Physical simulation of macroinstability behaviour of liquid level in oxygen coal combustion melting and separation furnace

References

• He G, Du X, Qu H, et al. Present status and development perspective of non-blast furnace ironmaking technology. Multipurp Util Mineral Resour. 2014;3:2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Zainullin LA, Epishin AY, Artov DA, et al. High-temperature carbothermal reduction of siderite ore in an electric arc. Metallurgist. 2017;60(11–12):1135–1138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan YJ. Progress and future of ultra-low carbon dioxide emissions steelmaking project. China Metall. 2017;27(02):6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wang M, Rong-xia R, et al. Discussion on the latest technology and process route selection for molten reduction ironmaking. Iron Steel. 2020;55(08):145–150.
   Google Scholar
• Lin L. Fundamental research on HIsmelt ironmaking process. Beijing: University of Science and Technology Beijing; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Xiaohua Z, Xuefeng S, Kai Z, et al. Development status and prospect of non-blast furnace ironmaking process. Mineral Compr Util. 2020;02:8–15.
   Google Scholar
• Changqing HU, Han X, Zhihong LI, et al. Comparison of CO2 emission between COREX and blast furnace iron-making system. J Environ Sci. 2009;21(supp-S1):S116–S120.
   Google Scholar
• Guo-li J, Bing-huai Z, Hai-bin Y, et al. Energy utilization characteristics of COREX 3000 smelting reduction ironmaking process. China Metall. 2007;03:43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng-xiu S, Wi-jin S. From COREX to FINEX: The case of path-revealing Innovation in POSCO. J Korea Technol Innovation Soc. 2010;13(4):700–711.
   Google Scholar
• Gao JJ, Wan XY, Qi YH, et al. Technology analysis of rotary reduction kiln pre-reduction and oxygen coal combustion smelting ironmaking. J Iron Steel Res. 2018;30(2):91–96.
   Google Scholar
• Mazumdar D, Guthrie R. Hydrodynamic modeling of some gas injection procedures in ladle metallurgy operations. Metall Materials Trans B. 1985;16(1):83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Lekherzak VE, Usachev AB, Romenets VA, et al. Physical modeling of slag-coal suspension in Romelt process (part I). Steel Transl. 2007;37(7):568–571.
   Google Scholar
• Haida O, Brimacombe JK. Physical-model study of the effect of gas kinetic energy in injection refining processes. Trans Iron Steel Inst Jpn. 2006;25(1):14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Castillejos AH, Brimacombe JK. Physical characteristics of gas jets injected vertically upward into liquid metal. Metall Trans B. 1989;20:596–601.
   Google Scholar
• Sen N, Sau R, Mazumdar S, et al. Physical modelling of liquid feeding for an unequal diameter two roll thin strip caster. Can Metall Q. 1998;37:161–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao K, Shen Y-z, Kong Z, et al. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of flow and splash behavior in an oxygen coal combustion melting and separating furnace. J Iron Steel Res Int. 2021;28(8):965–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winardi S, Nagase Y. Unstable phenomenon of flow in a mixing reactor with a marine propeller. J Chem Eng Jap. 1991;24:243–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittorf KJ, Kresta SM. Prediction of cloud height for solid suspensions in stirred tanks. Chem Eng Res Des. 2003;81(5):568–577.
   Google Scholar
• Haam S, Brodkey RS, Fasano JB. Local heat transfer in a mixing vessel using heat flux sensors. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1990;31(5):1384–1391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui F, Hong F, Li C, et al. Two-phase flow instability in distributed jet array impingement boiling on pin-fin structured surface and its affecting factors. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 2019;143(Nov.):118495.1–118495.13.
   Google Scholar
• Jesper K, Svensson FJ, Rasmuson A. Flow instabilities, energy levels, and structure in stirred tanks. AIChE J. 2006;52:4039–4051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy S, Acharya S, Cloeter MD. Flow structure and the effect of macro-instabilities in a pitched-blade stirred tank. Chem Eng Sci. 2010;65(10):3009–3024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam M, Irons G, Brooks G, et al. Inclined jetting and splashing in electric arc furnace steelmaking. Trans Iron Steel Inst Jpn. 2011;51(9):1439–1447.
   Google Scholar
• Mazumdar D, Guthrie R, Mazumdar D. Discussion of “mixing time and fluid flow phenomena in liquids of varying kinematic viscosities agitated by bottom gas injection”. Metall Mater Trans B. 1999;30(2):349–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranade VV, Perrard M, Sauze NL, et al. Trailing vortices of Rushton turbine: PIV measurements and CFD simulations with snapshot approach. Chem Eng Res Des. 2001;79(1):3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bruha O, Fort I, Smolka P, et al. Flow transition phenomena in an axially agitated system. Proceedings of the VIII European Conference on Mixing. Cambridge: American Institute of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Yue Y. Numerical simulation and experimental study of oxygen blowing process in copper bottom-blowing furnace. Beijing: University of Science and Technology Beijing; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Fan-Han L. Numerical simulation and evaluation method of mixing effect of side-blow enhanced mixing process in Varnukov furnace. Kunming: Kunming University of Technology; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wang T, Wang J, Yong J. Theoretical prediction of flow regime transition in bubble columns by the population balance model. Chem Eng Sci. 2005;60(22):6199–6209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Kim S, Ishii M, et al. One-group interfacial area transport in vertical air-water bubbly flow. Office Sci Tech Inf Tech Rep. 1997;41:1103–1112.
   Google Scholar
• Sovová H. Breakage and coalescence of drops in a batch stirred vessel—II comparison of model and experiments. Chem Eng Sci. 1981;36(9):1567–1573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright H, Ramkrishna D. Factors affecting coalescence frequency of droplets in a stirred liquid-liquid dispersion. AIChE J. 1994;40(5):767–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar