Challenges in working with pedagogical quality in preschools – a meta-interpretation synthesis of empirical studies

References

• Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38, 4–23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, M., Markström, A.-M., & Vallberg Roth, A.-C. (2014). Assessment and documentation in early childhood education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Asplund Carlsson, M, Pramling Samuelsson, I, & Kärrby, G. (2001). Strukturella faktorer och pedagogisk kvalitet i barnomsorg och skola: En kunskapsöversikt. (Structural factors and educational quality in childcare and school: A knowledge overview). Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen Ball. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, D. (2010). Neoliberal restructuring in education and health professions in Europe. Current Sociology, 58(4), 551–569. doi: 10.1177/0011392110367998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjervås, L. L. (2011). Samtal om barn och pedagogisk dokumentation som bedömningspraktik i förskolan: en diskursanalys (Teachers' views of preschool children in relation to pedagogical documentation – A discourse analysis). Diss. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Blase, K. A., Van Dyke, M., Fixsen, D. L., & Bailey, F. W. (2012). Implementation science: Key concepts, themes, and evidence for practitioners in educational psychology. In B. Kelly & D. F. Perkins (Eds.), Handbook of implementation science for psychology in education (pp. 13–34). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CARE: Curriculum Quality Analysis and Impact Review of European Early Childhood Education and Care. (2015). D2.2: The relations between structural quality and process quality in European early childhood education and care provisions: Secondary analyses of large scale studies in five countries. Jyväskylä and Utrecht: University of Jyväskylä and Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2005). En teori om organisering (A theory of organization). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, G, & Elfström, I. (2014). Pedagogisk dokumentation i tillblivelse. (Pedagogical documentation in the making). Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 19(nr 4-5), 268–296.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, G., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (1994). Förskola och skola. Om två skilda traditioner och om drömmen om en möjlig mötesplats. (Preschool and school. Two different traditions and a vision of a meeting place). Stockholm: Stockholms universitets förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, G, Moss, P, & Pence, A. (2009). Från kvalitet till meningsskapande (From quality to meaning making). Stockholm: HLS förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, M. P., Armstrong, D., Baker, R., Cleary, K., Davies, H., Davies, S., & Sibbald, B. (2009). An implementation research agenda. Implementation Science, 4(18), 2–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidevald, C. (2013). Systematiska analyser för utvärdering och utveckling i förskolan: Hallå, hur gör man? [Systematic analyzes for evaluation and development in preschool: Hey, how do you do it?]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Flewitt, R. (2006). Using video to investigate preschool classroom interaction: Education research assumptions and methodological practices. Visual Communication, 5(1), 25–50. doi: 10.1177/1470357206060917
   Google Scholar
• Franks, R. P., & Schroeder, J. (2013). Implementation science: What do we know and where do we go from here?. In T Halle, A Metz, & I Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Applying implementation science in early childhood programs and systems (pp. 5–20). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., & Olszewski, A. (2015). Developing a phonological awareness curriculum: Reflections on an implementation science framework. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 58, S1837–S1850. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, P. (2003). Om kvalitet i förskolan. Forskning om och utvärdering av förskolan 1998-2001 [About quality in preschool. Research and Evaluation of preschool 1998-2001]. Forskning i fokus nr 8. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Insulander, E, & Svärdemo Åberg, E. (2014). Vilken kunskap erkänns i det systematiska kvalitetsarbetet? Om oförenliga tankestilar i dagens förskola [What knowledge is recognized in the systematic quality work? Incompatible thought styles in today’s preschool]. Tidsskrift för Nordisk Barnehageforskning, 7(12), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kamens, D. H., & McNeely, C. L. (2010). Globalization and the growth of international educational testing and national assessment. Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 5–25. doi: 10.1086/648471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, B., & Perkins, D. F. (Eds.) (2012). Handbook of implementation science for psychology in education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lager, K. (2010). Att organisera för kvalitet. En studie om kvalitetsarbete i kommunen och i förskolan [To organize for quality. A study of quality work in municipalities and preschools] (Licentiate thesis). Gothenburg University, Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Lager, K. (2015). I spänningsfältet mellan kontroll och utveckling. En policystudie av systematiskt kvalitetsarbete i kommunen, förskolan och fritidshemmet [Between control and development. Systematic quality development work in municipalities, pre-schools and leisure-time centres] (Dissertation). Gothenburg University, Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education. Introducing an intra-active pedagogy. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Löfdahl, A., & Pérez, P. H. (2010). Den synliggjorda förskolan [The visible preschool]. In C. Lundahl & M. Folke Fichtelius (red.), Bedömning i och av skolan: praktik, principer, politik (pp. 71–84). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, K. (2006). Konstruktionen av det avvikande förskolebarnet – En kritisk fallstudie angående utvecklingsbedömningar av yngre barn [The construction of the deviant preschool child – a critical case study regarding development assessments of young children]. Malmö: Malmö University , Malmö Studies in Educational Sciences: Licentiate Dissertation Series 2006:2.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L., Dalli, C., & Urban, M. (2011). Early childhood grows up: Towards a critical ecology of the profession. In L. Miller, C. Dalli, & M. Urban (Eds.), Anthology. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• National Agency for Education. (2004). Kvalitetsindikatorer m.m. för förskoleverksamheten och skolbarnsomsorgen – uppdrag om resultatinformation. Del B2: Förslag till indikatorområden och indikatorer för verksamheters och kommuners kvalitetsredovisning för förskoleverksamhet och skolbarnsomsorg. (Regeringsuppdrag) [Indicators of quality etc. for preschool work and childcare – mission of information of results]. Retrieved from http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=1291
   Google Scholar
• National Agency for Education. (2008). Tio år efter förskolereformen: Nationell utvärdering av förskolan [Ten years after the preschool reform: National evaluation of preschool]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• National Agency for Education. (2010). Läroplan för förskolan Lpfö 1998, reviderad 2010 [Curriculum for preschool]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• National Agency for Education. (2012a). Systematiskt kvalitetsarbete - för skolväsendet. Skolverkets allmänna råd med kommentarer. (Systematic quality work - for education). Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• National Agency for Education. (2012b). Uppföljning, utvärdering och utveckling i förskolan: pedagogisk dokumentation. (Follow-up, evaluation and development in preschool: pedagogical documentation). Stockholm : Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S. (2002). The implication of visual research for discourse analysis: Transcription beyond language. Visual Communication, 1(1), 97–121. doi: 10.1177/147035720200100108
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). Starting strong III: A quality toolbox for early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Literature review on monitoring quality in early childhood education and care (ECEC). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J., Dahler-Larsen, P., Segerholm, C., & Simola, H. (Eds). (2011). Fabricating quality in education: Data and governance in Europe. Oxon: Routlegde.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. P., Gravesen, D. T., Hansen, M. A., & Lorentsen, B. H. (2013). Om pedagogers sociala strategier i et arbeidsliv under forandring [Educators social strategies in work place under change]. Nordisk Barnehageforskning, 6(4), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2010). Ska barns kunskaper testas eller deras kunnande utvecklas i förskolan? (Should childrensknowledge and knowing be tested in preschool?). Nordisk Barnehageforskning, 3(3), 159–167.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnerman, K. (2008). Medvetet kvalitetsarbete - en uppföljning av kursen Q i förskolan och dess inverkan på förskollärares handlingar i praktiken (Systematic quality work – an evaluation of the course Q in preschool and it's implication for preschool teachers' actions within practice) (IPD-rapport nr 2008:07).
   Google Scholar
• SFS 2010:800 Skollagen. (2010). Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S, Pramling Samuelsson, I, & Johansson, E. (2009). Barns tidiga lärande: En tvärsnittsstudie om förskolan som miljö för barns lärande. (The early learning of children: an interface-study of preschool as environment for childrens learning). Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S, & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2009). Barns lärande: Fokus i kvalitetsarbete. (Childrens learning: The focus of quality work). Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S. (2007). Dimensions of pedagogical quality in preschool. International Journal of Early Years Educations, 15(2), 197–217. doi: 10.1080/09669760701289151
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S., Williams, P., & Sandberg, A. (2013). Systematic quality work in preschool. International Journal of Early Childhood, 45(1), 123–150. doi: 10.1007/s13158-012-0076-8
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. W., Daunic, A. P., & Taylor, G. G. (2007). Treatment fidelity in applied educational research: Expanding the adoption and application of measures to ensure evidence-based practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 121–134. doi: 10.1353/etc.2007.0033
   Google Scholar
• Åsén, G., & Vallberg Roth, A.-C. (2012). Utvärdering i förskolan: En forskningsöversikt [Evaluation of preschool: a research overview]. Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie nr 6. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, D. (2005). Barndomspsykologi. Utveckling i en föränderlig värld. (Childhood psychology. Development in a changed world). Stockholm: Runa förlag.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish Schools Inspectorate. (2011). Förskolans pedagogiska uppdrag. Kvalitetsgranskning [The pedagogic mission of Preshool. Quality audit], rapport 2011:10. Stockholm: The Swedish Schools Inspectorate.
   Google Scholar
• Vallberg Roth, A-C. (2014). Bedömning i förskolors dokumentation - fenomen, begrepp och reglering. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 19(nr 4-5), 403–437.
   Google Scholar
• Vallberg Roth, A.-C. (2010). Bedömning i förskolans och skolans individuella utvecklingsplaner. In C Lundahl & M Folke-Fichtelius (Eds.), Bedömning i och av skolan: Praktik, principer, politik [Assessment in the development plans of preschools and schools] (pp. 49–67). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Vallberg Roth, A.-C. (2012). Different forms of assessment and documentation in Swedish preschools. Nordic Early Childhood Education Research, 5(23), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Vallberg Roth, A.-C. (2014). Bedömning i förskolors dokumentation – fenomen, begrepp och reglering. Pedagogisk Forskning I Sverige, tema bedömning och dokumentation, 19, nr4-5, pp. 403–437.
   Google Scholar
• Weed, M. (2008). A potential method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research: Issues in the development of ‘Meta interpretation’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(1), 13–28. doi: 10.1080/13645570701401222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennergren, A.-C., & Rönnerman, K. (2006). The relation between tools used in action research and the zone of proximal development. Educational Action Research, 14(4), 547–568. doi: 10.1080/09650790600975791
   Google Scholar