Using faecal DNA metabarcoding to determine the diet of the long-tailed bat, Chalinolobus tuberculatus

References

• Alberdi A, Razgouor O, Aizpurua O, Novella-Fernandez R, Aihartza J, Budinski I, Garin I, Ibanez C, Izagirre E, Rebelo H, et al. 2020. DNA metabarcoding and spatial modelling link diet diversification with distribution homogeneity in European bats. Nature Communications. 11:1154. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14961-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ando H, Mukai H, Komura T, Dewi T, Ando M, Isagi Y. 2020. Methodological trends and perspectives of animal dietary studies by non-invasive fecal DNA metabarcoding. Environmental DNA. 2:391–406. doi:10.1002/edn3.117.
   Google Scholar
• Barclay RMR, Dolan MA, Dyck A. 1991. The digestive efficiency of insectivorous bats. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 69:1853–1856. doi:10.1139/z91-256.
   Google Scholar
• Barnsley J. 2021. What is known about terrestrial insect population trends in Aotearoa New Zealand? Intern Project – Peer-reviewed report: Office of the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor, Wellington. 31 p.
   Google Scholar
• Bohmann K, Monadjem A, Lehmkuhl Noer C, Rasmussen M, Zeale MRK, Clare E, Jones G, Willerslev E, Gilbert MTP. 2011. Molecular diet analysis of two African free-tailed bats (Molossidae) using high throughput sequencing. PLoS One. 6:e21441. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgar JM, Murray DC, Craig MD, Haile J, Houston J, Stokes V, Bunce M. 2014. Who’s for dinner? High-throughput sequencing reveals bat dietary differentiation in a biodiversity hotspot where prey taxonomy is largely undescribed. Molecular Ecology. 23:3605–3617. doi:10.1111/mec.12531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nature Methods. 13:581–583. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare EL, Barber BR, Sweeney BW, Hebert PDN, Fenton MB. 2011. Eating local: influences of habitat on the diet of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus). Molecular Ecology. 20:1772–1780. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05040.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deagle BE, Thomas AC, McInnes JC, Clarke LJ, Vesterinen EJ, Clare EL, Kartzinel TR, Eveson JP. 2019. Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: how should we convert sequence reads to dietary data? Molecular Ecology. 28:391–406. doi:10.1111/mec.14734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekrout A, Clarkson BD, Parsons S. 2014. Temporal and spatial distribution and habitat associations of an urban population of New Zealand long-tailed bats (Chalinolobus tuberculatus). New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 41:285–295. doi:10.1080/03014223.2014.953551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar RC. 2016. SINTAX: a simple non-Bayesian taxonomy classifier for 16S and ITS sequences. bioRxiv preprint: doi:10.1101/074161.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham NJ. 1996. The behaviour and ecology of long-tailed bats (Chalinolobus tuberculatus Gray) in the central North Island [Master of Science thesis]. Palmerston North: Massey University.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths RW. 2007. Activity patterns of long-tailed bats (Chalinolobus tuberculatus) in a rural landscape, South Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 34:247–258. doi:10.1080/03014220709510083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan X, Britzke ER, Piaggio AJ, Bergman DL, Van Pelt L, Lance RF. 2020. Genetic assays for guano identification of species and sex in bats of the United States and Canada. Journal of Mammalogy. 101:970–978. doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyaa059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurau AL. 2014. The diet of the New Zealand long-tailed bat, Chalinolobus tuberculatus [Master of Science thesis]. Massey University.
   Google Scholar
• Ingala MR, Simmons NB, Wultsch C, Krampis K, Provost KL, Perkin SL. 2021. Molecular diet analysis of neotropical bats based on fecal DNA metabarcoding. Ecology and Evolution. 11:7474–7491. doi:10.1002/ece3.7579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miya M, Sato Y, Fukunaga T, Sado T, Poulsen JY, Sato K, Minamoto T, Yamamoto S, Yamanaka H, Araki H, et al. 2015. MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species. Royal Society Open Science. 2:150088. doi:10.1098/rsos.150088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller AP. 2020. Quantifying rapidly declining abundance of insects in Europe using a paired experimental design. Ecology and Evolution. 10:2446–2451. doi:10.1002/ece3.6070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nester GM, De Brauwer M, Koziol A, West KM, DiBattista JD, White NE, Power M, Heydenrych MJ, Harvey E, Bunce M. 2020. Development and evaluation of fish eDNA metabarcoding assays facilitate the detection of cryptic seahorse taxa (family: Syngnathidae). Environmental DNA. 2:614–626. doi:10.1002/edn3.93.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell CFJ. 2001. Advances in New Zealand mammalogy 1990–2000: long-tailed bat. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 31:43–57. doi:10.1080/03014223.2001.9517638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell CFJ, Borkin KM, Lloyd CB, Parsons S, Hitchmough RA. 2017. Conservation status of New Zealand bats, 2017. Wellington: Department of Conservation. 4 p.
   Google Scholar
• Panasci M, Ballard WB, Breck S, Rodriguez D, Densmore LD, Webster DB, Baker RJ. 2011. Evaluation of fecal DNA preservation techniques and effects of sample age and diet on genotyping success. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 75:1616–1624. doi:10.1002/jwmg.221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Riaz T, Shehzad W, Viari A, Pompanon F, Taberlet P, Coissac E. 2011. ecoPrimers: inference of new DNA barcode markers from whole genome sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Research. 39:e145. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark JD, Maxted JR. 2007. A user guide for the Macroinvertebrate Community Index. Prepared for the Ministry for the Environment. Cawthron Report No.1166. 58 p.
   Google Scholar
• Thuo D, Furlan E, Broekhuis F, Kamau J, MacDonald K, Gleeson D. 2019. Food from faeces: evaluating the efficacy of scat DNA metabarcoding in dietary analyses. PLos One. 14:e0225805. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0225805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treloar S, Lohr C, Hopkins AJM, Ottewell K, McArthur S, Davis RA. 2023. Scat DNA as a non-invasive method for estimating the abundance of the vulnerable mala (Lagorchetes hirsutus). Wildlife Research. doi:10.1071/WR22122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamos EE, Elbrecht V, Leese F. 2017. Short COI markers for freshwater macroinvertebrate metabarcoding. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics. 1:e14625. doi:10.3897/mbmg.1.14625.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson SP, Davy SK, Bunce M, Stat M. 2018. Taxonomic identification of environmental DNA with informatic sequence classification trees. PeerJ preprint: doi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.26812v1.
   Google Scholar