What difference does school leadership make to student outcomes?

References

• Alig-Mielcarek JM, Hoy WK. 2005. Instructional leadership: its nature, meaning, and influence. In: Miskel CG, Hoy WK, editors. Educational leadership and reform. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing; p. 29–52.
   Google Scholar
• Allen D, Roegman R, Hatch T. 2015. Investigating discourses for administrators’ learning within instructional rounds. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 44(5):837–852. doi:10.1177/1741143215574507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avenell K. 2015. Road testing Robinson et al (2009) - Does the “theory” work in practice? (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Australia: Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Bass BM. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bass BM, Avolio BJ. 1994. Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Remos R, Sadun R, Van Reenan J. 2014. Does management matter in schools? London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Böhlmark A, Grönqvist E, Vlachos J. 2016. The headmaster ritual: the importance of management for school outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 118(4):912–940. doi:10.1111/sjoe.12149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossert ST, Dwyer DC, Rowan B, Lee GV. 1982. The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly. 18(3):34–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branch GF, Hanushek EA, Rivkin SG. 2013. School leaders matter. Education Next. 13(1):62–69.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford J, Darling-Hammond L, LePage P. 2005. Introduction. In: L. Darling-Hammond, J. Bransford, editors. Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; p. 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR, editors. 2000. How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown AB, Clift JW. 2010. The unequal effect of adequate yearly progress: evidence from school visits. American Educational Research Journal. 47(4):774–798. doi:10.3102/0002831210374644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryk AS, Schneider BL. 2002. Trust in schools: a core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk AS, Sebring PB, Allensworth E, Luppescu S, Easton JQ. 2010. Organizing schools for improvement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhauser S, Pierson A, Gates SM, Hamilton LS. 2012. Challenges in using outcome data to evaluate school leadership improvement efforts. In: Burhauser S, Pierson A, Gates SM, Hamilton LS, editors. Addressing challenges in evaluating school improvement efforts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; p. 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Burns JM. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell SL, Ronfeldt M. 2018. Observational evaluation of teachers: measuring more than we bargained for? American Educational Research Journal. 55(6):1233–1267. doi:10.3102/0002831218776216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelli M, Green DA. 2012. Leadership effects: school principals and student outcomes. Economics of Education Review. 31:92–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow A. 2000. Power and politics in the adoption of school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 22(4):357–374. doi:10.3102/01623737022004357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow A, Hubbard L. 2016. Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision-making: a literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change. 17(1):7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day C, Gu Q, Sammons P. 2016. The impact of leadership on student outcomes: how successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly. 52(2):221–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhuey E, Smith J. 2014. How important are school principals in the production of student achievement? The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d'Economique. 47(2):634–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Liberto A, Schivardi F, Sulis G. (2015). Managerial practices and student performance. Economic Policy. 30(84):683–728. doi:10.1093/epolic/eiv015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke D, Salmonowicz M. 2010. Key decisions of a first-year ‘turnaround’ principal. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. 38(1):33–58. doi:10.1177/1741143209345450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumay X, Boonen T, Van Damme J. (2013). Principal leadership long-term indirect effects on learning growth in mathematics. The Elementary School Journal. 114(2):225–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Review Office. 2018. Evaluation at a glance: a decade of assessment in New Zealand primary schools - Practice and trends. Wellington, New Zealand: Education Review Office.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore RF. 2002. Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: the imperative for professional development in education. Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Favero N, Meier KJ, O’Toole JLJ. 2016. Goals, trust, participation, and feedback: linking internal management with performance outcomes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 26(2):327–343. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone WA. 2014. Teacher evaluation policy and conflicting theories of motivation. Educational Researcher. 43(2):100–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom JA, Loeb S. 2011. Triangulating principal effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal. 48(5):1091–1123. doi:10.3102/0002831211402663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom JA, Loeb S, Master B. 2013. Effective instructional time use for school leaders: longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher. 42(8):433–444. doi: 10.3102/0013189X13510020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger P. 2005. Instructional leadership and the school principal: a passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools. 4(3):221–239.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson R, Grigg J, Prichett R, Thomas C. 2007. The new instructional leadership: creating data-driven instructional systems in school. Journal of School Leadership. 17(2):447–481.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerness K, Darling-Hammond L, Bransford J, Berliner DC, Cochran-Smith M, McDonald M, Zeichner K. 2005. How teachers learn and develop. In: Darling-Hammond L, Bransford J, editors. Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; p. 358–389.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie J. 2009. Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie J. 2015. High impact leadership. Educational Leadership. 72(5):36–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck RH, Hallinger P. 2014. Modelling the longitudinal effects of school leadership on teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration. 52(5):653–681.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft MA, Gilmour AF. 2017. Revisiting the widget effect: teacher evaluation reforms and the distribution of teacher effectiveness. Educational Researcher. 46(5):234–249. doi:10.3102/0013189X17718797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides L, Creemers BPM. 2008. Using a multidimensional approach to measure the impact of classroom-level factors upon student achievement: a study testing the validity of the dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 19(2):183–205. doi:10.1080/09243450802047873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham GP, Locke EA. 2006. Enhancing the benefits and overcoming the pitfalls of goal setting. Organizational Dynamics. 35(4):332–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham GP, Locke EA. 2007. New developments and directions for goal setting research. European Psychologist. 12(4):290–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood K, Harris A, Hopkins D. 2008. Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management. 28(1):27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood K, Jantzi D. 2005. A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools. 4(3):177–199.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood K, Patten S, Jantzi D. 2010. Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly. 46(5):671–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Hallinger P, Ko J. 2016. Principal leadership and school capacity effects on teacher learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management. 30(1):76–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP. 1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Louis KS, Murphy J. 2017. Trust, caring and organizational learning: the leader’s role. Journal of Educational Administration. 55(1):103–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh J. 2012. Interventions promoting educators’ use of data: research insights and gaps. Teachers College Record. 114(11):1–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano RJ, Waters T, McNulty B. 2005. School leadership that works: from research to results. Auroroa, CO: ASCD and McREL.
   Google Scholar
• May H, Huff J, Goldring E. 2012. A longitudinal study of principals’ activities and student performance. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 23(4):417–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meindl JR. 1998. The romance of leadership as follower centric theory. In: Dansereau F, Yammarino F, editors. Leadership: The multiple-level approaches. Stamford, CT: JAI Press; p. 285–298.
   Google Scholar
• Miles KH, Frank S. 2008. The strategic school: making the most of people time and money. Thousand Oaks. California: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrop H, Sunderman GL. 2009. Predictable failure of federal sanctions-driven accountability for school improvement - And why we may retain it anyway. Educational Researcher. 38(5):353–364. doi:10.3102/0013189X09339055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs D, Kyriakides L, van der Werf G, Creemers B, Timperley H, Earl L. 2014. State of the art – teacher effectiveness and professional learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 25(2):231–256. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.885451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs D, Reynolds D. 2011. Effective teaching: evidence and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy J. 2008. Turnaround insights from the organizational sciences: a review of the empirical evidence and the development of a staged model of recovery with potential implications for the PK–12 education sector. Leadership and Policy in Schools. 7(4):331–357.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy J, Hallinger P, Heck RH. 2013. Leading via teacher evaluation: the case of the missing clothes? Educational Researcher. 42(6):349–354. doi:10.3102/0013189x13499625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmann FM, Smith B, Allensworth E, Bryk AS. 2001. Instructional program coherence: what it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 23(4):297–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuthall G, Alton-Lee A. 1993. Predicting learning from student experience of teaching: a theory of student knowledge construction in classrooms. American Educational Research Journal. 30(4):799–840. doi:10.3102/00028312030004799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid S. 2014. Knowledge influencers: leaders influencing knowledge creation and mobilization. Journal of Educational Administration. 52(3):332–357.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby JG, Larbi-Cherif A, Rosenquist BA, Sharpe CJ, Cobb P, Smith T. 2017. Administrator observation and feedback: does it lead toward improvement in inquiry-oriented math instruction? Educational Administration Quarterly. 53(3):475–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley P. 2015. The Australian principal occupational health, safety and well-being survey. Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia: Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.
   Google Scholar
• Rivkin SG, Hanushek EA, Kain JF. 2005. Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica. 72(2):417–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson V, Bendikson L, McNaughton S, Wilson A, Zhu T. 2017. Joining the dots: the challenge of creating coherent school improvement. Teachers College Record. 119(8):1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson VMJ. 2011. Student-centered leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson VMJ. 2016. The theory and practice of open-to-learning leadership. In: Robinson VMJ, Le Fevre DM, Sinnema CEL, editors. Open-to-learning leadership: how to build trust while tackling tough issues. Moorabin, Australia: Hawker Brownlow; p. 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson VMJ, Hohepa M, Lloyd C. 2009. School leadership and student outcomes: best evidence synthesis. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson VMJ, Lloyd C, Rowe KJ. 2008. The impact of leadership on student outcomes: an analysis of the differential effects of leadership type. Educational Administration Quarterly. 44(5):635–674. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheerens J, Bosker R. 1997. The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Sebastian J, Allensworth E. 2012. The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly. 48(4):626–663. doi:10.1177/0013161x11436273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastian J, Huang H, Allensworth E. 2017. Examining integrated leadership systems in high schools: connecting principal and teacher leadership to organizational processes and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 28(3):436–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnema CEL, Le Fevre D, Robinson VMJ, Pope D. (2013). When others’ performance just isn't good enough: educational leaders’ framing of concerns in private and public. Leadership and Policy in Schools. 12(4):301–336. doi:10.1080/15700763.2013.857419.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnema CEL, Robinson VMJ. 2007. The leadership of teaching and learning: implications for teacher evaluation. Leadership and Policy in Schools. 6(4):319–343. doi:10.1080/15700760701431603.
   Google Scholar
• Sun J, Leithwood K. 2012. Transformational school leadership effects on student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools. 11(4):418–451. doi:10.1080/15700763.2012.681001.
   Google Scholar
• Sun J, Leithwood K. 2015. Direction-setting school leadership practices: a meta-analytical review of evidence about their influence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 26(4):499–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley HS. 2008. Teacher professional learning and development (Vol. 18). Brussels, Belgium and Geneva. Switzerland: International Academy of Education and International Bureau of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley HS, Alton-Lee A. 2008. Reframing teacher professional learning: an alternative policy approach to strengthening valued outcomes for diverse learners. In: Kelly G, Luke A, Green J, editors. Review of research in Education (Vol. 32). Washington, DC: Sage; p. 328–369.
   Google Scholar
• Tuytens M, Devos G. 2011. Stimulating professional learning through teacher evaluation: an impossible task for the school leader? Teaching and Teacher Education. 27:891–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuytens M, Devos G. 2014. How to activate teachers through teacher evaluation? School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 25(4):509–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuytens M, Devos G. 2017. The role of feedback from the school leader during teacher evaluation for teacher and school improvement. Teachers and Teaching. 23(1):6–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M-T, Holcombe R. 2010. Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal. 47(3):633–662. doi:10.3102/0002831209361209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar