6,103
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Oncology

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of abemaciclib for the treatment of HR+, HER2− metastatic breast cancer

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1179-1187 | Received 04 Jan 2021, Accepted 26 Apr 2021, Published online: 20 May 2021

References

  • Cardoso F, Senkus E, Costa A, et al. 4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4). Ann Oncol. 2018;29(8):1634–1657.
  • Dhillon S. Palbociclib: first global approval. Drugs. 2015;75:541–543.
  • Syed YY. Ribociclib: first global approval. Drugs. 2017;77:799–807.
  • Kim ES. Abemaciclib: first global approval. Drugs. 2017;77:2063–2070.
  • Dickler MN, Tolaney SM, Rugo HS, et al. MONARCH 1, a phase II study of abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor, as a single agent, in patients with refractory HR(+)/HER2(−) metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(17):5218–5224.
  • Goetz MP, Toi M, Campone M, et al. MONARCH 3: abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3638–3646.
  • Johnston S, Martin M, Di Leo A, et al. MONARCH 3 final PFS: a randomized study of abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019;5:5.
  • Neven P, Johnston SRD, Toi M, et al. MONARCH 2: subgroup analysis of patients receiving abemaciclib + fulvestrant as first- and second-line therapy for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15):1061–1061.
  • Rugo HS, Tolaney SM, Cortes J, et al. MONARCH 1: final overall survival analysis of a phase 2 study of abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor, as monotherapy, in patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer, after chemotherapy for advanced disease. Cancer Res. 2017;77(13):CT044.
  • Sledge GW, Jr, Toi M, Neven P, et al. The effect of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant on overall survival in hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy - MONARCH 2: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(1):116–124.
  • Sledge GW, Jr, Toi M, Neven P, et al. MONARCH 2: abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer who had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(25):2875–2884.
  • Schneeweiss S, Gagne JJ, Glynn RJ, et al. Assessing the comparative effectiveness of newly marketed medications: methodological challenges and implications for drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;90:777–790.
  • Ma X, Long L, Moon S, et al. Comparison of population characteristics in real-world clinical oncology databases in the US: Flatiron Health, SEER, and NPCR [Internet]. New York (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 9]. Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.16.20037143v2
  • Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383.
  • Quan H, Li B, Couris C, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:676–682.
  • Griffith SD, Tucker M, Bowser B, et al. Generating real-world tumor burden endpoints from electronic health record data: comparison of RECIST, radiology-anchored, and clinician-anchored approaches for abstracting real-world progression in non-small cell lung cancer. Adv Ther. 2019;36:2122–2136.
  • National Cancer Institute [Internet]. Cancer therapy evaluation program. Bethesda (MD): Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5. 2020 [cited 2020 July 8]. Available from: https://ctep.Cancer.Gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.Htm#ctc_50
  • Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–247.
  • Feinberg BA, Bharmal M, Klink AJ, et al. Using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors in real-world evidence cancer research. Future Oncol. 2018;14:2841–2848.
  • Rugo HS, Sledge GW, Johnston SRD, et al. The association of early toxicity and outcomes for patients treated with abemaciclib [abstract. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(15):1053–1053.
  • Rugo HS, Tolaney SM, Huober J, et al. Management of abemaciclib associated adverse events in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2- advanced breast cancer: analysis of the MONARCH trials. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(8):viii90–viii121.
  • Rassen JA, Schneeweiss S. Newly marketed medications present unique challenges for nonrandomized comparative effectiveness analyses. J Comp Eff Res. 2012;1:109–111.
  • Di Leo A, O’Shaughnessy J, Sledge GW Jr, et al. Prognostic characteristics in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer and characterization of abemaciclib efficacy. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2018;4(1):41.
  • Mehta RS, Barlow WE, Albain KS, et al. Overall survival with fulvestrant plus anastrozole in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1226–1234.