Evaluation of diallelic STR markers with inter-population allelic database for their usefulness in paternity trios in the Central Indian population

References

• Aguilar-Velázquez JA, Martínez-Cortés G, Inclán-Sánchez A, Romero-Rentería O, Díaz-Navarro XX, Rangel-Villalobos H. 2016. Population data of 23 STR loci (PowerPlex® Fusion System) in Mexican Mestizos from the West Region. Int J Legal Med. 130(6):1489–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhteruzzaman S, Majumder AK, Ferdous A, Ali ME. 2012. False paternity with one or two mismatches using commercial STR kits. Australian J Forensic Sci. 44:253–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsafiah HM, Iyengar A, Hadi S, Alshlash WM, Goodwin W. 2018. Sequence data of six unusual alleles at SE33 and D1S1656 STR Loci. Electrophoresis. 39(19):2471–2476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Snan NR, Messaoudi S, Babu SR, Bakhiet M. 2019. Population genetic data of the 21 autosomal STRs included in GlobalFiler kit of a population sample from the Kingdom of Bahrain. PLoS One. 14(8):e0220620..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apostolov A. 2012. Application of DNA fragment analysis in disputed paternity (maternity) and identification of the individual. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 26(5):3210–3214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodner M, Bastisch I, Butler JM, Fimmers R, Gill P, Gusmão L, Morling N, et al. 2016. Recommendations of the DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) on quality control of autosomal Short Tandem Repeat allele frequency databasing (STRidER). Forensic Sci Int Genet. 24:97–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler JM, Hill CR, Kline M, Duewer DL, Sprecher CJ, McLaren RS, Rabbach DR, Krenke BE, et al. 2009. The single most polymorphic STR Locus: SE33 performance in U.S. populations. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2(1):23–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dash HR, Rawat N, Vajpayee K, Shrivastava P, Das S. 2021. Useful autosomal STR marker sets for forensic and paternity applications in the Central Indian population. Ann Hum Biol. 48(1):37–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado E, Neyra CD. 2019. Allele frequencies of 21 autosomal STR markers in a mixed race Peruvian population applied to forensic practice. Spanish J Leg Med. 45(3):92–97.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit S, Shrivastava P, Kumawat RK, Kaitholia K, Dash HR, Sharma H, Choubey G. 2019. Forensic genetic analysis of population of Madhya Pradesh with PowerPlex Fusion 6C™ Multiplex System. Int J Legal Med. 133(3):803–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drabek J. 2009. Validation of software for calculating the likelihood ratio for parentage and kinship. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 3:112–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung WK, Yang CT, Guo W. 2004. EasyDNA: user-friendly paternity and kinship testing programs. Int Cong Ser. 1261:628–630.
   Google Scholar
• Gao H, Wang C, Zhang R, Wu H, Sun S, Xiao D, Wang Y, Zhang M. 2019. Application of CPI cutoff value based on parentage testing of duos and trios typed by four autosomal kits. PLoS One. 14(11):e0225174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaviria A, Vela M, Morejon G, Galarza J, Castillo G, Pastás V, Burgos G, et al. 2015. Analysis of the most efficient autosomal strs and genetic data for the locus SE33 in ecuadorian population. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 5:e93–e95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill P, Evett I. 1995. Population genetics of short tandem repeat (STR) loci. Genetica. 96(1–2):69–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjertson DW, Brenner CH, Baur MP, Carracedo A, Guidet F, Luque JA, Lessig R, et al. 2007. ISFG: Recommendations on biostatistics in paternity testing. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 1(3–4):223–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin W, Linacre A, Hadi S. 2007. An introduction to forensic genetics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978-0-470-01027-3.
   Google Scholar
• Grover R, Jiang H, Turingan RS, French JL, Tan E, Selden RF. 2017. FlexPlex27-highly multiplexed rapid DNA identification for law enforcement, kinship, and military applications. Int J Legal Med. 131(6):1489–1501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn PR, Trueman K, Stapleton P, Klarkowski DB. 1997. DNA analysis in disputed parentage: the occurrence of two apparently false exclusions of paternity, both at short tandem repeat (STR) loci, in the one child. Electrophoresis. 18(9):1650–1652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hares DR. 2015. Selection and implementation of expanded CODIS core loci in the United States. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 17:33–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepler AB, Weir BS. 2008. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for paternity cases with allelic dependencies. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2(3):166–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling D, Tillmar AO, Egeland T. 2014. Familias 3 - extensions and new functionality. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 13:121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Guo L, Jin H, Li Z, Bai R, Shi M, Ma S. 2017. Developmental validation of a 6-dye typing system with 27 loci and application in Han population of China. Sci Rep. 7(1):4706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Liu Y, Guo J, Fu X, Wang Z, Liu Y, Cai J, Zha L. 2019. Genetic polymorphism of 29 STR loci in the Hunan Han population from China. Forensic Sci Res. 4(4):351–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macan M, Uvodić P, Botica V. 2003. Paternity testing in case of brother-sister incest. Croatian Med J. 44:347–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miladinov DT, Vasiljević P, Šorgić D, Axelsson EP, Stefanović A. 2020. Allele frequencies and forensic parameters of 22 autosomal STR loci in a population of 983 individuals from Serbia and comparison with 24 other populations. Ann Hum Biol. 47(7-8):632–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morling N, Allen RW, Carracedo A, Geada H, Guidet F, Hallenberg C, Martin W, et al. 2002. Paternity Testing Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendations on genetic investigations in paternity cases. Forensic Sci Int. 129(3):148–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroni R, Gasbarra D, Arjas E, Lukka M, Ulmanen I. 2008. Effects of reference population and number of STR markers on paternity testing. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 1(1):654–655.
   Google Scholar
• Moroni R, Gasbarra D, Arjas E, Lukka M, Ulmanen I. 2011. Effects of reference population and number of STR markers on positive evidence in paternity testing. J Forensic Res. 02:119.
   Google Scholar
• Ozeki M, Tamaki K. 2013. Allele frequencies of 37 short tandem repeat loci in a Japanese population. Leg Med (Tokyo). 15(6):342–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pemberton TJ, DeGiorgio M, Rosenberg NA. 2013. Population structure in a comprehensive genomic data set on human microsatellite variation. G3 (Bethesda). 3(5):891–907.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pimenta JR, Pena SDJ. 2010. Efficient human paternity testing with a panel of 40 short insertion-deletion polymorphisms. Genet Mol Res. 9(1):601–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preet K, Malhotra S, Shrivastava P, Jain T, Rawat S, Varte LR, Singh S, et al. 2016. Genetic diversity in Gorkhas: an autosomal STR study. Sci Rep. 6:32494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primorac D, Schanfield MS. 2000. Application of forensic DNA testing in the legal system. Croatian Med J. 41:32–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riancho JA, Zarrabeitia MT. 2003. A Windows-based software for common paternity and sibling analyses. Forensic Sci Int. 135(3):232–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma AK. 2007. DNA profiling: Social, legal, or biological parentage. Indian J Hum Genet. 13(3):88–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shewale JG, Wang D, Zhong C, Gopinath S, Mulero J, Razdan A, Vijaychander S, et al. 2013. From sample collection to report generation- a new integrated workflow solution for paternity and relationship testing. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 4(1):e232–e233.
   Google Scholar
• Silva NM, Pereira L, Poloni ES, Currat M. 2012. Human neutral genetic variation and forensic STR data. PLoS One. 7(11):e49666..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen CR, Coble MD, Gettings KB, Vallone PM. 2017. Corrigendum to 'U.S. Population Data for 29 Autosomal STR Loci' [Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 7 (2013) e82–e83]. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 31:e36–e40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey M. 2001. Short tandem repeat-based identification of individuals and parents. Croatian Med J. 42:233–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo SY, An SH, Park JH, Kim NY, Lee YA, Kim JJ, Park KW, Chung KW. 2014. Autosomal STR loci for improving the kinship discrimination power for missing children and forensic application. Genes Genom. 36(3):355–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young KL, Sun G, Deka R, Crawford MH. 2011. Autosomal short tandem repeat genetic variation of the Basques in Spain. Croat Med J. 52(3):372–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan X, Adnan A, Zhou Y, Khan A, Kasim K, McNevin D. 2018. Forensic characterization of 15 autosomal STRs in four populations from Xinjiang, China, and genetic relationships with neighboring populations. Sci Rep. 8(1):4673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar