Avian biodiversity across Auckland’s volcanic cone reserves

References

• Anderson SH. 2003. The relative importance of birds and insects as pollinators of the New Zealand flora. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 27:83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson SH, Ogden J. 2003. The bird community of Kaitoke wetland, Great Barrier Island. Notornis. 50:201–209.
   Google Scholar
• Auckland Regional Council. 2007. Auckland regional pest management strategy 2007–2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bird PR, Bicknell D, Bulman PA, Burke SJA. 1992. The role of shelter in Australia for protecting soils, plants and livestock. Agroforestry Australia. 20(1):59–86. doi: 10.1007/BF00055305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns BR, Dodd MB, Hartnett T. 2013. Auckland’s green volcanic heart: groundcover vegetation and soils of the Auckland volcanic cone reserve network. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 43(4):184–197. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2013.802701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd GV. 1979. Common Myna predation on Wedgetailed Shearwater eggs. Elepaio. 39:69–70.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd GV, Moriarty DI, Brady BG. 1983. Breeding biology of wedge-tailed shearwaters at Kilauea Point, Hawaii. Condor. 85:292–296. doi: 10.2307/1367063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canning G. 2011. Eradication of the invasive common myna, Acridotheres tristis, from Fregate Island, Seychelles. Phelsuma. 19:43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Chace JF, Walsh JJ. 2006. Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landscape Urban Plan. 74:46–69. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JL, Stewart AM. 1988. Reproductive biology of Phormium tenax: a honeyeater-pollinated species. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 26:453–463. doi: 10.1080/0028825X.1988.10410647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson DG, Bull PC. 1975. Counting birds in New Zealand forests. Notornis. 22:101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Dhami MK, Nagle B. 2009. Review of the biology and ecology of the common myna (Acridotheres tristis) and some implications for management of this invasive species. Pacific Invasives Initiative, The University of Auckland. 28 p.
   Google Scholar
• Edbrooke SW, Mazengarb C, Stephenson W. 2003. Geology and geological hazards of the Auckland urban area, New Zealand. Quaternary International. 103:3–21. doi: 10.1016/S1040-6182(02)00129-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esler A, Esler W. 2010. The grassland on Mount Eden-pasture dynamics. Auckland Botanical Society Journal. 65:137–140.
   Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2011. ArcGIS desktop: release 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Feare C, Craig A. 1998. Starlings and mynas. London: Christopher Helm Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fish M. 2002. Ground cover plants. London: B T Batsford.
   Google Scholar
• Germaine SS, Wakeling BF. 2001. Lizard species distributors and habitat occupation along an urban gradient in Tuscon, Arizona, USA. Biological Conservation. 97:229–237. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00115-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grarock K, Christopher R, Tidemann CR, Wood J, Lindenmayer DB. 2012. Is it benign or is it a pariah? Empirical evidence for the impact of the common myna (Acridotheres tristis) on Australian birds. PLoS One. 7:e40622. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grarock K, Tidemann CR, Wood J, Lindenmayer DB. 2014. Are invasive species drivers of native species decline or passengers of habitat modification? A case study of the impact of the common myna (Acridotheres tristis) on Australian bird species. Austral Ecology. 39:106–114. doi: 10.1111/aec.12049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene TC, Dilks PJ, Westbrooke IM, Pryde MA. 2013. Monitoring selected forest bird species through aerial application of 1080 baits, Waitutu, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 37:41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall DM, Camilo GR, Tonietto RK, Ollerton J, Ahrné K, Arduser M, Ascher JS, Baldock KC, Fowler R, Frankie G, Goulson D. 2017. The city as a refuge for insect pollinators. Conservation Biology. 31(1):24–29. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward BW, Kenny JA, Grenfell HR. 2011. More volcanoes recognised in Auckland volcanic field. Geoscience Society of New Zealand Newsletter. 5:11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes BJ, Martin GR, Reynolds SJ. 2008. Cats and seabirds: effects of feral domestic cat Felis silvestris catus eradication on the population of Sooty Terns Onychoprion fuscata on Ascension Island, South Atlantic. Ibis. 150:122–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00838.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly D, Robertson AW, Ladley JJ, Anderson SH, McKenzie RJ. 2006. Relative (un)importance of introduced animals as pollinators and dispersers of native plants. In: Allen RB, Lee WG, editors. Ecological studies, vol. 186, Biological invasions in New Zealand. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; p. 227–245.
   Google Scholar
• Kermode LO. 1992. Geology of the Auckland urban area: Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Geological Map 2, scale 1:50 000, 1 sheet.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton GR, Page SJ. 1997. Analysing the promotion, product and visitor expectations of urban tourism: Auckland, New Zealand as a case study. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing. 6:123–142. doi: 10.1300/J073v06n03_08
   Google Scholar
• Miller JR. 2005. Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 20(8):430–434. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monks JM, O’Donnell CF, Wright EF. 2013. Selection of potential indicator species for measuring and reporting on trends in widespread native taxa in New Zealand. DOC Research and Development Series 338, Department of Conservation, Wellington. 18 p.
   Google Scholar
• Müller A, Bøcher PK, Fischer C, Svenning JC. 2018. ‘Wild’ in the city context: Do relative wild areas offer opportunities for urban biodiversity? Landscape and Urban Planning. 170:256–265. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murgui E, Hedblom M, editors. 2017. Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy D, Kelly D. 2003. Seasonal variation in the honeydew, invertebrate, fruit and nectar resource for bellbirds in a New Zealand mountain beech forest. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 27:11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Zealand Government. 2012. Deed of settlement initialled with Tāmaki Collective. [Accessed 2018 May 21]. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/deed-settlement-initialled-t%C4%81maki-collective.
   Google Scholar
• Piñeros Arenas N. 2010. Stakeholder collaboration for the development of sustainable tourism in urban green spaces: the case of Maungawhau-Mt Eden, Auckland, New Zealand. Unpublished Msc Thesis. Wageningen, The Netherlands, Wageningen University and Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Savard JPL, Clergeau P, Mennechez G. 2000. Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape Urban Plan. 48:131–142. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00037-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan DF, Fuller RA, Bush R, Lin BB, Gaston KJ. 2015. The health benefits of urban nature: how much do we need? BioScience. 65(5):476–485. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biv032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smale MC, Gardner RO. 1999. Survival of Mount Eden Bush, an urban forest remnant in Auckland, New Zealand. Pacific Conservation Biology. 5:83–93. doi: 10.1071/PC990083
   Google Scholar
• Soga M, Gaston KJ. 2016. Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 14(2):94–101. doi: 10.1002/fee.1225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand. 2017. Population growth fastest in Northland, Auckland, and Waikato; [accessed 2017 October 26]. http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/population/estimates_and_projections/SubnationalPopulationEstimates_MRAtJun17.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Strohbach MW, Haase D, Kabisch N. 2009. Birds and the city: urban biodiversity, land use, and socioeconomics. Ecology and Society. 14(2):31. [online]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art31/ doi: 10.5751/ES-03141-140231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple SA, Wiens JA. 1989. Bird populations and environmental changes: can birds be bio-indicators. American Birds. 43:260–270.
   Google Scholar
• Tindall SD, Ralph CJ, Clout MN. 2007. Changes in bird abundance following Common Myna control on a New Zealand island. Pacific Conservation Biology. 13:202–212. doi: 10.1071/PC070202
   Google Scholar
• Tulloch A. 2015. Using decision theory to select indicators for managing threats to biodiversity. Indicators and Surrogates of Biodiversity and Environmental Change. 45 p.
   Google Scholar
• van Heezik Y, Smyth A, Mathieu R. 2008. Diversity of native and exotic birds across an urban gradient in a New Zealand city. Landscape and Urban Planning. 87(3):223–232. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wotton DM. 2007. Consequences of dispersal failure: kereru and large seeds in New Zealand Debra M. Wotton [unpublished PhD thesis]. Christchurch, University of Canterbury 2007. 12 p.
   Google Scholar
• Wotton DM, McAlpine KG. 2015. Seed dispersal of fleshy-fruited environmental weeds in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 39:155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar