Contests between male New Zealand sheet-web spiders, Cambridgea plagiata (Araneae: Desidae)

References

• Akaike H. 1998. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Tanabe K, Parzen E, Kitagawa G, editors. Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike. New York (NY): Springer; p. 199–213.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson JF. 1974. Responses to starvation in the spiders Lycosa lenta Hentz and Filistata hibernalis (Hentz). Ecology. 55(3):576–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson MB. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Apontes P, Brown CA. 2005. Between-sex variation in running speed and a potential cost of leg autotomy in the Wolf spider Pirata sedentarius. The American Midland Naturalist. 154(1):115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnott G, Elwood RW. 2009. Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Animal Behaviour. 77(5):991–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software. 67(1):1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL. 2009. The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Animal Behaviour. 77(4):771–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briffa M, Sneddon LU. 2007. Physiological constraints on contest behaviour. Functional Ecology. 21(4):627–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown WD, Smith AT, Moskalik B, Gabriel J. 2006. Aggressive contests in house crickets: size, motivation and the information content of aggressive songs. Animal Behaviour. 72(1):225–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brueseke MA, Rypstra AL, Walker SE, Persons MH. 2001. Leg Autotomy in the Wolf Spider Pardosa milvina: A Common Phenomenon with Few Apparent Costs. The American Midland Naturalist. 146(1):153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham K, Anderson D. 2002. Model selection and multimodal inference: A practical information-Theoretic approach. 2nd edn. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Florescano IA, Favila ME. 2008. Male reproductive status affects contest outcome during nidification in Canthon cyanellus cyanellus LeConte (coleoptera: scarabaeidae). Behaviour. 145(12):1811–1821.
   Google Scholar
• Cory A, Schneider JM. 2018. Effects of social information on life history and mating tactics of males in the orb-web spider Argiope bruennichi. Ecology and Evolution. 8(1):355–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick JT, Elwood RW. 1990. Symmetrical assessment of female quality by male Gammarus pulex (amphipoda) during struggles over precopula females. Animal Behaviour. 40(5):877–883.
   Google Scholar
• Dodson GN, Beck MW. 1993. Pre-copulatory guarding of penultimate females by male crab spiders, Misumenoides formosipes. Animal Behaviour. 46(5):951–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson GN, Schwaab AT. 2001. Body size, leg autotomy, and prior experience as factors in the fighting success of male crab spiders, Misumenoides formosipes. Journal of Insect Behaviour. 14(6):841–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias DO, Kasumovic MM, Punzalan D, Andrade MC, Mason AC. 2008. Assessment during aggressive contests between male jumping spiders. Animal Behaviour. 76(3):901–910.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elwood RW, Arnott G. 2013. Assessments in contests are frequently assumed to be complex when simple explanations will suffice. Animal Behaviour. 86(5):e8–e12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emberts Z, Escalante I, Bateman PW. 2019. The ecology and evolution of autotomy. Biological Reviews. 94(6):1881–1896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enquist M, Leimar O. 1983. Evolution of fighting behaviour: decision rules and assessment of relative strength. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 102(3):387–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming PA, Bateman PW. 2007. Just drop it and run: the effect of limb autotomy on running distance and locomotion energetics of field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus). Journal of Experimental Biology. 210(8):1446–1454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formanowicz DR. 1990. The antipredator efficacy of spider leg autotomy. Animal Behaviour. 40(2):400–401.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler-Finn KD, Hebets EA. 2006. An examination of agonistic interactions in the whip spider Phrynus marginemaculatus (arachnida: amblypygi). Journal of Arachnology. 34(1):62–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox J, Weisberg S. 2011. An {R} companion to applied regression. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fromhage L, Schneider JM. 2005. Virgin doves and mated hawks: contest behaviour in a spider. Animal Behaviour. 70(5):1099–1104.
   Google Scholar
• Goubault M, Decuigniere M. 2012. Previous experience and contest outcome: winner effects persist in absence of evident loser effects in a parasitoid wasp. The American Naturalist. 180(3):364–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hack MA, Thompson DJ, Fernandes DM. 1997. Fighting in males of the autumn spider, Metellina segmentata: effects of relative body size, prior residency and female value on contest outcome and duration. Ethology. 103(6):488–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy IC, Briffa M. 2013. Animal contests. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herberstein ME, Painting CJ, Holwell GI. 2017. Scramble competition polygyny in terrestrial arthropods. Advances in the Study of Behaviour. 49:237–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoefler CD. 2002. Is contest experience a trump card? The interaction of residency status, experience, and body size on fighting success in Misumenoides formosipes (araneae: thomisidae). Journal of Insect Behaviour. 15(6):779–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu Y, Wolf L. 1999. The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Animal Behaviour. 57(4):903–910.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson SA, Jakob EM. 1999. Leg autotomy in a spider has minimal costs in competitive ability and development. Animal Behaviour. 57(4):957–965.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kasumovic MM, Elias DO, Punzalan D, Mason AC, Andrade MC. 2009. Experience affects the outcome of agonistic contests without affecting the selective advantage of size. Animal Behaviour. 77(6):1533–1538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp DJ, Wiklund C. 2001. Fighting without weaponry: a review of male-male contest competition in butterflies. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology. 49(6):429–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp DJ, Wiklund C. 2004. Residency effects in animal contests. Proceedings-Royal Society of London B. 271:1707–1712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokko H, Rankin DJ. 2006. Lonely hearts or sex in the city? density-dependent effects in mating systems. Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 361(1466):319–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse KC, Switzer PV. 2007. Physical contests for females in the Japanese beetle, Popillia japonica. Journal of Insect Science. 7:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström K, Pampoulie C. 2005. Effects of resource holding potential and resource value on tenure at nest sites in sand gobies. Behavioural Ecology. 16(1):70–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCambridge JE, Painting CJ, Walker LA, Holwell GI. 2019. Weapon allometry and phenotypic correlation in the New Zealand sheetweb spider Cambridgea plagiata. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 126(2):349–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCambridge JE, Walker LA, Holwell GI. 2019. Natural history and ecology of the New Zealand sheet-web spiders Cambridgea plagiata and C. foliata (araneae: desidae). Journal of Natural History. 53:1153–1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinley RH, Prenter J, Taylor PW. 2015. Assessment strategies and decision making in male–male contests of Servaea incana jumping spiders. Animal Behaviour. 101:89–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painting CJ, Holwell GI. 2014. Exaggerated rostra as weapons and the competitive assessment strategy of male giraffe weevils. Behavioural Ecology. 25(5):1223–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker G. 1974. Assessment strategy and the evolution of animal conflicts. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 47:223–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne RJ. 1998. Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model. Animal Behaviour. 56(3):651–662.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Payne RJ, Pagel M. 1996. Escalation and time costs in displays of endurance. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 183(2):185–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne RJ, Pagel M. 1997. Why do animals repeat displays? Animal Behaviour. 54(1):109–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinto NS, Palaoro AV, Peixoto PE. 2019. All by myself? meta-analysis of animal contests shows stronger support for self than for mutual assessment models. Biological Reviews. 94(4):1430–1442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt JN, Demes KW, Dittrich-Reed DR. 2011. Temperature mediates shifts in individual aggressiveness, activity level, and social behavior in a spider. Ethology. 117:318–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Riechart SE. 1988. The energetic costs of fighting. American Zoologist. 28:877–884.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts JA, Uetz GW. 2004. Species-specificity of chemical signals: silk source affects discrimination in a wolf spider (araneae: lycosidae). Journal of Insect Behaviour. 17(4):477–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland C. 1983. Chemical signals bound to the silk in spider communication (arachnida, araneae). Journal of Arachnology. 11:309–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor PW, Elwood R. 2003. The mismeasure of animal contests. Animal Behaviour. 65(6):1195–1202.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor PW, Hasson O, Clark DL. 2001. Initiation and resolution of jumping spider contests: roles for size, proximity, and early detection of rivals. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology. 50(5):403–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor PW, Jackson RR. 2003. Interacting effects of size and prior injury in jumping spider conflicts. Animal Behaviour. 65(4):787–794.
   Google Scholar
• Thornhill R, Alcock J. 1983. The evolution of insect mating systems. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trumbo ST. 2012. Contest behaviour and other reproductive efforts in aging breeders: a test of residual reproductive value and state-dependent models. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology. 66(11):1511–1518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuni C, Berger-Tal R. 2012. High mortality and female-biased operational sex ratio result in low encounter rates and moderate polyandry in a spider. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 107(4):910–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker LA, Holwell GI. 2018. The role of exaggerated male chelicerae in male–male contests in New Zealand sheet-web spiders. Animal Behaviour. 139:29–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells MS. 1988. Effects of body size and resource value on fighting behaviour in a jumping spider. Animal Behaviour. 36(2):321–326.
   Google Scholar
• Whitlock MC, Schluter D. 2015. The analysis of biological data. 2nd ed. Greenwood Village: Roberts and Company Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wolak ME, Fairbairn DJ, Paulsen YR. 2012. Guidelines for estimating repeatability. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 3(1):129–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar