Clinical effectiveness and radial artery remodeling assessment via very-high-frequency ultrasound/ultra biomicroscopy after applying slender 7Fr sheath for transradial approach in left main bifurcation disease

References

• Thuijs D, Kappetein AP, Serruys PW, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10206):1325–1334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):2481–2489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Redfors B, Liu Y, et al. Radial versus femoral artery access in patients undergoing PCI for left main coronary artery disease: analysis from the EXCEL trial. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(10):1104–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid M, Kwok CS, Pancholy S, et al. Radial artery occlusion after transradial interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAHA. 2016;55(1):e002686.
   Google Scholar
• Aminian A, Iglesias JF, Van Mieghem C, et al. First prospective multicenter experience with the 7 French Glidesheath slender for complex transradial coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89(6):1014–1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund C, Friberg P, Gan LM. High-resolution radial artery intima-media thickness and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with suspected coronary artery disease-comparison with common carotid artery intima-media thickness. Atherosclerosis. 2012;221(1):118–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girasis C, Schuurbiers JC, Onuma Y, et al. Two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic models for bifurcation segmental analysis: in vitro validation of CAAS against precision manufactured plexiglas phantoms. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;77(6):830–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanmartin M, Goicolea J, Ocaranza R, et al. Vasoreactivity of the radial artery after transradial catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol. 2004;16(11):635–638.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang BB, Zhou YJ, Du J, et al. Comparison of very-high-frequency ultrasound assessment of radial arterial wall layers after first and repeated transradial coronary procedures. J Geriat Cardiol. 2017;14(4):245–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pancholy SB, Sanghvi KA, Patel TM. Radial artery access technique evaluation trial: randomized comparison of Seldinger versus modified Seldinger technique for arterial access for transradial catheterization. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent. 2012;80(2):288–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im E, Hong MK. Drug-eluting stents to prevent stent thrombosis and restenosis. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2016;14(1):87–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelor W, Dahya V, McGee D, et al. Ultrahigh-resolution ultrasound characterization of access site trauma and intimal hyperplasia following use of a 7F sheathless guide versus 6F sheath/guide combination for transradial artery PCI: results of the PRAGMATIC trial. Am Heart J. 2018;198:75–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg N, Madan BK, Khanna R, et al. Incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angioplasty: Doppler-guided follow-up study. J Invas Cardiol. 2015;27(2):106–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derimay F, Finet G, Souteyrand G, et al. Benefit of a new provisional stenting strategy, the re-proximal optimisation technique: the rePOT clinical study. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(3):e325–e332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Généreux P, Palmerini T, Caixeta A, et al. Quantification and impact of untreated coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: the residual SYNTAX (synergy between PCI with Taxus and cardiac surgery) score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(24):2165–2174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundeken MJ, Collet C, Ishibashi Y, et al. Visual estimation versus different quantitative coronary angiography methods to assess lesion severity in bifurcation lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91(7):1263–1270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone GW, Kappetein AP, Sabik JF, et al. Five-year outcomes after PCI or CABG for left main coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(19):1820–1830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head SJ, Milojevic M, Daemen J, et al. Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet (London, England). 2018;391(10124):939–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang SH, Ahn JM, Lee CH, et al. Differential event rates and independent predictors of long-term major cardiovascular events and death in 5795 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease treated with stents, bypass surgery, or medication: insights from a large international multicenter registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(7). DOI:10.1161/circinterventions.116.004988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlofmitz E, Genereux P, Chen S, et al. Left main coronary artery disease revascularization according to the SYNTAX Score. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(9):e008007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SL, Sheiban I, Xu B, et al. Impact of the complexity of bifurcation lesions treated with drug-eluting stents: the DEFINITION study (definitions and impact of complEx biFurcation lesIons on clinical outcomes after percutaNeous coronary IntervenTIOn using drug-eluting steNts). JACC Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014;7(11):1266–1276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu S, Geng T, et al. One-stent versus two-stent techniques for distal unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(8):14363–14370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zandvoort LJC, Tovar Forero MN, Masdjedi K, et al. References for left main stem dimensions: a cross sectional intravascular ultrasound analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;193(2):233–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ando T, Aoi S, Ashraf S, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention of left main disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;94(2):264–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelor W, Dahya V, Tehrani B, et al. Radial artery remodeling following transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in men and women: insights from serial ultrahigh frequency ultrasonography. Cardiovasc Revascular Med. 2020;21(3):286–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kala P, Kanovsky J, Novakova T, et al. Radial artery neointimal hyperplasia after transradial PCI-Serial optical coherence tomography volumetric study. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0185404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar