References
- Collins SP, Levy PD, Holl JL, et al. Incorporating patient and caregiver experiences into cardiovascular clinical trial design. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(11):1263–1269. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3606.
- Yeoman G, Furlong P, Seres M, et al. Defining patient centricity with patients for patients and caregivers: a collaborative endeavour. BMJ Innov. 2017;3(2):76–83. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2016-000157.
- Harrington RL, Hanna ML, Oehrlein EM, et al. Defining patient engagement in research: results of a systematic review and analysis: report of the ISPOR patient-centered special interest group. Value Health. 2020;23(6):677–688. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.019.
- Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.
- Vat LE, Finlay T, Schuitmaker-Warnaar TJ, et al. Evaluating the “return on patient engagement initiatives” in medicines research and development: a literature review. Health Expect. 2020;23(1):5–18. doi: 10.1111/hex.12951.
- Frith L. Democratic justifications for patient public involvement and engagement in health research: an exploration of the theoretical debates and practical challenges. J Med Philos. 2023;48(4):400–412. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhad024.
- Perestelo-Pérez L, Rivero-Santana A, Abt-Sacks A, et al. Patient empowerment and involvement in research. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1031:249–264. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_15.
- Williamson C. The patient movement as an emancipation movement. Health Expect. 2008;11(2):102–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00475.x.
- Nierse CJ, Schipper K, van Zadelhoff E, et al. Collaboration and co-ownership in research: dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team. Health Expect. 2012;15(3):242–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00661.x.
- Staley K, Abbey-Vital I, Nolan C. The impact of involvement on researchers: a learning experience. Res Involv Engagem. 2017;3(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0071-1.
- Parkinson’s UK. Patient and public involvement in research. [cited 2022 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.parkinsons.org.uk/research/patient-and-public-involvement-research
- Diabetes UK. Patient and public involvement. Guidance for researchers. [cited 2022 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.diabetes.org.uk/resources-s3/2017-09/0983_PPI%20resource_guidance-document_DL_v5.pdf
- National Institute for Health and Care Research. INVOLVE. Briefing notes for researchers: public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. [cited 2022 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/9938_INVOLVE_Briefing_Notes_WEB.pdf
- National Health Service. Health Research Authority. Public involvement. [cited 2022 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/best-practice/public-involvement/
- Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Patient involvement strategy: one year on. [cited 2023 Jul 17]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/patient-involvement-strategy-one-year-on/patient-involvement-strategy-one-year-on
- Boutin M, Dewulf L, Hoos A, et al. Culture and process change as a priority for patient engagement in medicines development. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017;51(1):29–38. doi: 10.1177/2168479016659104.
- Smith SK, Selig W, Harker M, et al. Patient engagement practices in clinical research among patient groups, industry, and academia in the United States: a survey. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140232.
- Ocloo J, Garfield S, Franklin BD, et al. Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a systematic review of reviews. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00644-3.
- Spinner JR, Haynes E, Nunez C, et al. Enhancing FDA's reach to minorities and under-represented groups through training: developing culturally competent health education materials. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021;12:21501327211003688. doi: 10.1177/21501327211003688.
- Mathur S, DeWitte S, Robledo I, et al. Rising to the challenges of clinical trial improvement in Parkinson’s disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2015;5(2):263–268. doi: 10.3233/JPD-150541.
- Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
- Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
- Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(12):1291–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013.
- Davis K, Drey N, Gould D. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(10):1386–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.010.
- Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
- Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141–146. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050.
- Sarrami-Foroushani P, Travaglia J, Debono D, et al. Scoping meta-review: introducing a new methodology. Clin Transl Sci. 2015;8(1):77–81. doi: 10.1111/cts.12188.
- Schultz A, Goertzen L, Rothney J, et al. A scoping approach to systematically review published reviews: adaptations and recommendations. Res Synth Methods. 2018;9(1):116–123. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1272.
- Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4.
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
- Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850.
- Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. Res Involv Engagem. 2017;3(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0062-2.
- Fierce Pharma. The top 20 pharma companies by 2021 revenue. [cited 2022 Apr 29]. Available from: https://www.fiercepharma.com/special-reports/top-20-pharma-companies-2021-revenue
- Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(3):398–405. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12048.
- European Patients’ Forum. The value + toolkit. [cited 2022 May 9]. Available from: https://www.eu-patient.eu/globalassets/projects/valueplus/value-toolkit.pdf
- FasterCures. Milken Institute. Expanding the science of patient input: the power of language. [cited 2022 May 9]. Available from: https://milkeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/reports-pdf/Expanding%20the%20Science%20of%20Patient%20Input-The%20Power%20of%20Language_0.pdf
- Pizzo E, Doyle C, Matthews R, et al. Patient and public involvement: how much do we spend and what are the benefits? Health Expect. 2015;18(6):1918–1926. doi: 10.1111/hex.12204.
- National Institute for Health and Care Research. Going the extra mile: improving the nation’s health and wellbeing through public involvement in research. [cited 2022 May 9]. Available from: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/about-us/our-contribution-to-research/how-we-involve-patients-carers-and-the-public/Going-the-Extra-Mile.pdf
- Patient Focused Medicines Development. Patient centricity – a collaborative definition. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://patientfocusedmedicine.org/patient-centricity-collaborative-definition/
- Boudes M, Robinson P, Bertelsen N, et al. What do stakeholders expect from patient engagement: are these expectations being met? Health Expect. 2018;21(6):1035–1045. doi: 10.1111/hex.12797.
- Hoddinott P, Pollock A, O’Cathain A, et al. How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research. F1000Research. 2018;7:752. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15162.1.
- Black A, Strain K, Wallsworth C, et al. What constitutes meaningful engagement for patients and families as partners on research teams? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018;23(3):158–167. doi: 10.1177/1355819618762960.
- National Institute for Health and Care Research. INVOLVE. Jargon buster. [cited 2022 May 9]. Available from: https://www.invo.org.uk/resource-centre/jargon-buster/
- United Kingdom Research and Innovation. Understanding health research. Patient and public involvement. [cited 2022 Aug 16]. Available from: https://www.ukri.org/councils/mrc/facilities-and-resources/find-an-mrc-facility-or-resource/mrc-regulatory-support-centre/understanding-health-research/patient-and-public-involvement/#contents-list
- Cochrane Consumer Network. An international network on public involvement in health and social care research. [cited 2022 May 9]. Available from: https://consumers.cochrane.org/news/international_network
- Smits DW, Van Meeteren K, Klem M, et al. Designing a tool to support patient and public involvement in research projects: the Involvement Matrix. Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00188-4.
- Banner D, Bains M, Carroll S, et al. Patient and public engagement in integrated knowledge translation research: are we there yet? Res Involv Engagem. 2019;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0139-1.
- van Bruinessen IR, van Weel-Baumgarten EM, Snippe HW, et al. Active patient participation in the development of an online intervention. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014;3(4):e59. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3695.
- Markle-Reid M, Ganann R, Ploeg J, et al. Engagement of older adults with multimorbidity as patient research partners: lessons from a patient-oriented research program. J Multimorb Comorb. 2021;11:2633556521999508. doi: 10.1177/2633556521999508.
- Diaz A, Gove D, Nelson M, et al. Conducting public involvement in dementia research: the contribution of the European Working Group of People with Dementia to the ROADMAP project. Health Expect. 2021;24(3):757–765. doi: 10.1111/hex.13246.
- National Health Service. Health Education England. Health literacy 'how to’ guide. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://library.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2020/08/Health-literacy-how-to-guide.pdf
- Keusch F, Rao R, Chang L, et al. Participation in clinical research: perspectives of adult patients and parents of pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20(10):1604–1611. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.06.020.
- HealthTalk.org. Patient and public involvement in research. [cited 2022 May 9]. Available from: https://healthtalk.org/patient-and-public-involvement-research/overview
- Chakradhar S. Training on trials: patients taught the language of drug development. Nat Med. 2015;21(3):209–210. doi: 10.1038/nm0315-209.
- Allen D, Cree L, Dawson P, et al. Exploring patient and public involvement (PPI) and co-production approaches in mental health research: learning from the PARTNERS2 research programme. Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00224-3.
- National Institute for Health and Care Research. Being inclusive in public involvement in health and care research. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/being-inclusive-in-public-involvement-in-health-and-care-research/27365
- Boote J, Julious S, Horspool M, et al. PPI in the PLEASANT trial: involving children with asthma and their parents in designing an intervention for a randomised controlled trial based within primary care. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016;17(6):536–548. doi: 10.1017/S1463423616000025.
- Gwara M, Smith S, Woods C, et al. International Children’s Advisory Network: a multifaceted approach to patient engagement in pediatric clinical research. Clin Ther. 2017;39(10):1933–1938. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.09.002.
- Allsop MJ, Holt RJ. Evaluating methods for engaging children in healthcare technology design. Health Technol. 2013;3(4):295–307. doi: 10.1007/s12553-013-0062-7.
- Deal LS, Goldsmith JC, Martin S, et al. Patient voice in rare disease drug development and endpoints. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017;51(2):257–263. doi: 10.1177/2168479016671559.
- National Institute for Health and Care Research. INVOLVE. Involving children and young people in research: top tips for researchers. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/involvingcyp-top-tips-January2016.pdf
- McNeil H, Elliott J, Huson K, et al. Engaging older adults in healthcare research and planning: a realist synthesis. Res Involv Engagem. 2016;2(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0022-2.
- Myers R, Anderson M, Korba C. Striving to become more patient-centric in life sciences. [cited 2022 May 9]. Available from: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/life-sciences/patient-centricity.html
- Faulkner SD, Sayuri Ii S, Pakarinen C, et al. Understanding multi-stakeholder needs, preferences and expectations to define effective practices and processes of patient engagement in medicine development: a mixed-methods study. Health Expect. 2021;24(2):601–616. doi: 10.1111/hex.13207.
- ICON. Paving the way for diversity and inclusion in clinical trials: establishing a platform for improvement. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://www.iconplc.com/insights/patient-centricity/diversity-and-inclusion-in-clinical-trials/diversity-and-inclusion-in-clinical-trials-whitepaper/
- National Health Council. Genetic Alliance. Patient-focused drug development recommended language for use in guidance document development. [cited 2021 Dec 22]. Available from: https://nationalhealthcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NHC-GA%20Feb2017.pdf
- Madrid S, Tuzzio L, Stults CD, et al. Sharing experiences and expertise: the Health Care Systems Research Network workshop on patient engagement in research. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2016;3(3):159–166. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1272.
- Jinks C, Carter P, Rhodes C, et al. Patient and public involvement in primary care research – an example of ensuring its sustainability. Res Involv Engagem. 2016;2(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0015-1.
- Raber-Johnson ML, Stinson M, Dillon C, et al. Key steps toward a promotional communications strategy: collaboration best practices for teams creating promotional materials and regulatory colleagues. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021;55(4):696–704. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00272-1.
- Patient Focused Medicines Development. The PFMD book of good practices. 3rd ed. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://patientfocusedmedicine.org/bogp/2020/the-book-of-good-practices.pdf
- Dewulf L. Patient engagement by pharma – why and how? A framework for compliant patient engagement. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015;49(1):9–16. doi: 10.1177/2168479014558884.
- Lowe MM, Blaser DA, Cone L, et al. Increasing patient involvement in drug development. Value Health. 2016;19(6):869–878. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.009.
- Tai-Seale M, Sullivan G, Cheney A, et al. The language of engagement: "Aha!" moments from engaging patients and community partners in two pilot projects of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Perm J. 2016;20(2):89–92. doi: 10.7812/TPP/15-123.
- United Kingdom Standards for Public Involvement. Inclusive opportunities. [cited 2022 May 9]. Available from: https://sites.google.com/nihr.ac.uk/pi-standards/standards/inclusive-opportunities
- Vat LE, Ryan D, Etchegary H. Recruiting patients as partners in health research: a qualitative descriptive study. Res Involv Engagem. 2017;3(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0067-x.
- UyBico SJ, Pavel S, Gross CP. Recruiting vulnerable populations into research: a systematic review of recruitment interventions. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(6):852–863. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0126-3.
- Staniszewska S, Denegri S, Matthews R, et al. Reviewing progress in public involvement in NIHR research: developing and implementing a new vision for the future. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e017124. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017124.
- Baquet CR. A model for bidirectional community-academic engagement (CAE): overview of partnered research, capacity enhancement, systems transformation, and public trust in research. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;23(4):1806–1824. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0155.
- Oliver S, Liabo K, Stewart R, et al. Public involvement in research: making sense of the diversity. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015;20(1):45–51. doi: 10.1177/1355819614551848.
- Borup G, Bach KF, Schmiegelow M, et al. A paradigm shift towards patient involvement in medicines development and regulatory science: workshop proceedings and commentary. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016;50(3):304–311. doi: 10.1177/2168479015622668.
- Haerry D, Landgraf C, Warner K, et al. EUPATI and patients in medicines research and development: guidance for patient involvement in regulatory processes. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018;5:230. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00230.
- National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, Policy and Global Affairs, Committee on Women in Science Engineering and Medicine, et al. Improving representation in clinical trials and research: building research equity for women and underrepresented groups. Barriers to representation of underrepresented and excluded populations in clinical research. Washington (DC). National Academies Press (US). [cited 2023 Jul 7]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK584407/
- Drug Information Association. Considerations guide to implementing patient-centric initiatives in health care product development. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://synapse.pfmd.org/resources/considerations-guide-to-implementing-patient-centric-initiatives-in-health-care-product-development/download
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Plain language principles. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/2052-PCORnet-Plain-Language-Principles-Infographic.pdf
- Patients Included. Patient information resources. [cited 2022 May 9]. Available from: https://patientsincluded.org/patient-information-resources/
- Fagan MB, Morrison CR, Wong C, et al. Implementing a pragmatic framework for authentic patient–researcher partnerships in clinical research. J Comp Eff Res. 2016;5(3):297–308. doi: 10.2217/cer-2015-0023.
- Pfizer. The newest vital sign. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://www.pfizer.com/products/medicine-safety/health-literacy/nvs-toolkit
- Pfizer. Health literacy. [cited 2022 Aug 4]. Available from: https://www.pfizer.com/health/literacy/healthcare-professionals
- Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. Health jargon buster: an A to Z guide: Scotland. [cited 2022 May 23]. Available from: https://www.abpi.org.uk/media/jojevzyp/abpi-scotland-jargon-buster.pdf
- Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. Health jargon buster: an A to Z guide: Wales. [cited 2022 May 23]. Available from: https://www.abpi.org.uk/media/afvjxexq/abpi-cymru-wales-jargon-buster-2021.pdf
- United States National Institutes for Health. Glossary of common terms. [cited 2022 May 23]. Available from: https://www.nih.gov/health-information/nih-clinical-research-trials-you/glossary-common-terms
- United States National Cancer Institute. NCI dictionary of cancer terms. [cited 2022 May 23]. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms
- European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation. Toolbox. [cited 2022 May 23]. Available from: https://www.toolbox.eupati.eu/
- Patients Active in Research and Dialogues for an Improved Generation of Medicines. PARADIGM patient engagement toolbox. [cited 2022 May 23]. Available from: https://imi-paradigm.eu/petoolbox/
- National Institute for Health and Care Research. INVOLVE. Guidance on co-producing a research project. [cited 2022 May 23]. Available from: https://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Copro_Guidance_Feb19.pdf
- Haynes D, Hughes KD, Okafor A. PEARL: a guide for developing community-engaging and culturally-sensitive education materials. J Immigr Minor Health. 2023;25(3):666–673. doi: 10.1007/s10903-022-01418-5.
- European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation. Welcome to EUPATI Open Classroom! [cited 2022 Jun 10]. Available from: https://learning.eupati.eu/
- European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation. Your questions answered – patient engagement trainings. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://eupati.eu/news/your-questions-answered-patient-engagement-trainings/
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Research fundamentals: preparing you to successfully contribute to research. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://www.pcori.org/engagement/research-fundamentals
- Kirwan JR, de Wit M, Frank L, et al. Emerging guidelines for patient engagement in research. Value Health. 2017;20(3):481–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.003.
- Gaasterland CMW, Jansen-van der Weide MC, Vroom E, et al. The POWER-tool: recommendations for involving patient representatives in choosing relevant outcome measures during rare disease clinical trial design. Health Policy. 2018;122(12):1287–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.09.011.
- Caeyers NP. SP0219 patient involvement in research: Flemish training of 18 patient research partners. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(Suppl 2):56.3–56. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.6319.
- Imperial College London. Public involvement training. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/patient-experience-research-centre/ppi/ppi-training/
- European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation. EUPATI fundamentals. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://eupati.eu/eupati-fundamentals/
- European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation. EUPATI essentials. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://eupati.eu/eupati-essentials/
- Patient Engagement Management Suite. Patient engagement training. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://pemsuite.org/patient-engagement-training/
- Patient Engagement Management Suite. Practical how-to guides for patient engagement. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://pemsuite.org/how-to-guides/
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Patient engagement toolkit. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://www.pcori.org/engagement/engagement-resources/Engagement-Tool-Resource-Repository/patient-engagement-toolkit
- Malm C, Jönson H, Andersson S, et al. A balance between putting on the researcher’s hat and being a fellow human being: a researcher perspective on informal carer involvement in health and social care research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022;20(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00946-8.
- Boylan AM, Locock L, Thomson R, et al. “About sixty per cent I want to do it”: health researchers’ attitudes to, and experiences of, patient and public involvement (PPI) – a qualitative interview study. Health Expect. 2019;22(4):721–730. doi: 10.1111/hex.12883.
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Social Media and Research Toolkit (SMART). [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://www.pcori.org/research-results/2016/social-media-and-research-toolkit-smart
- National Institute for Health and Care Research. Clinical Research Network. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/explore-nihr/support/clinical-research-network.htm
- PCORNet. Network. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://pcornet.org/network/
- European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation. EUPATIConnect. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://connect.eupati.eu/
- European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation. National Platforms. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://eupati.eu/eupati-national-platforms/
- Patient Engagement Management Suite. Patient engagement synapse. [cited 2022 Jun 24]. Available from: https://pemsuite.org/synapse/
- ForPatients by Roche. Welcome to ForPatients. [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://forpatients.roche.com/
- Shippee ND, Domecq Garces JP, Prutsky Lopez GJ, et al. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):1151–1166. doi: 10.1111/hex.12090.
- Goel N. Conducting research in psoriatic arthritis: the emerging role of patient research partners. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020;59(Suppl 1):i47–i55. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez338.
- Smith J, Damm K, Hover G, et al. Lessons from an experiential approach to patient community engagement in rare disease. Clin Ther. 2021;43(2):421–429. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.12.002.
- Squires A, Sadarangani T, Jones S. Strategies for overcoming language barriers in research. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76(2):706–714. doi: 10.1111/jan.14007.
- Willis A, Isaacs T, Khunti K. Improving diversity in research and trial participation: the challenges of language. Lancet Public Health. 2021;6(7):e445–e446. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00100-6.
- Carbó PA, Ahumada MAV, Caballero AD, et al. “How do I do discourse analysis?" teaching discourse analysis to novice researchers through a study of intimate partner gender violence among migrant women. Qual Soc Work. 2016;15(3):363–379. doi: 10.1177/1473325015617233.
- Evans-Agnew RA, Johnson S, Liu F, et al. Applying critical discourse analysis in health policy research: case studies in regional, organizational, and global health. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2016;17(3):136–146. doi: 10.1177/1527154416669355.
- Starks H, Trinidad SB. Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(10):1372–1380. doi: 10.1177/1049732307307031.
- Zimmermann A, Pilarska A, Gaworska-Krzemińska A, et al. Written informed consent-translating into plain language. A pilot study. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(2):232. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020232.
- Myeloma Patients Europe, WeCan, Patient Focused Medicines Development. Guiding principles on reasonable agreements between patient advocates and pharmaceutical companies. WECAN – final consensus document. [cited 2022 Aug 8]. Available from: https://patientengagement.synapseconnect.org/resources/guiding-principles-on-reasonable-agreements-between-patient-advocates-and-pharmaceutical-companies-1/download
- The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. Principles for working together. [cited 2023 Jul 17]. Available from: https://www.abpi.org.uk/partnerships/working-with-patient-organisations/working-with-patients-and-patient-organisations-2022-sourcebook-for-industry/principles-and-agreements/
- Plain English Campaign. Plain English Campaign. [cited 2023 Jul 17]. Available from: https://www.plainenglish.co.uk/index.php
- Versus Arthritis, Parkinson’s UK, Cystic Fibrosis Trust, et al. From transactional to truly collaborative: improving relationships between industry and patient organisations. [cited 2023 Jul 17]. Available from: https://www.versusarthritis.org/media/25664/improving-relationships-industry-patient-report.pdf
- Harrison JD, Auerbach AD, Anderson W, et al. Patient stakeholder engagement in research: a narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities. Health Expect. 2019;22(3):307–316. doi: 10.1111/hex.12873.
- Stoner AM, Cannon M, Shan L, et al. The other 45: improving patients’ chronic disease self-management and medical students’ communication skills. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2018;118(11):703–712. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2018.155.