How (not) to train your spider: successful and unsuccessful methods for studying learning

References

• Baker L, Kelty EC, Jakob EM. 2009. The effect of visual features on jumping spider movements across gaps. J Insect Behav. 22:350–361. doi: 10.1007/s10905-009-9177-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarski JV, Taylor P, Jakob EM. 2012. Optical cues used in predation by jumping spiders, Phidippus audax (Araneae, Salticidae). Anim Behav. 84:1221–1227. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breland K, Breland M. 1961. The misbehavior of organisms. Am Psychol. 16:681–684. doi: 10.1037/h0040090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchsbaum D, Morse DH. 2012. The effect of experience and rearing environment on the behaviour of crab spiderlings during their first weeks of life. Behaviour. 149:667–683. doi: 10.1163/156853912X649939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carducci JP, Jakob EM. 2000. Rearing environment affects behaviour of jumping spiders. Anim Behav. 59:39–46. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark DL, Kizer Zeeff C, Sabovodny G, Hollenberg A, Roberts JA, Uetz GW. 2015. The role of social experience in eavesdropping by male wolf spiders (Lycosidae). Anim Behav. 106:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark DL, Uetz GW. 1990. Video image recognition by the jumping spider, Maevia inclemens (Araneae: Salticidae). Anim Behav. 40:884–890. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80990-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross FR, Jackson RR. 2006. From eight-legged automatons to thinking spiders. In: Fujita K, Itakura S, editors. Diversity of cognition. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto University Academic Press; p. 188–215.
   Google Scholar
• Cross FR, Jackson RR. 2014. Specialised use of working memory by Portia africana, a spider-eating salticid. Anim Cogn. 17:435–444. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0675-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross FR, Jackson RR. 2015. Solving a novel confinement problem by spartaeine salticids that are predisposed to solve problems in the context of predation. Anim Cogn. 18:509–515. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0819-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson GN, Schwaab AT. 2001. Body size, leg autotomy, and prior experience as factors in the fighting success of male crab spiders, Misumenoides formosipes. J Insect Behav. 14:841–855. doi: 10.1023/A:1013045602493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukas R. 2008. Evolutionary biology of insect learning. Annu Rev Entomol. 53:145–160. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap AS, Stephens DW. 2009. Components of change in the evolution of learning and unlearned preference. Proc Biol Sci. 276:3201–3208. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiben B, Persons M. 2007. The effect of prior exposure to predator cues on chemically-mediated defensive behavior and survival in the wolf spider Rabidosa rabida (Araneae: Lycosidae). Behaviour. 144:889–906. doi: 10.1163/156853907781492681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebets EA. 2003. Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. P Nat A Sci USA. 100:13390–13395. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2333262100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebets EA, Vink CJ. 2007. Experience leads to preference: experienced females prefer brush-legged males in a population of syntopic wolf spiders. Behav Ecol. 18:1010–1020. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arm070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoefler CD. 2002. Is contest experience a trump card? The interaction of residency status, experience, and body size on fighting success in Misumenoides formosipes (Araneae: Thomisidae). J Insect Behav. 15:779–790. doi: 10.1023/A:1021123523307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoefler CD, Jakob EM. 2006. Jumping spiders in space: movement patterns, nest site fidelity and the use of beacons. Anim Behav. 71:109–116. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.03.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isman M, Duffey S, Scudder G. 1977. Variation in cardenolide content of lygaeid bugs, Oncopeltus fasciatus and Lygeaus kalmii kalmii and of their milkweed hosts (Asclepias spp.) in central California. J Chem Ecol. 3:613–624. doi: 10.1007/BF00988061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR. 2002. Trial-and-error derivation of aggressive-mimicry signals by Brettus and Cyrba, spartaeine jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from Israel, Kenya, and Sri Lanka. New Zeal J Zool. 29:95–117. doi: 10.1080/03014223.2002.9518294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR, Cross FR. 2011. Spider cognition. Advances in insect physiology, spider physiology and behaviour. Behaviour. 41:115–174.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson RR, Cross FR. 2015. Mosquito-terminator spiders and the meaning of predatory specialization. J Arachnol. 43:123–142. doi: 10.1636/V15-28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR, Carter CM, Tarsitano MS. 2001a. Trial-and-error solving of a confinement problem by a jumping spider, Portia fimbriata. Behaviour. 138:1215–1234. doi: 10.1163/15685390152822184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR, Li D, Woon JR, Hashim R, Cross FR. 2014. Intricate predatory decisions by a mosquito-specialist spider from Malaysia. Roy Soc Open Sci. 1:140131. doi:10.1098/rsos.140131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR, Pollard SD, Nelson XJ, Edwards GB, Barrion AT. 2001b. Jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) that feed on nectar. J Zool. 255:25–29. doi: 10.1017/S095283690100108X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR, Wilcox RS. 1993. Spider flexibly chooses aggressive mimicry signals for different prey by trial and error. Behaviour. 127:21–36. doi: 10.1163/156853993X00407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakob EM, Skow CD, Haberman MP, Plourde A. 2007. Jumping spiders associate food with color cues in a T-maze. J Arachnol. 35:487–492. doi: 10.1636/JOA-ST06-61.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakob EM, Skow CD, Long SM. 2011. Plasticity, learning, and cognition. In: Herberstein ME, editor. Spider behaviour: flexibility and versatility. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press; p. 307–347.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson JC. 2005. Cohabitation of juvenile females with mature males promotes sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders. Behav Ecol. 16:269–273. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arh152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasumovic MM, Elias DO, Sivalinghem S, Mason AC, Andrade MC. 2010. Examination of prior contest experience and the retention of winner and loser effects. Behav Ecol. 21(2):404–409. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arp204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedtke J, Schneider JM. 2014. Association and reversal learning abilities in a jumping spider. Behav Process. 103:192–198. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.12.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long SM, Leonard A, Carey A, Jakob EM. 2015. Vibration as an effective stimulus for aversive conditioning in jumping spiders. J Arachnol. 43:111–114. doi: 10.1636/S14-49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long SM, Lewis S, Jean-Louis L, Ramos G, Richmond J, Jakob EM. 2012. Firefly flashing and jumping spider predation. Anim Behav. 83:81–86. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse DH. 2000. The role of experience in determining patch-use by adult crab spiders. Behaviour. 137:265–278. doi: 10.1163/156853900502079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura T, Yamashita S. 2000. Learning and discrimination of colored papers in jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae). J Comp Physiol A: Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 186:897–901. doi: 10.1007/s003590000143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson XJ, Jackson RR. 2011. Flexibility in the foraging strategies of spiders. In: Herberstein ME, editor. Spider behaviour: flexibility and versatility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 31–56.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson XJ, Jackson RR. 2012. Fine tuning of vision-based prey-choice decisions by a predator that targets malaria vectors. J Arachnol. 40(1):23–33. doi: 10.1636/Hill-61.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaj DR, Lewis AC. 1993. Insect learning: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Patt JM, Pfannenstiel RS. 2008. Odor-based recognition of nectar in cursorial spiders. Entomol Exp Appl. 127:64–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2008.00669.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peckmezian C, Taylor P. 2015a. A virtual reality paradigm for the study of visually mediated behaviour and cognition in spiders. Anim Behav. 107:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peckmezian T, Taylor PW. 2015b. Electric shock for aversion training of jumping spiders: towards an arachnid model of avoidance learning. Behav Process. 113:99–104. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persons MH, Rypstra AL. 2000. Preference for chemical cues associated with recent prey in the wolf spider Hogna helluo (Araneae: Lycosidae). Ethology. 106:27–35. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2000.00496.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punzo F. 1997. Leg autotomy and avoidance behavior in response to a predator in the wolf spider, Schizocosa avida (Araneae, Lycosidae). J Arachnol. 25:202–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punzo F. 2002a. Early experience and prey preference in the lynx spider, Oxyopes salticus Hentz (Araneae: Oxyopidae). J New York Entomol Soc. 110:255–259. doi: 10.1664/0028-7199(2002)110[0255:EEAPPI]2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Punzo F. 2002b. Food imprinting and subsequent prey preference in the lynx spider, Oxyopes salticus (Araneae: Oxyopidae). Behav Process. 58:177–181. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00031-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punzo F, Ludwig L. 2002. Contact with maternal parent and siblings affects hunting behavior, learning, and central nervous system development in spiderlings of Hogna carolinensis (Araeneae: Lycosidae). Anim Cogn. 5:63–70. doi: 10.1007/s10071-002-0128-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punzo F, Preshkar C. 2002. Environmental and chemical cues associated with prey and subsequent prey preference in the wolf spider Hogna carolinensis Hentz (Araneae, Lycosidae). J Environ Biol. 23:341–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutledge JM, Uetz GW. 2014. Juvenile experience and adult female mating preferences in two closely related Schizocosa species. J Arachnol. 42:170–177. doi: 10.1636/J14-10.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutledge JM, Miller A, Uetz GW. 2010. Exposure to multiple sensory cues as a juvenile affects adult female mate preferences in wolf spiders. Anim Behav. 80:419–426. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.05.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shettleworth SJ. 2010. Cognition, evolution and behavior. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skow CD. 2007. Jumping spiders and aposematic prey: the role of contextual cues during avoidance learning [Unpublished thesis]. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Skow CD, Jakob EM. 2005. Jumping spiders attend to context during learned avoidance of aposematic prey. Behav Ecol. 17:34–40. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ari094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell-Rood EC, Davidowitz G, Papaj DR. 2011. Reproductive tradeoffs of learning in a butterfly. Behav Ecol. 22:291–302. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arq169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffer B, Uetz GW. 2015. The effects of social experience with varying male availability on female mate preferences in a wolf spider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 69:927–937. doi: 10.1007/s00265-015-1904-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarsitano MS, Jackson RR. 1997. Araneophagic jumping spiders discriminate between detour routes that do and do not lead to prey. Anim Behav. 53:257–266. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor L, Amin X, Maier EB, Byrne KJ, Morehouse NI. 2015. Flexible color learning in an invertebrate predator: Habronattus jumping spiders can learn to prefer or avoid red during foraging. Behav Ecol. doi:10.1093/beheco/arv182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor LA, Maier EB, Byrne KJ, Amin Z, Morehouse NI. 2014. Colour use by tiny predators: jumping spiders show colour biases during foraging. Anim Behav. 90:149–157. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toft S. 1997. Acquired food aversion of a wolf spider to three cereal aphids, intra- and interspecific effects. Entomophaga. 42:63–69. doi: 10.1007/BF02769881
   Google Scholar
• VanderSal ND, Hebets EA. 2007. Cross-modal effects on learning: a seismic stimulus improves color discrimination learning in a jumping spider. J Exp Biol. 210:3689–3695. doi: 10.1242/jeb.009126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox RS, Jackson RR. 1998. Cognitive abilities of araneophagic jumping spiders. In: Balda RP, Pepperberg IM, Kamil AC, editor. Animal cognition in nature. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; p. 411–434.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder SM, Rypstra AL. 2008. Prior encounters with the opposite sex affect male and female mating behavior in a wolf spider (Araneae, Lycosidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 62:1813–1820. doi: 10.1007/s00265-008-0610-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurek DB, Nelson XJ. 2012a. Hyperacute motion detection by the lateral eyes of jumping spiders. Vision Res. 66:26–30. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurek DB, Nelson XJ. 2012b. Saccadic tracking of targets mediated by the anterior-lateral eyes of jumping spiders. J Comp Physiol A. 198:411–417. doi: 10.1007/s00359-012-0719-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar