‘It's more flexible’: persistence of women engineers in the academy

References

• Ahmed, Nazeema, Bruce Kloot, and Brandon I. Collier-Reed. 2015. “Why Students Leave Engineering and Built Environment Programmes When They are Academically Eligible to Continue.” European Journal of Engineering Education 40 (2): 128–144. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2014.928670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barinaga, Marcia. 1994. “Overview: Surprises Across the Cultural Divide in Comparisons Across Cultures, and Science.” Science 263: 1467–1496. doi:10:1126/science.8128232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berkwits, Micheal, and Thomas S. Inui. 1998. “Making use of Qualitative Research Techniques.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 13 (3): 195–199. doi:10.1046/j.125-1497.1998.00054.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boshoff, Nelius. 2005. “The Representation of Women Academics in Higher Education in South Africa: Progress in the Pipeline?” South African Journal of Higher Education 19 (2): 359–377.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, Gunilla. 2013. “Initiation Into Engineering: Stability and Change in Gender Orders.” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 5 (2): 126–148.
   Google Scholar
• Case, Jenni. 2006. “Issues Facing Engineering Education in South Africa.” Paper presented at the 3rd African Regional Conference on Engineering Education, Pretoria. Accessed April 9, 2014. http://www.academia.edu/195145/Issues_facing_engineering_education_in_South_Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Cech, Erin A. 2007. “Dilbert in Stilettos: The Character of Deterrents Facing Women in Engineering.” In Gender and Engineering: Strategies and Possibilities, edited by Ingelore Welp, Barbara Reschka, and June Larkin, 35–50. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee, Daniella. 2001. “South African Education and the Ideology of Patriarchy.” South African Journal of Education 21 (4): 300–304.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, Catherine, and Angela Roger. 1999. “Theorizing Progress: Women in Science, Engineering, and Technology in Higher Education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (6): 637–661. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199908)36:6<637::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Kathleen S. 2001. “Peripheral and Subversive”: Women Making Connections and Challenging the Boundaries of the Science Community.” Science Education 85: 368–409. doi: 10.1002/sce.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DHET (Department of Higher Education and Training). 2013. Statistics on Post-School Education and Training in South Africa: 2011. Pretoria: DHET.
   Google Scholar
• Du Toit, Rènette, and Joan Roodt. 2009. Engineers in A Developing Country: The Profession and Education of Engineering Professionals in South Africa. Cape Town: HSRC Press. [Online] http://www.hsrcpress.ac.za/product.php?productid=2252&cat=1&page=1.
   Google Scholar
• Esler, Karen J., Lesley Shackleton, and Anusuya Chinsamy-Turan. 2006. “SAWISE and HERS-SA: Raising the Profile of Women in Science.” South African Journal of Science 102: 275–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, Wendy. 2000. “Dualism, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering.” Social Studies of Science 30 (5): 759–792. doi: 10.1177/030631200030005005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, Mary F. 2010. “Women and Men Faculty in Academic Science and Engineering: Social-Organizational Indicators and Implications.” American Behavioural Scientists 53 (7): 997–1012. doi: 10.1177/0002764209356234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frehill, Lisa. 2007. “The ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation Program's Impact on Engineering Schools.” In Gender and Engineering: Strategies and Possibilities, edited by Ingelore Welp, Barbara Reschka, and June Larkin, 225–244. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Garforth, Lisa, and Anne Kerr. 2009. “Women and Science: What's the Problem?” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 16 (3): 379–403. doi:10.1093/sp/jxp015.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, Mary. 2001. Feminist Reconstructions in Psychology: Narrative, Gender and Performance. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, Judith, Jane Fielding, and Deborah Smeaton. 1996. “What Happens to Women and men with SET Degrees?” Labour Market Trends 104 (2): 63–7.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim, Ulla H., and Berit Lundman. 2004. “Qualitative Content Analysis in Nursing Research: Concepts, Procedures and Measures to Achieve Trustworthiness.” Nurse Education Today 24: 105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, Amanda L. 2010. “Persistence of Women and Minorities in STEM Field Majors: Is it the School That Matters?” Economics of Education Review 29: 911–922. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, Namrata, and A.K. Sharma. 2003. “Gender Inequality in the Work Environment at Institutes of Higher Learning in Science and Technology in India.” Work, Employment & Society 17 (4): 597–616. doi:10.1177/0950017003174001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landström, Catharina. 2007. “Queering Feminist Technology Studies.” Feminist Theory 8 (1): 7–26. doi: 10.1177/1464700107074193
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, Lene M., Henriette T. Holmegaard, and Lars Ulriksen. 2015. “Being a Woman in a Man's Place or Being in a Woman's Place: Insights into Student's Experiences of Science and Engineering at University.” In Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science and Technology in Education, edited by Ellen. K. Henriksen, Justin Dillon, and Jim Ryder, 315–330. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Maree, David, and Marinda Maree. 2007. “Assessing the Impact of Gender Training on Engineering Students.” In Gender and Engineering: Strategies and Possibilities, edited by Ingelore Welp, Barbara Reschka, and June Larkin, 191–210. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Monhardt, Rebecca M., John W. Tillotson, and Peter D. Veronesi. 1999. “Same Destination, Different Journeys: A Comparison of Male and Female Views on Becoming and Being a Scientist.” International Journal of Science Education 21 (5): 533–551. doi: 10.1080/095006999290561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Advisory Council on Innovation. 2009. Facing the Facts: Women's Participation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Pretoria: National Advisory Council on Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Netswera, Fulufhelo G., Edward M. Rankhumise, and Thandisizwe, R. Mavundla. 2005. “Employee Retention Factors for South African Higher Education Institutions: A Case Study.” SA Journal of Human Resource Management 3 (2): 36–40. doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v3i2.64
   Google Scholar
• Ogude, Nthabiseng A., Nevhutalu Prins, and Vijay Reddy. 1997. “An Overview of Women in Science and Technology in South Africa.” Gates: An International Journal Promoting Greater Access to Technology, Engineering and Science 4 (1): 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J., and Nancy L. Leech. 2007. “A Call for Qualitative Power Analyses.” Quality and Quantity 41: 105–121. doi:10.1007/s11135-005-1098-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opare, Phyllis B. 2012. “Factors that Female Higher Education Faculty in Select Science, Techogloy, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Fields Percieve as Being Influential to their Success and Persistence in Their Chosen Professions.” Doctoral diss., Old Dominion University.
   Google Scholar
• Perumal, J. 2003. “Identifying and Responding to Barriers Impacting Women Educators: Reflections of Educators on Institutional Constraints.” SAJHE/SATHO 17 (1): 74–82.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, Abigail, Barbara Bagilhole, and Andre Dainty. 2009. “How Women Engineers do and Undo Gender: Consequences for Gender Equality.” Gender, Work and Organization 16 (4): 411–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00406.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, Joshua. 2010. “The Effect of Intructor Race and Gender on Student Persistence in STEM Fields.” Economics Education Review 29: 901–910. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay, Karen, and Gayle Letherby. 2006. “The Experience of Academic non-Mothers in the Gendered University.” Gender, Works and Organization 13 (1): 25–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00294.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, Kristen A., and Robert. D. Reason. 2013. College Students in the United States: Characteristics, Experiences and Outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoton, Laura A. 2011. “Distancing as A Gendered Barrier: Understanding Women Scientists’ Gender Practices.” Gender & Society 25 (6): 696–716. doi: 10.1177/0891243211422717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal, Kenneth D., and Natasha, J.A. Mamaril. 2008. “Women and Minorities in Engineering: A Review of the Literature.” All Academic Research. [Online] Accessed April 6, 2015. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED506512.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• SACSIR (South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research). 2006. “Women in Science.” Science Scope 1 (4): 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Sagebiel, Felizitas. 2007. “Gendered Organisational Engineering Cultures in Europe.” In Gender and Engineering: Strategies and Possibilities, edited by Ingelore Welp, Barbara Reschka, and June Larkin, 137–148. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• SARG (South African Reference Group). 2004. “Facing the Facts: Women's Participation in Science, Engineering and Technology.” Science, Engineering and Technology for Women. Pretoria: National Advisory Council on Innovation and the Department of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Sehoole, Chika. 2012. “South Africa: Challenges of Racism and Access.” International Higher Education 68: 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Shackleton, Lesley, Sarah Riordan, and Desireé Simonis. 2006. “Gender and the Transformation Agenda in South African Higher Education.” Women's Studies International Forum 29: 572–580. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, Bridgette. 1998. “Strangers in a Strange Land”: A Literature Review of Women in Science. CGIAR Gender Program, Working Paper, 17. [Online] Accessed June 22, 2015. http://library.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10947/5710/gender17.pdf?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Sofaer, Shoshanna. 1999. “Qualitative Methods: What are They and why use Them?” Health Services Research 34 (5Pt 2): 1101–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South African higher education: Facts and figures. Higher Education in Context. http://ufisa.aalto.fi/en/network/cput/facts_figures_section.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Abigail., Janet. E. Malley, and Danielle LaVaque-Manty, eds. 2007. Transforming Science and Engineering: Advancing Academic Women. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Liz. 2002. “Student Retention in Higher Education: The Role of Institutional Habitus.” Journal of Education Policy 17 (4): 423–442. doi: 10.1080/02680930210140257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinto, Vincent. 2003. Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics and Administration. 2011. “Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation.” ESA Issue Brief #04-11. Accessed April, 2014. http://www.esa.doc.gov/sites/default/files/news/documents/women_in_stem_a_gap_to_innovation8311.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 2010. “Engineering: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities for Development.” UNESCO Report. France: UNESCO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbur, John W. 2002. “Thematic Analysis of AIDS Literature.” Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 7: 386–397.
   Google Scholar