Land redistribution in South Africa’s land reform policy: a better way to select beneficiaries

References

• ADAS. 2004. Entry to and exit from farming in the United Kingdom: Final report. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Aliber, M. 2019. How can we promote a range of livelihood opportunities through land redistribution? Working paper 58, Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS), Cape Town: University of the Western Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Aliber, M., and B. Cousins. 2013. Livelihoods after land reform in South Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change 13, no. 1: 140–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliber, M., S. Mabhera, and T. Chikwanha. 2018. Agrarian reform and rural development. Alice: University of Fort Hare Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aliber, M., M. Reitzes, and M. Roefs. 2006. Assessing the alignment of South Africa’s land reform policy to people’s aspirations and expectations: A policy-oriented report based on a survey in three provinces. Research Report. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council. http://repository.hsrc.ac.za/handle/20.500.11910/6074.
   Google Scholar
• Bank, L.J., and T.G.B. Hart. 2019. Land reform and belonging in South Africa: A place-making perspective. Politikon 46, no. 4: 411–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergevoet, R.H.M. 2005. Entrepreneurship of Dutch dairy farmers. PhD diss., Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• BFAP (Bureau for Food and Agricultural Policy). 2018. Agricultural outlook 2018–2027. Pretoria: BFAP. https://www.westerncape.gov.za/sites/www.westerncape.gov.za/files/bfap_baseline_2018_final_low_res_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Binswanger-Mkhize, H.P. 2014. From failure to success in South African land reform. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 9, no. 4: 253–69.
   Google Scholar
• Binswanger-Mkhize, H.P., C. Bourguignon, and R. van den Brink. 2009. The growing consensus on the importance of land redistribution. In Agricultural land redistribution: Towards greater consensus, ed. H. P. Binswanger-Mkhize, C. Bourguignon, and R. van den Brink, 3–35. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, F., and G. Mkodzongi. 2018. Land reform revisited: Democracy, state making and agrarian transformation in post-apartheid South Africa. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L.R. 2000. In search of a systems model for the decision making behaviour of first-generation black commercial farmers in the border-Kei region of the Eastern Cape province. PhD diss., University of Fort Hare.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, B. 2020. Greater Tzaneen Local Municipality study, Limpopo: Employment-intensive rural land reform. Technical Research Report. Cape Town: Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS). Cape Town: University of the Western Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Burger, P.J. 1971. The measurement of managerial inputs in agriculture III: The construction and evaluation of a scale. Agrekon 10, no. 4: 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, B. 2015. “Through a glass, darkly”: Towards agrarian transformation in South Africa. In Land divided, land restored: Land reform in South Africa for the 21st century, ed. B. Cousins, and C. Walker, 250–69. Auckland Park, Johannesburg: Jacana.
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, B., R. Alcock, M. Aliber, M. Geraci, B. Losch, D. Mayson, and R. de Satgé. 2020. GTAC/CBPEP/EU project on employment-intensive rural land reform in South Africa: Policies, programmes and capacities. Final report. Cape Town: GTAC/CBPEP/EU.
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, B., and D. Chikazunga. 2013. Defining smallholder farmers in South Africa, in supporting smallholders into commercial agriculture: A social dialogue and learning project. Proceedings of the First Innovation Lab. Southern Africa Food Lab (SAFL) and the Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS), 13–14 August.
   Google Scholar
• DAFF (Department of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries). 2017. Abstract of Agricultural Statistics. Pretoria: DAFF. [online] https://www.dalrrd.gov.za/Portals/0/Statistics%20and%20Economic%20Analysis/Statistical%20Information/Abstract%202017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DALRRD (Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development). 2020. State Agricultural Land Allocation Plan, 2020. https://www.dalrrd.gov.za/Home/State-Agricultural-Land-Allocation-Plan.
   Google Scholar
• Dawood, G. 2018. The National Land Reform Programme and rural development. Report for submission to the Division of Revenue. https://www.ffc.co.za/docman-menu-item/commission-submissions/1140-2017-2018-tr-chapter-3-the-national-land-reform-programme-and-rural-development.
   Google Scholar
• De Mey, Y., F. van Winsen, E. Wauters, M. Vancauteren, L. Lauwers, and S. van Passel. 2014. Farm-level evidence on risk balancing behaviour in the EU-15. Agricultural Finance Review 74, no. 1: 17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Denison, J., L. Field, L. Wotshela, W. van Averbeke, M. Mutamba, P. Masika, and D. Mayson. 2009. A review of experiences of establishing emerging farmers in South Africa: Case Lessons and implications for farmer support within land reform programmes. Capacity Development in Food and Agriculture Policies 3, ##–##. Rome: FAO1-81. http://www.fao.org/3/i1385e/i1385e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Labour. 1998. Employment Equity Act, 1998 (Act 55 of 1998). Pretoria: Department of Labour.
   Google Scholar
• DLA (Department of Land Affairs). 1997. White paper on South African land policy. Pretoria: DLA.
   Google Scholar
• Dlamini, T.S., A.J. Verschoor, and G.C.G. Fraser. 2013. Exploring options in reforming South African land ownership: Opportunities for sharing land, labour and expertise. Agrekon 52, no. 1: 24–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohmen, T., A. Falk, D. Huffman, U. Sunde, J. Schupp, and G.G. Wagner. 2011. Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants and behavioural consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association 9, no. 3: 522–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DRDLR (Department of Rural Development and Land Reform). 2013. Policy for the recapitalization and development programme of the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform. Pretoria: DRDLR.
   Google Scholar
• DRDLR (Department of Rural Development and Land Reform). 2015. Implementation evaluation of proactive land acquisition strategy (PLAS). Pretoria: DRDLR.
   Google Scholar
• DRDLR (Department of Rural Development and Land Reform). 2020. National policy for beneficiary selection and land allocation (draft). Pretoria: DRDLR.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, H.F. 2003. Age-specific patterns of exit and entry in U.S. farming, 1978–1997. Review of Agricultural Economics 25, no. 1: 168–86.
   Google Scholar
• Gouse, M., D. Sengupta, P. Zambrano, and J.F. Zepeda. 2016. Genetically modified maize: Less drudgery for her, more maize for him? Evidence from smallholder maize farmers in South Africa. World Development 83: 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greyling, J.C., and P.G. Pardey. 2019. Measuring maize in South Africa: The shifting structure of production during the twentieth century, 1904–2015. Agrekon 58, no. 1: 21–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewald, J.A. 1971. The state of South African agriculture—a diagnosis. Agrekon 10, no. 1: 12–26.
   Google Scholar
• Groenewald, J.A. 2004. Conditions for successful land reform in Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Science 7, no. 4: 673–82.
   Google Scholar
• Habiyaremye, A., M. Maziya, N. Mdlulwa, and P. Chaminuka. 2017. Smallholder livestock farmers’ knowledge, attitudes, practices and perceptions towards vaccinations: The case of five provinces in South Africa. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. 2015. Who, what, where, how, why? The many disagreements about land redistribution in South Africa. In Land divided, land restored: Land reform in South Africa for the 21st century, ed. B. Cousins, and C. Walker, 130–48. Auckland Park, Johannesburg: Jacana.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., and T. Kepe. 2017. Elite capture and state neglect: New evidence on South Africa’s land reform. Review of African Political Economy 44, no. 151: 122–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebinck, P., D. Fay, and K. Kondlo. 2011. Land and agrarian reform in South Africa’s Eastern Cape Province: Caught by continuities. Journal of Agrarian Change 11, no. 2: 220–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornby, D., and B. Cousins. 2019. “Reproducing the social”: Contradictory interconnections between land, cattle production and household relations in the besters land reform project, South Africa. Anthropology Southern Africa 42, no. 3: 202–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaan, M. 2006. Re-imagining a future for South African agriculture. Agrekon 45, no. 3: 245–260.
   Google Scholar
• Keswell, M., and M.R. Carter. 2014. Poverty and land redistribution. Journal of Development Economics 110: 250–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsten, J.F., C.L. Machethe, T. Ndlovu, and P. Lubambo. 2016. Performance of land reform projects in the North West Province of South Africa: Changes over time and possible causes. Development Southern Africa 33, no. 4: 442–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J., S. Weir, and T. Woldehanna. 2003. The role of education in facilitating risk-taking and innovation in agriculture. Journal of Development Studies 39, no. 6: 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komarek, A.M., A. De Pinto, and V.H. Smith. 2020. A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know. Agricultural Systems 178: 102738. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiff, E. 2005. Land reform in the Eastern Cape: The ongoing struggle for resources and secure rights. Social Dynamics 31, no. 1: 39–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiff, E., S.M. Borras, and C. Kay. 2007. Market-led agrarian reform: Policies, performance and prospects. Third World Quarterly 28, no. 8: 1417–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiff, E., and G. Li. 2012. Land redistribution in South Africa: A critical review. Working paper 80874, Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Liebenberg, F. 2013. South African agricultural production, productivity and research performance in the 20th century. PhD diss., University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• LRAAP (Land Reform and Agriculture Advisory Panel). 2019. Final report of the presidential advisory panel on land reform and agriculture. Pretoria: The Presidency.
   Google Scholar
• Manenzhe, T.D., E.M. Zwane, and J.A. Van Niekerk. 2016. Factors affecting sustainability of land reform projects in Ehlanzeni District, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension 44, no. 2: 30–41.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, T., K. Eales, and A. Wildschut. 1996. Down to earth: Land demand in the new South Africa. Durban: Indicator Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, P.A. 2000. Maize yields in the Transkei: How productive is subsistence cultivation? Occasional paper 14, Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS). Cape Town: University of the Western Cape.
   Google Scholar
• McCusker, B., and P. Schmitz. 2008. Modelling land redistribution potential in Limpopo, South Africa. South African Geographical Journal 90, no. 2: 80–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearns, K.F. 2011. Ekaluka farmers’ Association and the land reform programme: Expectations and success factors. Development Southern Africa 28, no. 2: 241–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mtero, F., N. Gumede, and K. Ramantsima. 2019. Elite capture in land redistribution in South Africa. Research report no. 55. Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS). Cape Town: University of the Western Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Nakana, E., and T. Mkhabela. 2011. Performance determinants of wine farms in the Western Cape: An interval modelling approach. Agrekon 50, no. 1: 53–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NPC (National Planning Commission). 2011. The National Development Plan 2030: Our future – make it work. Pretoria: NPC.
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson, M. 2020. Socio-economic differentiation from a class-analytic perspective: The case of smallholder tree crop farmers in Limpopo, South Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change 20: 37–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PLAAS (Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies). 2020. National policy for beneficiary selection and allocation: Submission to the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform. Cape Town: University of the Western Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Randela, R. 2005. Integration of emerging cotton farmers into the commercial agricultural economy. PhD diss., University of the Free State.
   Google Scholar
• RSA (Republic of South Africa). 1996. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Pretoria: Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Rusenga, C. 2020. Setting them up to fail: Enforcement of the agribusiness model on land reform projects in South Africa. Review of African Political Economy 47, no. 165: 382–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirmer, S. 2005. White farmers and development in South Africa. South African Historical Journal 52: 82–101.
   Google Scholar
• Scholtz, M.M., J. Bester, J.M. Mamabolo, and K.A. Ramsay. 2008. Results of the national cattle survey undertaken in South Africa, with emphasis on beef. Applied Animal Husbandry and Rural Development 1: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sebola, M.P. 2018. Financing emerging black farmers for agricultural development in South Africa: A wasteful and unworkable model for creating black farmers. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa 14: 1. doi:10.4102/td.v14i1.555.
   Google Scholar
• Shinns, L.H., and M.C. Lyne. 2005. Possible causes of poverty within a group of land reform beneficiaries in the Midlands of KwaZulu-Natal: Analysis and policy recommendations. Agrekon 44, no. 1: 157–69.
   Google Scholar
• Sihlobo, W. 2020. Finding common ground: Land, equity and agriculture. Johannesburg: Pan Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sihlobo, W., and J.F. Kirsten. 2018. Clear criteria needed for beneficiary selection in South Africa’s agricultural land redistribution. Business Day, June 25. www.businesslive.co.za/bd/opinion/2018-06-25-clear-criteria-needed-for-beneficiary-selection-in-agricultural-restitution.
   Google Scholar
• Stats SA (Statistics South Africa). 2016. Community Survey: Agricultural Households. Report 03-01-05. www.statssa.gov.za (Accessed March 21, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Stats SA (Statistics South Africa). 2018. National Poverty Lines 2018. www.statssa.gov.za.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, R., G.S. Thomas, and H. Binswanger. 2007. Agricultural land redistribution in South Africa. In The land question in South Africa: The challenge of transformation and redistribution, ed. L. Ntsebeza, and R. Hall, 152–201. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, R., G.S. Thomas, and H. Binswanger. 2009. Land reform in South Africa: additional data and comments. In Agricultural land redistribution: Towards greater consensus, eds. H. P. Binswanger-Mkhize, C. Bourguignon, and R. van den Brink, 201–214. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Van Niekerk, J.A., I.B. Groenewald, and E.M. Zwane. 2014. Mentorship by commercial farmers in the land reform programme in the Free State Province. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension 42, no. 1: 62–70.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rooyen, C.J., and B. Njobe-Mbuli. 1996. Access to land: Selecting the beneficiaries. In Agricultural land reform in South Africa: Policies, markets and mechanisms, ed. J. van Zyl, J. Kirsten, and H. Binswanger, 461–98. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zyl, J. 1996. The farm size-efficiency relationship. In Agricultural land reform in South Africa: Policies, markets and mechanisms, ed. J. van Zyl, J. Kirsten, and H. Binswanger, 262–65. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zyl, J., H. Binswanger, and C. Thirtle. 1995. The relationship between farm size and efficiency in South African agriculture. Policy research working paper 1548. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Vink, N. 1993. Entrepreneurs and the political economy of reform in South African agriculture. Agrekon 32, no. 4: 153–66.
   Google Scholar
• Vink, N., and J. Kirsten. 2019. Principles and practice for successful farm land redistribution in South Africa. Working paper 57, Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies. (PLAAS), Cape Town: University of the Western Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C.R. 1999. Farm growth and survival: Econometric evidence for individual farms in upper Austria. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81: 103–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zantsi, S. 2019. Profiling potential land redistribution beneficiaries in South Africa: Implications for agricultural extension and policy design. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension 47, no. 4: 135–51.
   Google Scholar
• Zantsi, S., J.C. Greyling, and S. Mazwane. 2020. Determinants of potential land reform beneficiaries’ willingness to relocate from their former homeland homestead farms to commercial farms: A binary logistic regression approach. Working paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Stellenbosch.
   Google Scholar
• Zantsi, S., G. Mack, and N. Vink. 2021. Towards a viable farm size – determining a viable farm household income for emerging farmers in South Africa’s land redistribution programme: An income aspiration approach. Agrekon (forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2021.1903520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, F.J. 2000. Barriers to participation of the poor in South Africa’s land redistribution. World Development 28, no. 8: 1439–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar