Selecting alternative export markets for Namibia's red meat products: Application of a decision support model

REFERENCES

• Agricultural Survey. 2006. Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry, Directorate for Veterinary Services. Windhoek, Namibia.
   Google Scholar
• Balassa, B. 1965. Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 33(1):99–123.
   Google Scholar
• CBS. 2011. National accounts 2008 [online]. Available at: http://www.npc.gov.na (Accessed 12 September 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Chiriboga, L.M., Kilmer, C., Fan, R. and Gawande, K. 2008. Does Namibia have a comparative advantage in beef production? Bush School of Government and Public Services. Texas A & M University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Cuyvers, L. 1996. Export opportunities of Thailand: a Decision Support Model approach. Journal of Euro-Asian Management 2(2):71–96.
   Google Scholar
• Cuyvers, L. 2004. Identifying export opportunities: The case of Thailand. InternationalMarketing Review 21(3):255–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAFF. 2012. Abstract of agricultural statistics 2012. Pretoria: Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF).
   Google Scholar
• Djankov, S., Freund, C.L. and Pham, C.S. 2006. Trading on time. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3903. Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Düvel, G.H. and Stephanus, A.L. 2000. A comparison of economic and cultural incentives in the marketing of livestock in some districts of the Northern Communal Areas of Namibia. Agrekon 39(4):656–664.
   Google Scholar
• Egger, P. 2005. On the impact of transportation costs on trade in multilateral world. Southern Economic Journal 71(3):592–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission) 2012. Factsheet: The EU's new generalised system of preferences. Brussels, Belgium: EC.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2013. EU/ACP countries’ economic partnership agreement: Exclusion of certain countries from trade preferences. Text: P7_TA(2013)0112 adopted on April 16, 2013, Strasbourg, France.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenberg, M. and Paulmier, T. 2005a. Export potential assessment in Vietnam, Geneva: International Trade Centre, Market Analysis Section.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenberg, M. and Paulmier, T. 2005b. Export potential assessment in Laos, Geneva: International Trade Centre, Market Analysis Section.
   Google Scholar
• Green, R.T. and Allaway, A.W. 1985. Identification of export opportunities: A shift-share approach. Journal of Marketing 49:83–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekman, B. and Ncita, A. 2008. Trade policy, trade costs and developing country trade. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 4797.
   Google Scholar
• Horsthemke, O. 2009. Namibia trade directory 2009: Agriculture: Unlocking our true potential – An engine for growth in the Namibian economy. A Review of Namibian Trade and Industry 18.
   Google Scholar
• Hummels, D. 1999. Towards a geography of trade cost. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). Department of Economics, Purdue University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Idsardi, E., Mbai, S., Van Schalkwyk, H.D. and Groenewald, J.A. 2009. Agro-food competitiveness: The case of Namibia's exports. Paper presented at the 47th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), September 21–23 2009, Durban, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• ITC. 2012. Trademap. International Trade Centre (ITC). Available at: http://www.trademap.org (Accessed 28 June 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Kee, L.K., Nicita, A. and Olarreaga, M. 2008. Estimating trade restrictiveness indices, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Limao, N. and Venables, A.J. 2001. Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport cost and trade, World Bank Economic Review.
   Google Scholar
• Meat Board of Namibia. 2012a. Master plan for increased off-take and marketing of cattle and beef from the Northern Communal Areas. Windhoek, Namibia: Agra Professional Services.
   Google Scholar
• Meat Board of Namibia. 2012b. Market statistics. Available at: http://www.nammic.com.na (Accessed: December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, J. 2006. Farming systems in Namibia, Windhoek: Research and Information Services of Namibia.
   Google Scholar
• Nevil, T. 2004. Adding taste to beef. Available at: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5327/is_199907/ai_n21441499 (Accessed: September 2012).
   Google Scholar
• ONDD (Office National Du Ducroire). 2013. Country risk explanation. Available at: http://www.ondd.be/webondd/Website.nsf/weben/Country+risks_Explanations(Visitors)?OpenDocument (Accessed: October 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, N. and Denis, J.E. 1988. Inventory, taxonomy and assessment of methods for international market selection. International Marketing Review 5:38–51.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, N., Chen, H. and Thomas, D.R. 2002. Towards a trade-off model for international market selection. International Business Review 11:165–192.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, J., Viviers, W. and Cuyvers, L. 2007. Identifying export opportunities: The case of South Africa. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the Economic Society of South Africa, September 12 2007, Johannesburg.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, S.H. 2003. Modelling of international market selection process: A qualitative study of successful Australian international businesses. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 6(2):119–132.
   Google Scholar
• Russow, L.C. and Okoroafo, S.C. 1996. On the way towards developing a global screening model. International Marketing Review 13(1):46–64.
   Google Scholar
• Sakarya, S., Eckman, M. and Hyllegard, K.H. 2007. Market selection for international expansion: Assessing opportunities in emerging markets. International Marketing Review 24(2):208–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankarmahesh, M.N., Olsen, H.W. and Honeycutt, E.D. 2005. A dominant product-dominant country framework of industrial export segmentation. Industrial Marketing Management 34:203–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiimi, T., Taljaard, P.R. and Jordaan, H. 2012. Transaction cost and cattle farmer's choice of marketing channel in north-central Namibia. Agrekon 51(1):42–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, E., Rossouw, R., Viviers, W. and Cuyvers, L. 2009. Export market selection methods and the identification of realistic export opportunities for South Africa using a Decision Support Model. Working Paper Series, 2009-03. Pretoria: TIPS.
   Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, E. 2011. The identification of export opportunities for South African products with special reference to Africa. Ph.D. thesis, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
   Google Scholar