Dealing with complex and ill-structured problems: results of a Plan-Do-Check-Act experiment in a business engineering semester

References

• Alberts, D. S., and R. Hayes. 2003. Code of Best Practice for Experimentation. Washington, DC: DoD Command and Control Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Alstrup, L., and L. B. Kofoed. 1997. “There is More Than One Way: A Game About Production and Working Environment.” Paper presented at 3rd workshop on games in production management: Experimental learning in production management conference, 131–143, Espoo, June.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, F. 1620. Novum Organum.
   Google Scholar
• Badran, I. 2007. “Enhancing Creativity and Innovation in Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 32 (5): 573–585. doi: 10.1080/03043790701433061
   Google Scholar
• Barrows, H. S. 1985. How to Design a Problem-Based Curriculum for the Preclinical Years. Springer Series on Medical Education. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barrows, H. S. 2000. Problem-Based Learning Applied to Medical Education. Springfield: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B., and C. Tang. 2007. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, D. 1996. On Dialogue. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., R. Keogh, and D. Walker. 1985. Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. New York: Nichols.
   Google Scholar
• Choulier, D., F. Picard, and P-A. Weite. 2007. “Reflective Practice in a Pluri-Disciplinary Innovative Design Course.” European Journal of Engineering Education 32 (2): 115–124. doi: 10.1080/03043790601117020
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, G. P., D. J. Broer, and C. W. M. Bastiaansen. 2006. “Engineering Education on the ‘Fuzzy’ Front End: A High-technology Entrepreneurship Model.” European Journal of Engineering Education 31 (2): 145–153. doi: 10.1080/03043790600566987
   Google Scholar
• Deming, W. E. 1986. Out of the Crisis. Cambridge: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
   Google Scholar
• Erpenbeck, J., and L. Rosenstiel. 2007. Handbuch Kompetenzmessung: Erkennen, verstehen und bewerten von Kompetenzen in der betrieblichen, pädagogischen und psychologischen Praxis [Handbook Measuring Skills: Recognizing, Understanding and Evaluating Skills in Occupational, Educational, and Psychological Practice]. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
   Google Scholar
• Gattie, D. K., N. K. Nadia, J. R. Schramski, and J. Walther. 2011. “Engineering Education as a Complex System.” European Journal of Engineering Education 36 (6): 521–535. doi:10.1080/03043797.2011.622038.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. 1988. Learning by Doing: A Guide to Teaching and Learning Methods. London: Further Education Unit.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaff, E., and A. Kolmos. 2007 . Management of Change – Implementation of Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. P., E. W. MacPherson, and D. A. Williams. 2007. “Promoting Interdisciplinarity in Engineering Teaching.” European Journal of Engineering Education 32 (3): 285–293. doi: 10.1080/03043790701276775
   Google Scholar
• Hempen, S. 2014. “Vorgehensweise zur Spezifizierung von Zielzuständen im Kontext der kurzzyklischen Prozessverbesserung [Procedure for Specifying Target States in the Context of Short-cycle Process Improvement].” PhD diss., TU Dortmund University.
   Google Scholar
• Hempen, S., S. Wischniewski, T. Maschek, and J. Deuse. 2010. “Experiential Learning in Academic Education – A Teaching Concept for Efficient Work System Design.” In Proceedings of 14th Workshop of the Special Interest Group on Experimental Interactive Learning in Industrial Management of the IFIP Working Group, edited by Marco Taisch, Jacopo Cassina, and Riitta Smeds, 71–78. Milano: Poliscript.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, W. 1999. Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together: A Pioneering Approach to Communicating in Business and in Life. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experimental Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. London: Prentice-Hall International.
   Google Scholar
• Kolmos, A., K. F. Flemming, and L. Krogh. 2004. The Aalborg PBL Model – Progress, Diversity and Challenges. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, M., P. Christensen, X. Du, and M. Thrane. 2008. “Problem-Oriented and Project-Based Learning (POPBL) as an Innovative Learning Strategy for Sustainable Development in Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 33 (3): 283–295. doi: 10.1080/03043790802088566
   Google Scholar
• Manufuture: A Vision for 2020. 2004. http://www.manufuture.org/manufacturing/wp-content/uploads/manufuture_vision_en1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McCrindle, A. R., and C. A. Christensen. 1995. “The Impact of Learning Journals on Metacognitive and Cognitive Processes and Learning Performance.” Learning and Instruction 5 (2): 167–185. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(95)00010-Z.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J. A. 1999. Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies. 2004. The Engineer of 2020. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. 1995 . The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nueckles, M., S. Huebner, and A. Renkl. 2009. “Enhancing Self-regulated Learning by Writing Learning Protocols.” Learning and Instruction 19 (3): 259–271. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Moore, L. M., and T. E. Baldock. 2007. “Peer Assessment Learning Sessions (PALS): An Innovative Feedback Technique for Large Engineering Classes.” European Journal of Engineering Education 32 (1): 43–55. doi: 10.1080/03043790601055576
   Google Scholar
• Puente, S. M., M. Van Eijck, and W. Jochems. 2015. “Professional Development for Design-Based Learning in Engineering Education: A Case Study.” European Journal of Engineering Education 40 (1): 14–31. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2014.903228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason, P., and H. Bradbury. 2008. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, D. M., and M. C. Paretti. 2009. “Identifying Barriers to and Outcomes of Interdisciplinarity in the Engineering Classroom.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34 (1): 29–45. doi: 10.1080/03043790802710185
   Google Scholar
• Riis, J. O. 2014. Experimenting with Experiential Learning in the 3rd Semester of the Global Business Engineering Program at Aalborg University, Center for Industrial Production, Aalborg University, 33.
   Google Scholar
• Rother, M. 2010. Toyota Kata: Managing People for Improvement, Adaptiveness and Superior Results. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M. 2006 . The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Shewhart, W. A. 1980. Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. Milwaukee: American Society for Quality Control.
   Google Scholar
• Shewhart, W. A., and W. E. Deming. 1939. Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, M., D. May, and J. Deuse. 2012. “The Industrial Engineering Laboratory – Problem Based Learning in Industrial Engineering Education at TU Dortmund University.” IEEE Educon 2012 Collaborative Learning & New Pedagogic Approaches in Engineering Education, Marrakesh, April 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Willey, K., and Gardner, A. 2010. “Investigating the Capacity of Self and Peer Assessment Activities to Engage Students and Promote Learning.” European Journal of Engineering Education 35 (4): 429–443. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2010.490577
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, R. K. 2007. “Turning to the Problem is the Answer to the Question of How You Can Learn Faster Than Others: Applying PBL at Work.” Industrial and Commercial Training 39 (6): 307–314. doi:10.1108/00197850710816773.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, C. 2012. “Fostering Creative Engineers: A Key to Face the Complexity of Engineering Practice.” European Journal of Engineering Education 37 (4): 343–353. doi:10.1080/03043797.2012.691872.
   Google Scholar