The Impact of Adoption of Recommended Tea Plucking Interval on Tea Yields in Kenya

References

• Abdulai, A. and Binder, C.R. 2006. Slash-and-burn cultivation practice and agricultural input demand and output supply. Environment and Development Economics 11: 201–220. doi: 10.1017/S1355770X05002779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulai, A. and Huffman, W. 2000. Structural adjustment and economic efficiency of rice farmers in northern Ghana. Economic Development and Cultural Change 48: 503–520. doi: 10.1086/452608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulai, A. and Huffman, W. 2014. The adoption and impact of soil and water conservation technology: An endogenous switching regression application. Land Economics 90: 26–43. doi: 10.3368/le.90.1.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asfaw, S., Shiferaw, B., Simtowe, F. and Lipper, L. 2012. Impact of modern agricultural technologies on smallholder welfare: Evidence from Tanzania and Ethiopia. Food policy 37: 283–295. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkhaeuser, D., Evenson, R.E. and Feder, G. 1991. The economic impact of agricultural extension: A review. Economic Development and Cultural Change 39: 607–650. doi: 10.1086/451893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burpee, C. and Turcios, W. 1997. Indicadores locales de la calidad del suelo: Resultados iniciales de Honduras. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT).
   Google Scholar
• Evenson, R. E. 2001. Economic impacts of agricultural research and extension. Handbook of Agricultural Economics 1: 573–628. doi: 10.1016/S1574-0072(01)10014-9
   Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT. 2015. http://www.fao.org/faostat/.
   Google Scholar
• Fuglie, K. O. and Bosch, D. J. 1995. Economic and environmental implications of soil nitrogen testing: A switching-regression analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77: 891–900. doi: 10.2307/1243812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. and Kotz, S. 1970. Distribution in statistics, continuous univariate distributions. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kabunga, N. S., Dubois, T. and Qaim, M. 2012. Yield effects of tissue culture bananas in Kenya: accounting for selection bias and the role of complementary inputs. Journal of Agricultural Economics 63: 444–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00337.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousar, R. and Abdulai, A. 2014. Impact of non-farm work and land tenancy contracts on soil conservation measures. Paper presented at the 88th Annual Conference, 9–11April 2014, AgroParisTech, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L.-F. 1982. Some approaches to the correction of selectivity bias. The Review of Economic Studies 49: 355–372. doi: 10.2307/2297361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. J., Plantinga, A. J., Nelson, E. and Polasky, S. 2011. The efficiency of voluntary incentive policies for preventing biodiversity loss. Resource and Energy Economics 33: 192–211. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokshin, M. and Sajaia, Z. 2004. Maximum likelihood estimation of endogenous switching regression models. Stata Journal 4: 282–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olagunju, F. and Adesiji, G. 2011. Impact of agricultural extension services on cocoyam production in Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information 12: 294–303. doi: 10.1080/10496505.2011.588937
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, M. M. 1983. Farm-level fertilizer demand in Java: a meta-production function approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65: 502–508. doi: 10.2307/1240498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherlund, S. M., Barrett, C. B. and Adesina, A. A. 2002. Smallholder technical efficiency controlling for environmental production conditions. Journal of Development Economics 69: 85–101. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00054-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, T. 2011. Selection and comparative advantage in technology adoption. Econometrica 79: 159–209. doi: 10.3982/ECTA7749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TBK. 2015. Crop Production Statistics for 2013. http://www.teaboard.or.ke/statistics/production.html
   Google Scholar
• Wijeratne, M. 2003. Harvesting policies of tea (Camellia sinensis L.) for higher productivity and quality. Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension 14: 91–97.
   Google Scholar
• Winship, C. and Mare, R. D. 1992. Models for sample selection bias. Annual Review of Sociology 18: 327–350. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar