COVID-19 and the epistemology of epidemiological models at the dawn of AI

References

• Adam A. 2020. Special report: the simulations driving the world's response to COVID-19. Nature. 580(7803):316–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastassopoulou C, Russo L, Tsakris A, Siettos C. 2020. Data-based analysis, modelling and forecasting of the COVID-19 outbreak. PLoS One. 15(3):e0230405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold KF, Davies V, de Kamps M, Tennant PW, Mbotwa J, Gilthorpe MS. 2020. Reflections on modern methods: generalized linear models for prognosis and intervention—theory, practice and implications for machine learning. Int J Epidemiol. 1–9. DOI:10.1093/ije/dyaa049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashofteh A, Bravo JM. 2020. A study on the quality of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) official datasets. Stat J IAOS. 36(2):291–301.
   Google Scholar
• Ayyoubzadeh SM, Ayyoubzadeh SM, Zahedi H, Ahmadi M, Kalhori SR. 2020. Predicting COVID-19 incidence through analysis of google trends data in iran: data mining and deep learning pilot study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 6(2):e18828.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beggs L, Briscoe R, Griffiths C, Ellison GTH, Gilthorpe MS. 2020. Intervention differential effects and regression to the mean in studies where sample selection is based on the initial value of the outcome variable: an evaluation of methods illustrated in weight-management studies. Biostat Epidemiol. 4(1):172–188.
   Google Scholar
• Bertozzi AL, Franco E, Mohler G, Short MB, Sledge D. 2020. The challenges of modeling and forecasting the spread of COVID-19. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 117(29):16732–16738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair A, Stewart P, Lubin JH, Forastiere F. 2007. Methodological issues regarding confounding and exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies of occupational exposures. Am J Ind Med. 50(3):199–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blower SM, Dowlatabadi H. 1994. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of complex models of disease transmission: an HIV model, as an example. Int Stat Rev. 62(2):229–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box GEP. 1976. Science and statistics. J Am Stat Ass. 71(356):791–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent A. 2015. Causation and prediction in epidemiology: a guide to the “Methodological revolution”. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 54:72–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burn-Murdoch J, Giles C. 2020 May 28. UK suffers second-highest death rate from coronavirus. Financial Times. [Accessed 2 Aug 2020]. https://www.ft.com/content/6b4c784e-c259-4ca4-9a82-648ffde71bf0.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway E, Cyranoski D, Mallapaty S, Stoye E, Tollefson J. 2020. The coronavirus pandemic in five powerful charts. Nature. 579(7800):482–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng MP, Papenburg J, Desjardins M, Kanjilal S, Quach C, Libman M, Dittrich S, et al. 2020. Diagnostic testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome–related coronavirus 2: a narrative review. Ann Intern Med. 172(11):726–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole SR, Platt RW, Schisterman EF, Chu H, Westreich D, Richardson D, Poole C. 2010. Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider. Int J Epidemiol. 39(2):417–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook JA, Ranstam J. 2017. Statistical models and confounding adjustment. Br J Surg. 104(6):786–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozier C. 2020. Forecasting s-curves is hard. [Accessed 2020 Aug 2]. https://constancecrozier.com/2020/04/16/forecasting-s-curves-is-hard/; https://vimeo.com/408599958.
   Google Scholar
• Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S. 2001. Epidemiology-is it time to call it a day? Int J Epidemiol. 30(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai AN, Kraemer MU, Bhatia S, Cori A, Nouvellet P, Herringer M, Cohn EL, Carrion M, Brownstein JS, et al. 2019. Real-time epidemic forecasting: challenges and opportunities. Health Secur. 17(4):268–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detweiler BN, Kollmorgen LE, Umberham BA, Hedin RJ, Vassar BM. 2016. Risk of bias and methodological appraisal practices in systematic reviews published in anaesthetic journals: a meta-epidemiological study. Anaesthesia. 71(8):955–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorigatti I, Okell L, Cori CA, Imai N, Baguelin M, Bhatia S, Boonyasiri A, Cucunubá Z, et al. 2002. Report 4: severity of 2019-novel coronavirus (nCoV). Imperial College London, London. [Accessed 2020 Aug 2]. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/mrc-gida/2020-02-10-COVID19-Report-4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eberhardt F, Scheines R. 2007. Interventions and causal inference. Philosoph Sci. 74(5):981–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellenberg JH. 1994. Selection bias in observational and experimental studies. Stat Med. 13(5–7):557–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison GTH. 2020. Introducing causal inference to the medical curriculum using temporal logic to draw directed acyclic graphs. medRxiv. 1–18. DOI:10.1101/2020.08.02.20166900
   Google Scholar
• Ellison GTH, Wylde L, Deacon C, Wilson S, Shepherd A. 2020. Prediction’ in the era of Big Data: opportunities and challenges for intelligence professionals. Cognitio. 94:6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson NM, Laydon D, Nedjati-Gilani G, Imai N, Ainslie K, Baguelin M, Bhatia S, et al. 2002. Report 9: impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand. London: Imperial College London. [Accessed 2020 Aug 2]. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/mrc-gida/2020-03-16-COVID19-Report-9.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller J. 2019. The myth and fallacy of simple extrapolation in medicine. Synthese. 1–21. DOI:10.1007/s11229-019-02255-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller J. 2020a May 5. Models v. evidence. Boston Review. [Accessed 2020 Aug 2]. http://bostonreview.net/science-nature/jonathan-fuller-models-v-evidence.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller J. 2020b Apr 10. Why coronavirus death rates can’t be summed up in one simple number. Conversation. [Accessed 2020 Aug 2]. https://theconversation.com/why-coronavirus-death-rates-cant-be-summed-up-in-one-simple-number-135758.
   Google Scholar
• Funk S, Gilad E, Watkins C, Jansen VA. 2009. The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106(16):6872–6877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein JR, Atherwood S. 2020. Improved measurement of racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 mortality in the United States. medRxiv. 1–13. DOI:10.1101/2020.05.21.20109116
   Google Scholar
• Greenland S. 1996. Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases. Int J Epidemiol. 25(6):1107–1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen D, Zeka A, Hashmi IMQ. 2020 Apr 2. Six unknown factors in coronavirus models and how they could affect predictions. Conversation. [Accessed 2020 Aug 2]. https://theconversation.com/six-unknown-factors-in-coronavirus-models-and-how-they-could-affect-predictions-134855.
   Google Scholar
• Henley SS, Golden RM, Kashner TM. 2020. Statistical modeling methods: challenges and strategies. Biostat Epidemiol. 4(1):105–139.
   Google Scholar
• Holmdahl I, Buckee C. 2020. Wrong but useful—what covid-19 epidemiologic models can and cannot tell us. N Engl J Med. 383(4):303–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IHME (IHME COVID-19 health service utilization forecasting team), Murray CJL. 2020. Forecasting the impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital demand and deaths for the USA and European Economic Area countries. medRxiv. 1–35. DOI:10.1101/2020.04.21.20074732
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis JP. 2020. Coronavirus disease 2019: the harms of exaggerated information and non-evidence-based measures. Eur J Clin Invest. 50(4):e13222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis JPA, Cripps S, Tanner MA. 2020. Forecasting for COVID-19 has failed. International Institute of Forecasters. [Accessed 2020 Aug 2]. https://forecasters.org/blog/2020/06/14/forecasting-for-covid-19-has-failed/.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson M. 2002. Disease and diversity in history. Soc Hist Med. 15(2):323–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell NP, Lewnard JA, Jewell BL. 2020. Predictive mathematical models of the COVID-19 pandemic: underlying principles and value of projections. J Am Med Ass. 323(19):1893–1894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DS, Helmreich S. 2020 Jun 26. The shape of epidemics. Boston Review. [Accessed 2020 Aug 2]. https://bostonreview.net/science-nature/david-s-jones-stefan-helmreich-shape-epidemics.
   Google Scholar
• Keogh RH, Shaw PA, Gustafson P, Carroll RJ, Deffner V, Dodd KW, Küchenhoff H, et al. 2020. STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: part 1-basic theory and simple methods of adjustment. Stat Med. 39(16):2197–2231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermack WO, McKendrick AG. 1927. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc Roy Soc A. 115(772):700–721.
   Google Scholar
• Khamsi R. 2020 Feb 8. Coronavirus is bad. Comparing it to the flu is worse. Wired. [Accessed 2020 Aug 2]. https://www.wired.com/story/coronavirus-is-bad-comparing-it-to-the-flu-is-worse/.
   Google Scholar
• Kissler SM, Tedijanto C, Goldstein E, Grad YH, Lipsitch M. 2020. Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period. Science. 368(6493):860–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korber B, Fischer WM, Gnanakaran S, Yoon H, Theiler J, Abfalterer W, Hengartner N, et al. 2020. Tracking changes in SARS-CoV-2 Spike: evidence that D614G increases infectivity of the COVID-19 virus. Cell. 182(4):812.e19–827.e19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lash TL, Fox MP, MacLehose RF, Maldonado G, McCandless LC, Greenland S. 2014. Good practices for quantitative bias analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 43(6):1969–1985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lash TL, Fox MP, Fink AK. 2009. Applying quantitative bias analysis to epidemiologic data. New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN: 978-0-387-87960-4
   Google Scholar
• Lescure FX, Bouadma L, Nguyen D, Parisey M, Wicky PH, Behillil S, Gaymard A, et al. 2020. Clinical and virological data of the first cases of COVID-19 in Europe: a case series. Lancet Infect Dis. 20(6):697–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Qin L, Xu Z, Yin Y, Wang X, Kong B, Bai J, et al. 2020. Artificial intelligence distinguishes COVID-19 from community acquired pneumonia on chest CT. Radiology. 296(2):E65–E71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Smith JO, Funk S, McLean AR, Riley S, Wood JL. 2015. Nine challenges in modelling the emergence of novel pathogens. Epidemics. 10:35–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço J, Paton R, Ghafari M, Kraemer M, Thompson C, Simmonds P, Klenerman P, Gupta S. 2020. Fundamental principles of epidemic spread highlight the immediate need for large-scale serological surveys to assess the stage of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. medRxiv. 1–7. DOI:10.1101/2020.03.24.20042291
   Google Scholar
• Luo J. 2020. Predictive monitoring of COVID-19. Data-Driven Innovation Lab. [Accessed 2020 Aug 2]. https://www.newsbeast.gr/files/1/2020/05/COVID19PredictionPaper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mondal MRH, Bharati S, Podder P, Priya Podder P. 2020. Data analytics for novel coronavirus disease. Inform Med Unlocked. 20:100374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munafò MR, Tilling K, Taylor AE, Evans DM, Davey Smith G. 2018. Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations. Int J Epidemiol. 47(1):226–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaumer-Streit B, Mayr V, Dobrescu AI, Chapman A, Persad E, Klerings I, Wagner G, et al. 2020. Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID‐19: a rapid review. Cochrane Systematic Review. 9:1465–1858. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD013574.pub2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park M, Thwaites RS, Openshaw PJ. 2020. COVID‐19: lessons from SARS and MERS. Eur. J. Immunol. 50(3):308–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paules CI, Marston HD, Fauci AS. 2020. 2020. Coronavirus infections-more than just the common cold. J Am Med Ass. 323(8):707–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petermann M, Wyler D. 2020. A pitfall in estimating the effective reproductive number Rt for COVID-19. Swiss Med Wkly. 150:1–5. DOI:10.4414/smw.2020.20307
   Google Scholar
• Petersen E, Koopmans M, Go U, Hamer DH, Petrosillo N, Castelli F, Storgaard M, et al. 2020. L. Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with SARS-CoV and influenza pandemics. Lancet Infect Dis. 20(9):e238–e244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit SD, Jerome KR, Rouquié D, Mari B, Barbry P, Kanda Y, Matsumoto M, et al. 2020. 'All In': a pragmatic framework for COVID-19 testing and action on a global scale. EMBO Mol Med. 12(6):e12634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock SJ, Collier TJ, Dandreo KJ, de Stavola BL, Goldman MB, Kalish LA, Kasten LE, McCormack VA. 2004. Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice. BMJ. 329(7471):883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probert WJ, Jewell CP, Werkman M, Fonnesbeck CJ, Goto Y, Runge MC, Sekiguchi S, et al. 2018. Real-time decision-making during emergency disease outbreaks. PLoS Comput Biol. 14(7):e1006202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin L, Sun Q, Wang Y, Wu KF, Chen M, Shia BC, Wu SY. 2020. Prediction of number of cases of 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) using social media search index. IJERPH. 17(7):2365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raleigh VS. 2020. Tackling UK's mortality problem: covid-19 and other causes. BMJ. 369:m2295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehkopf DH, Glymour MM, Osypuk TL. 2016. The consistency assumption for causal inference in social epidemiology: when a rose is not a rose. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 3(1):63–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rettner R. 2020. How Does the New Coronavirus Compare with the Flu? Scientific American. [Accessed 2020 Aug 2]. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-does-the-new-coronavirus-compare-with-the-flu/.
   Google Scholar
• Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ. 2008. Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learn Individ Diff. 18(1):89–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson S, Spiegelhalter D. 2020 Apr 12. Coronavirus statistics: what can we trust and what should we ignore? Guardian. [Accessed 2020 Aug 2]. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/12/coronavirus-statistics-what-can-we-trust-and-what-should-we-ignore.
   Google Scholar
• Richiardi L, Bellocco R, Zugna D. 2013. Mediation analysis in epidemiology: methods, interpretation and bias. Int J Epidemiol. 42(5):1511–1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie H, Ortiz-Ospina E, Roser M, Hasell J. 2020 Mar 19. COVID-19 deaths and cases: how do sources compare? Our World in Data. [Accessed 2020 Aug 2]. https://ourworldindata.org/covid-sources-comparison.
   Google Scholar
• SAGE (Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies). 2020 Mar 29. Reasonable worst-case planning scenario. [Accessed 2020 Aug 2]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/897509/S0089_Reasonable_Worst-Case_Planning_Scenario_-_29.03.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schisterman EF, Cole SR, Platt RW. 2009. Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiol. 20:488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw PA, Gustafson P, Carroll RJ, Deffner V, Dodd KW, Keogh RH, Kipnis V, et al. 2020. STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: part 2-more complex methods of adjustment and advanced topics. Stat Med. 39(16):2232–2263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegenfeld AF, Bar-Yam Y. 2020. What models can and cannot tell us about COVID-19. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 117:16092–16095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeone R. 2020. Qualitative forecast and temporal evolution of the disease spreading using a simplified model and COVID-19 data for Italy. medRxiv. 1–27. DOI:10.1101/2020.06.22.20137133
   Google Scholar
• Sperrin M, Grant SW, Peek N. 2020. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis in Covid-19. BMJ. 369:m1464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun K, Chen J, Viboud C. 2020. Early epidemiological analysis of the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak based on crowdsourced data: a population-level observational study. Lancet Digit Health. 2(4):e201–e208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tennant PWG, Arnold K, Berrie L, Ellison GTH, Gilthorpe MS. 2017. Advanced modelling strategies: challenges and pitfalls in robust causal inference with observational data. Leeds: Leeds Institute for Data Analytics (LIDA). ISBN: 978-1-5272-1208-4
   Google Scholar
• Tennant PWG, Harrison WJ, Murray EJ, Arnold KF, Berrie L, Fox MP, Gadd SC, et al. 2019. Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) in applied health research: review and recommendations. Int J Epidemiol. 1–135. DOI:10.1101/2019.12.20.19015511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderWeele TJ, Arah OA. 2011. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding for general outcomes, treatments, and confounders. Epidemiology. 22(1):42–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Egger M. 2004. The scandal of poor epidemiological research. BMJ. 329(7471):868–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CJ, Ng CY, Brook RH. 2020. Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: big data analytics, new technology, and proactive testing. J Am Med Ass. 323(14):1341–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberger DM, Chen J, Cohen T, Crawford FW, Mostashari F, Olson D, Pitzer VE, et al. 2020. Estimation of excess deaths associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, March to May 2020. J Am Med Ass Int Med. 180:1336–1344. DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3391
   Google Scholar
• Westreich D, Greenland S. 2013. The table 2 fallacy: presenting and interpreting confounder and modifier coefficients. Am J Epidemiol. 177(4):292–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting K. 2020 Mar 20. Two experts explain what other viruses can teach us about COVID-19 – and what they can’t. World Economic Forum. [Accessed 2020 Aug 2]. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/03/coronavirus-covid-19-mers-sars-experts/.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson E, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran KJ, Bacon S, Bates C, Morton CE, Curtis HJ, et al. 2020. OpenSAFELY: factors associated with COVID-19-related hospital death in 17 million patients. Nature. 584:430–436. DOI:10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf SH, Chapman DA, Sabo RT, Weinberger DM, Hill L. 2020. Excess deaths from COVID-19 and other causes, March–April 2020. J Am Med Ass. 324(5):510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynants L, Van Calster B, Bonten MM, Collins GS, Debray TP, De Vos M, Haller MC, Heinze G, et al. 2020. Schuit E 2020. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ. 369:m1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav RS. 2020. Data analysis of COVID-2019 epidemic using machine learning methods: a case study of India. Int J Inf Tech. 12:1321–1330. DOI:10.1007/s41870-020-00484-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang S, Cao P, Du P, Wu Z, Zhuang Z, Yang L, Yu X, et al. 2020. Early estimation of the case fatality rate of COVID-19 in mainland China: a data-driven analysis. Annals of translational medicine. Ann Transl Med. 8(4):128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee J, Unger L, Zadravecz F, Cariello P, Seibert A, Johnson MA, Fuller MJ. 2020. Novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID‐19): emergence and implications for emergency care. J Am Coll Emerg Phys Open. 1(2):63–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang K, Liu X, Shen J, Li Z, Sang Y, Wu X, Zha Y, et al. 2020. Clinically applicable AI system for accurate diagnosis, quantitative measurements, and prognosis of covid-19 pneumonia using computed tomography. Cell. 181(6):1423–1433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar