How do engineering attitudes vary by gender and motivation? Attractiveness of outreach science exhibitions in four countries

References

• Adey, P., B. Csapó, A. Demetriou, J. Hautamäki, and M. Shayer. 2007. “Can we be Intelligent about Intelligence? Why Education Needs the Concept of Plastic General Ability.” Educational Research Review 2: 75–97. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. 1964. An Introduction to Motivation. Princeton: Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. 1960. Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity. New York: MCGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bitgood, S. 1988. A Comparison of Formal and Informal Learning. Technical Report No. 88–10. Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.
   Google Scholar
• Borrey, S. 2006. The Popularisation of Science, Technology, and Innovation in Flanders. Brussels: Department of Economy, Science and Innovation, Science Division. Accessed May, 2014. http://www.4science.cz/read/document/69.
   Google Scholar
• Borrows, P. 2004. “Chemistry Trails”. In Learning Science Outside the Classroom, edited by M. Braund and M. Reiss, 151–168. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braund, M., and M. Driver. 2005. “Pupils' Perceptions of Practical Science in Primary and Secondary School: Implications for Improving Progression and Continuity of Learning.” Educational Research 47: 77–91. doi: 10.1080/0013188042000337578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braund, M., and M. Reiss. 2004. Learning Science Outside the Classroom. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braund, M., and M. Reiss. 2006. “Validity and Worth in the Science Curriculum: Learning School Science Outside the Laboratory.” The Curriculum Journal 17 (3): 117–123.
   Google Scholar
• Breakwell, G., and S. Beardsell. 1992. “Gender, Parental and Peer Influences upon Science Attitudes and Activities.” Public Understanding of Science 1 (2): 183–198. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/1/2/003
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., R. McCord, H. Matusovich, and R. Kajfez. 2015. “The use of Motivation Theory in Engineering Education Research: A Systematic Review of Literature.” European Journal of Engineering Education 40 (2): 186–205. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2014.941339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, J. 2009. Cross-National Response Styles in International Educational Assessments: Evidence from PISA 2006. Accessed March, 2014. https://edsurveys.rti.org/PISA/documents/Buckley_PISAresponsestyle.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. 2010. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J., and G. Berntson. 1994. “Relationship between Attitudes and Evaluative Space: A Critical Review with Emphasis on the Separability of Positive and Negative Substrates.” Psychological Bulletin 115 (3): 401–423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, Gordon W., and Roger B. Rensvold. 2000. “Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations Modeling.” Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 31 (187). Accessed March, 2014. http://jcc.sagepub.com/content/31/2/187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciser. 2014. “Chapter 16, Repeated Measures”. SAS OnlineDoc: Version 8. Cornell University, Cornell Insitute for Social and Economic Research, Data and Computing Resources for Social Scientist. Accessed January, 2014. ciser.cornell.edu/sasdoc/saspdf/analyst/chap16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Csapó. B. 2007. “Research into Learning to Learn Through the Assessment of Quality and Organization of Learning Outcomes.” The Curriculum Journal 18 (2): 195–210. doi: 10.1080/09585170701446044
   Google Scholar
• Danilov, V. 1982. Science and Technology Centers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deakin Crick, R. 2007. “Learning How to Learn: The Dynamic Assessment of Learning Power.” The Curriculum Journal 18 (2): 135–153. doi: 10.1080/09585170701445947
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E., R. Hodges, L. Pierson, and J. Tomassone. 1992. “Autonomy and Competence as Self-Regulation Factors in Students with Learning Disabilities and Emotional Handicaps.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 25: 457–471. doi: 10.1177/002221949202500706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 2002. “Overview of Self-Determination Theory: An Organismic Dialectical Perspective.” In Handbook of Self-Determination, edited by E. Deci and R. Ryan, 3–33. Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demetriou, A., G. Spanoudis, and A. Mouyi. 2011. “Educating the Developing Mind: Towards an Overarching Paradigm.” Educational Psychology Review 23 (4): 601–663. doi: 10.1007/s10648-011-9178-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Development Center (EDC), Center for Science Education. 2007. Publications and Other Resources Resulting from a Synthesis of Research on the Impact of Inquiry Science Instruction. http://cse.edc.org/products/inquirysynth/.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Gender and education (and employment). Edited K. Lynch and M. Feeley. Brussels: DG-Education. 10.2766/37874.
   Google Scholar
• default.aspEurydice. 2010. Gender Differences in Educational Outcomes: Study on the Measures Taken and the Current Situation in Europe. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA P9 Eurydice). Accessed December 2013. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice./documents/thematic_reports/120EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J., and L. Dierking. 1992. The Museum Experience. Washington, DC: Whalesbak Books.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J., and L. Dierking. 2002. Lessons without Limit. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
   Google Scholar
• Farenga, S., and B. Joyce. 1999. “Intentions of Young Students to Enroll in Science Courses in the Future: An Examination of Gender Differences.” Science Education 83: 55–75. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<55::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenichel, M., and H. Scheingruber. 2010. Surrounded by Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. 2005. Teaching Children to Learn. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
   Google Scholar
• Garbin, C. 2014. “Introduction to Multilevel Models for Longitudinal and Repeated Measures Data.” Courses in Research Methods, Design and Data Analysis, University of Nebraska: Lincoln. Accessed January, 2014. psych.unl.edu/psycrs/944/944_Lecture01_intro_MLM.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. 1995. “Measuring Attitudes to Science.” Research in Science Education 25: 283–289. doi: 10.1007/BF02357402
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, H., and Chase, C. 2002. “Longitudinal Impact of an Inquiry-Based Science Program on Middle School Students’ Attitudes toward Science.” Science Education 86 (5): 693–705. doi: 10.1002/sce.10039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görlitz, D. 1987. “Exploration and Attribution in Developmental Context”. In Curiosity, Imagination and Play: On the Development of Spontaneous Cognitive and Motivational Processes, edited by D. Görlitz and J. Wohlwill, 78–105. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, P. 2009. “Technology and Informal Education: What is Taught, What is Learned.” Science, 323: 69–71. doi: 10.1126/science.1167190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grolnick, W., and Ryan, R. 1990. “Self-percept, Self-Regulation, and Adjustment in Children with Learning Disabilities: A Multiple Group Comparison Study.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 23 (3): 177–184. doi: 10.1177/002221949002300308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harring, J. 2014. “Datarestructuring.pdf.” In Quantitative Research Methods II, Measurement, Statistics and Evaluation, University of Maryland, College of Education. Accessed January, 2014. http://www.education.umd.edu/EDMS/fac/Harring/Past-Classes/EDMS646/Other/Dataestructuring.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hautamäki, J., and S. Kupiainen. 2014. “Learning to Learn in Finland. Theory and Policy, Research and Practice.” In Learning to Learn. International Perspectives From Theory and Practice, edited by Ruth Deakin Crick, Cristina Stringher, and Kai Ren, 170–193. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, L., and G. MacBride. 2012. “Does it Make us Think? Inquiry Based Learning in Science and Engineering.” In Implementing Inquiry Beyond the School, edited by H. Salmi, V. Kallunki, and A. Kaasinen, 8–12. Brussels: Fibonacci-project.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, H. 1990. The Exploratorium. The Museum as Laboratory. Washington, DC: The Smithsonian Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Henno, I., and P. Reiska. 2013. “Impact of the Socio-Cultural Context on Student Science Performance and Attitudes: The Case of Estonia.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 12 (4): 465–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. 2011. “Informal Learning: Student Achievement and Motivation in Science through Museum-Based Learning.” Learning Environments Research 14 (3): 263–277. doi: 10.1007/s10984-011-9094-y
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Z. 2010. “Effects of Collaborative Science Intervention on High Achieving Student’ Learning Anxiety and Attitudes toward Science.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (15): 1971–1988.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Z., H. Lin, H. Wang, H. Chen, and K. Yang. 2013. “Promoting and Scaffolding Elementary School Students’ Attitudes toward Science and Argumentation through Science and Society Intervention.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (10): 1625–1648. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.734935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskins, B., and Fredriksson, U. 2008. Learning to Learn: What is it and can it be measured? JRC Scientific and Technical Report. European Commission, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Jalil, P., M. Abu Sbeih, M. Boujetiff, and R. Barakat. 2009. “Autonomy in Science Education: A Practical Approach in Attitude Shifting towards Science Learning.” Journal of Science education and Technology 18: 476–486. doi: 10.1007/s10956-009-9164-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jidesjö, A. 2008. “Different Content Orientations in Science and Technology among Primary and Secondary Boys and Girls in Sweden: Implications for the Transition from Primary to Secondary School?” NorDiNa 4 (2): 192–208.
   Google Scholar
• Jidesjö, A. 2012. A Problematisation of Young People's Interest in Science and Technology at School and in the Society – Contents, Media, and the Function of Education [In Swedish]. The Swedish National Graduate School in Science and Technology Education, FontD, Department of Social and Welfare Studies Linköping University, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2003. “A Perspective on Judgment and Choice. Mapping Bounded Rationality.” American Psychologist 58 (9): 697–720. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupari, P., S. Sulkunen, J. Vettenranta, and K. Nissinen. 2012. More Joy for Learning. Fourth Graders’ Reading Skills and Competences in Mathematics and Science: International PIRLS and TIMMS-Assessments in Finland [In Finnish]. Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino.
   Google Scholar
• Kupari, P., J. Vettenranta, and K. Nissinen. 2012. Searching for Learner-centered Pedagogy. Learning Results of 8th Grade Students in Mathematics and Science. International TIMMS-Study in Finland [In Finnish]. Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino.
   Google Scholar
• Lavigne, G., Vallerand, R., and Miquelon, P. 2007. “A Motivational Model of Persistence in Science Education: A Self-Determination Theory Approach.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 22 (3): 351–369. doi: 10.1007/BF03173432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littledyke, M. 2004. “Primary Children's Views on Science and Environmental Issues: Examples of Environmental Cognitive and Moral Development.” Environmental Education Research 10: 217–235. doi: 10.1080/13504620242000198186
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. 1951. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, A., and E. Martín. 2007. “The Development of Learning to Learn in Spain.” The Curriculum Journal 18 (2): 175–193. doi: 10.1080/09585170701446028
   Google Scholar
• Nuttin, J. 1984. Self-regulation, Planning and Action: A Relational Theory of Behaviour Dynamics. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Volume I). OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, F. 1968. “A Rationale for a Science Museum.” Curator 8 (11): 208–213.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., and J. Dillon. 2008. Science Education in Europe. London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., S. Simon, and S. Collins. 2003. “Attitudes towards Science: A Review of the Literature and its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (9): 1049–1079. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvin, J., and M. Stephenson. 2014. “Learning Science at Industrial Sites.” In Learning Science Outside the Classroom, edited by M. Braund and M. Reiss, 129–150. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peleg, R., and A. Baram-Tsabari. 2011. “Atom Surprise: Using Theatre in Primary Science Education.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 20: 508–524. doi: 10.1007/s10956-011-9299-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Programme for International Student Assessment. 2012a. “PISA 2012 Results”. PISA 2012 Database. Accessed May 2014. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/PISA-2012-results-Annex%20A6-VolIII-VolIV.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Programme for International Student Assessment. 2012b. “Figure III.1.2.” PISA 2012 Database. Accessed May 2014. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J., J. C. Raven, and J. Court. 2000. Section 3. Standard Progressive Matrices, 2000 Edition. Oxford: Elsfield Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J., J. C. Raven, and J. Court. 2003. Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Oxford: OPP.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. 2002. “Self-Determination Theory Applied to Educational Settings.” In Handbook of Self-Determination, edited by E. Deci and R. Ryan, 183–203. Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rocard, M., P. Csermely, D. Jorde, D. Lenzen, H. Wahlberg-Henriksson, and V. Hemmo. 2007. Science Education Now: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. London: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R., and J. Connell. 1989. “Perceived Locus of Causality and Internalization: Examining Reasons for Acting in two Domains.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57: 749–761. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. E., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “Self–Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist 55 (1): 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmi, H. 1993. Science Centre Education. Motivation and Learning in Informal Education. Research Report 119. Helsinki: Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Salmi, H. 2003. “Science Centres as Learning Laboratories.” International Journal of Technology Management 25 (5): 460–476. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2003.003113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmi, H. 2010. “Science Centre Pedagogics and Academic Teacher Education [In Finnish].” In Academic Class Teacher Education: 30 Years of Theory, Practice, and Master's Degrees [In Finnish]. Kasvatusalan tutkimuksia, edited by A. Kallioniemi, A. Toom, M. Ubani, and H. Linnansaari, 377–406. Helsinki: Finnish Society for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Salmi, H., A. Kaasinen, and V. Kallunki. 2012. “Towards and Open Learning Environment via Augmented Reality (AR): Visualising the Invisible in Science Centres and Schools for Teacher Education.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 45: 284–295. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.565
   Google Scholar
• Salmi, H., S. Sotiriou, and F. Bogner. 2009. “Visualising the Invisible in Science Centres and Science Museums: Augmented Reality (AR) Technology Application and Science Teaching.” In Web-Based Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice: Virtual Environment for Social and Pedagogical Advancement, edited by N. Karacapilidis. 185–208. New York: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Screven, C. 1992. “Motivating Visitors to Read Labels.” ILVS Review: A Journal of Visitor Behavior 1 (2): 36–66.
   Google Scholar
• Tan Wee Hin, L., and R. Subramaniam. 2003. “Science and Technology Centres as Agents for Promoting Science Culture in Developing Nations.” International Journal of Technology Management 25 (5): 413–426. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2003.003110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuneberg, H. 2007. Is a Majority Enough? Psychological Well-being and its Relation to Academic and Prosocial Motivation, Self-regulation and Achievement at School. Research report 281. Department of Applied Sciences of Education, Faculty of Behavioural Sciences. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
   Google Scholar
• Thuneberg, H. 2010. “Changes in Academic and Prosocial Self-Regulation from the Sixth to the Ninth Grade.” In Piaget is Dead, Vygotsky is Still Alive, or? An Honorary Book for Professors Airi and Jarkko Hautamäki, edited by P. Aunio, M. Jahnukainen, M. Kalland, and J. Silvonen, 105–125. Jyväskylä: Finnish Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Vols, S. 2011. “Empowering Girls in Flanders to Try Engineering and Technology.” ASTS Dimension, Bimonthly News Journal of the Association of Science-technology Centers, March/April.
   Google Scholar
• Zeyer, A., K. Bölsterli, D. Brovelli, and F. Odermatt. 2012. “Brain Type or sex Differences? A Structural Equation Model of the Relation between Brain Type, Sex, and Motivation to Learn Science.” International Journal of Science 34 (5): 779–802.
   Google Scholar
• Zoldasova, K., and P. Prokop. 2006. “Analysis of Motivational Orientations in Science Education.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 4 (4): 669–688. doi: 10.1007/s10763-005-9019-2
   Google Scholar