How action schemas are reflected in young children’s emerging language

References

• Arnold, C. (1999). +Child development and learning 2–5 years: Georgia’s story. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, C. (2003). Observing Harry: Child development and learning 0–5 years. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, C. (2015). Doing your child observation case study: A step by step guide. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, C. and the Pen Green Team (2010). Understanding schemas and emotion in early childhood. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Atherton, F., & Nutbrown, C. (2013). Understanding schemas and young children. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Athey, C. (1990). Extending thought in young children: A parent–teacher partnership. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Athey, C. (2007). Extending thought in young children: A parent–teacher partnership (2nd ed.). London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Athey, C. (2013). Chapter entitled ‘beginning with the theory about schemas’. In K. Mairs and the Pen Green Team (edited by Arnold, C.) (Ed.), Young children learning through schemas (pp. 5–16). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, T. (1997). Early childhood education. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992). Flow: The psychology of happiness. London: Rider.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Y. M., & Goodman, K. S. (1990). Chapter entitled ‘vygotsky in a whole-language perspective’. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education (pp. 223–250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A., & Kuhl, P. (1999). How babies think. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmer, T. (2017). Observing and developing schematic behaviour in young children. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, H. E., & Voneche, J. J. (1977). The essential piaget. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haylock, D., & Cockburn, A. (2013). Understanding mathematics for young children (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1964). The early growth of logic in the child: Classification and seriation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, S. (1930). Intellectual growth in young children. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, S. (1933). Social development in young children. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, E. I. (2004). Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and bahaviour. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(8), 1412–1425. doi: 10.1162/0898929042304796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laevers, F. (1993). Deep level learning. European Early Childhood Research, 1(1), 53–68. doi: 10.1080/13502939385207351
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mairs, K. and the Pen Green Team (edited by Arnold, C.). (2013). Young children learning through schemas. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. (2003). Drawing and painting children and visual representation (2nd ed.). London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Meade, A., and Cubey, P. (2008). Thinking children. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nutbrown, C. (2011). Threads of thinking: Schemas and young children’s learning (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2017). Bold Beginnings: The Reception curriculum in a sample of good and outstanding primary schools. Retrieved from www.gov.uk/ofsted
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1968). Quantification, conservation and nativism. Science, 162, 976–979. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3857.976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1973). Memory and intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, C. (1948). I learn from children. New York, NY: Cornerstone library.
   Google Scholar
• Proulx, J. (2006). Constructivism: A re-equilibration and clarification of the concepts, and some potential implications for teaching and pedagogy. Radical Pedagogy, 8(1), Spring, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siraj-Blatchford, J., & Brock, L. (2016). Putting the schema back into schema theory and practice: An introduction to SchemaPlay. Poole: SchemaPlay.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, E., Schoner, G., Scheier, C., & Smith, L. B. (2000). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 1–34. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01003910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind: The origins of thought and language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whalley, M. and the Pen Green Team. (2017). Involving parents in their children’s learning: A knowledge- sharing approach (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M. (2010). Language and literacy in the early years 0–7 (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar