A qualitative investigation of factors preventing parents of typically developed and SEN/D children from taking advantage of the two-year-old funding offer

References

• Antaki, C. (2002). Personalised revision of 'failed' questions. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 411–428.
   Google Scholar
• Avis, M., Bulman, D., & Leighton, P. (2007). Factors affecting participation in Sure Start programmes: A qualitative investigation of parents’ views. Health & Social Care in the Community, 15(3), 203–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, H. (2008). Hard-to-reach families: Engagement in the voluntary and community sector. London: Family and Parenting Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46. doi: 10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, V. (2004). Literacy and social inclusion: The policy challenge. London: National Literacy Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Boag-Munroe, G., & Evangelou, M. (2012). From hard to reach to how to reach: A systematic review of the literature on hard-to-reach families. Research Papers in Education, 27(2), 209–239. doi: 10.1080/02671522.2010.509515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brackertz, N., Zwart, I., Meredyth, D., & Ralston, L. (2005). Community consultation and the ‘hard to reach’. Victorian Local Government Association. p. 37.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Burhansstipanov, L., & Krebs, L. U. (2005). Reaching populations labeled ‘Hard-to-Reach’, Edict (Eliminating Disparities in Clinical Trials). Retrieved from <http://www.bcm.edu/edict/PDF/Reaching_Populations.pdf >
   Google Scholar
• Comley, P. (1996). The use of the Internet as a data collection method. SGA ESOMAR paper. SGA market research. Retrieved from http://www.sga.co.uk/esomar.html
   Google Scholar
• Cortis, N. (2012). Overlooked and under-served? Promoting service use and engagement among ‘hard-to-reach’populations. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(4), 351–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00825.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, M. (2005). Working with parents. Looking after children in primary care: A companion to the children’s NSF (pp. 42–50). London: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, G., & Davies, J. (2007). Hard to reach parents or hard to reach schools? A discussion of home – school relations, with particular reference to Bangladeshi and Pakistani parents. British Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 295–313. doi: 10.1080/01411920701243578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, N. (2003). Awkward customers? Parents and provision for special educational needs. Disability & Society, 18(3), 341–356. doi: 10.1080/0968759032000052905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Equality Bill. (2009). Parliament. House of Commons Bill no. 85. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Field, F. (2010). The Foundation years: Preventing poor children becoming poor adults. The report of the independent review on poverty and life chances. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, S. M., & Hancock, B. (2010). ‘Reaching the hard to reach'-lessons learned from the VCS (voluntary and community Sector). A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 10(1), 92. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghate, D., & Hazel, N. (2002). Parenting in poor environments: Stress, support and coping. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 103–121. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. (1994). Focus Groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Landy, S., & Menna, R. (2006). Early intervention with multi-risk families: An integrative approach. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lefever, S., Dal, M., & Matthiasdottir, A. (2007). Online data collection in academic research: Advantages and limitations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 574–582. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00638.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nores, M., & Barnett, W. S. (2010). Benefits of early childhood interventions across the world: (under) Investing in the very young. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 271–282. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314. doi: 10.1080/02602930701293231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2016). Towns and cities analysis, England and Wales, March 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Pinney, A., Ball, M., & Niven, L. (2007). A better start: children and families with special needs and disabilities in Sure Start local programmes.
   Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F., & Hungler, B. P. (1995). Nursing research: Principles and methods. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
   Google Scholar
• Snell-Johns, J., Mendez, J., & Smith, B. (2004). Evidence-based solutions for overcoming access barriers, decreasing attrition and promoting change with underserved families. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(1), 19–35. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.18.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springate, I., Atkinson, M., Straw, S., Lamont, E., & Grayson, H. (2008). Narrowing the gap in outcomes: Early years (0-5 Years). National Foundation for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2004). The effective provision of pre-school education (EPPE) project: Final report: A longitudinal study funded by the DfES 1997-2004. Institute of Education, University of London/Department for Education and Skills/Sure Start.
   Google Scholar
• Taanlia, A., Syrjala, L., Kokkoken, J., & Jarvelin, M. R. (2002). Coping of parents with physically and/or intellectually disabled children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 28(1), 73–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unwin, P., & White, S. (2001, March). Parent partnership services: The organisational dilemma. Special Children.
   Google Scholar
• Urhan, G. (2002). Families of children with cerebral palsy. Retrieved from http://www.sosyalhizmetuzmani.org/ cpaileleri.htm
   Google Scholar
• Winkworth, G., McArthur, M., Layton, M., Thomson, L., & Wilson, F. (2010). Opportunities lost – Why some parents of young children are not well-connected to the service systems designed to assist them. Australian Social Work, 63(4), 431–444. doi: 10.1080/0312407X.2010.508170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar