Can Western water law become more ‘relational’? A survey of comparative laws affecting water across Australasia and the Americas

References

• Legislation
   Google Scholar
• 1855 Treaty Authority. Chippewa establishing rights of Manoomin on White Earth Reservation and throughout 1855 ceded territory 2019 (US).
   Google Scholar
• Great Ocean Road and Environs Protection Act 2020 (Vic).
   Google Scholar
• Coal Mines Amendment Act 1903 (NZ).
   Google Scholar
• Codigo de Aguas 1981 [Water Code 1981] (Chile) (‘Water Code’).
   Google Scholar
• Colombian Civil Code 1887 (Col).
   Google Scholar
• Constitución Ciudad de México [Mexico City Constitution] 2018 (Mex).
   Google Scholar
• Constitución Política de Colombia [Political Constitution of Colombia] (Col).
   Google Scholar
• Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos [Political Constitution of the United States of Mexico] (Mex).
   Google Scholar
• Constitución Política del Estado de Guerrero [Constitution of the state of Guerrero], 1917 (Mex).
   Google Scholar
• Constitución Política del Estado Libre y Soberano de Colima [Political Constitution of the Free and Sovereign State of Colima] 2017 (Mex).
   Google Scholar
• Constitucion Politica del Estado Libre y Soberano De Oaxaca [Political Constitution of the Free and Sovereign State of Oaxaca] 1922 (Mex).
   Google Scholar
• Ho-Chunk Nation General Council. Resolution to Amend the Ho-Chunk Nation Constitution and Provide for the Rights of Nature [Internet]. [place unknown]; [accessed 2019 Sep 18] (US).
   Google Scholar
• Ley Ambiental de Protección a la Tierra del Distrito Federal [Law for the Environmental Protection of Mother Earth Federal District] 2000 (Mex).
   Google Scholar
• Ley de Aguas Nacionales [National Water Law] 1992 (Mex).
   Google Scholar
• Ley de Equilibrio Ecológico y Protección al Ambiente del Estado de Guerrero [Law of Ecological Equilibrium and Environmental Protection for the State of Guerrero] (Mex).
   Google Scholar
• The McCarran Amendment 43 USC § 666 (1952) (US).
   Google Scholar
• Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Natural and Built Environments Bill 2021 (Exposure Draft) (NZ).
   Google Scholar
• Ngāti Rangi Claims Settlement Bill 2018 (NZ).
   Google Scholar
• Noël L. Magpie River Resolution 2021 (adopted by the Minganie Regional County Municipality).
   Google Scholar
• Proyecto de Ley Que Reforma El Código de Aguas [Water Code Amendment Bill] 2022. boletín N° 7.543-12 §. (Chile).
   Google Scholar
• Resource Management Act 1991 (NZ).
   Google Scholar
• Tamaqua Borough Sewage Sludge Ordinance (US).
   Google Scholar
• Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017 (NZ).
   Google Scholar
• The City of Santa Mónica Sustainability Rights Ordinance, Santa Mónica Municipal Code (US).
   Google Scholar
• The Constitution of the Ho-Chunk Nation. https://ho-chunknation.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Constitution-of-The-HoChunk-Nation.pdf (US).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, GA Res 61/295 UN Doc A/61/L.67 and Add.1 (13 September 2007). [accessed 2019 Sep 28]. https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010 (NZ).
   Google Scholar
• Water and Catchment Legislation Amendment Act 2019 (Vic).
   Google Scholar
• Water and Soil Conservation Act 1967 (NZ).
   Google Scholar
• Water Power Act 1903 (NZ).
   Google Scholar
• Yarra River Protection (Wilip-gin Birrarung murron) Act 2017 (Vic).
   Google Scholar
• Yurok Tribal Council. 2019. Resolution establishing the rights of the Klamath River [Internet]. files.harmonywithnatureun.org/uploads/upload833.pdf (US).
   Google Scholar
• Cases
   Google Scholar
• Aqua Mineral Chusmiza v Communidad Indigena e Chusmiza. 2009 Nov 25. Supreme Court (Chile).
   Google Scholar
• The Amzaon case. Andrea Lozano Barragán, Victoria Alexandra Arenas Sánchez, Jose Daniel y Felix Jeffry Rodríguez peña y otros v Presidente de la República y otros [2018] Corte Suprema de Justicia [Supreme Court of Justice], Sala de Casación Civil [Appeals Chamber] STC4360-2018 A (Colombia).
   Google Scholar
• Calder v Attorney-General of British Colombia (1973) 34 DLR (3rd) 145. 1973 (Ca).
   Google Scholar
• Centro de Estudios para la Justicia Social ‘Tierra Digna’ y otros v Presidente de la Republica y otros [2016] Corte Constitucional [Constitutional Court], Sala Sexta de Revision [Sixth Chamber] No T-622 of 2016 (Col).
   Google Scholar
• Delgamuukw v British Colombia. 1997 (Ca).
   Google Scholar
• Drewes Farms Partnership v City of Toledo, Ohio (Preliminary Injunction Order) (US).
   Google Scholar
• Guerin v The Queen. 1984 (Ca).
   Google Scholar
• In re the Bed of the Wanganui River [1962] NZLR 600 (NZ).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson v McIntosh 21 U.S. 543 (1823) (US).
   Google Scholar
• Mabo and Others v The State of Queensland [No 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• The Colorado River Ecosystem and Deep Green Resistance, et al v State of Colorado (Order to Dismiss). https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.174436/gov.uscourts.cod.174436.25.0.pdf (US).
   Google Scholar
• Trans-Tasman Resources v Taranaki-Whanganui Conservation Board (2021) NZSC (2021) 127 (NZ).
   Google Scholar
• Tsilhqot’in Nation v British Colombia [2014] SCC 44 (Ca).
   Google Scholar
• Winters v United States 207 US 564 (1908) (US).
   Google Scholar
• Policies and reports
   Google Scholar
• Charters C, Kingdon-Bebb K, Olsen T, Ormsby W, Owen E, Pryor J, Ruru J, Solomon N, Williams G, Zealand N, Kōkiri TP. 2019. He puapua: report of the working group on a plan to realise the UN declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Un version. Wellington: Technical Working Group on a Plan for the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (DWG), [Te Puni Kokiri].
   Google Scholar
• Constitutional Convention of Chile. 2022. Consolidated approved norms: constitutional proposal by the full convention [www.chileconvention.cl].
   Google Scholar
• Defensoría del Pueblo de Colombia. 2012. Avance del derecho humano al agua en la Constitución, la jurisprudencia y los instrumentos internacionales 2005-2011 [The advance of the human right to water in the Constitution, jurisprudence and international instruments 2005-2011]. Bogotá.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2022. WGIII Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2022. AR6 climate change 2022 : mitigation of climate change [Internet]. [place unknown]. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-3/.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 2022. Summary for policymakers of the methodological assessment of the diverse values and valuation of nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) (Version 1). [Internet]. Bonn. Zenodo.: IPBES Plenary at its ninth session (IPBES 9); [accessed 2022 Jul 22]. https://ipbes.net/media_release/Values_Assessment_Published.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. [place unknown].
   Google Scholar
• International Center for the Rights of Nature. 2019. Advancing legal rights of nature: timeline. Community Environ Leg Def Fund [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Sep 18]. https://celdf.org/advancing-community-rights/rights-of-nature/rights-nature-timeline/.
   Google Scholar
• International Working Group for Indigenous Affairs. 2019. The United States of America IW 2019. Int Work Group Indig Aff [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Jun 5]. https://iwgia.org/en/usa/3375-iw2019-usa.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Government. 2020. National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020 [Internet]. [place unknown]. https://www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/default/files/media/Fresh%20water/national-policy-statement-for-freshwater-management-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• North Australian Indigenous Land and Sea Management Alliance. 2009. A Policy Statement on North Australian Indigenous Water Rights [Internet]. http://www.nailsma.org.au/nailsma/forum/downloads/Water-Policy-Statement-web-view.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Orange County. 2020. Charter Review Commission. Final Report. https://www.ocfelections.com/sites/default/files/SiteSectionFiles/Links%20A/forms/2020%20CRC%20Final%20Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Referendum Council. 2017. Uluru statement from the heart [Internet]. https://www.referendumcouncil.org.au.
   Google Scholar
• State of Victoria. 2016. Water for Victoria: Securing Victoria’s Future [Internet]. [place unknown]. https://www.water.vic.gov.au/water-for-victoria.
   Google Scholar
• State of Victoria. 2021a. Waterways of the West Action Plan [Internet]. [place unknown]: Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning; [accessed 2022 Jun 27]. https://www.water.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/552562/Waterways-West_Action_Plan_WEB.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• State of Victoria. 2021b. Rivers of the Barwon (Barre Warre Yulluk) Action Plan [Internet]. [place unknown]: Department of Environment Land Water and Planning; [accessed 2022 Jun 27]. https://www.water.vic.gov.au/waterways-and-catchments/barwon.
   Google Scholar
• State of Victoria. 2022. Water is life: traditional owner access to water roadmap (Consultation Draft) [Internet]. [place unknown]: Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning. https://www.water.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0034/572983/Water-is-life-Draft-Summary.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Independent Working Group on Constitutional Transformation. 2016. He Whakaaro Here Whakaumu mō Aotearoa: the report of Matike Mai Aotearoa [Internet]. [place unknown]. https://nwo.org.nz/resources/report-of-matike-mai-aotearoa-the-independent-working-group-on-constitutional-transformation/.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Human Rights Council. 2017. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water on his mission to Mexico, A/HRC/36/45/Add.2 (2017). [place unknown].
   Google Scholar
• Waitangi Tribunal. 1999. The Whanganui River Report (Wai 167). Wellington : GP Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Academic publications
   Google Scholar
• Ansaldi O, Pardo-Vergara M. 2020. What constitution? On Chile’s constitutional awakening. Law Crit. 31(1):7–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arstein-Kerslake A, O’Donnell E, Kayess R, Watson J. 2021. Relational personhood: a conception of legal personhood with insights from disability rights and environmental law. Griffith Law Rev. 30(3):530–555. doi:10.1080/10383441.2021.2003744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock HM. 2016. A brook with legal rights: the rights of nature in court. Ecol Law Q. 43(1):1–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babidge S. 2016. Contested value and an ethics of resources: water, mining and indigenous people in the Atacama Desert, Chile. Aust J Anthropol. 27(1):84–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker K, Simms R, Joe N, Harris L. 2018. Indigenous peoples and water governance in Canada: regulatory injustice and prospects for reform. [place unknown]: Water Justice; p. 193–209.
   Google Scholar
• Barrera-Hernández L. 2005. Indigenous peoples, human rights and natural resource development: Chile’s Mapuche peoples and the right to water. Annu Surv Int Comp Law. 11(1):1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bartel R. 2018. Place-speaking: attending to the relational, material and governance messages of silent spring. Geogr J. 184(1):64–74. doi:10.1111/geoj.12229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer CJ. 2004. Siren song: Chilean water law as a model for international reform. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Bavikatte K, Bennett T. 2015. Community stewardship: the foundation of biocultural rights. J Human Rights Environ. 6(1):7–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bédard REM. 2021. Anishinaabeg maternal activism: we sing a prayer for the water. J Mother Initiat Res Community Involv. 12(2):109–125. https://jarm.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/jarm/article/view/40634.
   Google Scholar
• Berasaluce M, Díaz-Siefer P, Rodríguez-Díaz P, Mena-Carrasco M, Ibarra JT, Celis-Diez JL, Mondaca P. 2021. Social-environmental conflicts in Chile: is there any potential for an ecological constitution? Sustain Basel Switz. 13(22):12701. doi:10.3390/su132212701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge C. 2016. This Canadian river is now legally a person. It’s not the only one. National Geographic. April 16, Travel:Earth Day:[about 15 screens]. [accessed 2022 Jun 28]. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/these-rivers-are-now-considered-people-what-does-that-mean-for-travelers.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley N. 2016. The boundaries of property: complexity, relationality, and spatiality. Law Soc Rev. 50(1):224–255. doi:10.1111/lasr.12182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brougher C. 2011. Indian reserved water rights under the winters doctrine: an overview. Congr Res Serv. CRS-RL32198. [accessed 2019 Jun 5]. http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/assets/crs/RL32198.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Budds J. 2004. Power, nature and neoliberalism: the political ecology of water in Chile. Singap J Trop Geogr. 25(3):322–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchi S. 2005. The interface between customary and statutory water rights – a statutory perspective. International workshop on African Water Laws: Plural Legislative Frameworks for Rural Water Management in Africa, Jan 26–28; Johannesburg (South Africa). p. 32-1–32-9 http://projects.nri.org/waterlaw/AWLworkshop/BURCHI-S.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Camacho FM. 2012. Competing rationalities in water conflict: mining and the indigenous community in Chiu Chiu, El Loa Province, Northern Chile. Singap J Trop Geogr. 33(1):93–107. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9493.2012.00451.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanova PG, Ceceña AE, Polanco HD, Millán M. 2001. El zapatismo y los derechos de los pueblos indígenas [Zapatismo and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples]. OSAL Jun, p. 23.
   Google Scholar
• Clark C, Page J. 2022. The lawful forest: a critical history of property, protest and spatial justice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coates N. 2018. Future contexts for treaty interpretation. In: Indigenous peoples and the state: international perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi. 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge; p. 166–186.
   Google Scholar
• Coombe RJ, Jefferson DJ. 2021. Posthuman rights struggles and environmentalisms from below in the political ontologies of Ecuador and Colombia. J Hum Rights Environ. 12(2):177–204. doi:10.4337/jhre.2021.02.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombes B. 2020. Nature’s rights as Indigenous rights? Mis/recognition through personhood for Te Urewera. Espace populations sociétés [En ligne].doi:10.4000/eps.9857
   Google Scholar
• Cosens B, Chaffin BC. 2016. Adaptive governance of water resources shared with indigenous peoples: the role of law. Water. 8(3):97. doi:10.3390/w8030097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotterrell R. 1995. Law’s community: legal theory in sociological perspective [Internet]. [place unknown]: Oxford University Press. https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00006a&AN=melb.b2216300&site=eds-live
   Google Scholar
• Crase L. 2011. Water policy in Australia: the impact of change and uncertainty, issues in water. [place unknown]: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Cribb M, Mika J, Leberman. 2022. Te Pā Auroa nā Te Awa Tupua: The new (but old) consciousness needed to implement indigenous frameworks in non-indigenous organisations.
   Google Scholar
• Curley A. 2019. “Our winters’ rights”: challenging colonial water laws. Glob Environ Polit. 19(3):57–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curley A. 2021. Unsettling Indian water settlements: the Little Colorado River, the San Juan River, and colonial enclosures. Antipode. 53(3):705–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran D. 2019. Indigenous processes of consent: repoliticizing water governance through legal pluralism. Water. 11(3):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies M. 2017. Law unlimited: materialism, pluralism, and legal theory. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dehm J. 2022. Reconfiguring environmental governance in the green economy: extraction, stewardship and natural capital. In: Locating nature: making and unmaking international law. [place unknown]: Cambridge University Press; p. 70–108.
   Google Scholar
• de la Cadena M, Blaser M, editors. 2018. A world of many worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://www.dukeupress.edu/a-world-of-many-worlds.
   Google Scholar
• del Campo García ME, Sánchez Reinón M. 2021. The decade of contentious politics: the rise of social movements around water in post-transitional Chile. In: Navarrete B, Tricot V, editor. The social outburst and political representation in Chile. Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 151–172.
   Google Scholar
• Demeritt D. 2002. What is the ‘social construction of nature’? A typology and sympathetic critique. Prog Hum Geogr. 26(6):767–790. doi:10.1191/0309132502ph402oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudgeon P, Bray A. 2019. Indigenous relationality: women, kinship and the law. Genealogy. 3(2):1–11. doi:10.3390/genealogy3020023.
   Google Scholar
• Durie E. 2018. Indigenous law and responsible water governance 1. In: ResponsAbility law and governance for living well with the earth [Internet]. [place unknown]: Routledge; p. 135–142. doi:10.4324/9780429467622-10
   Google Scholar
• Earth Law Center. Mexico. [Durango (CO)]: Earth Law Center; [accessed 2022 Jun 30]. https://www.earthlawcenter.org/mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Easterly W. 2008. Institutions: top down or bottom up? Am Econ Rev. 98(2):95–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis R, Perry D. 2020. A confluence of anticolonial pathways for indigenous sacred site protection. J Contemp Water Res Educ. 169(1):8–26. doi:10.1111/j.1936-704X.2020.03329.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar A. 2018. Designs for the pluriverse: radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estrada-Guevara VE. 2017. Gobernanza Intercomunitaria del agua para uso doméstico en la región hidropolítica: municipios de las Margaritas y Maravilla Tenejapa Chiapas [Inter community water governance for domestic use in the hydro-politic tegion of Las Margaritas and Maravilla Tenejapa, Chiapas]. Thesis, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher DE. 2016. Markets, water rights and sustainable development. Environ Plan Law J. 23(2):100–112.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher K, Makey L, Macpherson E, Paul A, Rennie H, Jorgensen J. 2022. Broadening environmental governance ontologies to enhance ecosystem-based management in Aotearoa New Zealand. Marit Stud. doi:10.1007/s40152-022-00278-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher K, Parsons M. 2020. River co-governance and co-management in Aotearoa New Zealand: enabling indigenous ways of knowing and being. Transnatl Environ Law. 9(3):455–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzroy River Council. 2016. Fitzroy river declaration [Internet]. [accessed 2020 Jul 29] (WA) https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e86add4e98f7421bace70f1/t/5e9fcc157dedb86cbb06a2e9/1587530798453/fitzroy-river-declaration.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher MLM. 2018. A short history of Indian law in the Supreme Court. Hum Rights Mag Am Bar Assoc. 40(4):3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Garrick DE, Hernandez-Mora N, O’Donnell E. 2018. Water markets in federal countries: comparing coordination institutions in Australia, Spain and the Western USA. Reg Environ Change. 6:1593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garza Grimaldo JG. 2015. Los derechos de la naturaleza en México [Rights of nature in Mexico]. Rev Mex Cienc Agríc. 1:181–190.
   Google Scholar
• González Serrano MX. 2020. Three years of river rights: collective agency for community ontologies on water - rivers [Internet]. [accessed 2021 Feb 17]. https://rivers-ercproject.eu/three-years-of-river-rights-collective-agency-for-community-ontologies-on-water/.
   Google Scholar
• Gover K. 2009. Legal pluralism and state-indigenous relations in Western settler societies. Geneva: International Council on Human Rights Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Grear A, Boulot E, Vargas-Roncancio ID, Sterlin J. 2021. Posthuman legalities: new materialism and law beyond the human [Internet]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. https://go.exlibris.link/mfq7zMky
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann A. 2021. Pachamama as a legal person? Rights of nature and Indigenous thought in Ecuador. In: Gutmann A, editor. Rights of nature [Internet]. [place unknown]: Routledge; p. 36–50. doi:10.4324/9780367479589-3
   Google Scholar
• Haraway DJ. 2016. Staying with the trouble: making kin in the chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig LD, Jackson S, Markham F, Osborne N. 2022. Water colonialism and Indigenous water justice in south-eastern Australia. Int J Water Resour Dev. 38(1):30–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig LD, Markham F, Jackson S. 2021. Benchmarking Indigenous water holdings in the Murray-Darling basin: a crucial step towards developing water rights targets for Australia. Australas J Water Resour. 25(2):98–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedden-Nicely DR, Caldwell LK. 2020. Indigenous rights and climate change: the influence of climate change on the quantification of reserved instream water rights for American Indian tribes. Utah Law Rev. 3:755–794.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt J. 2018. Proposed ecosystem-based management principles for New Zealand. Resour Manag J Auckl NZ Online. 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbink L. 2021. Constitutional rewrite in Chile: moving toward a social and democratic rule of law? Hague J Rule Law HJRL. 13(2–3):223–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill R, Harkness P, Raisbeck-Brown N, Lyons I, Álvarez-Romero JG, Kim MK, Chungalla D, Wungundin H, Aiken M, Malay J, et al. 2022. Learning together for and with the Martuwarra Fitzroy River. Sustain Sci. 17(2):351–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holley C, Sinclair D. editors. 2018. Reforming water law and governance: from stagnation to innovation in Australia. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Horne A, O’Donnell E. 2014. Decision making roles and responsibility for environmental water in the Murray-darling basin. Aust J Water Resour. 18(2):118–132.
   Google Scholar
• International Cry. 2017. Ponca Nation of Oklahoma to recognize the rights of nature to stop fracking. Intercont Cry [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Sep 18]. https://intercontinentalcry.org/ponca-nation-oklahoma-recognize-rights-nature-stop-fracking/ (US).
   Google Scholar
• Jackson S. 2021. Enacting multiple river realities in the performance of an environmental flow in Australia’s Murray-Darling basin. Geogr Res. doi:10.1111/1745-5871.12513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson S, Anderson EP, Piland NC, Carriere S, Java L, Jardine TD. 2022. River rhythmicity: a conceptual means of understanding and leveraging the relational values of rivers. People Nat. 4(4):949–962. doi:10.1002/pan3.10335.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson S, Nias D. 2019. Watering country: Aboriginal partnerships with environmental water managers of the Murray–Darling basin, Australia. Australas J Environ Manag. 26(3):287–303. doi:10.1080/14486563.2019.1644544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson S, Woods R, Hooper F. 2021. Chapter 15 - empowering First Nations in the governance and management of the Murray–Darling basin. In: Hart BT, Bond NR, Byron N, Pollino CA, Stewardson MJ, editor. Murray-Darling basin Australia [Internet]. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 313–338. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-818152-2.00015-2
   Google Scholar
• Jones C. 2016. New treaty, new tradition: reconciling New Zealand and Maori law. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman CM, Martin PL. 2017. Can rights of nature make development more sustainable? Why some Ecuadorian lawsuits succeed and others fail. World Dev. 92:130–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman CM, Martin PL. 2021. The politics of rights of nature: strategies for building a more sustainable future [Internet]. [place unknown]: The MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/13855.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Kelly SH. 2021. Mapping hydropower conflicts: a legal geography of dispossession in Mapuche-Williche Territory, Chile. Geoforum. 127:269–282. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitson J, Cain A. 2022. Navigating towards Te Mana o te Wai in Murihiku. N Z Geogr. doi:10.1111/nzg.12330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotzé LJ. 2020. Earth system law for the anthropocene: rethinking environmental law alongside the earth system metaphor. Transnatl Leg Theory. 11(1–2):75–104. doi:10.1080/20414005.2020.1776556.
   Google Scholar
• Krauze K, Wagner I. 2019. From classical water-ecosystem theories to nature-based solutions — contextualizing nature-based solutions for sustainable city. Sci Total Environ. 655:697–706. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laborde S, Jackson S. 2022. Living waters or resource? Ontological differences and the governance of waters and rivers. Local Environ. doi:10.1080/13549839.2022.2044298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latchmore T, Schuster-Wallace CJ, Longboat DR, Dickson-Anderson SE, Majury A. 2018. Critical elements for local indigenous water security in Canada: a narrative review. J Water Health. 16(6):893–903. doi:10.2166/wh.2018.107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaitre J. 2009. El Derecho Como Conjuro: Fetichismo legal, violencia y movimientos sociales. [place unknown]: Siglo del Hombre; Universidad de Los Andes.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstrom GE. 2022. Accountability, relationality and indigenous epistemology: advancing an indigenous perspective on academic integrity. In: Eaton SE, Christensen Hughes J, editor. Academic integrity in Canada. An enduring and essential challenge [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 125–139. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_6
   Google Scholar
• Lyons I, Barber M. 2021. Relatedness and co-existence in water resource assessments: indigenous water values, rights and interests in the Mitchell Catchment, North Queensland. Australas J Water Resour. 25(1):57–69. doi:10.1080/13241583.2021.1921331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyver P, Ruru J, Scott N, Tylianakis JM, Arnold J, Malinen SK, Bataille CY, Herse MR, Jones CJ, Gormley AM, et al. 2019. Building biocultural approaches into Aotearoa – New Zealand’s conservation future. J R Soc N Z. 49(3):394–411. doi:10.1080/03036758.2018.1539405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macpherson E. 2017. Beyond recognition: lessons from Chile for allocating indigenous water rights in Australia. Univ New South Wales Law J. 40(3):1130–1169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macpherson E. 2019. Indigenous rights to water in law and regulation: lessons from comparative experience. [place unknown]: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson E. 2021. The (human) rights of nature: a comparative study of emerging legal rights for rivers and lakes in the United States of America and Mexico. Duke Environ Law Policy Forum. Spring:327–377.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson E. 2022. Ecosystem rights and the anthropocene in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. In: Amirante D, Bagni S, editors. Environmental constitutionalism in the anthropocene. Values, principles and actions. [place unknown]: Routledge; p. 168–186.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson E, Borchgrevink A, Ranjan R, Piedrahíta. 2021. Where ordinary laws fall short: ‘riverine rights’ and constitutionalism. Griffith Law Rev. 30(3):438–473. doi: 10.1080/10383441.2021.1982119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macpherson E, Torres Ventura J, Clavijo Ospina F. 2020. Constitutional law, ecosystems and indigenous peoples in Colombia: biocultural rights and legal subjects. Transnatl Environ Law. 9(3):521–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macpherson E, Urlich SC, Rennie HG, Paul A, Fisher K, Braid L, Banwell J, Torres Ventura J, Jorgensen E. 2021. ‘Hooks’ and ‘anchors’ for relational ecosystem-based marine management. Mar Policy. 130:104561. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manikuakanishtiku GJ, Desbiens C, Kanapé É. 2022. A river of names: The multiple voices of an Innu riverscape. River Res Appl. 38(3):412–421. doi:10.1002/rra.3876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Rhea Z. 2018. The art of negotiation: teaching about relationality and interdependence in land and water. In: Ma Rhea Z, editor. Land and water education and the allodial principle: rethinking ecological education in the postcolonial age [Internet]. Singapore: Springer; p. 65–77. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7600-8_6
   Google Scholar
• Marin AA. 2016. Constitutional challenges of the south: indigenous water rights in Chile; another step in the “civilizing mission”? Windsor Yearb Access Justice. 33(3):87.
   Google Scholar
• Martin B. 2018. Ngā Pou rāhui 1 : responsable laws for water and climate. In: Martin Betsan, Te Aho Linda, Humphries-Kil Maria, editors. Responsability law and governance for living well with the earth [Internet]. [place unknown]: Routledge; p. 12–34. doi:10.4324/9780429467622-2.
   Google Scholar
• May JR, Daly E. 2015. Global environmental constitutionalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139135559
   Google Scholar
• McCormack F. 2021. The Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary: terraqueous territorialization and Māori marine environments. Pac Aff. 94(1):77–96. doi:10.5509/202194177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikaere A. 2007. Seeing human rights through Maori eyes. Yearb N Z Jurisprud. 10:53–58. doi:10.3316/informit.388896985334902.
   Google Scholar
• Milgin A, Nardea L, Grey H, Laborde S, Jackson S. 2020. Sustainability crises are crises of relationship: learning from Nyikina ecology and ethics. People Nat. 2(4):1210–1222. doi:10.1002/pan3.10149.
   Google Scholar
• Moggridge BJ, Thompson RM. 2021. Cultural value of water and western water management: an Australian indigenous perspective. Australas J Water Resour. 25(1):4–14. doi:10.1080/13241583.2021.1897926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris J, Ruru J. 2010. Giving voice to rivers: legal personality as a vehicle for recognising indigenous peoples’ relationships to water. Aust Indig Law Rev. 14(2):49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Muru-Lanning M. 2016. Tupuna Awa: people and politics of the Waikato river. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Navas ODA. 2002. La Constitución Ecológica de Colombia: Análisis Comparativo con el Sistema Constitucional Latinoamericano. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• Ngāi Tahu takes court action to protect South Island lakes and rivers. 2020. Te Rūnanga O Ngāi Tahu [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Feb 21]. https://ngaitahu.iwi.nz/ngai-tahu-takes-court-action-to-protect-south-island-lakes-and-rivers/.
   Google Scholar
• Nowlan L. 2004. Customary water laws and practices in Canada [Internet]. [place unknown]. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/legal/docs/CaseStudy_Canada.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O’Bryan K. 2017. New law finally gives voice to the Yarra River’s traditional owners. The Conversation [Internet]. [accessed 2018 Sep 25]. http://theconversation.com/new-law-finally-gives-voice-to-the-yarra-rivers-traditional-owners-83307.
   Google Scholar
• Observatoire International des droits de la Nature. Fleuve Saint-Laurent (Québec, Canada) [accessed 2022 Jun 30] https://www.observatoirenature.org/fleuve-saint-laurent.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell E, Jackson S, Langton M, Godden L. 2022. Racialized water governance: the ‘hydrological frontier’ in the Northern Territory, Australia. Australas J Water Resour. 26(1):1–13. doi:10.1080/13241583.2022.2049053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell E, Macpherson E. 2018. Voice, power and legitimacy: the role of the legal person in river management in New Zealand, Chile and Australia. Australas J Water Resour. 26(1):1–10. doi:10.1080/13241583.2018.1552545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell E, Poelina A, Pelizzon A, Clark C. 2020. Stop burying the lede: the essential role of indigenous law(s) in creating rights of nature. Transnatl Environ Law. 9(3):403–427. doi:10.1017/S2047102520000242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orucu AE. 2006. Methodology of comparative law. In: Smits JM Elgar, editor. The encyclopedia of competition Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; p. 442–454.
   Google Scholar
• Oyarzún-Serrano L. 2020. Chile facing the pandemic and social unrest: crisis as an opportunity? Lat Am Policy. 11(2):320–326. doi:10.1111/lamp.12199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons M, Fisher K, Crease RP. 2021. Decolonising blue spaces in the anthropocene: freshwater management in Aotearoa New Zealand. [place unknown]: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Perreault T. 2017. Tendencies in tension: resource governance and social contradictions in contemporary Bolivia. [place unknown]: Gov Resour Extr.
   Google Scholar
• Pier-Olivier AM, Wilson G. 2021, Mar 15. Why recognize a river’s Rights? 2021. Oakland (CA): International Rivers. [accessed 2022 Jun 28]. https://www.internationalrivers.org/news/why-recognize-a-rivers-rights-behind-the-scenes-of-the-magpie-river-case-in-canada/.
   Google Scholar
• Poelina A, Wooltorton S, Guimond L, Sioui Durand G, Unamen Shipu Romaine River, Martuwarra RiverOfLife. 2021. Hearing, voicing and healing: rivers as culturally located and connected. River Res Appl. doi:10.1002/rra.3843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto M, Verdugo S. 2021. Understanding Chile’s constitution-making procedure. Int J Const Law. 19(1):1–5. doi:10.1093/icon/moab025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provis EL. 2021. Establishing a cultural flows commission: a framework for joint action on indigenous water rights. Glob J Res Eng. 21(1). [accessed 2022 May 7]. https://engineeringresearch.org/index.php/GJRE/article/view/2099.
   Google Scholar
• Radonic L. 2017. Through the aqueduct and the courts: an analysis of the human right to water and indigenous water rights in northwestern Mexico. Geoforum. 84:151–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymer E. 2021, Mar 9. Quebec's Magpie river is granted personhood. [Canada] Canadian Lawyer. https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/practice-areas/esg/quebecs-magpie-river-is-granted-personhood/353752.
   Google Scholar
• Reddekop J, Trownsell T. 2021. Disrupting anthropocentrism through relationality. [place unknown]: Springer International Publishing; p. 441–458. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53014-3_24.
   Google Scholar
• Reid JL. 2021. Replacing rights with indigenous relationality to reclaim homelands. Helsinki: Hels Univ Press [Internet].[accessed 2022 May 24]. doi:10.33134/AHEAD-1-9.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson W, McNeish J-A. 2021. Granting rights to rivers in Colombia: significance for ExtrACTIVISM and governance. In: Shapiro J, McNeish J-A, editors. Our extractive age; expressions of violence and resistance. [place unknown]: Routledge; p. 155–175.
   Google Scholar
• Rivas MG. 2014. Ethnolinguistic divisions and access to clean water in Mexico. Lat Am Res Rev. 49(2):129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RiverOfLife M, Pelizzon A, Poelina A, Akhtar-Khavari A, Clark C, Laborde S, Macpherson E, O’Bryan K, O’Donnell E, Page J. 2021a. Yoongoorrookoo. Griffith Law Rev. 1–25. doi:10.1080/10383441.2021.1996882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RiverOfLife M, Poelina A, Bagnall D, Lim M. 2020. Recognizing the Martuwarra’s first law right to life as a living ancestral being. Transnatl Environ Law. 9(3):541–568. doi:10.1017/S2047102520000163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RiverOfLife M, Taylor KS, Poelina A. 2021b. Living waters, law first: Nyikina and Mangala water governance in the Kimberley, Western Australia. Australas J Water Resour. 25(1):40–56. doi:10.1080/13241583.2021.1880538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roa-García MC, Urteaga-Crovetto P, Bustamante-Zenteno R. 2015. Water laws in the Andes: a promising precedent for challenging neoliberalism. Geoforum. 64:270–280. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruru J. 2013. Indigenous restitution in settling water claims: the developing cultural and commercial redress opportunities in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Pac Rim Law Policy J. 22(2):311.
   Google Scholar
• Ruru J. 2018a. The failing modern jurisprudence of the Treaty of Waitangi. In: Indigenous peoples and the state: international perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi. 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruru J. 2018b. Listening to Papatūānuku: a call to reform water law. J R Soc N Z. 48(2–3):215–224. doi:10.1080/03036758.2018.1442358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmond A. 2017. Tears of Rangi: experiments across worlds. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders K. 2018. ‘Beyond human ownership’? Property, power and legal personality for nature in Aotearoa New Zealand. J Environ Law. 30(2):207–234. doi:10.1093/jel/eqx029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensrud AB. 2016. Climate change, water practices and relational worlds in the Andes. Ethnos. 81(1):75–98. doi:10.1080/00141844.2014.929597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone C. 1972. Should trees have standing? Towards legal rights for natural objects. South Calif Law Rev. 45:450–501.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot-Jones J, Bennett J. 2022. Implementing bottom-up governance through granting legal rights to rivers: a case study of the Whanganui river, Aotearoa New Zealand. Australas J Environ Manag. 29(1):64–80. doi:10.1080/14486563.2022.2029775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tănăsescu M. 2016. Environment, political representation, and the challenge of rights: speaking for nature. Hampshire : Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tănăsescu M. 2020. Rights of nature, legal personality, and indigenous philosophies. Transnatl Environ Law. 9(3):429–453. doi:10.1017/S2047102520000217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tănăsescu M. 2022. Understanding the rights of nature [Internet]. [place unknown]: Transcript Publishing.; [accessed 2022 Feb 14]. https://www.transcript-publishing.com/978-3-8376-5431-8/understanding-the-rights-of-nature/.
   Google Scholar
• Tau TM. 2017. Water rights for Ngāi Tahu: a discussion paper. Christchurch: Canterbury University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor L, Hikuroa D. 2022. Kāwanatanga ‘Future search’ workshop summary report by the Sustainable Seas National Science Challenge project 4.3: Enabling kaitiakitanga & ecosystem- based management [Internet]. [place unknown]. https://www.sustainableseaschallenge.co.nz/tools-and-resources/k%C4%81wanatanga-future-search-workshop-summary-report/.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor LB. 2022. Stop drinking the waipiro! A critique of the government’s ‘why’ behind Te Mana o te Wai. N Z Geogr. 78(1):87–91. doi:10.1111/nzg.12328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor LB, Fenemor A, Mihinui R, Sayers TA, Porou T, Hikuroa D, Harcourt N, White P, O’Connor M. 2020. Ngā Puna Aroha: towards an indigenous-centred freshwater allocation framework for Aotearoa New Zealand. Australas J Water Resour. 1–13. doi:10.1080/13241583.2020.1792632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Aho L. 2014. Ruruku whakatupua Te Mana o te Awa Tupua – Upholding the mana of the Whanganui River. Māori Law Review. May. [accessed 2017 Apr 26]. http://maorilawreview.co.nz/2014/05/ruruku-whakatupua-te-mana-o-te-awa-tupua-upholding-the-mana-of-the-whanganui-river/.
   Google Scholar
• Te Aho L. 2018. Governance of water based on responsible use – an elegant solution?. In: Martin B, Te Aho L, Humphries-Kil M, editors. ResponsAbility law and governance for living well with the earth [Internet]. [place unknown]: Routledge; p. 143–161. doi:10.4324/9780429467622-11.
   Google Scholar
• Te Aho L. 2019. Te Mana o te Wai: an indigenous perspective on rivers and river management. River Res Appl. 35(10):1615–1621. doi:10.1002/rra.3365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsatsaros J, Wellman J, Bohnet I, Brodie J, Valentine P. 2018. Indigenous water governance in Australia: comparisons with the United States and Canada. Water Basel. 10(11):1639. doi:10.3390/w10111639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynan L. 2021. What is relationality? Indigenous knowledges, practices and responsibilities with kin. Cult Geogr. 28(4):597–610. doi:10.1177/14744740211029287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulloa A. 2020. The rights of the Wayúu people and water in the context of mining in La Guajira, Colombia: demands of relational water justice. Hum Geogr. 13(1):6–15. doi:10.1177/1942778620910894.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas-Chaves I, Rodríguez GA, Cumbe-Figueroa A, Mora-Garzón SE. 2020. Recognizing the rights of nature in Colombia: the Atrato river case. Jurídicas. 17(1):13–41. doi:10.17151/jurid.2020.17.1.2.
   Google Scholar
• Vásquez-Fernández AM, Ahenakew pii tai poo taa C. 2020. Resurgence of relationality: reflections on decolonizing and indigenizing ‘sustainable development. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 43:65–70. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecinos Laguna del Carpintero. 2018. [place unknown]. http://www2.scjn.gob.mx/ConsultaTematica/PaginasPub/DetallePub.aspx?AsuntoID = 195934.
   Google Scholar
• Vertongen B. 2022. In defence of co-governance: a response to Gary Judd QC. Law News [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Jun 28] (15). https://adls.org.nz/Attachment?Action = Download&Attachment_id = 4168&mc_cid = 0144af78d1&mc_eid = 1753b5ce16.
   Google Scholar
• Viaene L. 2021. Indigenous water ontologies, hydro-development and the human/more-than-human right to water: a call for critical engagement with plurilegal water realities. Water. 13(12):1660. doi:10.3390/w13121660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardle D. 2021. Sustainable indigenous water rights. In: C. Spee J, McMurray A, McMillan M, editor. Clan and tribal perspectives on social, economic and environmental sustainability: indigenous stories from around the globe [Internet]. [place unknown]: Emerald Publishing Limited; p. 9–22. doi:10.1108/978-1-78973-365-520211003
   Google Scholar
• Watson I. 2022. Inter-Nation relationships and the natural world as relation. In: Natarajan U, Dehm J, editor. Locating nature: making and unmaking international law [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 354–374. doi:10.1017/9781108667289.019
   Google Scholar
• Williams DV. 2021. Justiciability and tikanga: towards “soft” legal constitutionalism. N Z Univ Law Rev. 29(4):649–674.
   Google Scholar
• Williams J. 2013. Lex Aotearoa: an heroic attempt to map the Māori dimension in modern New Zealand Law. Waikato Law Rev. 21:1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson NJ. 2019. Seeing water like a state?”: indigenous water governance through Yukon first nation self-government agreements. Geoforum. 104:101–113. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson NJ, Inkster J. 2018. Respecting water: indigenous water governance, ontologies, and the politics of kinship on the ground. Environ Plan E Nat Space. 1(4):516–538. doi:10.1177/2514848618789378.
   Google Scholar
• Wooltorton S, Poelina A, Collard L. 2021. River relationships: for the love of rivers. River Res Appl. doi:10.1002/rra.3854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates JS, Harris LM, Wilson NJ. 2017. Multiple ontologies of water: politics, conflict and implications for governance. Environ Plan Soc Space. 35(5):797–815. doi:10.1177/0263775817700395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdiha H. 2017. The relationality of law and culture: dominant approaches and new directions for cultural sociologists. Sociol Compass. 11(12):e12545. doi:10.1111/soc4.12545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar