Coastal Diptera species and communities and their geographic distribution in Aotearoa|New Zealand

References

• Barreiro F, Gómez M, Lastra M, López J, De la Huz R. 2011. Annual cycle of wrack supply to sandy beaches: effect of the physical environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 433:65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel DJ. 1991. Sciapodinae, Medeterinae (Insecta: Diptera) with a generic review of the Dolichopodidae. Fauna of New Zealand. 23:1–72.
   Google Scholar
• Bickel DJ. 1996. Thinempis, a new genus from Australia and New Zealand (Diptera: Empididae), with notes on the tribal classification of the Empidinae. Systematic Entomology. 21:115–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brake I, Mathis WN. 2007. Revision of the genus Australimyza Harrison (Diptera: Australimyzidae). Systematic Entomology. 32:252–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao A. 1984. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 11:265–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao A, Ma KH, Hsieh TC, Chiu C-H. 2016. Package ‘SpadeR’: species-richness prediction and diversity estimation with R. R Package version 0.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Colombini I, Aloia A, Fallaci M, Pezzoli G, Chelazzi L. 2000. Temporal and spatial use of stranded wrack by the macrofauna of a tropical sandy beach. Marine Biology. 136:531–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombini I, Chelazzi L. 2003. Influence of marine allochthonous input on sandy beach communities. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review. 41:115–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell RK, Coddington JA. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 345:101–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core Team R. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for statistical computing.
   Google Scholar
• Couri MS. 2010. Key to the Australian and Oceanian genera of Muscidae (Diptera). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia. 54:529–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig DA, Craig REG, Crosby TK. 2012. Simuliidae (Insecta: Diptera). Fauna of New Zealand. 68:1–336.
   Google Scholar
• Dear JP. 1985. Calliphoridae (Insecta: Diptera). Fauna of New Zealand. 8:1–59.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson T. 1976. Seaweed flies (Diptera: Coelopidae, etc). In: Cheng L, editor. Marine insects. Amsterdam: North-Holland; p. 447–464.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez MC, Pont AC. 2014. Fanniidae (Insecta: Diptera). Fauna of New Zealand. 71:1–91.
   Google Scholar
• Dugan JE, Hubbard DM, McCrary MD, Pierson MO. 2003. The response of macrofauna communities and shorebirds to macrophyte wrack subsidies on exposed sandy beaches of southern california. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 58:25–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edward DA, Blyth JE, McKee R, Gilburn AS. 2007. Change in the distribution of a member of the strand line community: the seaweed fly (Diptera: Coelopidae). Ecological Entomology. 32:741–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgie SA S, John MG, Wiser SK. 2013. Invertebrate communities and drivers of their composition on gravel beaches in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 37:95–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francuski L, Ludoški J, Milankov V. 2013. Phenotypic diversity and landscape genetics of Eristalis tenax in a spatially heterogeneous environment, Durmitor Mountain (Montenegro). Annales Zoologici Fennici. 50:262–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaston KJ. 2000. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature. 405:220–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez M, Barreiro F, López J, Lastra M. 2018. Effect of upper beach macrofauna on nutrient cycling of sandy beaches: metabolic rates during wrack decay. Marine Biology. 165:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves SC, Marques JC. 2011. The effects of season and wrack subsidy on the community functioning of exposed sandy beaches. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 95:165–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths C, Stenton-Dozey J. 1981. The fauna and rate of degradation of stranded kelp. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 12:645–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths C, Stenton-Dozey J, Koop K. 1983. Kelp wrack and the flow of energy through a sandy beach ecosystem. In: McLachlan A, Erasmus T, editors. Sandy beaches as ecosystems. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 547–556.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison RA. 1952. New Zealand drosophilidae (Diptera): I - Introduction and descriptions of domestic species of the genus Drosophila Fallén. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 79:505–517.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison RA. 1959. Acalypterate Diptera of New Zealand. Christchurch: Whitcombe and Tombs Ltd. (Bulletin / New Zealand D.S.I.R; 128).
   Google Scholar
• Harrison RA. 1990. Bibionidae (Insecta: Diptera). Fauna of New Zealand. 20:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge S, Early J. 2016. Hymenoptera associated with marine strandlines at Christchurch and Banks Peninsula. New Zealand Entomologist. 39:117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge S, Williams A. 2007. Coleoptera found in wrack beds and strandlines around the Kent coast. British Journal of Entomology and Natural History. 20:61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Holwell GI, Andrew NR. 2015. Protecting the small majority: insect conservation in Australia and New Zealand. In: Stow A, Maclean N, Holwell GI, editors. Austral ark: The State of Wildlife in Australia and New Zealand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 278–297.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett BG, Gee M. 2019. The potential management of the drone fly (Eristalis tenax) as a crop pollinator in New Zealand. Insects. 72:221–230.
   Google Scholar
• Inglis G. 1989. The colonisation and degradation of stranded Macrocystis pyrifera (L.) C. Ag. by the macrofauna of a New Zealand sandy beach. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 125:203–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaspari M, O'Donnell S, Kercher JR. 2000. Energy, density, and constraints to species richness: ant assemblages along a productivity gradient. The American Naturalist. 155:280–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaspari M, Yuan M, Alonso L. 2003. Spatial grain and the causes of regional diversity gradients in ants. The American Naturalist. 161:459–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lastra M, Page HM, Dugan JE, Hubbard DM, Rodil IF. 2008. Processing of allochthonous macrophyte subsidies by sandy beach consumers: estimates of feeding rates and impacts on food resources. Marine Biology. 154:163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyneborg L. 1992. Therevidae (Insecta: Diptera). Fauna of New Zealand. 24:1–137.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane RP, Andrew IG. 2001. New Zealand Diptera identification, diversity and biogeography: a summary. Records of the Canterbury Museum. 15:33–72.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane RP, Maddison PA, Andrew IG, Berry JA, Johns PM, Hoare RJB, Larivière M-C, Greenslade P, Henderson RC, Smithers CN, et al. 2010. Phylum Arthropoda: Subphylum Hexapoda: Protura, springtails, Diplura, insects. In: Gordon DP, editor. New Zealand inventory of biodiversity: Kingdom Animalia: Chaetognatha, Ecdysozoa, Ichnofossils. Christchurch: Canterbury University Press; p. 233–467.
   Google Scholar
• Mackerras IM. 1957. Tabanidae (Diptera) of New Zealand. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 84:581–610.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall SA. 2012. Flies: the natural history and diversity of Diptera. Buffalo, NY: Firefly Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall SA, Roháček J. 2000. A world revision of the seaweed fly genus Thoracochaeta Duda (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae: Limosininae): Part 1: extra-Holarctic species. Studia Dipterologica. 7:257–572.
   Google Scholar
• Mathis WN. 1993. Studies of Gymnomyzinae (Diptera: Ephydridae), IV: A revision of the shore-fly genus Hecamede Haliday. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology. 541:1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Mathis WN, McAlpine DK. 2011. A catalogue and conspectus on the family Coelopidae (Diptera: Schizophora. In: Brake I, Thompson FC, editors. Contributions to the Systema Dipterorum (Insecta: Diptera. Sofia, Bulgaria: North American Dipterists Society & Pensoft Publishers; p. 171–205.
   Google Scholar
• Mathis WN, Zatwarnicki T, Marris JWM. 2004. Review of unreported shore-fly genera on the tribe Scatellini from the New Zealand subregion (Diptera: Ephydridae) with description of three new species. Zootaxa. 622:1–27.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine DK. 1991. Review of the Australian kelp flies Diptera: Coelopidae. Systematic Entomology. 16:29–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meiklejohn KA, Dowton M, Pape T, Wallman JF. 2013. A key to the Australian Sarcophagidae (Diptera) with species emphasis on Sarcophaga (sensu lato). Zootaxa. 3680:148–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munari L, Mathis WN. 2010. World catalog of the family Canacidae (including Tethinidae) (Diptera), with keys to the supraspecific taxa. Zootaxa. 2471:1–84.
   Google Scholar
• Nihei SS, de Carvalho CJB. 2009. The Muscini flies of the world (Diptera, Muscidae): identification key and generic diagnoses. Zootaxa. 1976:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• NIWA|Climate, Freshwater & Ocean Science. 13 Beach types. [accessed 2021 Nov 5]. https://niwa.co.nz/coasts-and-oceans/nz-coast/learn-about-coastal-environments/beach-types/13-beach-types.
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, et al. 2019. Package ‘vegan’: Community ecology package. R Package version 2.5-6.
   Google Scholar
• Oldroyd H. 1954. The seaweed fly nuisance. Discovery. 15:198–202.
   Google Scholar
• Oldroyd H. 1964. The natural history of flies. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
   Google Scholar
• Pape T, Blagoderov V, Mostovski MB. 2011. Order Diptera Linnaeus, 1758. In: Zhang Z-Q, editor. Animal biodiversity: an outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Auckland: Magnolia Press; p. 222–229.
   Google Scholar
• Polis GA, Hurd SD. 1996. Linking marine and terrestrial food webs: allochthonous input from the ocean supports high secondary productivity on small islands and coastal land communities. The American Naturalist. 147:396–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard G. 1983. Biology of Tipulidae. Annual Review of Entomology. 28:1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray GC, Hayden BP. 1992. Coastal zone ecotones. In: Hansen AJ, di Castri F, editors. Landscape boundaries: consequences of biotic diversity and ecological flows. New York: Springer; p. 403–420.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers E. 1982. Chersodromia Walker discovered in New Zealand (Diptera: Empididae), and the description of a new species. New Zealand Entomologist. 7:340–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiel DR. 2011. Biogeographic patterns and long-term changes on New Zealand coastal reefs: Non-trophic cascades from diffuse and local impacts. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 400:33–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlacher TA, Hutton BM, Gilby BL, Porch N, Maguire GS, Maslo B, Connolly RM, Olds AD, Weston MA. 2017. Algal subsidies enhance invertebrate prey for threatened shorebirds: A novel conservation tool on ocean beaches? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 191:28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlacher TA, Strydom S, Connolly RM. 2013. Multiple scavengers respond rapidly to pulsed carrion resources at the land–ocean interface. Acta Oecologica. 48:7–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal. 27:379–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell AE. 2005. Identification keys to larval and adult female mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 32:99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer KA. 1976. The Agromyzidae of New Zealand (Insecta: Diptera). Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 6:153–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talley DM, Huxel GR, Holyoak M. 2006. Connectivity at the land-water interface. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan MA, editors. Connectivity conservation. Conservation Biology Series-Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; p. 97–129.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas JA. 2005. Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 360:339–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson FC. 2008. A conspectus of New Zealand flower flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) with the description of a new genus and species. Zootaxa. 1716:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ward ND, Megonigal JP, Bond-Lamberty B, Bailey VL, Butman D, Canuel EA, Diefenderfer H, Ganju NK, Goñi MA, Graham EB. 2020. Representing the function and sensitivity of coastal interfaces in Earth system models. Nature Communications. 11:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams KA, Villet MH. 2014. Morphological identification of Lucilia sericata, Lucilia cuprina and their hybrids (Diptera, Calliphoridae). Zookeys. 420:69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Wise KAJ. 1965. An annotated list of the aquatic and semi-aquatic insects of New Zealand. Pacific Insects. 7:191–216.
   Google Scholar
• Yamazaki K. 2012. Seasonal changes in seaweed deposition, seaweed fly abundance, and parasitism at the pupal stage along sandy beaches in central Japan. Entomological Science. 15:28–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar