Aboard the helicopter: from adult science to early years (and back)

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy project 2061. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2017). NAP sample assessment science literacy public report 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Beckley, P., Compton, A., Johnston, J., & Marland, H. (2010). Problem solving, reasoning and numeracy. London: Continuum Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• British Science Week. (2017). British science week 2016. Retrieved from http://www.britishscienceassociation.org/bsw-2017
   Google Scholar
• Callanan, M. A. (2012). Conducting cognitive developmental research in museums: Theoretical issues and practical considerations. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13(2), 137–151. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2012.666730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Confederation of British Industry (CBI). (2016). Tomorrow’s world, Inspiring primary scientists. CBI and Brunel University London.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2015). Statutory guidance: National curriculum in England: Science programmes of study. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2017). Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. Ref: DFE-00169-2017 PDF, 552KB, 37 pages
   Google Scholar
• Gura, P. (Ed.). (1992). Exploring learning: Young children and blockplay. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hazen, R. M., & Trefil, J. (2009). Science matters. Achieving scientific literacy. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy. A teacher’s guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. doi: 10.1080/09500690601007549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Thompson, R. M. (2007). Using domain‐general principles to explain children's causal reasoning abilities. Developmental Science, 10(3), 333–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00586.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2006). Twenty-first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499–1521. doi: 10.1080/09500690600718344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM). (2016). A report: Science literacy. Concepts, contexts and consequences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2017). Bold beginnings: The reception curriculum in a sample of good and outstanding primary schools. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/663560/28933_Ofsted_-_Early_Years_Curriculum_Report_-_Accessible.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(3), 173–184. doi: 10.12973/ejmste/75396
   Google Scholar
• Sackes, M., Trundle, S., Bell, R. L., & O’Connell, A. A. (2011). The influence of early science experience in kindergarten on children’s immediate and later science achievement: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 217–235. doi: 10.1002/tea.20395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehjee, S. Q. (2017). Making scientists: Developing a model of science identity (Doctoral dissertation). Brunel University London, London.
   Google Scholar
• Salehjee, S. Q., & Watts, D. M. (2018). Models of scientific identity. In S. Pabst (Ed.), Science and technology education: Perspectives, opportunities and challenges (pp. 1–30). Hauppauge, NY: NOVA Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Salehjee, S. Q., & Watts, D. M. (2019/ in press). Becoming scientifc. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1960). What do scientists do? Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 5(1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Science and Learning Expert Group (SLEG). (Feb 2010). Science and Mathematics secondary education for the 21st century (HMSO). Retrieved from www.interactive.bis.gov.uk/scienceandsociety/ … /learning/ … /new-science-and-learning-expert-group-report/
   Google Scholar
• The Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted). (2013). Maintaining curiosity, report summary. November.
   Google Scholar
• Trundle, S. (2015). The inclusion of science in early childhood classrooms. In S. Trundle & M. Sackes (Eds.), Research in early childhood science education (pp. 1–6). Netherlands: Springer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. M. (2014). Explanations and explaining in science: You can’t force people to understand. In D. M. Watts (Ed.), Debates in science education (pp. 132–144). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. M. (2015). Public understanding of plant biology: Voices from the bottom of the garden. International Journal of Science Education, 5(4), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar