1,749
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Language learning in preschool children: an embodied learning account

&
Pages 4-15 | Received 15 Dec 2015, Accepted 09 May 2016, Published online: 16 Jun 2016

References

  • Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 513–562. doi: 10.1080/01690960344000026
  • Barsalou, L. W. (2008a). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
  • Barsalou, L. W. (2008b). Cognitive and neural contributions to understanding the conceptual system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 91–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00555.x
  • Barsalou, L. W. (2010). Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 716–724. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x
  • Barsalou, L. W. (2012). The human conceptual system. In M. J. Spivey, K. McRae, & M. F. Joanisse (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 239–258). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Barsalou, L. W., Breazeal, C., & Smith, L. B. (2007). Cognition as coordinated non-cognition. Cognitive Processing, 8(2), 79–91. doi: 10.1007/s10339-007-0163-1
  • Boca, C., (coord), Bucinschi, M., & Dulman, A. (2008). Educaţia timpurie şi specificul dezvoltării copilului: modul general pentru personalul grădiniţei. Bucureşti: Educaţia 2000+
  • Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36(2), 129–148. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.36.2.129
  • Braithwaite, D. W., Goldstone, R. L., van der Maas, H. L., & Landy, D. H. (2016). Non-formal mechanisms in mathematical cognitive development: The case of arithmetic. Cognition, 149, 40–55. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.004
  • Broaders, S. C., Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007). Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 539–550. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.539
  • Calvo, P., & Gomila, A. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of cognitive science: An embodied approach. San Diego: Elsevier.
  • Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Clark, A. (2011). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. doi: 10.1093/analys/58.1.7
  • Curriculum pentru educaţia timpurie a copiilor de la 3 la 6/7 ani. (2008). Ministerul Educaţiei, Cercetării şi Tineretului, Bucureşti, Romania.
  • Dueker, G., Portko, S., & Zelinsky, M. (2011). Meaningful touch in naturalistic contexts: Haptic input as a cue to the referent of infant directed speech. Cognitie, Creier, Comportament, 15(4), 427–448.
  • Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000310
  • Glenberg, A. M. (2008). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. Advanced Review, 1, 586–596. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., & Buccino, G. (2008). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 905–919. doi: 10.1080/17470210701625550
  • Glenberg, A. M., Witt, J. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). From the revolution to embodiment: 25 years of cognitive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 573–585. doi: 10.1177/1745691613498098
  • Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66(3), 325–331. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01468.x
  • Goldin-Meadow, S., & Wagner, S. M. (2005). How our hands help us learn. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(5), 234–241. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.006
  • Gomila, T., & Calvo, P. (2008). Directions for an embodied cognitive science: Toward an integrated approach. In P. Calvo & Gomila A. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive science: An embodied approach (pp. 1–25). San Diego: Elsevier.
  • Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1), 335–346. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6
  • Hommel, B. (2015). The theory of event coding (TEC) as embodied-cognition framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1318. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01318
  • Ionescu, T. (2011). Abordarea “embodied cognition” şi studiul dezvoltării cognitive. Revista de Psihologie, 57, 326–339.
  • Ionescu, T., & Vasc, D. (2014). Embodied cognition: Challenges for psychology and education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 275–280. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.156
  • James, K. H. (2010). Sensori-motor experience leads to changes in visual processing in the developing brain. Developmental Science, 13(2), 279–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00883.x
  • Johnson, M. (2015). Embodied understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 875. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00875
  • Kiefer, M., & Trumpp, N. M. (2012). Embodiment theory and education: The foundations of cognition in perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1, 15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2012.07.002
  • Kucker, S. C., McMurray, B., & Samuelson, L. K. (2015). Slowing down fast mapping: Redefining the dynamics of word learning. Child Development Perspectives, 9(2), 74–78. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12110
  • Laakso, A. (2011). Embodiment and development in cognitive science. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal (Special Issue: Embodiment and Development), 15, 409–425.
  • Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2007). How abstract is symbolic thought? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 720–733.
  • Maouene, J., & Ionescu, T. (2011). Editorial: Embodiment and development. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal (Special Issue: Embodiment and Development), 15, 403–408.
  • Maouene, J., Sethuraman, N., Laakso, A., & Maouene, M. (2011). The body region correlates of concret and abstract verbs in early child language. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal (Special Issue: Embodiment and Development), 15, 449–481.
  • Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143
  • Morse, A. F., Benitez, V. L., Belpaeme, T., Cangelosi, A., & Smith, L. B. (2015). Posture affects how robots and infants map words to objects. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0116012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116012
  • Needham, A., & Libertus, K. (2011). Embodiment in early development. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(1), 117–123.
  • Nguyen, D. J., & Larson, J. B. (2015). Don't forget about the body: Exploring the curricular possibilities of embodied pedagogy. Innovative Higher Education, 40, 331–344. doi: 10.1007/s10755-015-9319-6
  • Oliver, D. (1990). Grounded knowing: A postmodern perspective on teaching and learning. Educational Leadership, 48(1), 64–69.
  • Pereira, A., Smith, L. B., & Yu, C. (2014). A bottom-up view of toddler word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(1), 178–185. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0466-4
  • Perry, L. K. (2015). To have and to hold: Looking vs. touching in the study of categorization. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00178
  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1980). Computation and cognition: Issues in the foundations of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(01), 111–132. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00002053
  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Samuelson, L. K. (2011). Abstract thinking in space and time: Using the environment to learn words. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal (Special Issue: Embodiment and Development), 15, 571–581.
  • Schaffer, H. R. (2010). Introducere În Psihologia copilului, Ediţia a treia, Cluj-Napoca: Editura ASCR (Romanian translation of “Introducing child Psychology”, 2004, Blackwell).
  • Siegler, R. S., DeLoache, J. S., & Eisenberg, N. (2003). How children develop. New York: Macmillan.
  • Smith, L. B. (2009). Dynamic systems, sensorimotor processes, and the origins of stability and flexibility. In J. Spencer, M. S. C. Thomas, & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Toward a unified theory of development: Connectionism and dynamic systems theory re-considered (pp. 67–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Smith, L. B. (2013). It’s all connected: Pathways in visual object recognition and early noun learning. American Psychologist, 68(8), 618–629. doi: 10.1037/a0034185
  • Smith, L. B., & Sheya, A. (2010). Is cognition enough to explain cognitive development? Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01091.x
  • Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(8), 343–348. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00156-6
  • Smith, L., & Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics. Cognition, 106(3), 1558–1568. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.010
  • Smith, L. B., Yu, C., & Pereira, A. F. (2011). Not your mother's view: The dynamics of toddler visual experience. Developmental Science, 14(1), 9–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00947.x
  • Stapleton, M. (2013). Steps to a “Properly Embodied” cognitive science. Cognitive Systems Research, 22, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2012.05.001
  • Stolz, S. A. (2015). Embodied learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(5), 474–487. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2013.879694
  • Wagner Cook, S. (2011). Abstract thinking in space and time: Using gesture to learn math. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal (Special Issue: Embodiment and Development), 15, 553–570.
  • Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636. doi: 10.3758/BF03196322
  • Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2005). Embodied sentence comprehension. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding Cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 224–245). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13(2), 168–171. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00430

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.