Assessment of the dissolution rate and behaviour of raw dolomite and limestone with different calcination degrees in primary steelmaking slags

References

• A. Gosh and A. Chatterje: Ironmaking and steelmaking, theory and practice, PHI Learning, Delhi, 2013. p. 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Deo B, Boom R. Fundamentals of steelmaking metallurgy. London: Prentice Hall International; 1993. p. 150–175.
   Google Scholar
• Fruehan RJ. Making, shaping and treating of steel, steelmaking and refining. Pittsburgh: AISE; 1999. p. 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Williams P, Sunderland M, Briggs G. Interactions between dolomitic lime and iron silicate melts. Ironmak Steelmak. 1982;9:150–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obst K, Schürmann E, Münchberg W, et al. Auflösungsverhalten und Sättigungsgehalte des Magnesiumoxids in Anfangsschlacken des LD-Verfahrens. Arch Eisenhüttenwes. 1982;51 (10):407–412.
   Google Scholar
• Kitamura S-y. Dissolution behavior of lime into steelmaking slag. ISIJ Int. 2017;57(10):1670–1676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo M, Sun Z, Guo X, et al. Mechanisms of calcium oxide dissolution in CaO-Al2O3-SiO2-based slags, proceedings of the international symposium on liquid metal processing and casting. TMS. 2013: 101–107. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48102-9_14
   Google Scholar
• Dogan N, Brooks GA, A M. Rhamdhani: kinetics of flux dissolution in oxygen steelmaking. ISIJ Int. 2009;49 (10):1474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natalie CA., JW. Ironmaking Steelmaking. 1979;6(3):101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Hamano T, Horibe M, Ito K. The dissolution rate of solid lime into molten slag used for hot-metal dephosphorization. ISIJ Int. 2004;44 (2):263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamano T, Fukagai S, Tsukihashi F. Reaction mechanism between solid CaO and FeOx-CaO-SiO2-P2O5 slag at 1573 K. ISIJ Int. 2006;46:490–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruoka N, Ishikawa A, Shibata H, et al. Competitive dissolution of MgO from flux and refractory. Proc. of the 12th Unified International Technical Conference on Refractories; Kyoto. 2011, p. 590–593.
   Google Scholar
• Deng T. Doctoral thesis: study on the dissolution of lime and dolomite in converter slag. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Fruehan RJ, Li Y, Brabie L. Dissolution of magnesite and dolomite in simulated EAF slags. ISS Tech Conference. 2003. [Online]. Available: https://www.lime.org/documents/uses_of_lime/isstech-studies-paper.pdf (PDF).
   Google Scholar
• Kor GJW, Martonik LJ, and R J, et al. 5th Int. Iron Steel Cong., Iron Steel Inst., AIME, Warrendale, 1986, p. 679.
   Google Scholar
• J. Liu, M. Guo, P. Jones, F. Verhaeghe, B. Blanpain and P. Wollants: In situ observation of the direct and indirect dissolution of MgO particles in CaO – Al2O3 – SiO2-based slags, J Eur Ceram Soc. 2007 27 (4): 1961–1972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Kuwabara M, Asano T, et al. Effect of lime particle size on melting behavior of lime-containing flux. ISIJ Int 2007;47 (10):1401–1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amini S, Brungs M, Jahanshahi S, et al. Effects of additives and temperature on dissolution rate and diffusivity of lime in Al2O3-CaO-SiO2 based slags. Metall MaterTrans B. 2006;37B (5):773–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satyoko Y, Lee WE. Dissolution of dolomite and doloma in silicate slag. British Ceramic Transaction. 1999;98 (6):261–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang F, Liu J, Maruoka N, et al. Dissolution rates of solid oxides into molten slags. Int J Appl Ceram Technol. 2015;12 (6):1239–1244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheremisina E, Schenk J, Nocke L, et al. Influence of magnesium oxide content on kinetics of lime dissolution in steelmaking slags. ISIJ Int. 2017;57 (2):304–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin E, Firsbach F, Nispel M, et al. Value creation of dolime compared to MgO alternatives for EAF application. Nashville: AISTech; 2021. p.739–751.
   Google Scholar
• Firsbach F, Nispel M, Bruel G, et al. Dolime based EAF Hot repair material – An alternative to magnesia based materials. 63rd international Colloquium on Refractories (ICR), Aachen; Germany, 2020, p. 113–118.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmund H, Xie Y, Nispel M, et al. New lime based slag conditioners to improve the dephosphorization in the BOF process of dillinger. 2nd VDEh-ISIJ-Jernkontoret Steel Symposium; Stockholm. 2017, p. 154–165.
   Google Scholar
• Deng T, Gran J, Sichen D. Dissolution of lime in synthetic ‘FeO’-SiO2 and CaO-‘FeO’-SiO2 slags. Steel Research Int. 2010;81 (5):347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng H, Wang N, Chen M, et al. Dissolution behaviour of limestone in converter slag: evolution of microstructure and reaction interface. Ironmak Steelmak. 2020;47(4):417–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworak S, Rechberger H, Fellner J. How will tramp elements affect future steel recycling in Europe? – A dynamic material flow model for steel in the EU-28 for the period 1910 to 2050. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021: 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruoka N, Ito A, Hayasaka M, et al. Effect of CO2 content in quicklime on dissolution rate of quicklime in steelmaking slags. ISIJ Int. 2017;57 (10):1684–1690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng T, Nortier P, Ek M, et al. Limestone dissolution in converter slag at 1873K (1600 °C). Metallurg Mater Transact B. 2013;44(1):98–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng T, Du S. Dissolution mechanism of dolomite in converter slag at 1873K. Ironmak Steelmak. 2014;41(1):75–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsson J, Glaser B, Sichen D. Lime dissolution in foaming BOF slag. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B. 2018;49B:3165–3169.
   Google Scholar
• Matsushima M, Yodomaru S, Mori K, et al. Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. 1997;17 (8):442–449.
   Google Scholar
• Umakoshi M, Mori K, Kawai K. Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. 1984;24 (7):532.
   Google Scholar
• Bale CW, Bélisle E, Chartrand P, et al. Factsage thermochemical software and databases – 2010 – 2016. Calphad. 2016;54:35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar