Effect of snorkel shape on the fluid flow during RH degassing process: mathematical modelling

References

• F. Yoshikawa and J. Szekely: ‘Mechanism of blast furnace hearth erosion’, Ironmak. Steelmak., 1981, 8, (4), 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• I. Crudu, M. P. Ionescu, V. Munteanu, I. F. Sandu and P. Nedelcu: ‘A tribosystemic approach to refractory lining destruction in blast furnaces’, Wear, 1998, 216, (2), 251–261. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1648(98)00179-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Eizo and K. Satoi: ‘The damage of continuous casting tundish refractories’, Taikabutsu, 2001, 53, (4), 220–228.
   Google Scholar
• V. Singh, A. R. Pal and P. Panigrahi: ‘Numerical simulation of flow-induced wall shear stress to study a curved shape billet caster tundish design’, ISIJ Int., 2008, 48, (4), 430–437. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.48.430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Yang, L. Zhang, J. Li and K. Peaslee: ‘Structure optimization of horizontal continuous casting tundishes using mathematical modeling and water modeling’, ISIJ Int., 2009, 49, (10), 1551–1560. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.49.1551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhang, S. Yang, J. Li, W. Yang, Y. Wang and X. Guo: ‘Large eddy simulation on flow structure in a dissipative ladle shroud and a tundish’, ISIJ Int., 2015, 55, (8), 1684–1692. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2015-085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. A. Llanos, S. Garcia, J. A. Ramos-Banderas, J. . J. Barreto and G. Solorio: ‘Multiphase modeling of the fluidynamics of bottom argon bubbling during ladle operations’, ISIJ Int., 2010, 50, (3), 396–402. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.50.396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Huang, H. Gu, M. Zhang, N. Wang, T. Wang and Y. Zou: ‘Mathematical modeling on erosion characteristics of refining ladle lining with application of purging plug’, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2013, 44, (3), 744–749. doi: 10.1007/s11663-013-9805-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Li, Z. Liu, B. Li, H. Matsuura and F. Tsukihashi: ‘Water model and CFD-PBM coupled model of gas-liquid-slag three-phase flow in ladle metallurgy’, ISIJ Int., 2015, 55, (7), 1337–1346. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.55.1337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. G. Park, K. W. Yi and S. B. Ahn: ‘The effect of operating parameters and dimensions of the RH system on melt circulation using numerical calculations’, ISIJ Int., 2001, 41, (5), 403–409. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.41.403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Kamata, S. Hayashi and K. Ito: ‘Estimation of circulation flow rate in RH reactor using water model’, Tetsu-to-Hagané, 1998, 84, (7), 484–489. doi: 10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.84.7_484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Neves, H. P. O. de Oliveira and R. P. Tavares: ‘Evaluation of the effects of gas injection in the vaccum chamber of a RH degasser on melt circulation and decarburization rates’, ISIJ Int., 2009, 49, (8), 1141–1149. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.49.1141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Li and F. Tsukihashi: ‘Modeling of circulating flow in RH degassing vessel water model designed for two-and multi-legs operations’, ISIJ Int., 2000, 40, (12), 1203–1209. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.40.1203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. G. Park, W. C. Doo, K. W. Yi and S. B. An: ‘Numerical calculation of circulation flow rate in the degassing rheinstahl-heraeus process’, ISIJ Int., 2000, 40, (8), 749–755. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.40.749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Geng, H. Lei and J. He: ‘Numerical simulation of the multiphase flow in the rheinsahl–heraeus (RH) system’, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2010, 41, (1), 234–247. doi: 10.1007/s11663-009-9300-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. A. Kishan and S. K. Dash: ‘Prediction of circulation flow rate in the RH degasser using discrete phase particle modeling’, ISIJ Int., 2009, 49, (4), 495–504. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.49.495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wei and H. Hu: ‘Mathematical modelling of molten steel flow in a whole degasser during RH refining process’, Ironmak. Steelmak., 2005, 32, (5), 427–434. doi: 10.1179/174328105X48133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. K. Ajmani, S. K. Dash, S. Chandra and C. Bhanu: ‘Mixing evaluation in the RH process using mathematical modelling’, ISIJ Int., 2004, 44, (1), 82–90. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.44.82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Tsujino, J. Nakashima, M. Hirai and I. Sawada: ‘Numerical analysis of molten steel flow in ladle of RH process’, ISIJ Int., 1989, 29, (7), 589–595. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.29.589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Inoue, Y. Furuno, T. Usui and S. Miyahara: ‘Acceleration of decarburization in RH vacuum degassing process’, ISIJ Int., 1992, 32, (1), 120–125. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.32.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. K. Hanna, T. Jones, R. I. Blake and M. S. Millman: ‘Water modelling to aid improvement of degasser performance for production of ultralow carbon interstitial free steels’, Ironmak. Steelmak., 1994, 21, (1), 37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. Nascimento, H. L. V. Pujatti, L. Neves, T. R. C. de Almeida and R. P. Tavares: AISTech Proceedings, Indianapolis IN, USA, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• F. Jiang and G. G. Cheng: ‘Effects of gas injection with multihole orifices in upleg snorkel on bubble behaviour and decarburisation rate during RH refining’, Ironmak. Steelmak., 2012, 39, (5), 386–390. doi: 10.1179/1743281211Y.0000000068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Zhu, Q. Liu, D. Zhao, S. Ren, M. Xu, B. Yang and B. Hu: ‘Effect of nozzle blockage on circulation flow rate in up-snorkel during the RH degasser process’, Steel Res. Int., 2015, 85, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• L. Lin, Y. Bao, F. Yue, L. Zhang and H. Ou: ‘Physical model of fluid flow characteristics in RH-TOP vacuum refining process’, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2012, 19, (6), 483–489. doi: 10.1007/s12613-012-0584-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Li, X. Ai, N. Wang and N. Lv: ‘Water model study on circulation rate influenced by snorkel, nozzle and blowing parameters in RH refining’, Adv. Mater. Res., 2011, 287, 840–843.
   Google Scholar
• T. Kuwabara, K. Umezawa, K. Mori and H. Watanabe: ‘Investigation of decarburization behavior in RH-reactor and its operation improvement’, Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn., 1988, 28, (4), 305–314. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational1966.28.305
   Google Scholar
• Q. He and L. Liu: ‘Effects of device shape of RH on characteristics of flow and mixing’, Steelmaking, 2013, 29, (3), 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Q. Rui, F. Jiang, Z. Ma, Z. You, G. Cheng and J. Zhang: ‘Effect of elliptical snorkel on the decarburization rate in single snorkel refining furnace’, Steel Res. Int., 2013, 84, (2), 192–197. doi: 10.1002/srin.201200182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. He, L. Liu, X. Li and L. Xue: ‘Influence of snorkel shape on characteristics of flow and mixing of RH’, Iron & Steel, 2013, 48, (2), 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• C. W. Hirt and B. D. Nichols: ‘Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries’, J. Comput. Phys., 1981, 39, (1), 201–225. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSYS FLUENT 14.0, ‘FLUENT User's Guide’, 2011, Canonsburg, PA, ANSYS, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• H. Ling, F. Li, L. Zhang and A. N. Conejo: ‘Investigation on the effect of nozzle number on the recirculation rate and mixing time in the RH process using VOF + DPM model’, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2016, 47, (3), 1950–1961. doi: 10.1007/s11663-016-0669-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. E. Launder and D. B. Spalding: ‘Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence’; 1972, London, UK, Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• J. Aoki, L. Zhang and B. G. Thomas: ICS 2005-The 3rd Internat. Congress on the Science & Technology of Steelmaking (Charlotte, NC, May 9–12), AIST, Warrandale., 2005.
   Google Scholar
• S. A. Morsi and A. J. Alexander: ‘An investigation of particle trajectories in two-phase flow systems’, J. Fluid Mech., 1972, 55, (2), 193–208. doi: 10.1017/S0022112072001806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. F. Davidson and B. O. G. Schüler: Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 1960, 38, 335–342.
   Google Scholar
• C. G. Méndez, N. Nigro and A. Cardona: ‘Drag and non-drag force influences in numerical simulations of metallurgical ladles’, J. Mater. Process. Tech., 2005, 160, (3), 296–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. A. Drew and S. L. Passman: ‘Theory of multicomponent fluids’; 1999, New York, Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• M. Pourtousi, J. N. Sahu and P. Ganesan: ‘Effect of interfacial forces and turbulence models on predicting flow pattern inside the bubble column’, Chem. Eng. Process., 2014, 75, 38–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Zhang: ‘Mathematical simulation of fluid flow in gas-stirred liquid systems’, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2000, 8, (4), 463–476. doi: 10.1088/0965-0393/8/4/305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Xie and F. Oeters: ‘Experimental studies on the flow velocity of molten metals in a ladle model at centric gas blowing’, Steel Res. Int., 1992, 63, (3), 93–104. doi: 10.1002/srin.199200478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ramos-Banderas, R. D. Morales, L. García-Demedices and M. Diaz-Cruz: ‘Mathematical simulation and modeling of steel flow with gas bubbling in trough type tundishes’, ISIJ Int., 2003, 43, (5), 653–662. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.43.653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Zhang and F. Li: ‘Investigation on the fluid flow and mixing phenomena in a Ruhrstahl-Heraeus (RH) steel degasser using physical modeling’, JOM, 2014, 66, (7), 1227–1240. doi: 10.1007/s11837-014-1023-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar