Discrimination of draglines from potential mates by Evarcha culicivora, an East African jumping spider

References

• Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Austad SN. 1984. Evolution of sperm priority patterns in spiders. In: Smith RL, editor. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. London: Academic Press; p. 223–249.
   Google Scholar
• Bonduriansky R. 2001. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol Rev. 76:305–339. doi: 10.1017/S1464793101005693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL. 2011. Principles of animal communication. 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Carazo P, Sanchez E, Font E, Desfilis E. 2004. Chemosensory cues allow male Tenebrio molitor beetles to assess the reproductive status of potential mates. Anim Behav. 68:123–129. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark RJ, Harland DP, Jackson RR. 2000. Speculative hunting by an araneophagic salticid spider. Behaviour. 137:1601–1612. doi: 10.1163/156853900502736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark RJ, Jackson RR. 1994. Portia labiata, a cannibalistic jumping spider, discriminates between own and foreign eggsacs. Int J Comp Psychol. 7:38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Clark RJ, Jackson RR. 1995. Araneophagic jumping spiders discriminate between the draglines of familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics. Ethol Ecol Evol. 7:185–190. doi: 10.1080/08927014.1995.9522964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark RJ, Jackson RR, Waas JR. 1999. Draglines and assessment of fighting ability in cannibalistic jumping spiders. J Insect Behav. 12:753–766. doi: 10.1023/A:1020900925863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross FR, Jackson RR. 2009a. Mate-odour identification by both sexes of Evarcha culicivora, an East African jumping spider. Behav Process. 81:74–79. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross FR, Jackson RR. 2009b. How cross-modality effects during intraspecific interactions of jumping spiders differ depending on whether a female-choice or mutual-choice mating system is adopted. Behav Process. 80:162–168. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross FR, Jackson RR. 2013. The functioning of species-specific olfactory pheromones in the biology of a mosquito-eating jumping spider from East Africa. J Insect Behav. 26:131–148. doi: 10.1007/s10905-012-9338-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross FR, Jackson RR. 2014. Cross-modality effects of prey odour during the intraspecific interactions of a mosquito-specialist predator. Ethology. 120:598–606. doi: 10.1111/eth.12232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross FR, Jackson RR, Pollard SD. 2007. Male and female mate-choice decisions by Evarcha culicivora, an East African jumping spider. Ethology. 113:901–908. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01394.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross FR, Jackson RR, Pollard SD. 2008. Complex display behaviour of Evarcha culicivora, an East African mosquito-eating jumping spider. New Zeal J Zool. 35:151–187. doi: 10.1080/03014220809510112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curio E. 1976. The ethology of predation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Elias DO, Sivalinghem S, Mason AC, Andrade MCB, Kasumovic MM. 2010. Vibratory communication in the jumping spider Phidippus clarus: substrate-borne courtship signals are important for male mating success. Ethology. 116:990–998. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01815.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foelix RF. 2011. Biology of spiders. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskett AC. 2007. Spider sex pheromones: emission, reception, structures, and functions. Biol Rev. 82:27–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2006.00002.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland DP, Jackson RR, Macnab AM. 1999. Distances at which jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) distinguish between prey and conspecific rivals. J Zool. 247:357–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb00998.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland DP, Li D, Jackson RR. 2012. How jumping spiders see the world. In: Lazareva O, Shimizu T, Wasserman EA, editors. How animals see the world: comparative behavior, biology, and evolution of vision. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 133–164.
   Google Scholar
• Havrilak JA, Shimmel KM, Rypstra AL, Persons MH. 2015. Are you paying attention? Female wolf spiders increase dragline silk advertisements when males do not court. Ethology. 121:345–352. doi: 10.1111/eth.12340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell DC. 2002. Statistical methods for psychology. 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson RR. 1977. Courtship versatility in the jumping spider, Phidippus johnsoni (Araneae: Salticidae). Anim Behav. 25:953–957. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(77)90046-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR. 1986. Cohabitation of males and juvenile females: a prevalent mating tactic of spiders. J Nat Hist. 20:1193–1210. doi: 10.1080/00222938600770791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR. 1987. Comparative study of releaser pheromones associated with the silk of jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae). New Zeal J Zool. 14:1–10. doi: 10.1080/03014223.1987.10422676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR, Cross FR. 2011. Spider cognition. Adv Insect Physiol. 41:115–174. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-415919-8.00003-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR, Cross FR. 2015. Mosquito-terminator spiders and the meaning of predatory specialization. J Arachnol. 43:123–142. doi: 10.1636/V15-28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR, Nelson XJ, Sune GO. 2005. A spider that feeds indirectly on vertebrate blood by choosing female mosquitoes as prey. Proc Natl A Sci (USA). 102:15155–15160. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507398102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR, Pollard SD. 1997. Jumping spider mating strategies: sex among cannibals in and out of webs. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ, editors. The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 340–351.
   Google Scholar
• Khan R, Persons MH. 2015. Female Pardosa milvina wolf spiders increase silk advertisements when in the presence of silk from courting males. J Arachnol. 43:168–173. doi: 10.1636/J14-70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard AS, Morse DH. 2006. Line-following preferences of male crab spiders, Misumena vatia. Anim Behav. 71:717–724. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard Smith J, Harper D. 2003. Animal signals. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson XJ, Warui CM, Jackson RR. 2012. Widespread reliance on olfactory sex and species identification by lyssomanine and spartaeine jumping spiders. Biol J Linn Soc. 107:664–677. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.01965.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peckmezian T, Taylor PW. 2015. Electric shock for aversion training of jumping spiders: towards an arachnid model of avoidance learning. Behav Process. 113:99–104. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persons MH, Rypstra AL. 2001. Wolf spiders show graded antipredator behavior in the presence of chemical cues from different sized predators. J Chem Ecol. 27:2493–2504. doi: 10.1023/A:1013679532070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard SD, Macnab AM, Jackson RR. 1987. Communication with chemicals: pheromones and spiders. In: Nentwig W, editor. Ecophysiology of spiders. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 133–141.
   Google Scholar
• Rypstra AL, Schlosser AM, Sutton PL, Persons MH. 2009. Multimodal signalling: the relative importance of chemical and visual cues from females to the behaviour of male wolf spiders (Lycosidae). Anim Behav. 77:937–947. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rypstra AL, Wieg C, Walker SE, Persons MH. 2003. Mutual mate assessment in wolf spiders: differences in the cues used by males and females. Ethology. 109:315–325. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00874.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor PW. 1998. Dragline-mediated mate-searching in Trite planiceps (Araneae, Salticidae). J Arachnol. 26:330–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderSal ND, Hebets EA. 2007. Cross-modal effects on learning: a seismic stimulus improves color discrimination learning in a jumping spider. J Exp Biol. 210:3689–3695. doi: 10.1242/jeb.009126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt TD. 2003. Pheromones and animal behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar