Publication Cover
Agrekon
Agricultural Economics Research, Policy and Practice in Southern Africa
Volume 56, 2017 - Issue 3
323
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Does Food Assistance Improve Recipients' Dietary Diversity and Food Quality in Mozambique?

& ORCID Icon

References

  • Andersson, C., Mekonnen, A. and Stage, J. 2011. Impacts of the productive safety net program in Ethiopia on livestock and tree holdings of rural households. Journal of Development Economics 94: 119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.12.002
  • Arnold, C., Conway, T. and Greenslade, M. 2011. DFID cash transfers literature review. London: DFID (Department for International Development) Policy Division.
  • Audsley, B., Halme, R. and Balzer, N. 2010. Comparing cash and food transfers: A cost-benefit analysis from rural Malawi. In Revolution: From food aid to food assistance. Innovations in overcoming hunger, ed. Omamo, S.W., Gentilini, U. and Sandström, S., 89–102. Rome: World Food Programme.
  • Barrientos, A. 2010. Social protection and poverty. Social Policy and Development Paper 42. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
  • Bartholomew, D., Knotts, M. and Moustaki, I. 2011. Latent variable models and factor analysis: A unified approach (3rd edn). West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Caldes, N., Coady, D. and Maluccio, J. 2006. The cost of poverty alleviation transfer programs: A comparative analysis of three programs in Latin America. World Development 34(5): 818–837. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.10.003
  • Cattell, R.B. 1973. Factor analysis. Westport: Greenwood Press.
  • Coady, P.D. 2004. Designing and evaluating social safety nets: Theory, evidence and policy conclusions. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion Paper No. 172. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
  • Currie, J. and Gahvari, F. 2008. Transfers in cash and in-kind: Theory meets the data. Journal of Economic Literature 46(2): 333–383. doi: 10.1257/jel.46.2.333
  • de Brauw, A. and Hoddinott, J. 2011. Must conditional cash transfer programs be conditioned to be effective? The impact of conditioning transfers on school enrollment in Mexico. Journal of Development Economics 96(2): 359–370. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.08.014
  • Devereux, S. 2006. Cash transfers and social protection. Paper presented at regional workshop on cash transfer activities in southern Africa, co-hosted by the Southern African Regional Poverty Network (SARPN), Regional Hunger and Vulnerability Program (RHVP) and Oxfam Great Britain, Johannesburg, 9–10 October.
  • Devereux, S. 2010. Building social protection systems in southern Africa. Paper prepared in the framework of the European Report on Development. http://erd.eui.eu/media/BackgroundPapers/Devereaux%20-%20BUILDING%20SOCIAL%20PROTECTION%20SYSTEMS.pdf (accessed 18 April 2015).
  • Drèze, J. 1990. Famine prevention in India. In The political economy of hunger, ed. Drèze, J., Sen, A. and Hussain, A. 13–122. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2002. The state of food insecurity in the world. Rome: FAO.
  • Farrington, J. and Slater, R. 2006. Introduction: Cash transfers: Panacea for poverty reduction or money down the drain? Development Policy Review 24(5): 499–511. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2006.00344.x
  • Field, A. 2000. Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows. London: Sage.
  • Fiszbein, A., Schady, N., Ferreira, F.H.G., Grosh, M., Kelleher, N., Olinto, P. and Skoufias, E. 2009. Conditional cash transfers: Reducing present and future poverty. A World Bank Policy Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Gentilini, U. 2007. Cash and food transfers: A primer. World Food Programme Occasional Paper No.18. Rome: World Food Programme.
  • Gentilini, U. 2014. Our daily bread: What is the evidence on comparing cash versus food transfers? Social Protection and Labour Discussion Paper No. 1420. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Gilligan, D.O., Hoddinott, J. and Taffesse, A.S. 2008. The impact of Ethiopia’s productive safety net program and its linkages. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00839. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
  • Gough, I. and Wood, G. 2004. Introduction: Insecurity and welfare regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America. In Insecurity and welfare regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America: Social policy in development contexts, ed. Gough, I. and Wood, G. 1–11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Grosh, M., Del Nino, C. Tesliuc, E. and Ouerghi, A. 2008. The design and implementation of effective safety nets for protection and promotion. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Harman, H.H. 1976. Modern factor analysis (3rd edn rev.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Harvey, P. 2007. Cash-based responses in emergencies. Humanitarian Policy Group Report 24. London: Overseas Development Institute.
  • Harvey, P. and Bailey, S. 2011. Good practice review: Cash transfer programming in emergencies. Good Practice Reviews No. 11. Humanitarian Practice Network. London: Overseas Development Institute.
  • Heady, D. and Ecker, O. 2013. Rethinking the measurement of food security: From first principle to best practice. Food Security 5: 327–343. doi: 10.1007/s12571-013-0253-0
  • Herrmann, H. 2009. An introduction and review of cash transfer experiences and their feasibility as a food security tool for World Food Programme in Bolivia. Consultancy Report. Bolivia: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation and the World Food Programme.
  • Hidrobo, M., Hoddinott, J., Peterman, A., Margolies, A. and Moreira, V. 2014. Cash, food, or vouchers? Evidence from a randomized experiment in northern Ecuador. Journal of Development Economics 107: 144–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.11.009
  • HLPE (High Level Panel of Experts of the United Nations Committee on World Food Security). 2012. Social protection for food security. Report No. 4. Rome: HLPE.
  • HLPE (High Level Panel of Experts of the United Nations Committee on World Food Security). 2014. Food losses and waste in the context of sustainable food systems. A Report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3901e.pdf (accessed 1 August 2017).
  • Hoddinott, J. and Skoufias, E. 2004. The impact of PROGRESA (Programa de Educación, Salud, y Alimenación) on food consumption. Economic Development and Cultural Change 53(1): 37–61. doi: 10.1086/423252
  • Hoddinott, J. and Wiesmann, D. 2010. The impact of conditional cash transfer programs on food consumption. In Conditional cash transfers in Latin America, ed. Adato, M. and Hoddinott, J. 258–283. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Hoddinott, J., Gilligan, D., Hidrobo, M., Margolies, A., Roy, S., Sandström, S., Schwab B. and Upton, J. 2013. Enhancing WFP’s capacity and experience to design, implement, monitor, and evaluate vouchers and cash transfer programs: Study summary. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
  • Jahan, S. 2015. Human development report. Work for human development. United Nations Development Programme, New York. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2015_human_development_report_1.pdf (accessed 1 August 2017).
  • Jones, W.P. et al. 2010. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Agricultural outlook 2010–2019. 6th edn. Rome: FAO.
  • Kline, P. 1994. An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routledge.
  • Malik, K. 2013. The rise of the South: Human progress in a diverse world. United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report. New York. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/14/hdr2013_en_complete.pdf (accessed 1 August 2017).
  • Matin, I., Sulaiman, M. and Rabbani, M. 2008. Crafting a graduation pathway for the ultra poor: Lessons and evidence from a BRAC (Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee) program. CPRC (Chronic Poverty Research Centre) Working Paper 109. Manchester: CPRC.
  • Maunder, N., Dillon, N., Smith, G., Truelove, S. and De Bauw, V. 2016. Evaluation of the use of different transfer modalities in European Commission (ECHO) humanitarian aid actions 2011–2014. Evaluation report commissioned by the Evaluation Sector of the Directorate. General Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection – ECHO (European Commission). Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium): ECHO.
  • Maxwell, D.G., Lentz, E.C. and Barrett, C. 2007. A market analysis and decision tree tool for response analysis: Cash, local purchase and/or imported food aid? Background Paper. Atlanta, GA: Food Resources Coordination Team, Cooperation for Assistance and Relief Everywhere (CARE).
  • Molyneux, M. 2007. Two cheers for conditional cash transfers. International Development Studies Bulletin 38(3): 69–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2007.tb00381.x
  • O’Connor, B. 2000. SPAA and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 32(3): 396–402. doi: 10.3758/BF03200807
  • Oduro, A.D. 2010. Formal and informal social protection in sub-Saharan Africa. Background paper to European Report on Development. Paper presented at workshop “Promoting Resilience through Social Protection in sub-Saharan Africa” organized by the European Report on Development, Dakar, 28–30 June.
  • Omamo, S.W., Gentilini, U. and Sandstrom, S. 2010. Innovations in food assistance: Issues, lessons and implications. In Revolution: From food aid to food assistance. Innovations in overcoming hunger, ed. Omamo, S.W., Gentilini U. and Sandström, S. 1–18. Rome: World Food Programme.
  • Overseas Development Institute. 2015. Doing cash differently: How cash transfers can transform humanitarian aid. Report for the High Level Panel on Humanitarian Cash Transfers. London: ODI.
  • Rabbani, M., Prakash, V.A. and Sulaiman, M. 2006. Impact assessment of CFPR/TUP (Challenging the Frontiers of Poverty Reduction/ Targeting the Ultra Poor): A descriptive analysis based on 2002–2005 panel data. CFPR/TUP Working Paper 12. Dhaka and Ottawa: BRAC (Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee) Research and Evaluation Division and the Aga Khan Foundation.
  • Rietveld, T. and van Hout, R. 1993. Statistical techniques for the study of language and language behaviour. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Ruel, T.M. 2002. Is dietary diversity an indicator of food security or dietary quality? A review of measurement issues and research needs. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division discussion Paper No. 140. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
  • SETSAN (Technical Secretariat for Food Security and Nutrition). 2011. Food security and nutrition evaluation in Mozambique. Maputo: Ministry of Agriculture.
  • Stevenson, D. and Gentilini, U. 2008. Vouchers and cash transfers as food aid assistance instruments: Opportunities and challenges. Paper presented at World Food Programme Executive Board Second Regular Session, Rome, 27–30 October.
  • UN (United Nations) General Assembly. 2014. Report of the Open Working Group of the General Assembly on Sustainable Development Goals. Report issued as document A/68/970 available at http://undocs.org/A/68/970. Washington, DC: United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1579SDGs%20Proposal.pdf (accessed 19 May 2017).
  • USAID (United States Agency for International Aid). 2007. Mozambique food programming framework FY 2008-2012. Maputo: United States Agency for International Aid.
  • Victora, C.G., Adair, L., Fall, C., Hallal, P.C., Martorell, R., Richter L. and Sachdev, H.S. 2008. Maternal and child under nutrition: Consequences for adult health and human capital. The Lancet 371: 340–357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61692-4
  • Wagstaff, A. and Watanabe, N. 2000. Socio economic inequalities in child malnutrition in the developing world. Policy Research Working Paper 2434. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • WFP (World Food Programme). 2017. Systemic food assistance. Paper prepared as an interim strategic and operational guidance for WFP engagement and investment in food systems. Food Systems Strategy, Policy and Support Service. Rome: Word Food Program
  • WFP (World Food Programme). 2016. WFP Strategic Plan (2017–2021). WFP Executive Board, Second Regular Session, Rome, 14–18 November 2016, Agenda Item 4, WFP/EB.2/2016/4-A/1/Rev.2. http://documents.wfp.org/stellent/groups/public/documents/eb/wfp286743.pdf?_ga=2.172569059.1719692935.1495187674-81988171.1457343863 (accessed 19 May 2017).
  • WFP (World Food Programme). 2011. Mozambique Country Program 2012–2015. Maputo: World Food Programme.
  • WFP/FAO (World Food Programme/ Food and Agriculture Organization). 2008. Interagency workshop report WFP/FAO. Measures of food consumption: Harmonizing methodologies. Rome: World Food Programme.
  • World Bank. 2015. Cash transfers in humanitarian contexts. Strategic note prepared for the Principals of the Inter-Agency Standing Committee on Humanitarian Assistance. Washington, DC: The World Group.
  • Yong, A.G. and Pearce, S. 2013. A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 9(2): 79–94. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.