References
- Vermeir P, Vandijck D, Degroote S, et al. Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations. Int J Clin Pract. 2015;69(11):1257–1267. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12686.
- Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Health communication, healthy people 2030 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jan 9]. Available from: https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/health-communication.
- Institute of Medicine's Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm; 2001.
- Salmon C, O’Conor R, Singh S, et al. Characteristics of outpatient clinical summaries in the United States. Int J Med Inform. 2016;94:75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.06.005.
- Center PR. The Social Life of Health Information | Pew Research Center [Internet]; 2009 [cited 2023 Jun 28]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2009/06/11/the-social-life-of-health-information/.
- Khoong EC, Le GM, Hoskote M, et al. Health information–seeking behaviors and preferences of a diverse, multilingual urban cohort. Med Care. 2019;57:S176–S183. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001050.
- Lee K, Hoti K, Hughes JD, et al. Dr Google is here to stay but health care professionals are still valued: an analysis of health care consumers’ internet navigation support preferences. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(6):e210. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7489.
- Moorcraft SY, Marriott C, Peckitt C, et al. Patients’ willingness to participate in clinical trials and their views on aspects of cancer research: results of a prospective patient survey. Trials. 2016;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1105-3.
- Pleasant A, Maish C, O’Leary C, et al. A theory-based self-report measure of health literacy: the calgary charter on health literacy scale. Methodol Innov. 2018;11(3):205979911881439. doi: 10.1177/2059799118814394.
- Wahlstrom-Edwards L, Hess A-M. The patient perspective on clinical trials [Internet]; 2019 [cited 2023 Sep 21]. Available from: https://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/patient-perspective-clinical-trials.
- Schroter S, Price A, Malički M, et al. Frequency and format of clinical trial results dissemination to patients: a survey of authors of trials indexed in PubMed. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):e032701. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032701.
- Gresham G, Meinert JL, Gresham AG, et al. Assessment of trends in the design, accrual, and completion of trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov by sponsor type, 2000–2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2014682. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14682.
- World Health Organization. Make it visual [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 21]. Available from: https://www.who.int/about/communications/understandable/visuals.
- Franconeri SL, Padilla LM, Shah P, et al. The science of visual data communication: what works. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2021;22(3):110–161. doi: 10.1177/15291006211051956.
- Dormer L, Schindler T, Williams LA, et al. A practical ‘how-To’ guide to plain language summaries (PLS) of peer-reviewed scientific publications: results of a multi-stakeholder initiative utilizing co-creation methodology. Res Involv Engagement. 2022;8(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00358-6.
- Rosenberg A, Baróniková S, Feighery L, et al. Open pharma recommendations for plain language summaries of peer-reviewed medical journal publications. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021;37(11):2015–2016. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1971185.
- 2017_01_26_summaries_of_ct_results_for_laypersons_0.pdf. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 25]. Available from: https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-02/2017_01_26_summaries_of_ct_results_for_laypersons_0.pdf.
- Draft FDA Guidance on Provision of Plain Language Summaries. The Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 25]. Available from: https://mrctcenter.org/resource/draft-fda-guidance-on-provision-of-plain-language-summaries/.
- Partridge AH, Wong JS, Knudsen K, et al. Offering participants results of a clinical trial: sharing results of a negative study. Lancet. 2005;365(9463):963–964. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71085-0.
- Bruhn H, Cowan E-J, Campbell MK, et al. Providing trial results to participants in phase III pragmatic effectiveness RCTs: a scoping review. Trials. 2021;22(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05300-x.
- Long CR, Stewart MK, McElfish PA. Health research participants are not receiving research results: a collaborative solution is needed. Trials. 2017;18(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2200-4.