London: Ofsted. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/initial-teacher-education-ite-inspection-framework-and-handbook.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, Margaret. 2013. “Student Teachers’ Perceptions of Reading and the Teaching of Reading: the Implications for Teacher Education.” European Journal of Teacher Education 36 (3): 293–306. https://doi-org.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/10. 1080/02619768.2013.763790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plourde, Lee. 2002. “The Influence of Student Teaching on Preservice Elementary Teachers Science Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy Beliefs.” Journal of Instructional Psychology 29 (4): 245–254.
   Google Scholar
• Prestorius, Elizabeth, and Mirriam Lephalala. 2011. “Reading Comprehension in High-Poverty Schools: how Should it be Taught and how Well Does it Work?” Per Linguam 27 (2): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, Keith, Barbara R. Foorman, Charles A. Perfetti, David Pesetsky, and Mark S. Seidenberg. 2001. “How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2 (2): 31–74. https://doi-org.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/10. 1111/1529-1006.00004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, Colin. 2011. Real World Research. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Scarborough, Hollis. 2001. “Connecting Early Language and Literacy to Later Reading (dis)Abilities: Evidence, Theory, and Practice.” In Handbook of Early Literacy, edited by Susan Neuman, and David Dickinson, 97–110. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stouffer, Joe. 2021. “Seeking Middle Ground: Analyzing Running Records from the Top and Bottom.” The Reading Teacher 74 (6): 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, Morag, Rhona Stainthorp, and Maggie Snowling. 2008. “Literacy as a Complex Activity: Deconstructing the Simple View of Reading.” Literacy 42 (2): 59–66. https://doi-org.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/10. 1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00490.x.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Gary. 2017. How to do Your Research Project: A Guide for Students. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Torgerson, Carole, Greg Brooks, Louise Gascoine, and Steve Higgins. 2019. “Phonics: Reading Policy and the Evidence of Effectiveness from a Systematic ‘Tertiary’ Review.” Research Papers in Education 34 (2): 208–238. https://doi-org.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/10. 1080/02671522.2017.1420816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgerson, Carole, Greg Brooks, and Jill Hall. 2006. A Systematic Review of the Research Literature on the use of Phonics in the Teaching of Reading and Spelling (Research Report RR711). London: Department for Education and Skills. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/14791/1/RR711_.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, Alan, Amanda Mason-Singh, Amy Ho, and John Guthrie. 2014. “Intervening to Improve Children’s Reading Motivation and Comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction.” In Advances in Motivation and Achievement, edited by Stuart Karabenick, and Timothy Urdan, 37–70. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, Sylvia C. 2015. “Talking Policy Into Practice: Probing the Debates Around the Effective Teaching of Early Reading.” Education 43 (5): 498–513. DOI:10.1080/03004279.2013.828765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar