Cold polypectomy techniques for small and diminutive colorectal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

References

• Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abuelazm MT, Abdelnabi M, Mahmoud A, et al. The impact of abdominal compression devices on colonoscopy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2023;39(9):1247–1256. doi:10.1080/03007995.2023.2243214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, Løberg M, et al. Population-based colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer : a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(7):894–902. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(8):687–696. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1100370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenfels AB, Williams JL, Holub JL, et al. Determinants of polyp size in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11(1):101. doi:10.1186/1471-230X-11-101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaltenbach T, Anderson JC, Burke CA, et al. Endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions: recommendations by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(3):435–464. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy. 2017;49(3):270–297. doi:10.1055/s-0043-102569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitman SJ, Tate DJ, Bourke MJ. Optimizing resection of large colorectal polyps. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2017;15(1):213–229. doi:10.1007/s11938-017-0131-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hewett DG, Rex DK. Colonoscopy and diminutive polyps: hot or cold biopsy or snare? Do I send to pathology? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(2):102–105. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2010.09.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh N, Harrison M, Rex DK. A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60(3):414–418. doi:10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01808-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda T, Kawano H, Hisabe T, et al. Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of diminutive colorectal polyps. Dig Endosc. 2014;26 Suppl 2(S2):104–108. doi:10.1111/den.12281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shin SJ, Lee S-H, Park DI, et al. A Korean national survey for treatment modality in Colon polypectomy. Intest Res. 2011;9(3):196. doi:10.5217/ir.2011.9.3.196.
   Google Scholar
• Draganov PV, Chang MN, Alkhasawneh A, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of standard, large-capacity versus jumbo biopsy forceps for polypectomy of small, sessile, colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(1):118–126. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslan F, Alper E, Akpinar Z, et al. Tu1497 comparison of jumbo biopsy forceps and standard biopsy forceps in the treatment of small colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(5):AB561. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2013.03.978.
   Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Handb Syst Rev Interv. 2019;1–694.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki S, Gotoda T, Kusano C, et al. Width and depth of resection for small colorectal polyps: hot versus cold snare polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(4):1095–1103. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2017.10.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu J, Jian H, Li L, et al. Effectiveness and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy: a meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;34(1):49–58. doi:10.1111/jgh.14464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papastergiou V, Paraskeva KD, Fragaki M, et al. Cold versus hot endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6–10 mm: a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2018;50(4):403–411. doi:10.1055/s-0043-118594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamura T, Takeuchi Y, Asai S, et al. A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study). Gut. 2018;67(11):1950–1957. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innovation VH. Covidence systematic review software [Internet]. Melbourne, Australia; Available from: http://www.covidence.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343(7829):d5928. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d5928
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Owen RK, Bradbury N, Xin Y, et al. MetaInsight: an interactive web-based tool for analyzing, interrogating, and visualizing network meta-analyses using R-shiny and netmeta. Res Synth Methods. 2019;10(4):569–581. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R core team 2021 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. R Found Stat Comput. 2021;2:2019. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rücker G, Schwarzer G, Krahn U, et al. netmeta: Network meta-analysis using frequentist methods. R package version 0.9-8. 2016. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=netmeta.
   Google Scholar
• Yen AW, Leung JW, Wilson MD, et al. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic resection of nondiminutive nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a prospective randomized controlled trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(3):643–654.e2. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.gie.2019.09.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei MT, Louie CY, Chen Y, et al. Randomized controlled trial investigating use of submucosal injection of EverLiftTM in rates of complete resection of non-pedunculated 4–9 mm polyps. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022;37(6):1273–1279. Available from: doi:10.1007/s00384-022-04136-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei MT, Louie CY, Chen Y, et al. Randomized controlled trial investigating cold snare and forceps polypectomy among small POLYPs in rates of complete resection: the TINYPOLYP trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022;117(8):1305–1310. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai S, Gupta S, Copur-Dahi N, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing jumbo biopsy forceps to cold snare for the resection of diminutive colorectal polyps. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(3):1206–1213. Available from: doi:10.1007/s00464-019-06874-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatima H, Rex DK, Imperiale T. A pilot randomized trial of polypectomy techniques for 4 to 6 mm colonic polyps. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022;56(5):426–432. doi:10.1097/MCG.0000000000001571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horiuchi A, Hosoi K, Kajiyama M, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of 2 methods of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(4):686–692. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2015.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez V, Badillo R, Crook J, et al. Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3(1):C1. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1391366.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rex DK, Anderson JC, Pohl H, et al. Cold versus hot snare resection with or without submucosal injection of 6- to 15-mm colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;96(2):330–338. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CK, Shim JJ, Jang JY. Cold snare polypectomy vs. cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(10):1593–1600. doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Wang W, Xie J, et al. Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6–20 mm colorectal polyps. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020;55(3):362–370. Available from: doi:10.1080/00365521.2020.1732456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung YS, Kwon H, Han J, et al. Underwater versus conventional cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps 4–9 mm in diameter: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(9):6527–6534. Available from: doi:10.1007/s00464-022-09013-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh CW, Kim JS, Choi HH, et al. Jumbo biopsy forceps versus cold snares for removing diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90(1):105–111. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JS, Lee BI, Choi H, et al. Cold snare polypectomy versus cold forceps polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(3):741–747. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimodate Y, Itakura J, Takayama H, et al. Impact of submucosal saline solution injection for cold snare polypectomy of small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92(3):715–722.e1. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidhu M, Forbes N, Tate DJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cold snare polypectomy technique: technique matters more than snare wire diameter. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022;117(1):100–100. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SK, Ko BM, Han JP, et al. A prospective randomized comparative study of cold forceps polypectomy by using narrow-band imaging endoscopy versus cold snare polypectomy in patients with diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(3):527–532.e1. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrod G, Perez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Coron E, et al. Comparison of cold biopsy forceps vs cold snare for diminutive colorectal polyp removal: a multicenter non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2022;46(3):101867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MJ, Na SY, Kim JS, et al. Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(5):3789–3795. doi:10.1007/s00464-023-09875-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung YS, Park CH, Nam E, et al. Comparative efficacy of cold polypectomy techniques for diminutive colorectal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(3):1149–1159. doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5786-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Siersema PD, Desai M. Is jumbo biopsy forceps comparable to cold snare for diminutive colorectal polyps? – a meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2021;9(1):E9–E13. doi:10.1055/a-1293-6965.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ichise Y, Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for small colorectal polyps. Digestion. 2011;84(1):78–81. doi:10.1159/000323959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abuelazm M, Mohamed I, Jaber FS, et al. Cold versus hot snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023;57(8):760–773. https://journals.lww.com/jcge/Abstract/9900/Cold_Versus_Hot_Snare_Polypectomy_for_Colorectal.135.aspx. doi:10.1097/MCG.0000000000001837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uraoka T, Ramberan H, Matsuda T, et al. Cold polypectomy techniques for diminutive polyps in the colorectum. Dig Endosc. 2014;26 Suppl 2(S2):98–103. doi:10.1111/den.12252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Din S, Ball AJ, Riley SA, et al. Cold snare polypectomy: does snare type influence outcomes? Dig Endosc. 2015;27(5):603–608. doi:10.1111/den.12431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda H, Takeuchi Y, Shoji A, et al. Curative value of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for submucosally invasive colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;36(9):2471–2478. doi:10.1111/jgh.15513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Park SJ, Lee JH, et al. Is forceps more useful than visualization for measurement of Colon polyp size? World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(11):3220–3226. doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohsiriwat V. Colonoscopic perforation: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(4):425–430. doi:10.3748/wjg.v16.i4.425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar