Total factor productivity growth in livestock production in Botswana: what is the role of scale and mix efficiency change in beef production?

References

• Abed, R., and A. Acosta. 2018. Assessing livestock total factor productivity: a Malmquist Index approach. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource-Economics 13: 297–306.
   Google Scholar
• Acosta, A., and A. Luis. 2019. What is driving livestock total factor productivity change? A persistent and transient efficiency analysis. Global Food Security 21: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bahta, S., D. Baker, P. Malope, and H. Katijuongua. 2015. A metafronteir analysis of determinants of technical efficiency in beef farm types: an application to Botswana (No. 1008-2016-80069).
   Google Scholar
• Bahta, S., and P. Malope. 2014. Measurement of competitiveness in smallholder livestock systems and emerging policy advocacy: an application to Botswana. Food Policy 49: 408–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewert, W. E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 1393–1414.
   Google Scholar
• Conradie, B., J. Piesse, N. Vink, and C. Thirtle. 2019. South African wine grape production, 2005–2015: regional comparisons of scale and technical efficiencies and total factor productivity. Agrekon 58, no. 1: 53–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d’Alexis, S., D. Sauvant, and M. Boval. 2014. Mixed grazing systems of sheep and cattle to improve liveweight gain: a quantitative review. The Journal of Agricultural Science 152, no. 4: 655–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakpo, K.H., Y. Desjeux, and L. Latruffe. 2018b. Productivity: indices of productivity and profitability using data envelopment analysis (DEA). R package, version 1.1. 0.
   Google Scholar
• Dakpo, K.H., P. Jeanneaux, L. Latruffe, C. Mosnier, and P. Veysset. 2018a. Three decades of productivity change in French beef production: a Färe-Primont index decomposition. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 62, no. 3: 352–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Roest, K., P. Ferrari, and K. Knickel. 2018. Specialisation and economies of scale or diversification and economies of scope? Assessing different agricultural development pathways. Journal of Rural Studies 59: 222–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2016. Synthesis – livestock and the sustainable development goals: global agenda for sustainable livestock for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Gaspar, P., F.J. Mesías, M. Escribano, and F. Pulido. 2009. Assessing the technical efficiency of extensive livestock farming systems in Extremadura, Spain. Livestock Science 121, no. 1: 7–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrero, M., D. Grace, J. Njuki, N. Johnson, D. Enahoro, S. Silvestri, and M.C. Rufino. 2013. The roles of livestock in developing countries. Animal 7, no. s1: 3–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrero, M., P. Havlik, J. McIntire, A. Palazzo, and H. Valin. 2014. African livestock futures: realizing the potential of livestock for food security, poverty reduction and the environment in Sub-Saharan Africa. Geneva: Switzerland: Office of the Special Representative of the UN Secretary General for Food Security and Nutrition and the United Nations System Influenza Coordination.
   Google Scholar
• Irz, X., and C. Thirtle. 2004. Dual technological development in Botswana agriculture: a stochastic input distance function approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics 55, no. 3: 455–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, F., R. Salim, and H. Bloch. 2015. Nonparametric estimates of productivity and efficiency change in Australian B roadacre Agriculture. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 59, no. 3: 393–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahabile, M., M.C. Lyne, and A. Panin. 2005. An empirical analysis of factors affecting the productivity of livestock in southern Botswana. Agrekon 44, no. 1: 99–117.
   Google Scholar
• Malope, P., D. Mmopelwa, and S. Bahta. 2016. Factors influencing the choice of a service provider between the public and private sector in the delivery of animal health services in Botswana. Unpublished Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Cillero, M., and F. Thorne. 2019a. Sources of productivity growth using the Färe-Primont decomposition. An empirical application to the Irish beef sector. Applied Economics 51, no. 36: 3982–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez Cillero, M., F. Thorne, M. Wallace, and J. Breen. 2019b. Technology heterogeneity and policy change in farm-level efficiency analysis: an application to the Irish beef sector. European Review of Agricultural Economics 46, no. 2: 193–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayberry, D., A. Ash, D. Prestwidge, C.M. Godde, B. Henderson, A. Duncan, and M. Herrero. 2017. Yield gap analyses to estimate attainable bovine milk yields and evaluate options to increase production in Ethiopia and India. Agricultural Systems 155: 43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minviel, J.J., and P. Veysset. 2021. Are there economies of inputs in mixed crop-livestock farming systems? A cross-frontier approach applied to French dairy-grain farms. Applied Economics 53, no. 20: 2275–91. doi:10.1080/00036846.2020.1856324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng’ombe, J.N. 2017. Technical efficiency of smallholder maize production in Zambia: a stochastic meta-frontier approach. Agrekon 56, no. 4: 347–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nin, A., S. Ehui, and S. Benin. 2007. Livestock productivity in developing countries: an assessment. Handbook of agricultural economics 3: 2461–532.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C.J. 2010. Measuring and decomposing agricultural productivity and profitability change. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 54: 527–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C.J. 2011. DPIN 3.0. A program for decomposing productivity index numbers. Brisbane, Australia: CEPA, University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C.J. 2012. An aggregate quantity framework for measuring and decomposing productivity change. Journal of Productivity Analysis 38, no. 3: 255–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C.J. 2018. Productivity and efficiency analysis. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Otieno, D.J., L. Hubbard, and E. Ruto. 2014. Assessment of technical efficiency and its determinants in beef cattle production in Kenya. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics 6, no. 6: 267–78.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rae, A.N., H. Ma, J. Huang, and S. Rozelle. 2006. Livestock in China: commodity-specific total factor productivity decomposition using new panel data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88, no. 3: 680–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, S., and R. Salim. 2013. Six decades of total factor productivity change and sources of growth in Bangladesh agriculture (1948–2008). Journal of Agricultural Economics 64, no. 2: 275–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Botswana. 2016. Annual agricultural survey report 2014–traditional sector. Gaborone, Botswana. https://www.statsbots.org.bw/sites/default/files/Annual%20Agriculture%.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Botswana. 2020. Annual agricultural survey report 2019–traditional sector. Gaborone, Botswana. https://www.statsbots.org.bw/sites.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Botswana. 2022. National accounts. Gaborone, Botswana. https://www.statsbots.org.bw/national-accounts.
   Google Scholar
• Steinfeld, H. 2003. Economic constraints on production and consumption of animal source foods for nutrition in developing countries. The Journal of Nutrition 133, no. 11: 4054S–61S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarawali, S. 2019. Meat: the future series: options for the livestock sector in developing and emerging economies to 2030 and beyond. In Meat: the future dialogue, edited by International Livestock Research Institute for the World Economic Forum. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Temoso, O., D. Hadley, and R. Villano. 2015a. Performance measurement of extensive beef cattle farms in Botswana. Agrekon 54, no. 4: 87–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temoso, O., D. Hadley, and R. Villano. 2018. Sources of efficiency, productivity and output growth in Botswana agriculture. Review of Development Economics 22, no. 3: 1105–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temoso, O., and L.W. Myeki. 2022. Estimating South African higher education productivity and its determinants using Färe-Primont index: are historically disadvantaged universities catching up? Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09699-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temoso, O., R. Villano, and D. Hadley. 2015b. Agricultural productivity, efficiency and growth in a semi-arid country: a case study of Botswana. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 10: 192–206.
   Google Scholar
• Temoso, O., R. Villano, and D. Hadley. 2016. Evaluating the productivity gap between commercial and traditional beef production systems in Botswana. Agricultural Systems 149: 30–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirtle, C., D. Hadley, and R. Townsend. 1995. Policy-induced innovation in Sub-Saharan African agriculture: a multilateral malmquist productivity index approach. Development Policy Review 13, no. 4: 323–48.
   Google Scholar
• Thirtle, C., J. Piesse, A. Lusigi, and K. Suhariyanto. 2003. Multi-factor agricultural productivity, efficiency, and convergence in Botswana, 1981–1996. Journal of Development Economics 71, no. 2: 605–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trestini, S. 2006. Technical efficiency of Italian beef cattle production under a heteroscedastic non-neutral production frontier approach (No. 1685-2016-137097).
   Google Scholar
• West, S.C., A.W. Mugera, and R.S. Kingwell. 2022. The choice of efficiency benchmarking metric in evaluating firm productivity and viability. Journal of Productivity Analysis 57, no. 2: 193–211. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-022-00628-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar