The Economic Implications of Robinia pseudoacacia L. (black locust) on Agricultural Production in South Africa

References

• Acosta, L.E. 2008. Distribution of Geraeocormobius sylvarum (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae): Range modelling based on bioclimatic variables. Journal of Arachnology 36(3): 574–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acquaye, A.K., Alston, J.M., Lee, H. and Sumner, D.A. 2005. Economic consequences of invasive species policies in the presence of commodity programs: theory and application to citrus canker. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy P27(3): 498–504.
   Google Scholar
• Akamatsu, F., Makishima, M., Taya, Y., Nakanishi, S. and Miwa, J. 2014. Evaluation of glyphosate application in regulating the reproduction of riparian black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) after clear-cutting, and the possibility of leaching into soil. Landscape and Ecological Engineering 10(1): 47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ARC (Agricultural Research Council). 2009. Grazing capacity data. Available from Dr A. Palmer, Agricultural Research Council, Grahamstown, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Bangsund, D.A., Leistritz, F.L. and Leitch, J.A. 1999. Assessing economic impacts of biological control of weeds: the case of leafy spurge in the northern Great Plains of the United States. Journal of Environmental Management 56(1): 35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhengu, S., Schulz, C. and Grobler, J. 2009. South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI). National Land Cover (NLC) 2009. GIS Metadata, Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Boval, M. and Dixon, R.M. 2012. The importance of grasslands for animal production and other functions: a review on management and methodological progress in the tropics. Animal 6(5): 748–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W.T., Krasny, M.E. and Schoch, N. 2001. Volunteer monitoring of nonindigenous invasive plant species in the Adirondack Park, New York, USA. Natural Areas Journal 21(2): 189–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundu, G. and Richardson, D.M. 2016. Planted forests and invasive alien trees in Europe: A Code for managing existing and future plantings to mitigate the risk of negative impacts from invasions. NeoBiota 30: 5–47.
   Google Scholar
• Carbutt, C. 2012. The emerging invasive alien plants of the Drakensberg Alpine Centre, southern Africa. Bothalia 42(2): 71–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cierjacks, A., Kowarik, I., Joshi, J., Hempel, S., Ristow, M., Lippe, M. and Weber, E. 2013. Biological flora of the British Isles: Robinia pseudoacacia. Journal of Ecology 101(6): 1623–1640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruttwell McFadyen, R.E. 2000. Successes in biological control of weeds. In Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, 3–14. Bozeman, MT: Montana State University.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, J.M. and Whitten, M.J. 1995. Economics of classical biological control: a research practice. In Biological Control–Benefits and Risks, ed. Hokkanen, H. and Lynch, J., 270–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Czarapata, E.J. 2005. Invasive plants of the Upper Midwest: An illustrated guide to their identification and control. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 215.
   Google Scholar
• De Meyer, M., Robertson, M.P., Peterson, A.T. and Mansell, M.W. 2008. Ecological niches and potential geographical distributions of Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) and Natal fruit fly (Ceratitis rosa). Journal of Biogeography 35(2): 270–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neergaard, A., Saarnak, C., Hill, T., Khanyile, M., Berzosa, A.M. and Birch-Thomsen, T. 2005. Australian wattle species in the Drakensberg region of South Africa – An invasive alien or a natural resource? Agricultural Systems 85(3): 216–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloach, C.J. 1997. The biological control of weeds in the United States and Canada. In Assessment and management of plant invasions, eds Luken, J.O. and Thieret, J.W. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1010084724526
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, I.A., Bennett, B.M., Burrows, L.E., Nuñez, M.A., Peltzer, D.A., Porté, A., Richardson, D.M., Rejmánek, M.M., Rundel, P.W. and van Wilgen, B.W. 2014. Conflicting values: ecosystem services and invasive tree management. Biological Invasions 16: 705–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditomaso, J.M. 2000. Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Science 48(2): 255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dube, N. 2010. The economic evaluation of possible loss of prosopis pods as a result of increased biological control in the Northern Cape Province, South Africa. Unpublished MSc (Agric) thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Eagle, A.J., Eiswerth, M.E., Johnson, W.S., Schoenig, S.E. and Cornelis van Kooten, G. 2007. Costs and losses imposed on California ranchers by Yellow starthistle. Rangeland Ecology and Management 60(4): 369–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgin, B. 2007. Vegetation management guideline black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.). Illinois Nature Reserve Commission 1(4): 1–7. http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/INPC/Documents/VMG/VMG%20Black%20locust%20revised%202007%20%20Copy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ESRI (Environmental System Research Institute). 2011. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Flichman, G. (ed). 2011. Bio-economic models applied to agricultural systems. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, G.G., Le Maitre, D.C., O’Farrell, P.J. and Van Wilgen, B.W. 2012. The prioritisation of invasive alien plant control projects using a multi-criteria decision model informed by stakeholder input and spatial data. Journal of Environmental Management (103): 51–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility). 2015. GBIF secretariat: GBIF backbone taxonomy. Robinia pseudoacacia L. http://www.gbif.org/species/5352251
   Google Scholar
• Guisan, A. and Thuiller, W. 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters 8(9): 993–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, L. and Wilson, J.R. 2017. Changes in the composition and distribution of alien plants in South Africa: An update from the Southern African Plant Invaders Atlas. Bothalia 47(2): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, S.A. and Leitch, J.A. 1996. The effect of knapweed on Montana’s economy. Agricultural Economics, Report No. 355, p. 43.
   Google Scholar
• Hijmans, R.J., Cameron, S.E., Parra, J.L., Jones, P.G. and Jarvis, A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25(15): 1965–1978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M.P. and Coetzee, J. 2017. The biological control of aquatic weeds in South Africa: Current status and future challenges. Bothalia 47(2): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, P.M., Dennill, G.B. and Moll, E.J. 1987. Effects of feeding by native alydid insects on the seed viability of an alien invasive weed, Acacia Cyclops. South African Journal of Science 83: 580–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey L. 2016. The potential economic implications of black locust (Robinia Pseudoacacia L.) on agricultural production in South Africa. Unpublished Master of Commerce thesis, Department of Economics and Economic History, Rhodes University, Grahamstown/Makhanda, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Knowler, D. 2002. A review of selected bioeconomic models with environmental influences in fisheries. Journal of Bioeconomics 4(2): 163–181.
   Google Scholar
• Kraaij, T., Baard, J.A., Rikhotso, D.R., Cole, N.S. and Van Wilgen, B.W. 2017. Assessing the effectiveness of invasive alien plant management in a large fynbos protected area. Bothalia 47(2), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kull, C.A., Shackleton, C.M., Cunningham, P.S., Ducatillon, C., Dufour Dror, J.-M., et al. 2011. Adoption, use, and perception of Australian acacias around the world. Diversity and Distributions 17: 822–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R. 1992. Anti-nutritional factors, the potential risks of toxicity and methods to alleviate them. In Legume trees and other fodder trees as protein source for livestock. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper no. 102, 145–160. http://www.fao.org/3/a-t0632e/T0632E10.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kurokochi, H., Toyama, K. and Hogetsu, T. 2010. Regeneration of Robinia pseudoacacia riparian forests after clear-cutting along the Chikumagawa River in Japan. Plant Ecology 210(1): 31–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leistritz, F.L. and Ekstrom, B.L. 1986. Interdependencies of agriculture and rural communities: An annotated bibliography. New York, NY: Garland Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Leistritz, F.L. and Murdock, S.H. 1981. Socioeconomic impact of resource development: Methods for assessment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leistritz, F.L., Leitch, J.A., Bangsund, D.A. and Wallace, N.M. 1993. Economic impact of leafy spurge on grazing land and wildland in North Dakota. Great Plains Research: A Journal of Natural and Social Sciences. Paper 83.
   Google Scholar
• Leitch, J.A., Leistritz, F.L. and Bangsund, D.A. 1996. Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results. Impact Assessment 14(4): 419–433.
   Google Scholar
• Le Maitre, D.C. and Versfeld, D.B. 1994. Field manual for mapping populations of invasive plants for use with the Catchment Management System. Report FOR-DEA, Department of Environment Affairs, Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Le Maitre, D.C., Kotze, I.M. and O’Farrell, P.J. 2014. Impacts of land-cover change on the water flow regulation ecosystem service: Invasive alien plants, fire and their policy implications. Land Use Policy 36: 171–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Maitre, D.C., Forsyth, G.G., Dzikiti, S. and Gush, M.B. 2016. Estimates of the impacts of invasive alien plants on water flows in South Africa. Water SA 42(4): 659–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G., Xu, G., Guo, K. and Du, S. 2014. Mapping the global potential geographical distribution of Black Locust (Robinia Pseudoacacia L.) using herbarium data and a maximum entropy model. Forests 5(11): 2773–2792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mau-Crimmins, T.M., Schussman, H.R. and Geiger, E.L. 2006. Can the invaded range of a species be predicted sufficiently using only native-range data? Lehmann lovegrass (Eragrostis lehmanniana) in the southwestern United States. Ecological Modelling 193(3): 736–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, H.H., Scholtz, M.M. and Palmer, A.R. 2013. Sustainability of the South African livestock sector towards 2050. Part 1: Worth and impact of the sector. South African Journal of Animal Science 43(3): 282–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mgidi, T.N., Le Maitre, D.C., Schonegevel, L., Nel, J.L., Rouget, M. and Richardson, D.M. 2007. Alien plant invasions-incorporating emerging invaders in regional prioritization: a pragmatic approach for Southern Africa. Journal of Environmental Management 84(2): 173–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, V.C., Hoffmann, J.H. and Zimmermann, H.G. 2005. Biological control of invasive alien plants in South Africa: Necessity, circumspection, and success. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3(2): 71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucina, L. and Rutherford, M. 2006. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Pretoria, SA: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, T.G. and Kuyler, P. 2009. Impact of land use on the biodiversity integrity of the moist sub-biome of the grassland biome. South African Journal of Environmental Management 90: 384–395.
   Google Scholar
• Olckers, T. and Hill, M.P. 1999. Biological control of weeds in South Africa (1990–1998). Entomological Society of Southern Africa, Memoir No. 1, 1–182.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, A.R., Short, A. and Yunusa, I.A. 2010. Biomass production and water use efficiency of grassland in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 27(3): 163–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel, D., McNair, S., Janecka, J., Wightman, J., Simmonds, C., O’Connel, C. et al. 2001. Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 84: 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P. and Schapire, R.E. 2006. Maximum entropy modelling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190(3): 231–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Republic of South Africa. 2013. South Africa Yearbook 2013/14: Agriculture. Department of Government Communications and Information System, 31–59.
   Google Scholar
• Rejmánek, M. and Richardson, D.M. 2013. Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species – 2013 update of the global database. Diversity and Distributions 19(8): 1093–1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyers, B. and Tosh, C.A. 2003. National grasslands initiative: Concept document. Gauteng Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Land Affairs, Johannesburg, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, D.M. and Van Wilgen, B.W. 2004. Invasive alien plants in South Africa: How well do we understand the ecological impacts? South African Journal of Science 100(1): 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, D.M., Hui, C., Nunez, M. and Pauchard, A. 2014. Tree invasions – patterns and processes, challenges and opportunities. Biological Invasions 16: 473–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, D.M. and Kluge, R.L. 2008. Seed banks of invasive Australian Acacia species in South Africa: role in invasiveness and options for management. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 10(3): 161–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, M.P., Caithness, N. and Villet, M.H. 2001. A PCA-based modelling technique for predicting environmental suitability for organisms from presence records. Diversity and Distributions 7(1-2): 15-27.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M.P., Villet, M.H., Fairbanks, D.H.K., Henderson, L., Higgins, S.I., Hoffmann, J.H., et al. 2003. A proposed prioritization system for the management of invasive alien plants in South Africa: research in action. South African Journal of Science 99(1&2): 37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabo, A.E. 2000. Robinia pseudoacacia invasions and control in North America and Europe. University of Minnesota, Restoration and Reclamation Review 6(3): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• SAPIA (Southern African Plant Invaders Atlas). 2015. SAPIA database. http://www.arc.agric.za/arc-ppri/Pages/Weeds%20Research/Geographical-distribution-of-IAPs-in-southern-Africa-(SAPIA)-.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Shackleton, R.T., Le Maitre, D.C., Pasiecznik, N.M., Richardson, D.M. 2014. Prosopis: a global assessment of the biogeography, benefits, impacts and management of one of the world’s worst woody invasive plant taxa. AoB Plants 6: plu027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, A.W., Shaw, R.H. and Sforza, R. 2006. Top 20 environmental weeds for classical biological control in Europe: a review of opportunities, regulations and other barriers to adoption. Weed Research 46(2): 93–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieg, C.H., Denslow, J.S., Huebner, C.D., Miller, J.H. 2010. The role of the forest service in innovative invasive plant research. In A dynamic invasive species research vision: opportunities and priorities 2009–29, eds Dix, M.E. and Britton, K., 35–42. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO–79. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Sim, TR. 1907. The forests and forest flora of the colony of the Cape of Good Hope. Aberdeen, Scotland: Taylor and Henderson.
   Google Scholar
• Snaddon, C. 1999. Degradation of surface water resources. In Land degradation in South Africa, eds Hoffman, T., Todd, S., Ntshona, Z., Turner, S., 37–60. Cape Town, SA: Plant Conservation Unit, University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Soji, Z., Chikwanda, D., Chikwanda, A.T., Jaja, I.F., Mushonga, B. and Muchenje, V. 2015. Relevance of the formal red meat classification system to the South African informal livestock sector. South African Journal of Animal Science 45(3): 263–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, F.M., Schlick-Steiner, B.C., Vanderwal, J., Reuther, K.D., Christian, E., Stauffer, C. et al. 2008. Combined modelling of distribution and niche in invasion biology: A case study of two invasive Tetramorium ant species. Diversity and Distributions 14(3): 538–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, G.D., Robertson, M.P., Webber, B.L., Richardson, D.M., Le Roux, J.J., Wilson, J.R. 2011. Predicting the subspecific identity of invasive species using distribution models: Acacia saligna as an example. Diversity and Distributions 17(5): 1001–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibane, E., Vermeulen, A. (eds). 2014. South Africa Yearbook 2013/14. Department of Government Communications and Information System, Republic of South Africa. http://www.gcis.gov.za/content/resourcecentre/sa-info/yearbook2013-14
   Google Scholar
• Trethowan, P.D., Robertson, M.P. and McConnachie, A.J. 2011. Ecological niche modelling of an invasive alien plant and its potential biological control agents. South African Journal of Botany 77(1): 137–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turpie, J.K., Marais, C. and Blignaut, J.N. 2008. The Working for Water programme: Evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa. Ecological Economics 65: 788–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanschandevijl, K., Van Loon, G., Lefère, L., Deprez, P. 2010. Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) intoxication as a suspected cause of transient hyperammonaemia and enteral encephalopathy in a pony. Equine Veterinary Education 22(7): 336–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wilgen, B.W., Richardson, D.M., Le Maitre, D.C., Marais, C., Magadlela, D. 2001. The economic consequences of alien plant invasions: Examples of impacts and approaches to sustainable management in South Africa. Environment, Development and Sustainability 3(2): 145–168.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wilgen, B.W., De Wit, M., Anderson, H., Le Maitre, D.C., Kotze, I.M., Ndala, S., Brown, B. and Rapholo, M.B. 2004. Costs and benefits of biological control of invasive alien plants: Case studies from South Africa. South African Journal of Science 100: 113–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wilgen, B.W., Forsyth, G.G., Le Maitre, D.C., Wannenburgh, A., Kotzé, J.D., Van Den Berg, E. and Henderson, L. 2012. An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa. Biological Conservation 148(1): 28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wilgen, B.W., Moran, V.C. and Hoffmann, J.H. 2013. Some perspectives on the risks and benefits of biological control of invasive alien plants in the management of natural ecosystems. Environmental Management 52(3): 531–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wilgen, B.W. and Richardson, D.M. 2014. Challenges and trade-offs in the management of invasive alien trees, Biological Invasions 16: 721–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wyk, B.-E., Van Heerden, F. and Van Oudtshoorn, B. 2002. Poisonous plants of South Africa. Pretoria, SA: Briza Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenberg, J. and Zentner, J. 1997. Herbicide spray provides best control of black locust saplings (California). Restoration and Management Notes 15(1): 94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, R.W. 1984. Growth and development of black locust coppice stands in eastern Kentucky. PhD thesis, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, H.G., Moran, V.C. and Hoffmann, J.H. 2004. Biological control in the management of invasive alien plants in South Africa, and the role of the Working for Water programme. South African Journal of Science 100(1&2): 34–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar