Building back better: lessons learned from a year with COVID 19 caused changes to school and teaching

References

• Adams, D. 1993. “Defining Educational Quality.” Improving Educational Quality Project Publication, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechtsen, T. R. S., and A. Qvortrup. 2017. Undersøgelsesbaseret undervisning: et review over nyere forskningslitteratur fra et almendidaktisk perspektiv. https://www.ucviden.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/102675308/KiDM_delrapport_1_ISBN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Araujo, M. C., P. Carneiro, Y. Cruz-Aguayo, and N. Schady. 2016. “Teacher Quality and Learning Outcomes in Kindergarten.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (3): 1415–1453. doi:10.1093/qje/qjw016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ary, D., L. C. Jacobs, A. Razavieh, and C. Sorensen. 2009. Introduction to Research in Education. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Bacher-Hicks, A., and J. Goodman. 2021. “The Covid-19 Pandemic is a Lousy Natural Experiment for Studying the Effects of Online Learning: Focus, Instead, on Measuring the Overall Effects of the Pandemic Itself.” Education Next 21 (4): 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavior Change.” Pshchological Review 84: 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, B., D. While, and T. Boyle. 2004. “A Longitudinal Study of Teacher Change: What Makes Professional Development Effective?” Curriculum Journal 15 (1): 45–68. doi:10.1080/1026716032000189471.
   Google Scholar
• Børns Vilkår & TrygFonden. 2020. “Skolen og det trygge klassemiljø.” Accessed 27 September 2022. https://bornsvilkar.dk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Pres-og-stress.-Skolen-og-det-trygge-klassemiljoe.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, N. C., C. Howes, M. Burchinal, R. C. Pianta, S. Ritchie, D. M. Bryant, R. M. Clifford, D. M. Early, and O. A. Barbarin. 2010. “Children's Classroom Engagement and School Readiness Gains in Prekindergarten.” Child Development 81 (5): 1534–1549. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01490.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, P., S. V. Katikireddi, A. Leyland, and F. Popham. 2017. “Natural Experiments: An Overview of Methods, Approaches, and Contributions to Public Health Intervention Research.” Annual Review of Public Health 38: 39–56. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2011. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DiBiase, W., and J. R. McDonald. 2015. “Science Teacher Attitudes Toward Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning.” The Clearing House 88 (2): 29–38. doi:10.1080/00098655.2014.987717.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2001. “Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization.” Journal of Education and Work 14 (1): 133–156. doi:10.1080/13639080020028747.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2011. “From Design Experiments to Formative Interventions.” Theory & Psychology 21 (5): 598–628. doi:10.1177/0959354311419252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engzell, P., A. Frey, and M. D. Verhagen. 2021. “Learning Loss due to School Closures During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (17): e2022376118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2022376118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., and E. Peterson. 2004. “Conceptions of Learning and Knowledge in Higher Education: Relationships with Study Behaviour and Influences of Learning Environments.” International Journal of Educational Research 41 (6): 407–428. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.009.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., D. Skinner, D. Entwistle, and S. Orr. 2000. “Conceptions and Beliefs About “Good Teaching”: An Integration of Contrasting Research Areas.” Higher Education Research & Development 19 (1): 5–26. doi:10.1080/07294360050020444.
   Google Scholar
• Fives, H., and M. G. Gill. 2015. International Handbook of Research on Teachers’ Beliefs. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Follman, J. 1992. “Secondary School Students’ Ratings of Teacher Effectiveness.” The High School Journal 75 (3): 168–178.
   Google Scholar
• Gaertner, H., and M. Brunner. 2018. “Once Good Teaching, Always Good Teaching? The Differential Stability of Student Perceptions of Teaching Quality.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 30 (2): 159–182. doi:10.1007/s11092-018-9277-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goble, P., and R. C. Pianta. 2017. “Teacher–Child Interactions in Free Choice and Teacher-Directed Activity Settings: Prediction to School Readiness.” Early Education and Development 28 (8): 1035–1051. doi:10.1080/10409289.2017.1322449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goe, L., C. Bell, and O. Little. 2008. “Approaches to Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness: A Research Synthesis.” National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Accessed 27 September 2022. https://gtlcenter.org/sites/default/files/docs/EvaluatingTeachEffectiveness.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Golbeck, S. L. 2001. “Instructional Models for Early Childhood: In Search of a Child-Regulated/Teacher-Guided Pedagogy.” In Psychological Perspectives on Early Childhood Education: Reframing Dilemmas in Research and Practice, edited by S. L. Golbeck, 153–180. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnþórsdóttir, H., B. Gísladóttir, and Y. G. Sigurðardóttir. 2021. “Teachers in New Situations During the COVID-19 Period: Impact on Professional Collaboration and Quality of Teaching.” Education in the North 28 (3): 25–43. doi:10.26203/4p4k-2f22.
   Google Scholar
• Hamaidi, D. A., Y. M. Arouri, R. K. Noufal, and I. T. Aldrou. 2021. “Parents’ Perceptions of Their Children’s Experiences with Distance Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 22 (2): 224–241. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., and D. Green. 1993. “Defining Quality.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 18 (1): 9–34. doi:10.1080/0260293930180102.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Helmke, A. 2013. Undervisningskvalitet og lærerprofessionalitet. Diagnosticering, evaluering og udvikling af undervisning. Frederikshavn: Dafolo.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, N. E., and D. F. Tyson. 2009. “Parental Involvement in Middle School: A Meta-Analytic Assessment of the Strategies That Promote Achievemedt.” Developmental Psychology 45 (3): 740–763. doi:10.1037/a0015362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, M. 2007. “Goal Conflicts and Self-Regulation: A New Look at Pupils’ Off-Task Behaviour in the Classroom.” Educational Research Review 2 (1): 28–38. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, J. E., J. J. Watters, J. Brownlee, and M. Lupton. 2012. “Elementary Teacher's Conceptions of Inquiry Teaching: Messages for Teacher Development.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 23 (2): 159–175. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9251-2.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, S. S., and D. Reimer. 2021. “The Effect of COVID-19-Related School Closures on Students’ Well-Being: Evidence from Danish Nationwide Panel Data.” SSM Popul Health 16: 100945. doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeynes, W. H. 2005. “A Meta-Analysis of the Relation of Parental Involvement to Urban Elementary School Student Academic Achievement.” Urban Education 40 (3): 237–269. doi:10.1177/0042085905274540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeynes, W. H. 2007. “The Relationship Between Parental Involvement and Urban Secondary School Student Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis.” Urban Education 42 (1): 82–110. doi:10.1177/0042085906293818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leatherdale, S. T. 2019. “Natural Experiment Methodology for Research: A Review of How Different Methods Can Support Real-World Research.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 22 (1): 19–35. doi:10.1080/13645579.2018.1488449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, B. L. M., E. E. Thomas, K. Drago, and L. A. Rex. 2013. “Examining Studies of Inquiry-Based Learning in Three Fields of Education.” Journal of Teacher Education 64 (5): 387–408. doi:10.1177/0022487113496430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Cuba. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Loyens, S. M. M., and R. M. J. P. Rikers. 2011. “Instruction Based on Inquiry.” In Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction, edited by R. E. Mayer, and P. A. Alexander, 361–381. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lune, H., and B. L. Berg. 1998. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. England: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Lykkegaard, E., A. Qvortrup, and J. Jensen. 2022. Well-Being and COVID 19 Related Stressors: Fluctuations and ‘At Risk Students’ During the Pandemic (in review).
   Google Scholar
• Maggioni, L., and M. M. Parkinson. 2008. “The Role of Teacher Epistemic Cognition, Epistemic Beliefs, and Calibration in Instruction.” Educational Psychology Review 20 (4): 445–461. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9081-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, C. A., and B. J. MacFadden. 2014. “At the Elbows of Scientists: Shaping Science Teachers’ Conceptions and Enactment of Inquiry-Based Instruction.” Research in Science Education (Australasian Science Education Research Association) 44 (6): 927–947. doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9408-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. 2005. Hvad er god undervisning?. København: Gyldendal Uddannelse.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2018. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. USA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. A. 2013. “Scientists’ Participation in Teacher Professional Development: The Impact on Fourth to Eighth Grade Teachers’ Understanding and Implementation of Inquiry Science.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 12 (4): 793–816. doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9439-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., L. A. M. Delli, and M. N. Edwards. 2004. “The Good Teacher and Good Teaching: Comparing Beliefs of Second-Grade Students, Preservice Teachers, and Inservice Teachers.” The Journal of Experimental Education 72 (2): 69–92. doi:10.3200/JEXE.72.2.69-92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutch, D. M. 2020. “The Covid-19 Global Pandemic: A Natural Experiment in the Making.” Lifestyle Genomics 13 (5): 135–137. doi:10.1159/000510217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsberth, M., Y. Liljekvist, C. Olin-Scheller, J. Samuelsson, and C. Hallquist. 2021. “Digital Teaching as the New Normal? Swedish Upper Secondary Teachers’ Experiences of Emergency Remote Teaching During the COVID-19 Crisis.” European Educational Research Journal 20 (4): 442–462. doi:10.1177/14749041211022480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noman, M., and A. Kaur. 2015. “Parents’ Perception of Dimensions of Quality K-12 Schools in Bangkok, Thailand.” International Journal of Management in Education 9 (4): 396–410. doi:10.1504/IJMIE.2015.072094.
   Google Scholar
• Nordenbo, S. E., M. S. Larsen, N. Tiftikçi, R. E. Wendt, and S. Østergaard. 2008. Lærerkompetanser og elevers læring i barnehage og skole – Et systematisk review utført for Kunnskapsdepartementet. Oslo: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Olteanu, C., and L. Olteanu. 2013. “Enhancing Mathematics Communication Using Critical Aspects and Dimensions of Variation.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 44 (4): 513–522. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2012.742153.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Research. 2019. “Bevægelse i skoledagen 2019.” Dansk Skoleidræt, TrygFonden. Accessed 27 September 2022. https://oxfordresearch.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/bevaegelse-i-skoledagen-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, C., and H. J. Boon. 2014. “Relations Between Teachers’ Classroom Goals and Values: A Case Study of High School Teachers in Far North Queensland, Australia.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 39 (8): 14–36. doi:10.14221/ajte.2014v39n8.1.
   Google Scholar
• Qvortrup, A. 2022. “Stressors from and Well-Being After COVID-19 among Danish Primary and Lower Secondary School Students.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. doi:10.1080/00313831.2022.2116483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qvortrup, A., R. Lomholt, V. Christensen, T. E. Lundtofte, and A. Nielsen. 2022. “Playful Learning During the Reopening of Danish Schools After Covid 19 Closures.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, doi:10.1080/00313831.2022.2042850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, J. 2021. “Pandemic Upheaval Offers a Huge Natural Experiment.” Nature 596 (7870): 149–151. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-02092-7. https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-021-02092-7/d41586-021-02092-7.pdf.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sortkjær, B. 2013. Larm og læring: Klasserumsklimaets betydning for elevers læring. Aarhus: Centre for Strategic Educational Research. Accessed 27 September 2022. https://cser.dk/fileadmin/www.cser.dk/wp_0010_bs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tauber, A. L., S. M. Levonis, and S. S. Schweiker. 2022. “Gamified Virtual Laboratory Experience for In-Person and Distance Students.” Journal of Chemical Education 99 (3): 1183–1189. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, T. 1997. “What Makes Schools Effective? A Comparison Between School Communities in Australia and the USA.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 8 (3): 311–326. doi:10.1080/0924345970080302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidensråd for forebyggelse. 2016. Fysisk aktivitet - læring, trivsel og sundhed i folkeskolen. Accessed 27 September 2022. https://vidensraad.dk/rapport/fysisk-aktivitet-laering-trivsel-og-sundhed-i-folkeskolen.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. 2009. “Qualitative Analysis of Content.” In Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, edited by B. M. Wildemuth, 308–319. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar