Does teaching students how to explicitly model the causal structure of systems improve their understanding of these systems?

References

• ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). 2011. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2012–2013.” Accessed June 15, 2012. http://www.abet.org/engineering-criteria-2012-2013/
   Google Scholar
• Besterfield-Sacre, M., L. J. Schuman, H. Wolfe, C. J. Atman, J. McGourty, R. L. Miller, B. M. Olds, and G. M. Rogers. 2000. “Defining the Outcomes: A Framework for EC-2000.” IEEE Transactions on Education 43 (2): 100–110. doi: 10.1109/13.848060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell, C., and C. Dillon. 2000. “Telling Tales: Models, Stories and Meanings.” For the Learning of Mathematics 20 (3): 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bobrow, D. G., ed. 1985. Qualitative Reasoning About Physical Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, W. E., and R. C. DiPrima. 1997. Elementary Differential Equations. 6th ed. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brogan, W. L. 1991. Modern Control Theory. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A., and B. L. Sherin. 2000. “Meta-Representation: An Introduction.” Journal of Mathematical Behavior 19 (4): 385–398. doi: 10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00051-7
   Google Scholar
• Dym, C. L. 2004. “Design, Systems, and Engineering Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education 20 (3): 305–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., and R. Brent. 2003. “Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria.” Journal of Engineering Education 92 (1): 7–25. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00734.x
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. 1961. Industrial Dynamics. Waltham, MA: Pegasus Communications.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, G. F., D. J. Powell, and A. Emami-Naeini. 2010. Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Gainsburg, J. 2006. “The Mathematical Modeling of Structural Engineers.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 8 (1): 3–36. doi: 10.1207/s15327833mtl0801_2
   Google Scholar
• Gainsburg, J. 2007. “Problem Solving and Learning in Everyday Structural Engineering Work.” In Foundations for the Future in Mathematics Education, edited by R. A. Lesh, E. Hamilton, and J. J. Kaput, 37–56. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Greca, I. M., and M. A. Moreira. 2002. “Mental, Physical, and Mathematical Models in the Teaching and Learning of Physics.” Science Education 86 (1): 106–121. doi: 10.1002/sce.10013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, E. 2005. “Learning and Transfer From a Simple Dynamic System.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 46 (2): 119–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00442.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, E., and B. Brehmer. 2003. “Understanding and Control of a Simple Dynamic System.” System Dynamics Review 19 (2): 119–137. doi: 10.1002/sdr.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehle, P. E., and F. K. Lester. 2003. “A Semiotic Look at Modeling Behavior.” In Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching, edited by R. Lesh and H. M. Doerr, 97–122. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kheir, N. A., K. J. Åström, D. Auslander, K. C. Cheok, G. F. Franklin, M. Masten, and M. Rabins. 1996. “Control Systems Engineering Education.” Automatica 32 (2): 147–166. doi: 10.1016/0005-1098(96)85546-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, J. H., and H. A. Simon. 1987. “Why A Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words.” Cognitive Science 11 (1): 65–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesh, R., and H. M. Doerr. 2003. “Foundations of A Modeling Perspective of Mathematics, Teaching, Learning, and Problem Solving.” In Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solvning, Learning, and Teching, edited by R. Lesh and H. M. Doerr, 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lotka, A. J. 1925. Elements of Physical Biology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Maytham, B., Case, J., and D. Fraser. 2005. “Engineering Graduates’ Perceptions of How Well They Were Prepared for Work in Industry.” European Journal of Engineering Education 30 (2): 167–180. doi: 10.1080/03043790500087571
   Google Scholar
• Passow, H. J. 2007. “What Competencies Should Engineering Programs Emphasize? A Meta-Analysis of Practitioners’ Options Informs Curricular Design.” Proceedings of the 3rd international CDIO conference. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Accessed June 15, 2012. http://www.cdio.org/files/document/file/T2A1Passow.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Redish, E. F., and K. A. Smith. 2008. “Looking Beyond Content: Skill Development for Engineers.” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3): 295–307. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugarcia, A., R. M. Felder, D. R. Woods, and J. E. Stice. 2000. “The Future of Education I: A Vision for a New Century.” Cheical. Engineering Education 34 (1): 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Safoutin, M. J., C. J. Atman, R. Adams, T. Rutar, J. C. Kramlich, and J. L. Fridley. 2000. “A Design Attribute Framework for Course Planning and Learning Assessment.” IEEE Transactions on Education 43 (2): 188–199. doi: 10.1109/13.848072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaife, M., and Y. Rogers. 1996. “External Cognition: How Do Graphical Representations Work?” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45 (2): 185–213. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., and B. Y. White. 2005. “Metamodeling Knowledge: Developing Students’ Understanding of Scientific Modeling.” Cognition and Instruction 23 (2): 165–205. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2302_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. D. 2000. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., and N. Verloop. 1999. “Teachers’ Knowledge of Models and Modeling in Science.” International Journal of Science Education 21 (11): 1141–1153. doi: 10.1080/095006999290110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volterra, V. 1926. “Variazioni e flluttuazioni del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi [Variations and fluctuations in the number of members of cohabitating animal species].” Atti della R. Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Classe di scienze fisiche, matematiche e naturali VI (2): 31–113.
   Google Scholar
• Zawojewski, J. S., H. A. Diefes-Dux, and K. J. Bowman. eds. 2008. Models and Modeling in Engineering Education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. 1997. “The Nature of External Representations in Problem Solving.” Cognitive Science 21 (2): 179–217. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2102_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar