918
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

Students’ responses to authentic assessment designed to develop commitment to performing at their best

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 219-240 | Received 10 Jan 2014, Accepted 20 Oct 2015, Published online: 15 Dec 2015

References

  • ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). 2004. Sustaining the Change: A Follow-up Report to the Vision for Change. Baltimore, MD: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.
  • Baillie, Caroline, and Anne Johnson. 2008. “A Threshold Model for Attitudes in First Year Engineering Students.” In Threshold Concepts Within the Disciplines, edited by R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, and J. Smith, 129–141. Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Bary, Raphael, and Michael Rees. 2006. “Is (Self-directed) Learning the Key Skill for Tomorrow's Engineers?” European Journal of Engineering Education 31 (1): 73–81. doi: 10.1080/03043790500429021
  • Bradley, Alan. 2008. “Accreditation Criteria Guidelines Document G02 Rev 2.” In Accreditation Management Systems Education Programs at the Level of Professional Engineer. Barton, ACT: Institution of Engineers Australia. https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/sites/default/files/shado/Education/Program%20Accreditation/AMS%20Engineering%20Technologist/G02ET_accreditation_criteria_guidelines_highlight_change.pdf
  • Brumm, Thomas J., Larry F. Hanneman, and Steven K. Mickelson. 2006. “Assessing and Developing Program Outcomes Through Workplace Competencies.” International Journal of Engineering Education 22 (1): 123–129.
  • Carew, Anna L., Sandrine Therese, Simon Barrie, Alan Bradley, Paul Cooper, John Currie, Roger Hadgraft, Timothy McCarthy, Sharon Nightingale, and David Radcliffe. 2009. Engineer Meta-attributes Project EMAP: Systems Thinking and Reflective Practice in Engineering Education: Final Report CG623 Teaching & Assessment of Meta-attributes in Engineering: Identifying, Developing and Disseminating Good Practice (EMAP). Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Teaching and Learning Council.
  • Dillman, Don A. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • ENAEE (European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education). 2008. EUR-ACE Framework Standards for the Accreditation of Engineering Programmes. Bruxelles: European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education.
  • Faulkner, Wendy. 2007. “‘Nuts and Bolts and People’: Gender-troubled Engineering Identities.” Social Studies of Science 37 (3): 331–356. doi: 10.1177/0306312706072175
  • Foddy, William. 1993. Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Foley, Bernadette A., and Craig R. Willis. 2013. “A Framework for the Development of a Management System for Engineering Education (MaSEE).” Australasian Association for engineering education conference, Gold Coast.
  • Grinter, L. E. 1955. “Report of the Committee on the Evaluation of Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 46: 25–60.
  • Guzzomi, Andrew L., and Karol Miller. 2013. “A Mobility Assignment with Industry Relevance.” In New Trends in Mechanism and Machine Science, edited by Fernando Viddero-Rueda and Marco Ceccarelli, 711–720. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Jackson, D. 2013. “Business Graduate Employability – Where Are We Going Wrong?” Higher Education Research & Development 32 (5): 776–790. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.709832
  • Johnson, P. 1996. Changing the Culture: Engineering Education into the Future. Review Report. Barton, ACT: The Institution of Engineers Australia.
  • King, C. J. 2012. “Restructuring Engineering Education: Why, How and When?” Journal of Engineering Education 101 (1): 1–5. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00038.x
  • Male, Sally Amanda. 2010. “Generic Engineering Competencies: A Review and Modelling Approach.” Education Research and Perspectives 37 (1): 25–51.
  • Male, Sally Amanda, Mark B. Bush, and Elaine S. Chapman. 2011. “An Australian Study of Generic Competencies Required by Engineers.” European Journal of Engineering Education 36 (2): 151–163. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2011.569703
  • Mann, Sarah J. 2001. “Alternative Perspectives on the Student Experience: Alienation and Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 26 (1): 7–19. doi:10.1080/03075070020030689.
  • Martin, Rosanna, Bryan Maytham, Jennifer Case, and Duncan Fraser. 2005. “Engineering Graduates’ Perceptions of How Well They Were Prepared for Work in Industry.” European Journal of Engineering Education 30 (2): 167–180. doi: 10.1080/03043790500087571
  • Mertens, Donna M. 2005. Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analyis A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Sage.
  • Nguyen, D. Q. 1998. “The Essential Skills and Attributes of an Engineer: A Comparative Study of Academics, Industry Personnel and Engineering Students.” Global Journal of Engineering Education 2 (1): 65–76.
  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2002. Definition and Selection of Competencies (DeSeCo) Theoretical and Conceptual Foundations. Strategy Paper. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Oliver, B. 2013. “Graduate Attributes as a Focus for Institution-wide Curriculum Renewal: Innovations and Challenges.” Higher Education Research & Development 32 (3): 450–463. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.682052
  • Palmer, Stuart. 2007. “Authenticity in Assessment: Reflecting Undergraduate Study and Professional Practice.” European Journal for Engineering Education 29 (2): 193–202. doi: 10.1080/03043790310001633179
  • Ramadi, Eric, Serge Ramadi, and Karim Nasr. 2015. “Engineering Graduates’ Skill Sets in the MENA Region: A Gap Analysis of Industry Expectations and Satisfaction.” European Journal of Engineering Education: 1–19. doi:10.1080/03043797.2015.1012707
  • Ramsden, P. 2003. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. 2nd ed. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Sambell, K. 2012. “‘This was Really Different!’ Alternative Perspectives on the Student Experience of Assessment: Alienation and Engagement.” In Engaging with Learning in Higher Education, edited by Ian Solomonides, Anna Reid, and Peter Petocz, 185–207. Faringdon: Libri.
  • Scales, Katherine, Christi Owen, Subodh Shiohare, and Michael Leonard. 1998. “Preparing for Program Accreditation Review Under ABET Engineering Criteria 2000: Choosing Outcome Indicators.” Journal of Engineering Education 87 (3): 207–210. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00342.x
  • Schon. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
  • Sheppard, Sheri D., Kelly Macatangay, Anne Colby, and William M. Sullivan. 2009. “Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future Field Book Highlights and Summary.” http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/sites/default/files/publications/elibrary_pdf_769.pdf.
  • Smith, M., and F. Trede. 2013. “Reflective Practice in the Transition Phase from University Student to Novice Graduate: Implications for Teaching Reflective Practice.” Higher Education Research & Development 32 (4): 632–645. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.709226
  • Trevelyan, J. P. 2007. “Technical Coordination in Engineering Practice.” Journal of Engineering Education 96 (3): 191–204. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00929.x
  • Trevelyan, J. P., 2011. “Are we Accidentally Misleading Students about Engineering Practice?” Paper presented at the Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Madrid, October 4–7.
  • Trevelyan, J. P. 2014. “Towards a Theoretical Framework for Engineering Practice.” In Engineering Practice in a Global Context, edited by B. Williams, Jose Figueiredo, and J. Trevelyan, 33–60. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Vardi, Iris. 2012. Effective Feedback for Student Learning in Higher Education. Edited by Alan Goody, HERDSA Guides. Milperra, NSW: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.
  • Walther, J., N. Kellam, N. Sochacka, and D. Radcliffe. 2011. “Engineering Competence? An Interpretive Investigation of Engineering Students’ Professional Formation.” Journal of Engineering Education 100 (4): 703–740. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00033.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.