376
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Rheumatology

Cost–utility analysis of second-line therapy with rituximab compared to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 157-166 | Received 25 May 2020, Accepted 31 Oct 2020, Published online: 18 Nov 2020

References

  • Matcham F, Scott IC, Rayner L, et al. The impact of rheumatoid arthritis on quality-of-life assessed using the SF-36: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;44(2):123–130.
  • Bombardier C, Hawker G, Mosher D. The impact of arthritis in Canada: today and over the next 30 years. Arthritis Alliance Can. 2011:1–52.
  • Bykerk VP, Akhavan P, Hazlewood GS, Canadian Rheumatology Association, et al. Canadian Rheumatology Association recommendations for pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis with traditional and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(8):1559–1582.
  • Pope JE, Haraoui B, Rampakakis E, on behalf of the Optimization of Adalimumab Trial Investigators, et al. Treating to a target in established active rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving a tumornecrosis factor inhibitor: results from a real-world cluster-randomized Adalimumab trial. Arthritis Care Res.2013;65(9):1401–1409.
  • Schipper LG, Vermeer M, Kuper HH, et al. A tight control treatment strategy aiming for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis is more effective than usual care treatment in daily clinical practice: a study of two cohorts in the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(6):845–850.
  • Stoffer MA, Schoels MM, SmolenJS, et al. Evidence for treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: results of a systematic literature search update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(1):16–22.
  • Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges, SL, Jr. et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(1):1–26.
  • Favalli EG, Raimondo MG, Becciolini A, et al. The management of first-line biologic therapy failures in rheumatoid arthritis: current practice and future perspectives. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16(12):1185–1195.
  • Todoerti M, Favalli EG, Iannone F, et al. Switch or swap strategy in rheumatoid arthritis patients failing TNF inhibitors? Results of a modified Italian Expert Consensus. Rheumatology. 2018;57(Suppl 7):vii42–vii53.
  • Fragoulis GE, McInnes IB, Siebert S. JAK-inhibitors. New players in the field of immune-mediated diseases, beyond rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2019;58(Suppl 1):i43–i54.
  • Choquette D, Bessette L, Haraoui B, et al. Use of rituximab compared to TNFi agents as second and third line therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 6-year follow-up report from the Rhumadata® clinical database and registry. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:615–616.
  • Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
  • Malottki K, Barton P, Tsourapas A, et al. Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis after the failure of a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15(14):1–278.
  • Pennington B, Davis S. Mapping from the Health Assessment Questionnaire to the EQ-5D: the impact of different algorithms on cost-effectiveness results. Value Health. 2014;17(8):762–771.
  • Manders SH, Kievit W, Adang E, et al. Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab, and TNFi treatment after previous failure with TNFi treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17(1):134.
  • Joensuu JT, Huoponen S, Aaltonen KJ, et al. The cost-effectiveness of biologics for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. PLOS One.2015;10(3):e0119683.
  • Brown S, Everett CC, Naraghi K, et al. Alternative tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or abatacept or rituximab following failure of initial TNFi in rheumatoid arthritis: the SWITCH RCT. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2018 Jun. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 22.34.); 2019 [cited 2019 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507299/.
  • Tsao NW, Bansback NJ, Shojania K, et al. The issue of comparators in economic evaluations of biologic response modifiers in rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26(5):659–676.
  • Neumann PJ, Cohen JT. QALYs in 2018-advantages and concerns. JAMA. 2018;319(24):2473–2474.
  • TreeAge Pro. TreeAge Software. Williamstown (MA). Available from: http://www.treeage.com.
  • Rhumadata. Rhumadata Portail. 2019. Available from: https://rhumadata.info/.
  • Bruce B, Fries J. The health assessment questionnaire (HAQ). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(5 Suppl 39):S14–S18.
  • EQ-5D | EQ-5D Instruments | About EQ-5D [cited 2019 Apr 1]. Available from: https://euroqol.org/.
  • Barton P, Jobanputra P, Wilson J, et al. The use of modelling to evaluate new drugs for patients with a chronic condition: the case of antibodies against tumour necrosis factor in rheumatoid arthritis. In: NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme: Executive Summaries. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2003.
  • Drummond MF, Barbieri M, Wong J. Analytic choices in economic models of treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: what makes a difference? Med Decis Making. 2005;25(5):520–533.
  • Liste de Médicamentspubliéepar la Régie de l’assurancemaladie du Québec. Service des relations avec la clientele.Québec; 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 8]. Available from: https://www.ramq.gouv.qc.ca/sites/default/files/documents/liste-med-2020-07-08-en.pdf.
  • Régie de l'assurancemaladie du Québec. Médecinsspécialistes–Manuel et guide de facturation [cited 2020 Sep 8]. Available from: http://www.ramq.gouv.qc.ca/fr/professionnels/medecins-specialistes/manuels/Pages/remuneration-acte.aspx.
  • Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Canada. 4th ed. Ottawa: CADTH; 2017.
  • Briggs A, Sculpher M, Claxton K. Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford: OUP Oxford; 2006.
  • Briggs AH, Weinstein MC, Fenwick EA, ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force, et al. Model parameter estimation and uncertainty: a report of the ISPOR-SMDMModeling Good Research Practices Task Force-6. Value Health. 2012;15(6):835–842.
  • StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13.College Station(TX): StataCorp LP.; 2013.
  • SAS [computer program]. Version 9.4. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc; 2014.
  • Pope JE, Khanna D, Norrie D, et al. The minimally important difference for the health assessment questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis clinical practice is smaller than in randomized controlled trials. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(2):254–259.
  • Dakin H, Abel L, Burns R, et al. Review and critical appraisal of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D: an online database and application of the MAPS statement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):31.
  • Barnabe C, Thanh NX, Ohinmaa A, et al. Healthcare service utilisation costs are reduced when rheumatoid arthritis patients achieve sustained remission. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(10):1664–1668.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.