1,150
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special issue: Fossil vertebrates from southern Zealandia

First records of two mackerel shark species (Carcharodon planus comb. nov. and Carcharodon hubbelli; Lamnidae) from New Zealand

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 21 Jun 2023, Accepted 21 Oct 2023, Published online: 05 Dec 2023

References

  • Agassiz LJR. 1843. Recherches sur les poissons fossiles. [Research of fossil fishes]. Tome III (livr. 15-16). Neuchâtel: Imprimerie de Petitpierre, p. 157–390.
  • Agassiz LJR. 1856. Notice on the fossil fishes found in California by WP Blake. American Journal of Science and Arts. 21(Series. 2 ):272–275.
  • Aguirre-Fernández G. 2013. Neogene dolphins from New Zealand: implications for the evolution of the family Kentriodontidae [dissertation]. Dunedin: University of Otago.
  • Aguirre-Fernández G, Fordyce, RE. 2014. Papahu taitapu, gen. et sp. nov., an early Miocene stem odontocete (Cetacea) from New Zealand. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 34(1):195–210. doi:10.1080/02724634.2013.799069.
  • Barnes LG, Howard H, Hutchison JH, Welton BJ. 1981. The vertebrate fossils of the marine Cenozoic San Mateo Formation at Oceanside, California. In: Abbott PL, O'Dunn S, editors. Geologic investigations of the coastal plain. San Diego: San Diego Association of Geologists; p. 53–70.
  • Barnes LG, Raschke RE, McLeod SA. 1985. A late Miocene marine vertebrate assemblage from Southern California. National Geographic Society Research Reports. 21:13–20.
  • Berg LS. 1958. System der rezenten und fossilen Fischartigen und Fische. Berlin: Deutsche Verlag Wissenschaften.
  • Beu AG, Maxwell PA. 1990. Cenozoic mollusca of New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin. 58:1–518.
  • Boessenecker RW. 2011. A new marine vertebrate assemblage from the late Neogene Purisima Formation in central California, part I: fossil sharks, bony fish, birds, and implications for the age of the Purisima Formation west of the San Gregorio Fault. PalArch's Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 8(4):1–30.
  • Browne GH, Field BD. 1985. The lithostratigraphy of late Cretaceous to early Pleistocene rocks of northern Canterbury, New Zealand. NZ Geological Survey Record. 6:1–63.
  • Chávez-Hoffmeister MF, Villafaña JA. 2023. The Neogene record of cartilaginous fishes (chondrichthyes: holocephali, elasmobranchii) from northern Chile: a review and identification guide. Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 124:104230. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2023.104230.
  • Deméré TA. 1984. Paleontology of the middle Miocene Los Indios Member of the Rosarito Beach Formation, northwestern Baja California, Mexico. Pacific Section A.A.P.G. 54:47–56.
  • Ehret DJ, Hubbell G, MacFadden BJ. 2009. Exceptional preservation of the white shark Carcharodon (Lamniformes, Lamnidae) from the early Pliocene of Peru. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 29:1–13. doi:10.1671/039.029.0113.
  • Ehret DJ, MacFadden BJ, Jones DS, DeVries TJ, Foster DA, Salas-Gismondi R. 2012. Origin of the white shark Carcharodon (Lamniformes: Lamnidae) based on recalibration of the upper Neogene Pisco Formation of Peru. Palaeontology. 55:1139–1153. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01201.x.
  • Feldmann RM, Keyes IW. 1992. Systematic and stratigraphic review with catalogue and locality index of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic decapod Crustacea of New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey Record. 45:1–73.
  • Field BD, Browne GH. 1986. Lithostratigraphy of Cretaceous and Tertiary rocks, southern Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey Record. 14:1–55.
  • Fordyce RE. 1991. A new look at the fossil vertebrate record of New Zealand. In: Vickers-Rich P, Monaghan JM, Baird RF, Rich TH, editors. Vertebrate palaeontology of Australasia. Melbourne: Pioneer Design Studio and Monash University; p. 1191–1316.
  • Hubbell G. 1996. Using tooth structure to determine the evolutionary history of the white shark. In: Kimley A, Ainley D, editors. Great white sharks: The biology of Carcharodon carcharias. San Diego, California: Academic Press; p. 9–18.
  • Huxley TH. 1880. On the application of the laws of evolution to the arrangement of the Vertebrata, and more particularly of the Mammalia. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, London. 43:649–662.
  • Jordan DS, Hannibal H. 1923. Fossil sharks and rays of the Pacific slope of North America. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Science. 22:27–63.
  • Karasawa H. 1989. Late Cenozoic elasmobranchs from the Hokuriku district, central Japan. The Science Reports of the Kanazawa University. 34:1–57.
  • Kemp NR. 1991. Chondrichthyans in the Cretaceous and Tertiary of Australia. In: Vickers-Rich P, Monaghan JM, Baird RF, Rich TH, editors. Vertebrate palaeontology of Australasia. Melbourne: Pioneer Design Studio and Monash University; p. 497–568.
  • Kent BW. 2018. The cartilaginous fishes (chimaeras, sharks and rays) of the Calvert Cliffs, Maryland, USA. In: Godfrey SJ, editor. The geology and vertebrate paleontology of Calvert Cliffs, Maryland: Smithsonian contributions to paleobiology, vol. 100: p. 45–156.
  • Keyes IW. 1972. New records of the Elasmobranch C. megalodon (Agassiz) and a review of the genus Carcharodonin the New Zealand fossil record. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics. 15(2):228–242. doi:10.1080/00288306.1972.10421956.
  • King CM, Roberts CD, Bell BD, Fordyce RE, Nicoll RS, Worthy TH, Paulin CD, Hitchmough RA, Keyes IW, Baker AN, et al. 2009. Phylum chordata: lancelets, fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals. In: Gordon DP, editor. The New Zealand inventory of biodiversity. 1. Kingdom Animalia. Christchurch: Canterbury University Press, p. 431–527.
  • Kriwet J, Mewis H, Hampe O. 2015. A partial skeleton of a new lamniform mackerel shark from the Miocene of Europe. Acta Paleontologica Polonica. 60:857–875.
  • Kuga N. 1985. Revision of Neogene mackerel shark of genus Isurus from Japan. Memoirs of the faculty of science, Kyoto university. Series of Geology and Mineralogy. 51(1-2):1–20.
  • Lewis DW. 1976. Subaqueous debris flows of Early Pleistocene age at Motunau, North Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics. 19(5):535–567. doi:10.1080/00288306.1976.10426308.
  • Linnaeus C. 1758. Systema naturae, Tenth Edition. Stockholm.: Larentii Salvii.
  • Marx FG, Coste A, Richards MD, Palin JM, Fordyce RE. in press. Strontium isotopes reveal a globally unique assemblage of early miocene baleen whales. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand.
  • Muizon Cd, DeVries TJ. 1985. Geology and paleontology of late Cenozoic marine deposits in the Sacaco area (Peru). Geologische Rundschau. 74:547–563. doi:10.1007/BF01821211.
  • Müller J, Henle FGJ. 1838. On the generic characters of cartilaginous fishes. Magazine of Natural History. 2:88–91.
  • Nazarkin MV. 2013. Hooked mako Isurus planus (agassiz, 1856) from the Miocene of Sakhalin. Zoosystematica Rossica. 22:311–314. doi:10.31610/zsr/2013.22.2.311.
  • Nyberg KG, Ciampaglio CN, Wray GA. 2006. Tracing the ancestry of the great white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, using morphometric analyses of fossil teeth. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 26:806–814. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2006)26[806:TTAOTG]2.0.CO;2.
  • Ochoa D, DeVries TJ, Quispe K, Barbosa-Espitia A, Salas-Gismondi R, Foster DA, Gonzales R, Revillon S, Berrospi R, Pairazamán L, et al. 2022. Age and provenance of the Mio-Pleistocene sediments from the Sacaco area, Peruvian continental margin. Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 116:103799. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2022.103799.
  • Perry FA. 1993. Fossil sharks and rays of the southern Santa Cruz Mountains, California. Santa Cruz, California: Santa Cruz Museum Association; p. 1–48.
  • Prothero DR, Bitboul CZ, Moore GW, Moore EJ. 2001. Magnetic stratigraphy of the lower and middle Miocene Astoria Formation, Lincoln county, Oregon. Pacific Section SEPM Special Publication. 91:272–283.
  • Purdy RW, Schneider VP, Applegate SP, McLellan JH, Meyer RL, Slaughter BH. 2001. The neogene sharks, rays, and bony fishes from Lee Creek Mine, Aurora, North Carolina. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology. 90:71–202. doi:10.5479/si.00810266.90.71.
  • Raine JI, Beu AG, Boyes AF, Campbell HJ, Cooper RA, Crampton JS, Crundwell MP, Hollis CJ, Morgans HEG. 2015. Revised calibration of the New Zealand geological timescale: NZGT2015/1. GNS Science Report. 2012/39:1–53.
  • Repenning CA, Tedford RH. 1977. Otarioid seals of the Neogene. US Geological Survey Professional Paper. 992:1–87.
  • Shimada K. 2002a. The relationship between the tooth size and total body length in the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias (Lamniformes: Lamnidae). Journal of Fossil Research. 35:28–33.
  • Shimada K. 2002b. The relationship between the tooth size and total body length in the shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus (Lamniformes: Lamnidae). Journal of Fossil Research. 35:6–9.
  • Türtscher J, López-Romero FA, Jambura PL, Kindlimann R, Ward DJ, Kriwet J. 2021. Evolution, diversity, and disparity of the tiger shark lineage Galeocerdo in deep time. Paleobiology. 47:574–590. doi:10.1017/pab.2021.6.
  • Ward DJ, Bonavia CG. 2001. Additions to, and a review of, the Miocene shark and ray fauna of Malta. Central Mediterranean Naturalist. 3:131–146.
  • Welton BJ. 1972. Fossil sharks of Oregon. The Ore Bin. 34(10):161–172.
  • Yabe H. 2000. Teeth of an extinct great white shark, Carcharodon sp., from the Neogene Senhata Formation, Miura Group, Chiba prefecture, Japan. Tertiary Research. 20:95–105.
  • Yun C. 2022. A tooth of the extinct lamnid shark, Cosmopolitodus planus comb nov. (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) from the Miocene of Pohang City, South Korea. Acta Paleontologica Romaniae. 18:9–16.