Students’ use of the interactive whiteboard during physics group work

References

• Christiansen, F. V., and C. Rump. 2007. “Getting It Right: Conceptual Development From Student to Experienced Engineer.” European Journal of Engineering Education 32 (4): 467–479. doi: 10.1080/03043790701333063
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., J. Hindmarsh, and P. Luff. 2010. Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S. 2011. “The Role of Digital Artefacts on the Interactive Whiteboard in Supporting Classroom Dialogue.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27 (6): 463–489. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00416.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingerman, Å., M. Berge, and S. Booth. 2009. “Physics Group Work in a Phenomenographic Perspective – Learning Dynamics as the Experience of Variation and Relevance.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34 (4): 349–358. doi: 10.1080/03043790902989382
   Google Scholar
• Kershner, R., N. Mercer, P. Warwick, and J. Kleine Staarman. 2010. “Can the Interactive Whiteboard Support Young Children's Collaborative Communication and Thinking in Classroom Science Activities?” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 5 (4): 359–383. doi: 10.1007/s11412-010-9096-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littleton, K. 2010. “Research Into Teaching With Whole-Class Interactive Technologies: Emergent Themes.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 19 (2): 285–292. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2010.491240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and K. Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., P. Warwick, R. Kershner, and J. Kleine Staarman. 2010. “Can the Interactive Whiteboard Help to Provide ‘Dialogic Space’ for Children's Collaborative Activity?” Language and Education 24 (5): 367–384. doi: 10.1080/09500781003642460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E., and P. H. Scott. 2003. Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• NOKUT. 2008. Evaluering av ingeniørutdanningen i Norge 2008. Oslo: Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, S., and K. Hakkarainen. 2005. “The Knowledge Creation Metaphor – An Emergent Epistemological Approach to Learning.” Science & Education 14 (6): 535–557. doi: 10.1007/s11191-004-5157-0
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. 1999. “Learning as the Use of Tools: A Sociocultural Perspective on the Human–Technology Link. In Learning with Computers: Analysing Productive Interactions, edited by K. Littleton and P. Light, 144–161. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scherr, R. E., and D. Hammer. 2009. “Student Behavior and Epistemological Framing: Examples from Collaborative Active-Learning Activities in Physics.” Cognition and Instruction 27 (2): 147–174. doi: 10.1080/07370000902797379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. 1998. “On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One.” Educational Researcher 27 (2): 4–13. doi: 10.3102/0013189X027002004
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. J., S. Higgins, K. Wall, and J. Miller. 2005. “Interactive Whiteboards: Boon or Bandwagon? A Critical Review of the Literature.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21 (2): 91–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, L., M. E. Stanne, and S. S. Donovan. 1999. “Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 69 (1): 21–51. doi: 10.3102/00346543069001021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, P., N. Mercer, R. Kershner, and J. Kleine Staarman. 2010. “In the Mind and in the Technology: The Vicarious Presence of the Teacher in Pupil's Learning of Science in Collaborative Group Activity at the Interactive Whiteboard.” Computers & Education 55 (1): 350–362. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. 2006. “A Dialogic Understanding of the Relationship Between CSCL and Teaching Thinking Skills.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1 (1): 143–157. doi: 10.1007/s11412-006-6840-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. 2007. Dialogic Education and Technology – Expanding the Space of Learning. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. 2008. “Dialogic or Dialectic? The Significance of Ontological Assumptions in Research on Educational Dialogue.” British Educational Research Journal 34 (3): 347–361. doi: 10.1080/01411920701532228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. 1998. Mind as Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar