Distribution, body size, genetic structure and conservation of Siphlaenigma janae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera)

References

• Akaike H. 1973. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F, editors. 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado; p. 267–281.
   Google Scholar
• Ball SL, Hebert PDN, Burian SK, Webb JM. 2005. Biological identifications of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) using DNA barcodes. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 24:508–524. doi: 10.1899/04-142.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandelt H-J, Forster P, Röhl A. 1999. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 16:37–48. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. 2013. Genbank. Nucleic Acids Research. 41:D36–D42. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carew ME, Hoffmann AA. 2015. Delineating closely related species with DNA barcodes for routine biological monitoring. Freshwater Biology. 60:1545–1560. doi: 10.1111/fwb.12587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology. 9:1657–1659. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier KJ, Probert PK, Jeffries M. 2016. Conservation of aquatic invertebrates: concerns, challenges and conundrums. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 26:817–837. doi: 10.1002/aqc.2710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins RA, Boykin LM, Cruickshank RH, Armstrong KF. 2012. Barcoding’s next top model: an evaluation of nucleotide substitution models for specimen identification. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 3:457–465. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00176.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Counterman BA, Araujo-Perez F, Hines HM, Baxter SW, Morrison CM, Lindstrom DP, Papa R, Ferguson L, Joron M, ffrench-Constant RH, et al. 2010. Genomic hotspots for adaptation: the population genetics of Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius erato. PLoS Genetics. 6:e1000796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby TK, Dugdale JS, Watt JC. 1998. Area codes for recording specimen localities in the New Zealand subregion. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 25:175–183. doi: 10.1080/03014223.1998.9518148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Queiroz K. 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology. 56:879–886. doi: 10.1080/10635150701701083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis EA, Marshall DC, Hill KBR, Owen CL, Kamp PJJ, Simon C. 2015. Phylogeography of six codistributed New Zealand cicadas and their relationship to multiple biogeographical boundaries suggest a re-evaluation of the Taupo Line. Journal of Biogeography. 42:1761–1775. doi: 10.1111/jbi.12532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources. 10:564–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick BM. 2009. Power and sample size for nested analysis of molecular variance. Molecular Ecology. 18:3961–3966. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04314.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology. 3:294–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerbeaux P, Champion P, Dunn N. 2016. Conservation of fresh waters. In: Jellyman PG, Davie TJA, Pearson CP, Harding JS, editors. Advances in New Zealand freshwater science. Wellington: New Zealand Hydrological Society and New Zealand Limnological Society; p. 573–593.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger N, Collier K, Hitchmough R, Harding J, Smith B, Sutherland D. 2014. Conservation status of New Zealand freshwater invertebrates, 2013, New Zealand Threat Classification Series 8. Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. 28 p.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra AL, Alevi KCC, Banho CA, de Oliveira J, da Rosa JA, de Azeredo-Oliveira MTV. 2016. D2 region of the 28S RNA gene: a too-conserved fragment for inferences on phylogeny of South American triatomines. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 95:610–613. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall TA. 1999. Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series. 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 270:313–321. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchings TR. 2001. The Canterbury Museum mayfly collection and database (Insecta: Ephemeroptera). Records of the Canterbury Museum. 15:11–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchings TR, Hitchings TR, Shaw MD. 2015. A revision of the distribution maps and database of New Zealand mayflies (Ephemeroptera) at Canterbury Museum. Records of the Canterbury Museum. 29:5–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 16:111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjer KM, Zhou X, Frandsen PB, Thomas JA, Blahnik RJ. 2014. Moving toward species-level phylogeny using ribosomal DNA and COI barcodes: an example from the diverse caddisfly genus Chimarra (Trichoptera: Philopotamidae). Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny. 72:345–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koss RW, Edmunds GF. 1974. Ephemeroptera eggs and their contribution to phylogenetic studies of the order. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 55:267–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1974.tb01648.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landa V, Soldán T. 1985. Phylogeny and higher classification of the order Ephemeroptera: a discussion from the comparative anatomical point of view, Studie Československá Akademie Věd No. 4, Prague, Czech Republic. 121 p.
   Google Scholar
• Leigh JW, Bryant D. 2015. POPART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 6:1110–1116. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leys M, Keller I, Räsänen K, Gattolliat J-L, Robinson CT. 2016. Distribution and population genetic variation of cryptic species of the Alpine mayfly Baetis alpinus (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) in the Central Alps. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 16:77. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0643-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low VL, Adler PH, Takaoka H, Ya’cob Z, Lim PE, Tan TK, Lim YAL, Chen CD, Norma-Rashid Y, Sofian-Azirun M. 2014. Mitochondrial DNA markers reveal high genetic diversity but low genetic differentiation in the black fly Simulium tani Takaoka & Davies along an elevational gradient in Malaysia. PLoS ONE. 9:e100512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugo-Ortiz CR, McCafferty WP. 1998. First report of the genus Siphlaenigma Penniket and the family Siphlaenigmatidae (Ephemeroptera) from Australia. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington. 100:209–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty WP. 1991. Toward a phylogenetic classification of the Ephemeroptera (Insecta): a commentary on systematics. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 84:343–360. doi: 10.1093/aesa/84.4.343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty WP. 1999. Distribution of Siphlaenigmatidae (Ephemeroptera). Entomological News. 110:191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty WP, Edmunds GF. 1979. The higher classification of the Ephemeroptera and its evolutionary basis. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 72:5–12. doi: 10.1093/aesa/72.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch GA, Wallis GP, Waters JM. 2010. Onset of glaciation drove simultaneous vicariant isolation of alpine insects in New Zealand. Evolution. 64:2033–2043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlone MS. 1985. Plant biogeography and the late Cenozoic history of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 23:723–749. doi: 10.1080/0028825X.1985.10434240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean AJ, Schmidt DJ, Hughes JM. 2008. Do lowland habitats represent barriers to dispersal for a rainforest mayfly, Bungona narilla, in south-east Queensland? Marine and Freshwater Research. 59:761–771. doi: 10.1071/MF07202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MFE. 2015. Ministry for the Environment national indicator data for river condition in New Zealand. Collected by Regional Councils and the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), collated and processed by NIWA and protected by copyright owned by the Ministry for the Environment on behalf of the Crown. Accessed 9th July 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan MT, Balke M, Gregory TR, Vogler AP. 2005. DNA-based species delineation in tropical beetles using mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 360:1925–1933. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nei M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York (NY): Columbia University Press. p. 512.
   Google Scholar
• Nunn GB, Theisen BF, Christensen B, Arctander P. 1996. Simplicity-correlated size growth of the nuclear 28S ribosomal RNA D3 expansion segment in the crustacean order Isopoda. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 42:211–223. doi: 10.1007/BF02198847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden TH, Gattolliat JL, Sartori M, Staniczek AH, Soldán T, Whiting MF. 2009. Towards a new paradigm in mayfly phylogeny (Ephemeroptera): combined analysis of morphological and molecular data. Systematic Entomology. 34:616–634. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2009.00488.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painting CJ, Myers S, Holwell GI, Buckley TR. 2017. Phylogeography of the New Zealand giraffe weevil Lasiorhynchus barbicornis (Coleoptera: Brentidae): a comparison of biogeographic boundaries. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 122:13–28. doi: 10.1093/biolinnean/blx051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penniket JG. 1962. Notes on New Zealand Ephemeroptera. III. A new family, genus and species. Records of the Canterbury Museum. 7:389–398.
   Google Scholar
• Riek, EF. 1973. The classification of the Ephemeroptera. In: Peters WL, Peters JG, editors. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Ephemeroptera, 17–20 August 1970. Tallahassee, Florida, United States of America. Leiden, Netherlands: E. J. Brill. p. 160–178.
   Google Scholar
• Rix MG, Harvey MS, Roberts JD. 2008. Molecular phylogenetics of the spider family Micropholcommatidae (Arachnida: Araneae) using nuclear rRNA genes (18S and 28S). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 46:1031–1048. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekiné K, Bayartogtokh B, Bae YJ. 2017. Post-glacial distribution of a Mongolian mayfly inferred from population genetic analysis. Freshwater Biology. 62:102–110. doi: 10.1111/fwb.12853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PJ, McVeagh SM, Collier KJ. 2006. Genetic diversity and historical population structure in the New Zealand mayfly Acanthophlebia cruentata. Freshwater Biology. 51:12–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01462.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnenberg R, Nolte AW, Tautz D. 2007. An evaluation of LSU rDNA D1-D2 sequences for their use in species identification. Frontiers in Zoology. 4:6. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-4-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ståhls G, Savolainen E. 2008. MtDNA COI barcodes reveal cryptic diversity in the Baetis vernus group (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 46:82–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniczek, AH. 1997. The morphology of Siphlaenigma janae Penniket (Ephemeroptera, Siphlaenigmatidae), and its significance for the ground plan of the Baetoidea. In: Landolt P, Sartori M, editors. Ephemeroptera & Plecoptera: biology, ecology, systematics. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ephemeroptera and the 12th International Conference on Plecoptera, Lausanne, Switzerland, 14–20 August 1995. Fribourg, Switzerland: Mauron + Tinguely & Lachat SA. p. 536–549.
   Google Scholar
• Stauffer-Olsen NJ, O’Grady PM, Resh VH. 2017. Temporal patterns of genetic diversity in Baetis tricaudatus (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) from the Russian River, northern California. Freshwater Science. 36:351–363. doi: 10.1086/691973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towns DR. 1978. First records of Siphlaenigma janae (Ephemeroptera: Siphlaenigmatidae) from the North Island of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 5:365–370. doi: 10.1080/03014223.1978.10428322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaff SJ, Clarkson BR. 2012. Systematics and ecology of the Australasian genus Empodisma (Restionaceae) and description of a new species from peatlands in northern New Zealand. PhytoKeys. 13:39–79. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.13.3259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams HC, Ormerod SJ, Bruford MW. 2006. Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the cryptic species complex Baetis rhodani (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 40:370–382. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winterbourn MJ, Pohe SR, Goldstien SJ. 2017. Genetic and phenotypic variability in Stenoperla prasina (Newman, 1845) (Plecoptera: Eustheniidae) in relation to latitude and altitude in New Zealand. Aquatic Insects. 38:49–65. doi: 10.1080/01650424.2017.1302091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar