Translation, adaptation and psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the numerical rating scale when used with children and adolescents

References

• IASP Task force on Taxonomy. In Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. 2nd edition. Seattle, USA: IASP Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• King S, Chambers CT, Huguet A, et al. The epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents revisited: a systematic review. PAIN. 2011;152(12):2729–2738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupples PA. Chronic pain in children. Anaesth Intensive Care Med. 2013;14(12):517–519.
   Google Scholar
• Schug SA, Lavand'homme P, Barke A, et al. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic postsurgical or posttraumatic pain. Pain. 2019;160(1):45–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessica F, Huijer H, Miró J. Chronic pain in young people: the situation in Lebanon. Leban Med J. 2021;69:30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Tang SP, Yeo ASH, Cardosa MS. Paediatric pain management in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021;5(1):5–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen MP, Castarlenas E, Roy R, et al. The utility and construct validity of four measures of pain intensity: results from a university-based study in Spain. Pain Med. 2019;20(12):2411–2420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Rodríguez E, Miró J, Castarlenas E. A comparison of four self-report scales of pain intensity in 6- to 8-year-old children. Pain. 2012;153(8):1715–1719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castarlenas E, Jensen MP, von Baeyer CL, et al. Psychometric properties of the numerical rating scale to assess self-reported pain intensity in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2017;33(4):376–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atoui M, Kurdahi Badr L, Drenttel Brand T, et al. The daily experiences of adolescents in Lebanon with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr Health Care. 2015;29(5):424–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miró J, Huguet A. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and preference for a pediatric pain intensity scale: the catalan version of the faces pain scale – revised. Pain. 2004;111(1):59–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salameh Y. How many countries speak Arabic around the world? Tarjama. 2021. Available from: https://www.tarjama.com/how-many-countries-that-speak-arabic-around-the-world/
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census. 1 Million Arab Americans in the United States. PRB. 2000. Available from: https://www.prb.org/resources/1-million-arab-americans-in-the-united-states/.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. Refugee Statistics. 2020. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. Arab States. 2019 GEM Report. 2021. Available from: https://www.unesco.org/reports/science/2021/en/arab-states.
   Google Scholar
• Miró J, Castarlenas E, Huguet A. Evidence for the use of a numerical rating scale to assess the intensity of pediatric pain. Eur J Pain. 2009;13(10):1089–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsze DS, von Baeyer CL, Pahalyants V, et al. Validity and reliability of the verbal numerical rating scale for children aged 4 to 17 years with acute pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(6):691–702.e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Baeyer CL. Numerical rating scale for self-report of pain intensity in children and adolescents: recent progress and further questions. Eur J Pain. 2009;13(10):1005–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong AEE, Bremer M, Schouten M, et al. Reliability and validity of the pain observation scale for young children and the visual analogue scale in children with burns. Burns. 2005;31(2):198–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahl C, Cleland JA. Visual analogue scale, numeric pain rating scale and the McGill pain questionnaire: an overview of psychometric properties. Phys Ther Rev. 2005;10(2):123–128.
   Google Scholar
• Le May S, Ballard A, Khadra C, et al. Comparison of the psychometric properties of 3 pain scales used in the pediatric emergency department: visual analogue scale, faces pain scale-revised, and colour analogue scale. Pain. 2018;159(8):1508–1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields BJ, Cohen DM, Harbeck-Weber C, et al. Pediatric pain measurement using a visual analogue scale: a comparison of two teaching methods. Clin Pediatr. 2003;42(3):227–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crombez G, Bijttebier P, Eccleston C, et al. The child version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS-C): a preliminary validation. Pain. 2003;104(3):639–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cederberg JT, Weineland S, Dahl JA, et al. A preliminary validation of the Swedish version of the pain catastrophizing scale for children (PCS-C) for children and adolescents with cancer. J Pain Res. 2019;12:1803–1811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solé E, Castarlenas E, Miró J. A Catalan adaptation and validation of the pain catastrophizing scale for children. Psychol Assess. 2016;28(6):e119–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay I, Beaulieu Y, Bernier A, et al. Pain catastrophizing scale for francophone adolescents: a preliminary validation. Pain Res Manag. 2008;13(1):19–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miró J. Translation, validation, and adaptation of an instrument to assess the information-seeking style of coping with stress: the Spanish version of the miller behavioral style scale. Pers Individ Differ. 1997;23(5):909–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient-Reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation background and rationale. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thong ISK, Jensen MP, Miró J, et al. The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure? Scand J Pain. 2018;18(1):99–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrando PJ. Difficulty, discrimination, and information indices in the linear factor analysis model for continuous item responses. Appl Psychol Meas. 2009;33(1):9–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller WA. Measurement error models. Ames: John Wiley & Sons. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock GR. Correlation validity coefficients disattenuated for score reliability: a structural equation modeling approach. Educ Psychol Meas. 1997;57(4):598–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diedenhofen B, Musch J. Cocor: a comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLOS One. 2015;10(4):e0121945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancey CP, Reidy J. Statistics without maths for psychology. London: Pearson; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• nie nh, Bent DH, Hull CH. SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. Lisrel 8.80. Scientific software international inc. Lincolnwood, IL; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey B, Daoust R, Doyon-Trottier E, et al. Validation and properties of the verbal numeric scale in children with acute pain. PAIN®. 2010;149(2):216–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castarlenas E, Miró J, Sánchez-Rodríguez E. Is the verbal numerical rating scale a valid tool for assessing pain intensity in children below 8 years of age? J Pain. 2013;14(3):297–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruskin D, Lalloo C, Amaria K, et al. Assessing pain intensity in children with chronic pain: convergent and discriminant validity of the 0 to 10 numerical rating scale in clinical practice. Pain Res Manag. 2014;19(3):141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsze DS, von Baeyer CL, Pahalyants V, et al. Validity and Reliability of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale in Children Aged 4 to 17 Years with Acute Pain. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Castarlenas E, Sánchez-Rodríguez E, de La Vega R, et al. Agreement between verbal and electronic versions of the numerical rating scale (NRS-11) when used to assess pain intensity in adolescents. Clin J Pain. 2015;31(3):229–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob E, McCarthy KS, Sambuco G, et al. Intensity, location, and quality of pain in Spanish-Speaking children with cancer. Pediatr Nurs. 2008;34(1):45–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Könning A, Rosenthal N, Brown D, et al. Severity of chronic pain in German adolescent school students: a cross-sectional study. Clin J Pain. 2021;37(2):118–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miró J, Solé E, Castarlenas E, et al. The survey of pain attitudes: a revised version of its pediatric form. Scand J Pain. 2016;11:90–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roth-Isigkeit A, Thyen U, Raspe H, et al. Reports of pain among German children and adolescents: an epidemiological study. Acta Paediatr. 2004;93(2):258–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent B, Horle B, Wood C. Evaluation de la douleur chez l’enfant. Traité EMC Pediatrie, EMC. 2009;4(1):1–170. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Rodríguez E, de la Vega R, Castarlenas E, et al. An APP for the assessment of pain intensity: validity properties and agreement of pain reports when used with young people. Pain Med. 2015;16(10):1982–1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huguet A, Miró J. Development and psychometric evaluation of a Catalan self- and interviewer-administered version of the pediatric quality of life Inventory version 4.0. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008;33(1):63–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieri D, Reeve RA, Champion GD, et al. The faces pain scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties. Pain. 1990;41(2):139–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford PA, et al. The faces pain scale – revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain. 2001;93(2):173–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar