STEM-EDELCY learning model: a conceptual and pedagogical framework to facilitate students to develop 21st-century skills

References

• Aiken, Lewis R. 1985. “Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings.” Educational and Psychological Measurument 45 (1): 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altan, Esra Bozkurt, and Sema Tan. 2020. “Concepts of Creativity in Design Based Learning in STEM Education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09569-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arends, Richard I. 2012. Learning to Teach. Ninth. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Asrizal, A., Y. Yurnetti, and E. A. Usman. 2022. “ICT Thematic Science Teaching Material with 5E Learning Cycle Model to Develop Students’ 21st-Century Skills.” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 11 (1): 61–72. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.33764.
   Google Scholar
• Ataizi, Murat. 2012. “Situated Cognition.” In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6.
   Google Scholar
• Benek, Ibrahim, and Behiye Akcay. 2022. “The Effects of Socio-Scientific STEM Activities on 21st Century Skills of Middle School Students.” Participatory Educational Research 9 (2): 25–52. https://doi.org/10.17275/PER.22.27.9.2.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Kellie, Brody Heritage, and Peter Allen. 2023. SPSS Statistics: A Practical Guide. 5th ed. Victoria Australia: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Binkley, Marilyn, Ola Erstad, Joan Herman, Senta Raizen, Martin Ripley, May Miller-Ricci, and Mike Rumble. 2012. “Defining Twenty-First Century Skills.” In Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, edited by Patrick Griffin, Barry McGaw, and Esther Care, 17–66. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Care, Esther, Claire Scoular, and Patrick Griffin. 2016. “Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving in Education Environments.” Applied Measurement in Education ISSN 29 (4), https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209204.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Deborah Faye, Hyun Kyoung Ro, Benjamin Alcott, and Lisa R. Lattuca. 2016. “Co-Curricular Connections: The Role of Undergraduate Research Experiences in Promoting Engineering Students’ Communication, Teamwork, and Leadership Skills.” Research in Higher Education 57 (3): 363–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9386-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, Elizabeth A., Selcen S. Guzey, Gillian H. Roehrig, Aran W. Glancy, Elizabeth A. Ring-Whalen, and Tamara J. Moore. 2017. “Approaches to Integrating Engineering in STEM Units and Student Achievement Gains.” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research 7 (2), https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1148.
   Google Scholar
• Eroğlu, Seyide, and Oktay Bektaş. 2022. “The Effect of 5E-Based STEM Education on Academic Achievement, Scientific Creativity, and Views on the Nature of Science.” Learning and Individual Differences 98 (102181), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eun, Barohny. 2018. “The Zone of Proximal Development as an Overarching Concept: A Framework for Synthesizing Vygotsky’s Theories.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (1): 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1421941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facione, Peter, and Carol Ann Gittens. 2016. Think Critically. 3rd ed. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, Jack R., Norman E. Wallen, and Helen H. Hyun. 2023. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Eleventh. New York: McGraw Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, Vu Thi, Le Hong Chung, Nguyen Van Hanh, and Bui Minh Hai. 2023. “Teaching Science Using Argumentation-Supported 5E-STEM, 5E-STEM, and Conventional Didactic Methods: Differences in the Learning Outcomes of Middle School Students.” Education Sciences 13 (3), https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, Joseph F, Jeffrey J. Risher, Marko Sarstedt, and Christian M Ringle. 2019. “When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM.” European Business Review 31 (1): 2–24. http://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, Joseph F, G. Tomas, M. Hult, Christian M. Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. 2022. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PlS-SEM). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Hwa Jung, and Kew Cheol Shim. 2019. “Development of an Engineering Design Process-Based Teaching and Learning Model for Scientifically Gifted Students at the Science Education Institute for the Gifted in South Korea.” Asia-Pacific Science Education 5 (1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0047-6.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Biyun, Morris Siu Yung Jong, Ronnel B. King, Ching Sing Chai, and Michael Yi Chao Jiang. 2022. “Promoting Secondary Students’ Twenty-First Century Skills and Stem Career Interests through a Crossover Program of Stem and Community Service Education.” Frontiers in Psychology 13 (July), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903252.
   Google Scholar
• Hynes, Morgan, Merredith Portsmore, Emily Dare, Elissa Milto, and Chris Rogers. 2011. “Infusing Engineering Design into High School STEM Courses.” https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1165&context=ncete_publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, Anne. 2017. STEM by Design: Stategies and Activities for Grades 4-8. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, Bruce, Marsha Weil, and Emily Calhoun. 2015. Models of Teaching. Ninth. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. All.
   Google Scholar
• Kanmaz, Ahmet. 2022. “Middle School Teacher’ Critical Thinking Skills and Awareness towards Teaching Critical Thinking Skills.” International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET) 9 (4): 1648–1671. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1353469.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, Todd R., and J. Geoff Knowles. 2016. “A Conceptual Framework for Integrated STEM Education.” International Journal of STEM Education 3 (11), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kilbane, Clare R, and Natalie B Milman. 2014. Teaching Models: Designing Instruction for 21st Century Learners. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lou, Shi Jer, Yung Chieh Chou, Ru Chu Shih, and Chih Chao Chung. 2017. “A Study of Creativity in CaC2 Steamship-Derived STEM Project-Based Learning.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 13 (6): 2387–2404. https://doi.org/10.12973/EURASIA.2017.01231A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, Iva, Mónica Baptista, and Pedro Reis. 2021. “Students’ Images of STEM Professionals: A Study in the Portuguese Context.” Education 3-13 51 (1): 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1955945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Páez, Tobías, David Aguilera Aguilera, Francisco Javier Perales-Palacios, and José Miguel Vílchez-González. 2019. “What Are We Talking about When We Talk about STEM Education? A Review of Literature.” Science Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurohman, S., W. Sunarno, S. Sarwanto, and S. Yamtinah. 2021. “The Validation of Digital Analysis Tool-Assisted Real-World Inquiry (Digita-RI) as a Modification of the Inquiry-Based Learning Model in the Digital Age.” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 10 (3): 387–399. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.30779.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, OECD. 2022. Thinking Outside the Box: The PISA 2022 Creative Thinking Assessment. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/innovation/creative-thinking/.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, Alandeom W., Adam Oliver Brown, Wo Su Zhang, Patrick LeBrun, Liam Eaton, and Suhaila Yemen. 2021. “Fostering Creativity in Science Learning: The Potential of Open-Ended Student Drawing.” Teaching and Teacher Education 105: 103416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlich, Donald C., Robert J. Harder, Richard C. Callahan, Michael S. Trevisan, and Abbie H. Brown. 2010. Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Effective Instruction. Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Ornstein, Allan C., Daniel U. Levine, Gerald L. Gutek, and David E. Vocke. 2011. Foundations of Education. 11th ed. Belmont, USA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, Alexandra, and Rebecca Hite. 2019. “Globalize Your Classroom: Employing Global Collaboration to Develop Student Communication Skills Using the Water Cycle.” Science Scope 43 (4): 44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26899101
   Google Scholar
• Putra, Pramudya Dwi Aristya, Nurul Fitriyah Sulaeman, Supeno Supeno, and Sri Wahyuni. 2023. “Exploring Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Using the Engineering Design Process in a Physics Classroom.” Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 32 (1): 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00640-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Martín, Héctor, and Rodger W. Bybee. 2022. “The Cognitive Principles of Learning Underlying the 5E Model of Instruction.” International Journal of STEM Education 9 (21), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00337-z.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, Dale H. 2012. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Cynthia Luna. 2015. “The Futures of Learning 3: What Kind of Pedagogies for the 21st Century?” Education Research and Foresight. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243126.
   Google Scholar
• Shernoff, David J., Suparna Sinha, Denise M. Bressler, and Lynda Ginsburg. 2017. “Assessing Teacher Education and Professional Development Needs for the Implementation of Integrated Approaches to STEM Education.” International Journal of STEM Education 4 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1.
   Google Scholar
• Siew, Nyet Moi, Henry Goh, and Fauziah Sulaiman. 2016. “Integrating Stem in an Engineering Design Process: The Learning Experience of Rural Secondary School Students in an Outreach Challenge Program.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 15 (4): 477–493. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soh, Kaycheng. 2017. “Fostering Student Creativity through Teacher Behaviors.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 23: 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Kevin, Aibhín Bray, and Brendan Tangney. 2020. “Developing Twenty-First-Century Skills in out-of-School Education: The Bridge21 Transition Year Programme.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1835709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandika, Pambas Basil. 2022. “Instructional Materials and the Development of Young Children’s 21st Century Skills: Perspectives from Early Educators in Ukerewe, Tanzania.” Journal of Research in Childhood Education 36 (1): 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2020.1834473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill-Miller, Branden, Anaëlle Camarda, Maxence Mercier, Jean Marie Burkhardt, Tiffany Morisseau, Samira Bourgeois-Bougrine, Florent Vinchon, et al. 2023. “Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education.” Journal of Intelligence 11 (3), https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trilling, Bernie, and Charles Fadel. 2009. 21St Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Turan, Serife. 2021. “Pre-Service Teacher Experiences of the 5E Instructional Model: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 17 (8): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/11102.
   Google Scholar
• Ünlü, Zeynep Koyunlu, and İlbilge Dökme. 2022. “A Systematic Review of 5E Model in Science Education: Proposing a Skill-Based STEM Instructional Model within the 21-St Century Skills.” International Journal of Science Education 44 (13): 2110–2130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2114031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vong, Sam Aun, and Wareerat Kaewurai. 2017. “Instructional Model Development to Enhance Critical Thinking and Critical Thinking Teaching Ability of Trainee Students at Regional Teaching Training Center in Takeo Province, Cambodia.” Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 38 (1): 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, John G. 2016a. “I-STEM Ed Exemplar: Implementation of the PIRPOSAL Model.” Technology and Engineering Teacher 76 (2): 16–23. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/96423/Wells_ImplementPIROPSAL_TET_v76n2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, John G. 2016b. “PIRPOSAL Model of Integrative STEM Education: Conceptual and Pedagogical Framework for Classroom Implementation.” Technology and Engineering Teacher 75 (6): 12–19. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/96424/Wells_PIRPOSAL_March2016-TET.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• Yata, Chikahiko, Tadashi Ohtani, and Masataka Isobe. 2020. “Conceptual Framework of STEM Based on Japanese Subject Principles.” International Journal of STEM Education 7 (12), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00205-8.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Kuang Chao, Pai Hsing Wu, and Szu Chun Fan. 2020. “Structural Relationships among High School Students’ Scientific Knowledge, Critical Thinking, Engineering Design Process, and Design Product.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 18 (6): 1001–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10007-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanden, Petrie J.A.C. van der, Eddie Denessen, Antonius H.N. Cillessen, and Paulien C. Meijer. 2020. “Fostering Critical Thinking Skills in Secondary Education to Prepare Students for University: Teacher Perceptions and Practices.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 25 (4): 394–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2020.1846313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, Xiaohong, Daner Sun, Rui Song, Yuqin Yang, and Ying Zhan. 2023. “Empowering Students’engineering Thinking: An Empirical Study of Integrating Engineering into Science Class at Junior Secondary Schools.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 49 (June): 101364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101364.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, Baichang, Xiaofan Liu, Liying Xia, and Wang Sun. 2022. “A Proposed Taxonomy of Teaching Models in STEM Education: Robotics as an Example.” SAGE Open 12 (2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221099525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar