Development of Social Determinants of Health Screening Tool (SDoHST): qualitative validation with stakeholders and patients in South Australia

References

• WHO. Commission of Social Determinants of Health: Final Summary. Geneva; 2008. p. 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's health 2020: in brief. Australia's health series no. 17 Cat no AUS 232. Canberra: AIHW; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Neadley KE, McMichael G, Freeman T, et al. Capturing the social determinants of health at the individual level: a pilot study. Public Health Res Pract. 2021;31(2):30232008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler N, Stead W. Patients in context– EHR capture of social and behavioral determinants of health. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):698–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler N, Glymour M, Fielding J. Addressing social determinants of health and health inequalities. JAMA. 2016;316(16):1641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler S. Building blocks for addressing social determinants of health. JAMA. 2017;318(19):1855–1856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibbins-Domingo K. Integrating social care into the delivery of health care. JAMA. 2019;322(18):1763–1764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IOM. Capturing social and behavioural domains and measures in electronic health records: phase 2. Washington (DC): IOM; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb L, Wing H, Adler N. A systematic review of interventions on patients’ social and economic needs. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53(5):719–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis LL, Kogan R, Hanson L. A guide to using the accountable health communities health-related social needs screening tool. Mathe Policy Res. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Billioux A, Verlander K, Anthony S, et al. Standardized screening for health-related social needs in clinical settings: the accountable health communities screening tool. NAM Perspect. 2017;7(5).
   Google Scholar
• Henrikson NB, Blasi PR, Dorsey CN, et al. Psychometric and pragmatic properties of social risk screening tools: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2019;57(6): s13–S24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furr RM, Bacharach VR. Psychometrics: an introduction. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Zakershahrak M, Ribeiro Santiago PH, Sethi S, et al. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L in South Australia: a multi-method non-preference-based validation study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2022;38:673–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago PHR, Nielsen T, Smithers LG, et al. Measuring stress in Australia: validation of the perceived stress scale (PSS-14) in a nationally representative sample. 2020. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Browne-Yung K, Freeman T, Battersby M, et al. Developing a screening tool to recognise social determinants of health in Australian clinical settings. Public Health Res Pract. 2019;29(4):e28341813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brod M, Tesler LE, Christensen TL. Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(9):1263–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York (NY): Aldine Publications Co.; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Frost MHR, Reeve BBP, Liepa AMP, et al. What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of Patient-Reported outcome measures? Value in Health. 2007;10:S94–S105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, et al. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):533–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. AJTAS. 2016;5(1):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Masadeh MA. Focus group: reviews and practices. J Appl Sci Technol. 2012;2(10).
   Google Scholar
• Deng Q, Liu W. Physical exercise, social interaction, access to care, and community service: mediators in the relationship between socioeconomic status and health among older patients with diabetes. Front Public Health. 2020;8:589742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ, Patton MQ, Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Noble H, Smith J. Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs. 2015;18(2):34–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pham TTL, Berecki-Gisolf J, Clapperton A, et al. Definitions of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD): a literature review of epidemiological research in Australia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie SA, Hassan A, Krull EG, et al. Assessing and referring adolescents’ health-related social problems: qualitative evaluation of a novel web-based approach. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(7):392–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodey B, Addington J, First M, et al. The early psychosis screener (EPS): item development and qualitative validation. Schizophr Res. 2018;197:504–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware NC, Tugenberg T, Dickey B. Ethnography and measurement in mental health: qualitative validation of a measure of continuity of care (CONNECT). Qual Health Res. 2003;13(10):1393–1406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware NC, Dickey B, Tugenberg T, et al. CONNECT: a measure of continuity of care in mental health services. Ment Health Serv Res. 2003;5(4):209–221.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown A, Mentha R, Howard M, et al. Men, hearts and minds: developing and piloting culturally specific psychometric tools assessing psychosocial stress and depression in Central Australian aboriginal men. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016;51(2):211–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallinson S. Listening to respondents: a qualitative assessment of the Short-Form 36 health status questionnaire. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(1):11–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godderis R, Adair CE, Brager N. Applying new techniques to an old ally: a qualitative validation study of the edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Women Birth. 2009;22(1):17–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kosinski M, Gajria K, Fernandes A, et al. Qualitative validation of the FACIT-fatigue scale in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2013;22(5):422–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt S. The problem of quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1997;205–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hak T, Willems D, van der Wal G, et al. A qualitative validation of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(2):417–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ. Selection bias and Self-Selection. In: Durlauf SN, Blume LE, editors. Microeconometrics. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2010. p. 242–266.
   Google Scholar
• Costigan CL, Cox MJ. Fathers’ participation in family research: is there a self-selection bias? J Fam Psychol. 2001;15(4):706–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar