Comparative cytogenetics of North Island tree wētā in sympatry

References

• Bourque G, Zdobnov EM, Bork P, Pevzner PA, Tesler G 2005. Comparative architectures of mammalian and chicken genomes reveal highly variable rates of genomic rearrangements across different lineages. Genome Research 15: 98–110.10.1101/gr.3002305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulgarella M, Trewick S, Minards NA, Jacobson MJ, Morgan-Richards M 2014. Shifting ranges of two tree weta species (Hemideina spp.): competitive exclusion and changing climate. Journal of Biogeography. 41: 524–535. 10.1111/jbi.12224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin MJ, Trewick SA, Wehi PM, Morgan-Richards M 2011. Exploring the concept of niche convergence in a land without rodents: the case of weta as small mammals. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 35: 302–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick M 2010. How and why chromosome inversions evolve. PLoS Biology 8: e1000501. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000501.g002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick M, Barton N 2006. Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics 173: 419–434.10.1534/genetics.105.047985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AA 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52: 201–220.10.1111/j.1601-5223.1964.tb01953.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Richards M 1997. Intraspecific karyotype variation is not concordant with allozyme variation in the Auckland tree weta of New Zealand, Hemideina thoracica (Orthoptera: Stenopelmatidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60: 423–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Richards M 2000. Robertsonian translocations and B chromosomes in the Wellington tree weta, Hemideina Crassidens (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae). Hereditas 132: 49–54.10.1111/j.1601-5223.2000.00049.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Richards M 2005. Chromosome rearrangements are not accompanied by expected genome size change in the tree weta Hemideina thoracica (Orthoptera, Anostostomatidae). Journal of Orthoptera Research 14: 143–148.10.1665/1082-6467(2005)14[143:CRANAB]2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Morgan-Richards M, Daugherty CH, Gibbs GW 1995. Taxonomic status of tree weta from Stephens Island, Mt Holdsworth and Mt Arthur, based on allozyme variation. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 25: 301–312.10.1080/03014223.1995.9517491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Richards M, Gibbs GW 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of New Zealand giant and tree weta (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae: Deinacrida and Hemideina) using morphological and genetic characters. Invertebrate Systematics 15: 1–12.10.1071/IT99022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Richards M, King T, Trewick SA 2001a. The evolutionary history of tree weta: a genetical approach. In: Field L ed. Biology of weta, king crickets and their Allies. Oxford, CABI Publishing. Pp. 111–124.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan-Richards M, Smissen RD, Shepherd LD, Wallis GP, Hayward JJ, Chan C-H et al. 2009. A review of genetic analyses of hybridisation in New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 39(1): 15–34.10.1080/03014220909510561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Richards M, Townsend JA 1995. Hybridisation of tree weta on Banks Peninsula, New Zealand, and colour polymorphism within Hemideina ricta (Orthoptera: Stenopelmatidae). New Zealand Journal of Zoology 22: 393–399.10.1080/03014223.1995.9518058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Richards M, Trewick SA, Wallis GP 2000. Characterization of a hybrid zone between two chromosomal races of the weta Hemideina thoracica following a geologically recent volcanic eruption. Heredity 85: 586–592.10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00796.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Richards M, Trewick SA, Wallis GP 2001b. Chromosome races with Pliocene origins: evidence from mtDNA. Heredity 86: 303–312.10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00828.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Richards M, Wallis GP 2003. A comparison of five hybrid zones of the weta Hemideina thoracica (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae): degree of cytogenetic variation fails to predict zone width. Evolution 57: 849–861.10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00296.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay GW, Bigelow RS 1978. New Zealand wetas of the genus Hemideina. The Weta 1: 32–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rieseberg LH 2001. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 351–358.10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02187-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowell DM, Higgins AV, Briscoe DA, Tait NN 1995. The use of chromosomal data in the systematics of viviparous onychophorans from Australia (Onychophora: Peripatopsidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 114: 139–153.10.1111/j.1096-3642.1995.tb00117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowell DM, Rockman MV, Tait NN 2002. Extensive Robertsonian rearrangement: implications for the radiation and biogeography of Planipapillus Reid (Onychophora: Peripatopsidae). Journal of Zoology 257: 171–179.10.1017/S0952836902000778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle JB 1993. Chromosome hybrid zones in eutherian mammals. In: Harrison RG ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. New York, NY, Oxford University Press. Pp. 309–353.
   Google Scholar
• Sessions SK 1996. Chromosomes: molecular systematics. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C eds. Molecular systematics. 2nd edition. Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates. Pp. 121–168.
   Google Scholar
• Sites JW, Moritz C 1987. Chromosomal evolution and speciation revisited. Systematic Biology 36: 153–174.
   Google Scholar
• Trewick SA, Morgan-Richards M 2005. After the deluge: mitochondrial DNA indicates Miocene radiation and Pliocene adaptation of tree and giant weta (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae) Molecular phylogenetics of weta. Journal of Biogeography 32: 295–309.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01179.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar